chapter 4 key concepts. acquisition-learning hypothesis

75
Chapter 4 Key Concepts

Upload: blaze-clayson

Post on 14-Dec-2015

220 views

Category:

Documents


1 download

TRANSCRIPT

Page 1: Chapter 4 Key Concepts. Acquisition-Learning Hypothesis

Chapter 4Key Concepts

Page 2: Chapter 4 Key Concepts. Acquisition-Learning Hypothesis

Acquisition-Learning Hypothesis

Page 3: Chapter 4 Key Concepts. Acquisition-Learning Hypothesis

Acquisition-Learning Hypothesis

Krashen’s Monitor Model proposed that only “acquisition” or subconsciously acquired knowledge leads to productive output; “learning,” the learner’s conscious knowledge of the rules of a language, only serves as a monitor.

Page 4: Chapter 4 Key Concepts. Acquisition-Learning Hypothesis

Affective Filter Hypothesis

Page 5: Chapter 4 Key Concepts. Acquisition-Learning Hypothesis

Affective Filter Hypothesis

A hypothesis of the Monitor Model suggesting an affective filter can block access to language acquisition under certain conditions, such as when the learner is stressed or anxious.

Page 6: Chapter 4 Key Concepts. Acquisition-Learning Hypothesis

automatic processing

Page 7: Chapter 4 Key Concepts. Acquisition-Learning Hypothesis

automatic processing

In an information-processing view, this occurs when a skill becomes practiced and can be carried out relatively rapidly and without conscious effort or short-term memory limitations.

Page 8: Chapter 4 Key Concepts. Acquisition-Learning Hypothesis

cognitive linguistics

Page 9: Chapter 4 Key Concepts. Acquisition-Learning Hypothesis

cognitive linguistics (CL)

An approach viewing meaning as central to language; language is seen as inextricably linked to cognition.

Page 10: Chapter 4 Key Concepts. Acquisition-Learning Hypothesis

complex adaptive system (CAS)

Page 11: Chapter 4 Key Concepts. Acquisition-Learning Hypothesis

complex adaptive system (CAS)

The view that language is acquired and develops through the combined influences of social interaction and cognitive processes.

Page 12: Chapter 4 Key Concepts. Acquisition-Learning Hypothesis

Comprehensible Input Hypothesis

Page 13: Chapter 4 Key Concepts. Acquisition-Learning Hypothesis

Comprehensible Input Hypothesis

Monitor Model hypothesis stating that the most effective way to increase L2 competence is by exposure to “comprehensible input” (one level beyond the learner’s current level).

Page 14: Chapter 4 Key Concepts. Acquisition-Learning Hypothesis

Comprehensible Output Hypothesis

Page 15: Chapter 4 Key Concepts. Acquisition-Learning Hypothesis

Comprehensible Output Hypothesis

Swain (1985) proposed that having to produce the L2 encourages the learner to attend to the language and thereby leads to improved proficiency.

Page 16: Chapter 4 Key Concepts. Acquisition-Learning Hypothesis

contrastive analysis

Page 17: Chapter 4 Key Concepts. Acquisition-Learning Hypothesis

contrastive analysis

The comparison of the linguistic structures of two or more languages, to determine their similarities and differences. In 1950s and 1960s, it was used as a tool for L2 teaching.

Page 18: Chapter 4 Key Concepts. Acquisition-Learning Hypothesis

Contrastive Analysis Hypothesis (CAH)

Page 19: Chapter 4 Key Concepts. Acquisition-Learning Hypothesis

Contrastive Analysis Hypothesis(CAH)

In the strong form, this predicts that where there are similarities between the two languages, the learner will acquire L2 structures with ease; where there are differences, the learner will have difficulty.

Page 20: Chapter 4 Key Concepts. Acquisition-Learning Hypothesis

controlled processing

Page 21: Chapter 4 Key Concepts. Acquisition-Learning Hypothesis

controlled processing

In an information-processing view, controlled processing characterizes new skill learning, is comparatively slow and effortful, and is limited by short-term memory constraints.

Page 22: Chapter 4 Key Concepts. Acquisition-Learning Hypothesis

cross-linguistic influence (CLI)

Page 23: Chapter 4 Key Concepts. Acquisition-Learning Hypothesis

cross-linguistic influence(CLI)

Refers to instances of phonological, lexical, grammatical, or other aspects of transfer from one language to another.

Page 24: Chapter 4 Key Concepts. Acquisition-Learning Hypothesis

developmental error

Page 25: Chapter 4 Key Concepts. Acquisition-Learning Hypothesis

developmental error

An error in learner language which does not result from transfer from the first language, but which reflects the learner’s gradual discovery of the L2 system.

Page 26: Chapter 4 Key Concepts. Acquisition-Learning Hypothesis

Error Analysis (EA)

Page 27: Chapter 4 Key Concepts. Acquisition-Learning Hypothesis

Error Analysis (EA)

An approach to L2 acquisition research involving the description and classification of errors to gain insight into the learner's current underlying knowledge of the L2 system.

Page 28: Chapter 4 Key Concepts. Acquisition-Learning Hypothesis

explicit knowledge

Page 29: Chapter 4 Key Concepts. Acquisition-Learning Hypothesis

explicit knowledge

In SLA, knowledge of the L2 (vocabulary, grammar rules, etc.) of which learners are explicitly aware.

Page 30: Chapter 4 Key Concepts. Acquisition-Learning Hypothesis

explicit learning

Page 31: Chapter 4 Key Concepts. Acquisition-Learning Hypothesis

explicit learning

Learning with explicit awareness of what is being learned.

Page 32: Chapter 4 Key Concepts. Acquisition-Learning Hypothesis

implicit knowledge

Page 33: Chapter 4 Key Concepts. Acquisition-Learning Hypothesis

implicit knowledge

In SLA, knowledge of the L2 that underlies the learner’s performance, but of which he or she is not explicitly aware.

Page 34: Chapter 4 Key Concepts. Acquisition-Learning Hypothesis

implicit learning

Page 35: Chapter 4 Key Concepts. Acquisition-Learning Hypothesis

implicit learning

Learning without awareness of what is being learned.

Page 36: Chapter 4 Key Concepts. Acquisition-Learning Hypothesis

information-processing approach (cognitive approach)

Page 37: Chapter 4 Key Concepts. Acquisition-Learning Hypothesis

information-processing approach (or cognitive approach)

Stemming from cognitive psychology, this approach emphasizes that the mental processes used for interpreting experience are also involved in the acquisition and use of a second language.

Page 38: Chapter 4 Key Concepts. Acquisition-Learning Hypothesis

input processing (IP)

Page 39: Chapter 4 Key Concepts. Acquisition-Learning Hypothesis

input processing (IP)

Model proposed by VanPatten on how learners make form-meaning connections: learners have limited processing capacity so give priority to meaning.

Page 40: Chapter 4 Key Concepts. Acquisition-Learning Hypothesis

intake

Page 41: Chapter 4 Key Concepts. Acquisition-Learning Hypothesis

intake

The part of input that the learner notices.

Page 42: Chapter 4 Key Concepts. Acquisition-Learning Hypothesis

Interaction Hypothesis

Page 43: Chapter 4 Key Concepts. Acquisition-Learning Hypothesis

Interaction Hypothesis

Hypothesis proposed by Long (1983) predicting that interactional modification makes input comprehensible; comprehensible input promotes acquisition; therefore, interactional modification promotes acquisition.

Page 44: Chapter 4 Key Concepts. Acquisition-Learning Hypothesis

interlanguage

Page 45: Chapter 4 Key Concepts. Acquisition-Learning Hypothesis

interlanguage

A term for the language produced by a learner that differs in systematic ways from that of a native speaker.

Page 46: Chapter 4 Key Concepts. Acquisition-Learning Hypothesis

language acquisition device

Page 47: Chapter 4 Key Concepts. Acquisition-Learning Hypothesis

language acquisition device

An element that UG linguists originally proposed as an innate component, or mental organ, to account for language acquisition.

Page 48: Chapter 4 Key Concepts. Acquisition-Learning Hypothesis

Monitor Model

Page 49: Chapter 4 Key Concepts. Acquisition-Learning Hypothesis

Monitor Model

Krashen’s model of second language acquisition based on the concept that learners have two systems (acquisition and learning) and that the learned system acts as a monitor (editor) on the acquired system.

Page 50: Chapter 4 Key Concepts. Acquisition-Learning Hypothesis

Natural Order Hypothesis

Page 51: Chapter 4 Key Concepts. Acquisition-Learning Hypothesis

Natural Order Hypothesis

Monitor Model hypothesis stipulating that language elements are acquired in an essentially fixed, pre-determined order.

Page 52: Chapter 4 Key Concepts. Acquisition-Learning Hypothesis

negotiation for meaning

Page 53: Chapter 4 Key Concepts. Acquisition-Learning Hypothesis

negotiation for meaning

Process in which learners and competent speakers interact in various ways, making adjustments in their speech until understanding is achieved.

Page 54: Chapter 4 Key Concepts. Acquisition-Learning Hypothesis

negative feedback

Page 55: Chapter 4 Key Concepts. Acquisition-Learning Hypothesis

negative feedback

Drawing attention in some way to the L2 learner’s incorrect utterances.

Page 56: Chapter 4 Key Concepts. Acquisition-Learning Hypothesis

Noticing Hypothesis

Page 57: Chapter 4 Key Concepts. Acquisition-Learning Hypothesis

Noticing Hypothesis

Proposed by Schmidt (1995), it states that what learners notice in the input is what becomes intake for learning.

Page 58: Chapter 4 Key Concepts. Acquisition-Learning Hypothesis

noticing

Page 59: Chapter 4 Key Concepts. Acquisition-Learning Hypothesis

noticing

Paying attention to language input with some awareness.

Page 60: Chapter 4 Key Concepts. Acquisition-Learning Hypothesis

output

Page 61: Chapter 4 Key Concepts. Acquisition-Learning Hypothesis

output

The language produced by the learner.

Page 62: Chapter 4 Key Concepts. Acquisition-Learning Hypothesis

parameters

Page 63: Chapter 4 Key Concepts. Acquisition-Learning Hypothesis

parameters

A small set of alternatives for a given grammatical feature, for example, whether a complement, such as a preposition (Prep), precedes or follows the main element (or the “head”), such as the Noun (N) of a noun phrase (Prep N or N Prep).

Page 64: Chapter 4 Key Concepts. Acquisition-Learning Hypothesis

procedural knowledge

Page 65: Chapter 4 Key Concepts. Acquisition-Learning Hypothesis

procedural knowledge

Knowledge of how to do something; underlies automatic performance.

Page 66: Chapter 4 Key Concepts. Acquisition-Learning Hypothesis

recasts

Page 67: Chapter 4 Key Concepts. Acquisition-Learning Hypothesis

recasts

Rephrasing an L2 learner’s incorrect utterance correctly.

Page 68: Chapter 4 Key Concepts. Acquisition-Learning Hypothesis

scaffolding

Page 69: Chapter 4 Key Concepts. Acquisition-Learning Hypothesis

scaffolding

In a sociocultural approach, the role played by teachers, peers, and others in supporting the learner’s development to get to a more advanced stage.

Page 70: Chapter 4 Key Concepts. Acquisition-Learning Hypothesis

sociocultural theory (SCT)

Page 71: Chapter 4 Key Concepts. Acquisition-Learning Hypothesis

sociocultural theory (SCT)

Applied to SLA, refers to the view that social interaction is necessary for L2 development and learning needs to be examined in its social context.

Page 72: Chapter 4 Key Concepts. Acquisition-Learning Hypothesis

usage-based

Page 73: Chapter 4 Key Concepts. Acquisition-Learning Hypothesis

usage-based

A usage-based approach emphasizes the view that language constructions emerge from real communicative events.

Page 74: Chapter 4 Key Concepts. Acquisition-Learning Hypothesis

zone of proximal development (ZPD)

Page 75: Chapter 4 Key Concepts. Acquisition-Learning Hypothesis

zone of proximal development (ZPD)

“The distance between the actual developmental level as determined by independent problem solving and the level of potential development as determined through problem solving under adult guidance … ’’ (Vygotsky, 1978, p. 86)