CHAPTER 5

CIVIL LIBERTIES

FREEDOM OF SPEECH

Schenk v US (1919) Facts Question Ruling Reasoning Significance

FREEDOM OF SPEECH

Gitlow v New York (1925) Facts Question Ruling Reasoning Significance

14th Amendment Selective

incorporation

FREEDOM OF SPEECH

Dennis v US (1950) Facts Question Ruling Reasoning Significance

FREEDOM OF SPEECH

Brandenburg v Ohio (1969)

Facts Question Ruling Reasoning Significance

FREEDOM OF SPEECH

Snyder v Phelps (2011) Facts Question Ruling Reasoning Significance

FREEDOM OF SPEECH

Miller v California (1973) Facts Question Ruling Reasoning Significance

FREEDOM OF SPEECH

Reno v ACLU (1997) Facts Question Ruling Reasoning Significance

FREEDOM OF SPEECH

Tinker v Des Moines (1968)

Facts Question Ruling Reasoning Significance

FREEDOM OF SPEECH

Texas v Johnson (1990)

Facts Question Ruling Reasoning Significance

FREEDOM OF SPEECH

Morse v Frederick (2002) Facts Question Ruling Reasoning Significance

FREEDOM OF ASSEMBLY

Nazi Party v. Skokie (1977) Facts Question Ruling Reasoning Significance

FREEDOM OF RELIGION: ESTABLISHMENT CLAUSEMcCollum v BOE (1948) Facts Question Ruling Reasoning Significance

FREEDOM OF RELIGION: ESTABLISHMENT CLAUSE

Engle v Vitale (1962) Facts Question Ruling Reasoning Significance

FREEDOM OF RELIGION: ESTABLISHMENT CLAUSE

Abington School District v Schempp (1963) Facts Question Ruling Reasoning Significance

FREEDOM OF RELIGION: ESTABLISHMENT CLAUSE

Moment of Silence Prayer in government meetings

FREEDOM OF RELIGION: ESTABLISHMENT CLAUSE

Epperson v Arkansas (1968) Facts Question Ruling Reasoning Significance

FREEDOM OF RELIGION: ESTABLISHMENT CLAUSE

Lemon v Kurtzman (1971) Facts Question Ruling Reasoning Significance

FREEDOM OF RELIGION: FREE EXERCISE CLAUSE

Reynolds v US (1878) Facts Question Ruling Reasoning Significance

FREEDOM OF RELIGION: FREE EXERCISE CLAUSE

West Virginia v Barnette (1943) Facts Question Ruling Reasoning Significance

FREEDOM OF RELIGION: FREE EXERCISE CLAUSE

Wisconsin v Yoder (1970) Facts Question Ruling Reasoning Significance

FREEDOM OF RELIGION: FREE EXERCISE CLAUSE

Oregon v Smith (1990) Facts Question Ruling Reasoning Significance

FREEDOM OF THE PRESS

New York Times v US (1971)

Facts Question Ruling Reasoning Significance

CRIME AND DUE PROCESS

4TH Amendment: Mapp v Ohio (1961)

Facts Question Ruling Reasoning Significance

FREEDOM OF RELIGION: FREE EXERCISE CLAUSE

5th Amendment: Miranda v Arizona (1966)

Facts Question Ruling Reasoning Significance

FREEDOM OF RELIGION: FREE EXERCISE CLAUSE

6th Amendment: Gideon v Wainwright (1963)

Facts Question Ruling Reasoning Significance

FREEDOM OF RELIGION: FREE EXERCISE CLAUSE

8th Amendment: Furman v Georgia (1972)

Facts Question Ruling Reasoning Significance

RIGHT TO PRIVACY: 4th Amendment

Griswold v Connecticut (1965) Facts Question Ruling Reasoning Significance

RIGHT TO PRIVACY: 4th Amendment

Roe v. Wade (1973) Facts Question Ruling Reasoning Significance

RIGHT TO PRIVACY: 4th Amendment

Webster v Reproductive Health Services (1988)

Facts Question Ruling Reasoning Significance

CHAPTER 6

CIVIL RIGHTS

OVERVIEW

Civil Liberties v. Civil Rights Civil Rights:

Reasonableness standard Suspect classification

2 categories of protection: 14th Amendment

Due Process Clause (selective incorporation) Equal Protection Clause

Civil Rights Legislation

SLAVERY

Dred Scott v Sanford (1857)

Facts Question Ruling Reasoning Significance

CIVIL WAR AMENDENTS

13th

14th

15th

JIM CROW LAWS

SEGREGATION

Plessy v Ferguson (1896)

Facts Question Ruling Reasoning Significance

NAACP LEGAL DEFENSE FUND

DESEGREGATION CASES

Brown v Board of Education (1954)

Facts Question Ruling Reasoning Significance

MASSIVE RESISTANCE

DESEGREGATION LEGISLATION

Civil Rights Act of 1964

Voting Rights Act of 1965

DESEGREGATION CASES

Heart of Atlanta Motel v US (1965)

Facts Question Ruling Reasoning Significance

AFFIRMATIVE ACTION

Green v County School Board (1967) Facts Question Ruling Reasoning Significance

AFFIRMATIVE ACTION

Swann v Charlotte-Mecklenburg (1971) Facts Question Ruling Reasoning Significance

AFFIRMATIVE ACTION

University of California v Bakke (1978)

Facts Question Ruling Reasoning Significance

AFFIRMATIVE ACTION

Gratz v Bollinger (2003) Facts Question Ruling Reasoning Significance

AFFIRMATIVE ACTION

Grutter v Bollinger (2003) Facts Question Ruling Reasoning Significance

WOMEN AND EQUAL RIGHTS

Gender equity laws: equal pay for equal work employment opportunity school admissions

Gender equity cases middle ground between

reasonableness and strict scrutiny

TITLE IX (1972)

No person in the United States shall, on the basis of sex, be excluded from participation in, be denied the benefits of, or be subjected to discrimination under any education program or activity receiving federal financial assistance..

AGE DISCRIMINATION