chapter 4 durability studies on...
TRANSCRIPT
65
CHAPTER 4
DURABILITY STUDIES ON PMMFRHPC
4.1 GENERAL
This chapter presents the durability aspects of Polyolefin
Macro-Monofilament Fibre Reinforced High Performance Concrete. The
experimental studies on durability properties of PMMFRHPC, such as void
permeability, water absorption, permeability, acid resistance, impact
resistance, drying shrinkage, Rapid Chloride Penetration Test (RCPT), and
corrosion resistance -impressed current voltage test were carried out. The
results of durability studies of properties of PMMFRHPC have been
discussed. Mathematical models for the durability studies of concrete are also
developed and validated.
4.2 EXPERIMENTAL PROGRAMME
4.2.1 Materials Used
The various materials (Cement, Fly ash, Metakaolin, Fine
aggregate, Coarse aggregate, Water, Superplasticizer and Polyolefin
macro-monofilament fibre) used for the experimental investigation were
given under 3.2.1
4.2.2 Mix Proportioning
Mix proportioning was done based on ACI 211.4R-08 “Guide for
selecting proportions for high strength concrete with Portland cement and
66
other cementitious materials”. The summary of mix proportions used for
experimental investigation was discussed under 3.2.2 and presented in
Table 3.5.
4.2.3 Details of Test Specimens
The experimental investigation of PMMFRHPC was done under
three Phases as shown in Figure 1.1. The summary of the cast specimens for
durability studies are given in Table 4.1.
Table 4.1 Details of the Specimen Cast for Durability Studies
Sl.No.
Shape Dimensions in mm
Number of Specimens
Cast
Age in Days
Type of Test Carried Out
1. Cube 100 x 100 x 100 15 28,56 and 90 VoidsPermeability
2. Cube 100 x 100 x 100 15 28,56 and 90 WaterAbsorption
3. Cube 100 x 100 x 100 45 28,56 and 90 PermeabilityH2SO44. Cube 100 x 100 x 100 30 28,56 and 90
HCl
5. Disc152 diameter
63.5 height 63 28, 56 and 90 Impact
Resistance
6. Prism 285 x 75 x 75 63 28, 56 and 90 DryingShrinkage
7. Cylinder100 diameter
200 height 45 28, 56 and 90 Chloride Ions
8. Cylinder100 diameter
200 height 45 28, 56 and 90 Corrosion
Resistance Total specimens 321
67
4.2.4 Voids Permeability
In the present investigation, percentage of water absorption and
percentage of permeable voids were determined as per the procedure given in
ASTMC 642-97. The absorption and permeable voids were determined using
100 mm cubes. Saturated surface dry cubes were kept in a hot air oven at
105 oC till a constant weight was attained. The ratio of the difference between
the mass of saturated surface dry specimen and the mass of the oven dried
specimen at 105 oC to the volume of the specimen (1000 ml.) gives the
permeable voids in percentage as given in the Equation (4.1):
Permeable voids = [(A – B)/V] x 100 (4.1)
where,
A = weight of surface dried saturated specimen after 28 days.
B = weight of oven dried specimen in air.
V = volume of sample (considered as 1000 ml).
The oven dried cubes after attaining constant weight were then
immersed in water and the weight gain was measured at regular intervals until
a constant weight was reached. The absorption at 30 min. (initial surface
absorption) and final absorption (at a point when the difference between two
consecutive weights at 12 hours interval, almost negligible) were determined.
The final absorption in all cases was determined at 96 hours. The absorption
characteristics indirectly represented the volume of pores and their connectivity.
4.2.5 Water Absorption
Saturated Water Absorption (SWA) Test was carried out on
100 mm cube specimens at the age of 28, 56 and 90 days of curing as per
68
ASTM C 642-97 .The specimens were weighed before drying. The drying
was carried out in a hot air oven at a temperature of 105o C. The drying
process was continued, until the difference in mass between two successive
measurements at 24 hours interval agreed closely. The dried specimens were
cooled at room temperature and then immersed in water. The specimens were
taken out at regular intervals of time, surface dried using a clean cloth and
weighed. This process was continued till the weights became constant (fully
saturated). The difference between the saturated mass and oven dried mass
expressed as a percentage of oven dry mass gives the saturated water
absorption.
4.2.6 Permeability
The test was conducted as per IS 3085-1965. The permeability test
setup is shown in Figure 4.1. The equipment comprises of three cells, each
square in cross section mounted on stands. These cells were connected with
connecting pipe through valve. A pressure regulator was mounted on a
pressure chamber with two pressure gauges one 0-20 kg/cm2 gauge and the
other 0 - 15 kg/cm2. First one showed the input pressure and the second
showed the test pressure. The pressure was regulated by turning the handle of
pressure regulator in the clockwise direction to the desired pressure.
A pressure chamber fitted with a Schrader valve water inlet for
pouring water and valve provided as a water source. Standard cubes of
150 mm size were cast and cured for 28, 56 and 90 days. After the curing
period, it was taken out and allowed to dry for two days and the four faces of
the cube were painted to prevent penetration of water from sides. Then the top
surface was effectively sealed to achieve water tightness. Glass bottles were
kept in bottom position to collect the water percolating through the specimen.
Compressor was started and the pressure equal to 0.5 MPa/second was
applied to the water column. The quantity of water passing through the cube
69
was collected at the bottom, in the glass bottle through the funnel being
maintained in humid atmosphere to prevent losses due to evaporation. The
operating pressure, quantity of water collected, time of observation etc., at
intervals were recorded. The test was conducted till the uniform rate of flow
was obtained. The co-efficient of permeability was then calculated.
Figure 4.1 Permeability Test setup
4.2.7 Acid Resistance
The chemical resistance of the concrete was studied through
chemical attack by immersing the specimens in an acid solution. After
28 days period of curing, the specimens were removed from the curing tank
and their surfaces were cleaned with a soft nylon brush to remove weak
reaction products and loose materials from the specimen. The initial weights
were measured and the specimens were identified with numbered tokens that
were tied around them. The specimens were then immersed in 3% H2SO4
solution and 3% HCl solution, for the pre-determined period maintaining a
constant pH value of 4 throughout the test period. The solution was replaced
70
at regular intervals to maintain the required concentration throughout the test
period. The mass of specimens were measured at regular intervals upto
90 days, and the loss of mass of specimens was determined. Some of the
cubes were immersed in HCl and H2SO4 as shown in Figure 4.2.
Figure 4.2 Curing of Cubes in HCl and H2SO4 Solutions
4.2.8 Impact Resistance
The Impact Test was performed in accordance with the impact
testing procedures recommended by ACI 544.5R-10, “Report on the Physical
Properties and Durability of Fibre Reinforced Concrete” Reported by ACI
Committee 544. The test equipment was fabricated according to standards for
testing as per ACI 544.5R-10 and presented in Figure 4.3. For this study disc
specimens of size 152 mm (dia.) x 63.5 mm (thickness) were cast using
PMMFRHPC. For each mix proportion 9 disc specimens were cast and the
test results were obtained for 28, 56 and 90 days of immersion. Totally 63
concrete specimens were cast as per procedures recommended by ASTM.
Specimens were tested at 28, 56 and 90 days of age. Curing and handling of
the specimens were similar to those adopted for finding compression.
71
The samples were coated on the bottom with a thin layer of
petroleum jelly or heavy grease and placed on the base plate. The base plate
was bolted to a rigid base such as a concrete floor or a concrete block. A steel
hammer of weight 44.145 N was guided through a steel tube and dropped on
the specimen from a height of 457 mm to transfer impact energy of 20.169 Nm on
the concrete disc specimens. The total number of blows required to detect the
first crack, as well as to cause the ultimate failure by splitting were noted.
From the results, first crack energy was calculated by multiplying the number
of blows required to cause the first crack with the impact energy (20.169 Nm)
and the energy spent for ultimate failure was calculated by multiplying the
number of blows required to cause the splitting of disc specimens and the
impact energy. The schematic diagram of impact test setup and disc
specimens are shown in Figures 4.3 and 4.4 respectively.
Calculation of Impact Energy
For the entire disc subjected to impact loading, damage was
localized at the point of contact and no large fragments fallout from the
specimens. Impact energy was calculated for the discs as reported by
Mohammadi et al (2009)
H = gt2/2 457= 9810 x t2/2 t = 0.3052 sec
V = gt V = 9810 x 0.3052 V = 2994.01 mm/sec
U = mv 2/2 U = Wv 2/2g
U = 44.145 x (2994.01)2/ (2 x 9810) U = 20.169 Nm
72
Figure 4.3 Schematic Diagram of Impact Test Setup
Figure 4.4 Disc Specimen
4.2.9 Drying Shrinkage
The drying shrinkage of concrete was determined on prism of size
285 x 75 x 75 mm as per ASTM C-157-08. Drying shrinkage experiments
73
were carried out to evaluate the unrestrained volumetric shrinkage of concrete
specimens. After removal from the moulds, steel balls were fixed to the centre
of both the square ends of the specimens. An initial measurement of the
length performed on the length comparator setup is shown in Figure 4.5. For
each mix proportion, three prism specimens were cast and length
measurement was performed periodically by the length comparator at 28, 56,
90 and 120 days.
Figure 4.5 Length Comparator Setup
4.2.10 Rapid Chloride Penetration Test (RCPT)
The most hazardous durability problem in the country is corrosion
of reinforcement in RCC structures. One of the principal sources of this
problem is the ingress of chloride ions into porous concrete. Movement of
ions into a porous medium under a constant gradient is known as diffusion. It
is necessary that concrete is impermeable to chloride ions for quality control
measures. Measurement of chloride diffusion co-efficient requires a long time
for establishment of steady state conditions. Therefore, a direct current (DC)
74
potential is usually applied to accelerate the migration of chloride ions. The
RCPT Test Setup is shown in Figure 4.6.
Figure 4.6 Rapid Chloride Penetration Test setup
The RCPT apparatus consists of two reservoirs. The test method
consists of monitoring the amount of electrical current passing through a
water-saturated concrete specimen of size 50 mm thick, 100 mm diameter
when subjected to a 60 V applied through DC current supply for 6 hours. The
total charge passed during this period was calculated in terms of coulombs
using the trapezoidal rule as given in the ASTM C 1202-97,
Q = 900 (I0 + 2 I30 + 2 I60 + .................. + 2 I330 + I360) (4.2)
where,
Q = charge passed (coulombs)
I0 = current (amperes) immediately after voltage is applied, and
It = current (amperes) at‘t’ minutes after voltage is applied.
75
If the specimen diameter was other than 95 mm, the value for total
charge passed must be adjusted. The adjustment was made by multiplying the
value established by the ratio between the cross – sectional area of the
standard to that of actual specimen. It is given in the Equation (4.3),
Qs = Q x (3.75/x) 2 (4.3)
where
Qs = charge passed (coulombs) through a 95 mm diameter specimen
Qx = charge passed (coulombs) through x inch diameter specimen
x = diameter (inch) of the non – standard specimen.
A higher amount of electric charge passing through the specimen
during the test represents a higher penetrability of chloride ions into the
concrete. The concrete quality can be assessed according to the RCPT rating
as per ASTMC 1202-97 criteria given in Table 4.2.
Table 4.2 RCPT Ratings
Charge Passed ( coulombs)
Chloride Ion Penetrability
> 4,000 High
2,000 - 4,000 Moderate
1,000 - 2,000 Low
100 - 1,000 Very Low
< 100 Negligible
The testing procedure leads to variation of values and hence, to
minimize the variation, three samples are generally tested and the average
value is reported. (However, the average values of the result of three samples
76
should not differ by more than 29 % between two separate laboratories). From
the RCPT, the Q value was applied in the Berke’s equation to calculate
diffusion coefficient, DC values are calculated from Equation (4.4) (Andrade
and Whiting 1996).
Dc = 0.0103 x 10-8 x Q0.84, cm2/s (4.4)
In the present study , the Rapid Chloride Penetration Test (RCPT)
was performed as per ASTM C1202-97 to determine the electrical
conductance of HPC and PMMFRHPC mixes at the age of 28, 56 and 90 days
curing and to provide a rapid indication of its resistance to the penetration of
chloride ions. The specimen was fixed between two reservoirs using an epoxy
bonding agent to make the setup to be leak proof. In one reservoir was a 2.4 N
NaCl solution which was connected to negative terminal of DC source and in
the other reservoir, a 0.3 M NaOH solution was connected to positive terminal
of DC source, a DC of 60 V was applied across the specimen using two
stainless steel electrodes (meshes) and the current flowing across the
specimen was recorded at an interval of 30 minutes for a duration of 6 hours.
4.2.11 Corrosion Resistance - Impressed Current Voltage Test
The Impressed Current Voltage Test for concretes was carried out
based on FM 5-522 “Florida Method of Test for an Accelerated Laboratory
Method for Corrosion Testing of Reinforced Concrete using Impressed
Current”. The concrete cylinders of 100 mm (dia.) and 200 mm (height) with
16 mm dia. Fe 415 bar embedded concentrically were tested at the ages of 28,
56 and 90 days. The concrete specimens were immersed in 3% sodium
chloride solution. The embedded rebar was treated as anode and an external
stainless steel electrode served as cathode and a constant positive potential of
30 Volts to this system was applied from a DC source. The variation of
current was recorded with time. A sharp rise in current indicates the
77
corrosion, and cracking of the concrete is usually visible thereafter, the time
taken for the initiation if the first crack can be considered as a measure of
their resistance against chloride permeability and reinforcement corrosion.
After cracking, the specimens were taken out, visually inspected, and
carefully split open to assess the corroded steel rod. The reinforcement bars
were then cleaned by dipping it in Clark’s solution for 25 minutes. Each bar
was then weighed again to an accuracy of 0.1 mg. and the change in weight
was observed. The Impressed Current Voltage Test setup is shown in
Figure 4.7.
Figure 4.7 Schematic View of Impressed Current Voltage Test setup
4.3 TEST RESULTS AND DISCUSSION ON DURABILITY OF
PMMFRHPC
The results obtained for the various durability studies of PMMFRHPC
have been presented and discussed.
78
4.3.1 Voids Permeability
The results of the Voids Permeability Test on concrete cubes are
listed in Table 4.3. The maximum value of permeable voids obtained for mix
FMHPC00 at 28 days was 4.42 %.The mix FMHPC03 showed the lowest
value of permeable voids absorption and its value 1.87% was lower than the
FMHPC00 mix at the age of 28. Adding PMM fibre to the normal concrete,
the porosity of the concrete was reduced and the main reason were due to
decrease in permeable voids. The test indicated that when more pozzolanic
material was added to concrete, the water absorption reduced. Also mix
FMHPC02 showed a moderate value of 2.56% at 28 days. The PMM fibre
added in ascending order in FMHPC00 mix showed variation according to the
increase in percentage (0.1, 0.2, and 0.3).Voids Permeability is mainly
influenced by the paste phase; primarily, it was dependent on the extent of
interconnected capillary porosity in the paste. The relationship between Voids
Permeability (fvp) and fibre content (x) in percentage is obtained as
fvp = -15.2x + 6.18 at age of 28 days, fvp = -14.7x + 5.28 at age of 56 days and
fvp = -13.8x + 4.42 at age of 90 days, as shown in Figure 4.8
Table 4.3 Test Results of Voids Permeability and Water Absorption
Voids Permeability in % Water Absorption in %
Mix
Fibre Dosage in %
28Days
56Days
90Days
28Days
56Days
90Days
CM - 7.5 6.7 5.9 2.61 1.62 0.82
FMHPC00 - 6.5 5.3 4.5 2.60 1.38 0.80
FMHPC01 0.1 4.3 3.9 3.1 2.35 0.98 0.68
FMHPC02 0.2 2.9 2.1 1.3 2.12 0.82 0.59
FMHPC03 0.3 1.9 1 0.5 1.92 0.66 0.46
79
y = -15.2x + 6.18R2 = 0.9691
y = -14.7x + 5.28R2 = 0.9924
y = -13.8x + 4.42R2 = 0.9806
0
2
4
6
8
0 0.1 0.2 0.3Fibre (%)
Figure 4.8 Voids Permeability Vs Fibre Content
4.3.2 Water Absorption
The results of the Water Absorption Test of concrete cubes are
listed in Table 4.3. The result shows that the water absorption reduced when
the admixture metakaolin used. The maximum value of water absorption
obtained at 28 days was 3.01 %. Concrete mixes with higher paste contents
were bound to have higher absorption values than concrete with lower paste
content (at consistent w/c). The lower voids permeability thus observed for
normal vibrated concrete was attributed to the relatively lower paste volume
i.e., smaller capillary pore volume. It was noted that high performance
concretes with fly ash and metakaolin had lesser water absorption. The
increase in paste volume due to the lower specific gravity of fly ash
contributed to an increased capillary pore volume and increased water
absorption in the control mix concrete. The test result indicated that when
more pozzolanic material is added to concrete, the water absorption would
80
reduce. Water absorption was mainly influenced by the paste primarily; it was
dependent on the extent of interconnected capillary porosity in the paste.
Concrete mixes with higher paste contents were bound to have higher
absorption values than concretes with lower paste content (at consistent w/c).
The lower water absorption thus observed for normal vibrated concretes was
attributed to the relatively lower paste volume i.e., smaller capillary pore
volume. It was noted that high performance concretes with fly ash and
metakaolin have lesser water absorption. The relationship between water
absorption (fwab) and fibre content (x) in percentage is obtained as
fwab = -2.27x + 2.588 at age of 28 days, fwab = -2.32x + 1.308 at age of
56 days and fwab = -1.11x + 0.799 at age of 90 days, as shown in Figure 4.9.
y = -2.27x + 2.588R2 = 0.9976
y = -2.32x + 1.308R2 = 0.9397
y = -1.11x + 0.799R2 = 0.9956
0
1
2
3
0 0.1 0.2 0.3
Fibre (%)
Figure 4.9 Water Absorption Vs Fibre Content
4.3.3 Permeability
The test results of permeability are shown in Table 4.4. The
permeability of concrete reduced for the optimum dosage of mineral
81
admixtures such as fly ash 10% and metakaolin 10% with 0.3% of PMM fibre
for the mix FMHPC03.
Table 4.4 Test Results of Permeability Test
The Co-efficient of Permeability (K) K= QL/(ATH) x 10-7 cm/sec Mix
Fibre Dosagein % 28 Days 56 Days 90 Days
CM - 5.29 4.43 3.57
FMHPC00 - 5.09 4.25 3.39
FMHPC01 0.1 4.98 4.18 3.32
FMHPC02 0.2 4.89 3.95 3.09
FMHPC03 0.3 4.76 3.7 2.84
The maximum permeability obtained by the FMHPC00 is 5.09x10-7
at 28 days. The lowest value of permeability obtained by the mix FMHPC03
is 4.76 x10-7 at 28 days. The permeability was reduced, when the metakaolin
and fly ash is equally replaced along with fibres. For FMHPC00 specimen
developed with replacements of fly ash and metakaolin, the corresponding
permeability was also found to be lesser. This may be due to the high paste
volumes (due to replacements of fly ash and metakaolin), water contents and
super plasticizer dosages adopted in producing HPC which result in decreased
porosity. The relationship between permeability (fp) and fibre content (x) in
percentage is obtained as fp = -1.08x + 5.092 at age of 28 days,
fp = -1.88x + 4.302 at age of 56 days and fp = -1.88x + 3.442 at age of
90 days, as shown in Figure 4.10.
82
y = -1.08x + 5.092R2 = 0.9952
y = -1.88x + 4.302R2 = 0.9511
y = -1.88x + 3.442R2 = 0.9511
2
4
6
0 0.1 0.2 0.3
Fibre (%)
Figure 4.10 Permeability Vs Fibre Content
4.3.4 Acid Resistance
The Acid Resistance Test was conducted by using sulphuric acid
and hydrochloric acid at a concentration of 3% dilution. From the results it
was found that the resistance of concrete to sulphuric acid in the mix with
mineral admixtures was far greater than that of control mix. Most resistance
was offered by a mix containing 10% metakaolin and 10% fly ash. A similar
result was found in the case of hydrochloric acid also. The results of acid
resistance test of concrete cubes were listed in Table 4.5. The result showed
that the percentage of weight loss reduced when the percentages of
metakaolin increased. The maximum value of weight loss was obtained for
mix FMHPC00 at 28 days and it was 2.12 % in sulphuric acid. The mix
FMHPC02 showed a value of 0.62% of weight loss and mix FMHPC03
showed a value of 0.56 % comparatively low than the control mix at 28 days
in sulphuric acid. In case of hydrochloric acid, the maximum weight loss
obtained for mix FMHPC00 at 28 days is 0.96% at 28 days. The mix
FMHPC03 showed a value of 0.39% at 28 days. Mix FMHPC03 showed a
83
moderate weight loss of 0.43%. Every mix showed a difference in weight loss
between control mixes. Adding fibres to the normal concrete, the porosity of
the concrete was reduced this was the main reason for decrease in weight loss.
Figure 4.11 Cubes Cured in H2SO4 Figure 4.12 Cubes Cured in HCL
The Concrete Cube Test specimens attacked by sulphuric acid lead
to leaching of maximum part of outer surface. And it was observed that no
pores or voids were formed but the surface of the specimen was completely
washed out. The acid attack leached away the calcium compounds of cement
paste formed in concrete through the hydration process, as well as the calcium
in calcareous aggregate. The reaction is primarily between the offending acid
and calcium hydroxide. Acid attack weakens the concrete structurally and
reduces its durability and service life. The compressive strength of the cubes
was reduced in all the mixes after curing in sulphuric acid, the reduction of
strength maximum in mix FMHPC00 at a percentage of 2.12% at 28 days
curing in sulphuric acid. The relationship between acid resistance H2SO4
(fcu)and fibre content (x) in percentage is obtained as fars = -350x + 2497 at
age of 28 days, fars = -285x + 2454 at age of 56 days and fars = -285x + 2379
at age of 90 days, as shown in Figure 4.13. The relationship between acid
resistance HCl (fcu) and fibre content (x) in percentage is obtained as
84
farh = -351x + 2497 at age of 28 days, farh = -285x + 2473 at age of 56 days
and farh = -285x + 2398 at age of 90 days, as shown in Figure 4.14.
y = -350x + 2497.5R2 = 0.9646
y = -285x + 2454R2 = 0.9982
y = -285x + 2379R2 = 0.9982
2250
2400
2550
0 0.1 0.2 0.3
Fibre (%)
Figure 4.13 Acid Resistance (H2SO4) Vs Fibre Content
y = -351x + 2497.4R2 = 0.9609
y = -285x + 2473R2 = 0.959
y = -285x + 2398R2 = 0.959
2250
2400
2550
0 0.1 0.2 0.3
Fibre (%)
Figure 4.14 Acid Resistance (HCl) Vs Fibre Content
85
Table 4.5 Loss of weight due to Chemical Exposure of H2SO4 and HCl
H2SO4
Loss in weight, gms HCL
Loss in weight, gms Mix
Fibre Dosage in % 28
Days56
Days90
Days28
Days56
Days90
DaysCM - 2555 2480 2405 2567 2492 2417
FMHPC00 - 2500 2455 2380 2500 2475 2400
FMHPC01 0.1 2465 2425 2350 2465 2447 2372
FMHPC02 0.2 2415 2395 2320 2414 2405 2330
FMHPC03 0.3 2400 2370 2295 2400 2394 2319
In hydrochloric acid FMHPC00 mix showed a maximum value, but
less when comparing with sulphuric acid. In control mix, the reduction of
compressive strength was more. Mix FMHPC03 was the lowest value in both
the acids. Hence, concrete with metakaolin and fly ash equally replaced
provides a better durable concrete.
It was observed that the test specimen were least attacked by HCl
acid and hence, the loss of weight leaching effect was also minimum. In most
cases, the reaction between the attacking acid and calcium compounds will
form calcium salts, which could be soluble in water. These salts would then
be leached away, causing a loss of volume and cohesion of the paste.
Both the Figures 4.11 to 4.12 in case of H2S04 and HCl clearly
showed that the coarse aggregate used here was not attacked by the acid. The
maximum size of the aggregate was restricted by passing through a sieve of
12.5 mm In this way, the aggregates actually protect the concrete. Based on
the experimental investigation, it was observed that loss of compressive
strength decreased with ages subjected to hydrochloric acid and sulphuric acid
86
exposure. It was observed from the experimental investigations, the
percentage loss of compressive strength was higher with the increase in fly
ash, metakaolin and fibre content. But with the increase of age, percentage
loss of compressive strength was reducing. This property was due to gain in
strength with the increase in ages.
4.3.5 Impact Resistance
The experimental results of the impact resistance of the concrete
mixes with admixtures and without fibers and the remaining five mixes with
admixtures containing 0.1, 0.2, 0.3, 0.5 and 0.7 percentage of fibers were
consider in this investigation and presented in Table 4.6 and shown in Figure
4.15. The impact strength of the mix FMHPC01 was 18.18 - 72.72% higher
than the FMHPC00 with the increase in age. But for the mix FMHPC05 and
FMHPC07 the average increase in impact strength was varying between 51-
103% higher than the FMHPC00 mix with the increase in ages. On attaining
the age of 90 days, the addition of fibre improved the strength characteristics
of the FMHPC mixes with fibres significantly to 100% higher than mix
without fibre. The maximum impact strength achieved by the FMHPC07 mix
was 450.37 kNmm at 90 days 437.06.70 kNmm at 56 and 336.22 kNmm at
28 days respectively. Whereas, the mix FMHPC00 without fibre achieved an
impact strength of 342.87 kNmm at 90 days, 322.70 kNmm at 56 days and
221.86 kNmm at 28 days respectively. Three factors namely fibre, age and the
compressive strength of the mix mainly had contributed to the improvement
of impact strength. On an average FMHPC03, FMHPC05, FMHPC07 attained
impact strength of 47% higher than FMHPC00 at 28 days whereas, the same
mixes achieved impact strength of 100% higher than FMHPC00 at 90 days.
Further with the addition of fibre dosage above 0.3%, the improvement of
impact resistance is meager. Thus the fibre, compressive strength and age
constituted the improvement in impact strength. The relationship between
87
impact resistance (fir) and fibre content (x) in percentage is obtained as fir =
154.2x + 246.1 at age of 28 days, fir = 150.3x + 351.5 at age of 56 days and
fir = 142.3x + 369.6 at age of 90 days, as shown in Figure 4.16.
150
300
450
0 0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8
Fibre dosage (%)
28 days 56 days 90 days
Figure 4.15 Variation of Impact Strength at Different Ages
y = 154.29x + 246.16R2 = 0.8306
y = 150.32x + 351.56R2 = 0.7587
y = 142.31x + 369.63R2 = 0.757
200
300
400
500
0 0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8Fibre (%)
Figure 4.16 Impact Resistance Vs Fibre Content
88
Table 4.6 Impact Strength of Concretes
Specimen Weight in kg.
Energy Absorbed in Nm
MixFibre in % 28
Days56
Days90
Days28
Days 56
Days90
DaysCM - 4.12 4.19 4.23 201.69 302.53 322.70
FMHPC00 - 4.10 4.18 4.23 221.86 322.70 342.87
FMHPC01 0.1 4.08 4.12 4.15 262.20 363.04 383.21
FMHPC02 0.2 4.20 4.24 4.27 289.02 403.38 410.04
FMHPC03 0.3 4.10 4.13 4.15 316.05 423.55 443.72
FMHPC05 0.5 4.08 4.11 4.13 329.36 430.20 443.72
FMHPC07 0.7 4.16 4.19 4.22 336.22 437.06 450.37
4.3.6 Drying Shrinkage
The experimental observations on the drying shrinkage value
(percentage change in length) of the concrete mixes are presented in Table 4.7
and shown in Figures 4.17. In the case of fibre concretes, the appearance of
the crack was delayed, compared to plain concrete. Free drying shrinkage of
all the fibre concretes was lesser than the plain concrete. The maximum
shrinkage at 120 days was observed to be around 0.12% for plain concrete.
The rate of shrinkage decreased rapidly with time. It was observed that 40 to
80 percent of shrinkage occurred within 90 days. The maximum percentage
of the rate of shrinkage decreased at 56, 90 and 120 days by 70%, 76% and
77% respectively when compared to the 28 days. The relationship between
drying shrinkage (fds) and fibre content (x) in percentage is obtained as
fds = 0.041x - 0.030 at age of 28 days, fds = 0.072x - 0.069 at age of 56 days
and fds = 0.0772x - 0.0803at age of 90 days, as shown in Figure 4.18.
89
Figure 4.17 Drying Shrinkage of Concretes
y = 0.0416x - 0.0307R2 = 0.6754
y = 0.0721x - 0.069R2 = 0.8375
y = 0.0772x - 0.0803R2 = 0.9009
-0.1
-0.08
-0.06
-0.04
-0.02
00 0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8
Fibre (%)
Figure 4.18 Drying Shrinkage Vs Fibre Content
90
Table 4.7 Test Results of Drying Shrinkage Test
Mix 28 days 56days 90 days 120 days
CM 0.06267 0.10000 0.11467 0.12267
FMHPC00 0.04267 0.08133 0.08933 0.09200
FMHPC01 0.02267 0.05867 0.06933 0.07467
FMHPC02 0.01600 0.04933 0.06400 0.06667
FMHPC03 0.01200 0.03867 0.04933 0.05200
FMHPC05 0.00800 0.02933 0.03733 0.04000
FMHPC07 0.00800 0.02667 0.03333 0.03467
4.3.7 Rapid Chloride Penetration Test (RCPT)
The results of the Rapid Chloride Penetration Tests of the mixes are
given in Table 4.8. From the test results, it was observed that the lowest value
charge passed was for the mix having fibre dosage as 0.3%. It was also noted
that the addition of pozzolanic material such as fly ash and metakaolin
increased the penetration resistance of concrete when compared to control
mix. It was also noted that as the curing period increased, the penetration
resistance increases due to the depletion of calcium ions in the gel pore fluids
and subsequent reduction of pH and the development of constricted
discontinuous and tortuous pore structure. As a result of pore structure
becoming relatively more refined due to the pozzolanic reactions, the high
conductivity path or the least resistive paths for the ions would be decreased.
The relationship between rapid chloride penetration test (RCPT) (frcp) and
fibre content (x) in percentage is obtained as frcp = -6489.x + 3079 at age of
28 days, frcp= -3798x + 1454 at age of 56 days and frcp= -2686.x + 967.9 at
age of 90 days, as shown in Figures 4.19.
91
y = -6489.9x + 3079.3R2 = 0.9938
y = -3798x + 1454.4R2 = 0.9997
y = -2686.5x + 967.95R2 = 0.9448
0
1500
3000
4500
0 0.1 0.2 0.3
Fibre (%)
Figure 4.19 RCPT Vs Fibre Content
Table 4.8 Test Results of Rapid Chloride Penetration Test
Charge Passed as per ASTM Equivalent
(coulombs)
Degree of Chloride ion Penetrability Based on Charge
PassedMix
28 days 56 days 90 days 28 days 56 days 90 days CM 3639.9 2325 1697.1 Moderate Moderate Low
FMHPC00 3141.9 1449 1218.5 Moderate Low Low
FMHPC01 2343.3 1077.9 677.7 Moderate Low Very Low
FMHPC02 1767.3 704.4 322.2 Low Very Low Very Low
FMHPC03 1170.6 307.5 241.5 Low Very Low Very Low
4.3.8 Diffusion Co-efficient for Mixes
The diffusion co-efficient for the mixes containing control mix and
fly ash, metakaolin replaced concrete with fibre dosage 0.1%,0.2% and 0.3%
are given in Table 4.9. From The results indicated that the diffusion
92
co-efficient value decreased as the fibre dosage increased and also the curing
period was extended. The decrease in diffusion co-efficient value indicated
that the concrete exhibited increased penetration resistance. The fibres used
provide excellent resistance to the salts.
Table 4.9 Diffusion Co-efficient of Concretes
Diffusion Co- Efficient (cm2/s)Mix
28 days 56 days 90 days CM 1.00961E-06 6.93E-07 5.32E-07
FMHPC00 8.92234E-07 4.66E-07 3.46E-07
FMHPC01 6.97417E-07 3.63E-07 2.46E-07
FMHPC02 5.50273E-07 2.54E-07 1.32E-07
FMHPC03 3.89314E-07 1.27E-07 1.03E-07
4.3.9 Corrosion Resistance (Impressed Current Voltage Test)
In the accelerated electrolytic corrosion test, constant voltage
studies were carried out on control mix and HPC mixes containing fly ash,
metakaolin with fibre dosage 0.1%, 0.2% and 0.3% for 28, 56 and 90 days of
curing. The loss of weight of rebar for the mixes at 28, 56 and 90 days of
curing are shown in Tables 4.10 to 4.12 respectively.
From the test results it was observed that the loss in weight in rebar
due to corrosion was less for concrete mixes with higher fibre dosage of 0.3%
and high for control mix. The control mix showed greater loss in weight than
replacement mixes with different fibre dosage. The increased resistance to
corrosion was mainly due to the pozzolanic activity and the fibres that
contributed primarily to reduced inter connected porosity. It was the pore
structure which attributed to the ultimate reduction of corrosion. The intensity
93
of current was measured for different fibre dosages at 28, 56 and 90 days of
curing. It showed that the intensity of current measured decreased with
increase in fibre dosage and as the curing period increased, the number of
days for the concrete to develop initial crack also increased. The relationship
between corrosion resistance (fcr) and fibre content (x) in percentage is
obtained as fcr = -8.96x + 5.589 at age of 28 days, fcr = -6.6x + 4.14 at age of
56 days and fcr = -4.66x + 2.614 at age of 90 days, as shown in Figure 4.20.
y = -8.96x + 5.589R2 = 0.9286
y = -6.6x + 4.14R2 = 0.8994
y = -4.66x + 2.614R2 = 0.8428
0
2
4
6
0 0.1 0.2 0.3
Fibre (%)
Figure 4.20 Corrosion Resistance Vs Fibre Content
Table 4.10 Accelerated Electrolytic Corrosion Results for 28 Days Curing
Mix Loss of weight of Rebar %
Visual Observation of Specimen Placed in 3.5% NaCl Solution After 28 Days
CM 8.5 Severe Corrosion
FMHPC00 5.48 Severe Corrosion
FMHPC01 5.05 Mild Corrosion
FMHPC02 3.41 Mild Corrosion
FMHPC03 3.04 Mild Corrosion
94
Table 4.11 Accelerated Electrolytic Corrosion Results for 56 Days Curing
MixLoss of weight
of Rebar % Visual Observation of Specimen Placed
in 3.5% NaCl Solution After 56 Days CM 4.39 Mild Corrosion
FMHPC00 4.31 Mild Corrosion
FMHPC01 3.41 Mild Corrosion
FMHPC02 2.45 Mild Corrosion
FMHPC03 2.43 Mild Corrosion
Table 4.12 Accelerated Electrolytic Corrosion Results for 90 Days Curing
Mix Loss of weight of Rebar %
Visual Observation of Specimen Placed in 3.5% NaCl Solution After 90 Days
CM 3.3 Mild Corrosion
FMHPC00 2.84 Mild Corrosion
FMHPC01 1.92 Mild Corrosion
FMHPC02 1.46 Mild Corrosion
FMHPC03 1.44 Mild Corrosion
4.4 CORRELATIONS AMONG VARIOUS HARDENED
PROPERTIES
4.4.1 Correlation between Impact Energy and Compressive Strength
The impact energy at 28 days is related with compressive strength
concrete mixes, as shown in Figure 4.21. The coefficient of determination
(R2) for the estimated impact energy was 0.9936. Relation between impact
energy (fir) and compressive strength (fcu) is as per Equation (4.5).
fir = 6.354e0.0536 fcu (4.5)
95
y = 6.354e0.0536x
R2 = 0.9936
200
260
320
64 66 68 70 72 74
Compressive strength f cu (MPa)
Figure 4.21 Correlation between Impact Energy and Compressive Strength
4.4.2 Correlation between Water Absorption and Compressive Strength
The water absorption at 28 days is related with compressive strength
concrete mixes, as shown in Figure 4.22. The coefficient of determination (R2) for
the estimated water absorption was 0.9462. Relation between water
absorption (fwab) and compressive strength (fcu) is as per Equation (4.6).
fwab = 52.478e-0.0452 fcu (4.6)
y = 52.478e-0 .04 52x
R2 = 0.9462
1
3
4
64 66 68 70 72 74
Compressive strength f cu (MPa)
Figure 4.22 Correlation between Water Absorption and Compressive Strength
96
4.4.3 Correlation Between Permeability and Compressive Strength
The permeability at 28 days is related with compressive strength
concrete mixes, as shown in Figure 4.23. The coefficient of determination
(R2) for the estimated permeability was 0.9239. Relation between
permeability (fp) and compressive strength (fcu) is as per Equation (4.7).
fp = 9.7057e-0.0097 fcu (4.7)
y = 9.7057e-0.0 09 7x
R2 = 0.9239
4.70
5.08
5.46
64 66 68 70 72 74
Compressive strength f cu (MPa)
Figure 4.23 Correlation between Permeability and Compressive Strength
4.5 MATHEMATICAL MODELLING FOR DURABILITY
PROPERTIES OF PMMFRHPC
4.5.1 Statistical Approach
A mathematical model is a description of system using
mathematical concepts and language. The process of developing a
mathematical equation is termed as mathematical modelling. Identification of
process control parameter, based on statistical approach was given by Ghezal
and Kamal Khayat (2002). Models were developed for the durability studies
at the ages of 28, 56, and 90 days.
97
The response function representing any of the recorded response
can be expressed as in the Equation (4.8)
Y = f (F/M) (4.8)
The relationship selected is a single degree response surface
expressed as follows
Y = a0 + a1[F/M] (4.9)
Variables, F refers fibre, M refers mortar composite (cement,
metakaolin, fly ash, water, super plasticizer and fine aggregate), a0 refers
regression constant and a1 refers Variables co-efficient.
4.5.1.1 Voids Permeability Model
The Voids Permeability Regression Models, (fvp) in percentage
developed in the study were based on the variables given in Equation (4.9).
Models were developed for 28,56 and 90 days as presented in the
Equations (4.10) to (4.12) respectively.
fvp = 4.12 – 2.62 F/M R2 = 0.934 (4.10)
fvp = 3.281 – 2.581 F/M R2 = 0.940 (4.11)
fvp = 2.565 – 2.462 F/M R2 = 0.925 (4.12)
4.5.1.2 Water Absorption Models
The Water Absorption Regression Models, (fwab) in percentage
developed in the study are based on the variables given in Equation (4.9).
Models developed for 28, 56 and 90 days are presented in the Equations (4.13) to
(4.15).
98
fwab= 2.250 – 0.346 F/M R2 = 0.997 (4.13)
fwab= 1.005 – 0.431 F/M R2 = 0.882 (4.14)
fwab= 0.644 – 0.160 F/M R2 = 0.992 (4.15)
4.5.1.3 Permeability Models
The Co-efficient of Permeability Regression Models, (fp) in cm/sec
developed in the study are based on the variables given in Equation (4.9). Models
developed for 28, 56 and 90 days are presented in the Equations (4.16) to (4.18).
fp= 4.959 – 0.214 F/M R2 = 0.856 (4.16)
fp= 4.038 – 0.316 F/M R2 = 0.942 (4.17)
fp= 3.178 – 0.316 F/M R2 = 0.942 (4.18)
4.5.1.4 Acid Resistance Models
The acid resistances, mass losses regression models in grams
developed in the study are based on the variables given in Equation (4.9). Models
developed for 28, 56 and 90 days as presented in the Equations (4.19) to (4.24).
Sulphuric acid (H2SO4)
fars= 2453.381 – 67.721 F/M R2 = 0.864 (4.19)
fars= 2415.02 – 49.64 F/M R2 = 0.948 (4.20)
fars= 2340.017 – 49.641 F/M R2 = 0.948 (4.21)
Hydrochloric acid (HCl)
farh = 2454.907 – 71.071 F/M R2 = 0.831 (4.22)
farh= 2432.99 – 47.784 F/M R2 = 0.947 (4.23)
farh= 2457.99 – 47.784 F/M R2 = 0.947 (4.24)
99
4.5.1.5 Impact Resistance Models
The Impact Energy Absorbed Regression Models, (fir) in Nm
developed in the study are based on the variables given in Equation (4.9). Models
developed for 28, 56 and 90 days are presented in the Equations (4.25) to (4.27).
fir= 296.545 + 63.526 F/M R2 = 0.817 (4.25)
fir= 400.153 + 63.098 F/M R2 = 0.864 (4.26)
fir= 415.589 + 59.847 F/M R2 = 0.876 (4.27)
4.5.1.6 Drying Shrinkage Models Shrinkage Value %
(Change in Length)
The Drying Shrinkage Value (change in length) Regression
Models, (fds) in percentage developed in the study are based on the variables
given in Equation (4.9). Models developed for 28, 56 and 90 days are
presented in the Equations (4.28) to (4.30).
fds= -0.019 + 0.021 F/M R2 = 0.856 (4.28)
fds= -0.046 + 0.032 F/M R2 = 0.877 (4.29)
fds= -0.056 + 0.034 F/M R2 = 0.879 (4.30)
4.5.1.7 RCPT Models
The RCPT Regression Models, (fds) in coulombs developed in the
study are based on the variables given in Equation (4.9). Models developed
for 28, 56 and 90 days are presented in the Equations (4.31) to (4.33).
frcp= 2186.95 – 1122.05 F/M R2 = 0.950 (4.31)
frcp = 1011.83 – 800.222 F/M R2 = 0.812 (4.32)
frcp = 671.560 – 595.89 0 F/M R2 = 0.828 (4.33)
100
4.5.1.8 Corrosion – Loss of Weight of Rebar Models
The Corrosion Loss of Weight of Rebar Regression Models, (fcr) in
percentage developed in the study are based on the variables given in
Equation (4.9). Models developed for 28, 56 and 90 days as presented in the
Equations (4.34) to (4.36).
fcr= 4.67 – 2.11 F/M R2 = 0.822 (4.34)
fcr= 3.19 – 1.06 F/M R2 = 0.922 (4.35)
fcr= 2.015 – 0.880 F/M R2 = 0.829 (4.36)
4.5.2 Validity of the PMMFRHPC Models
The validation of models establishes a precise correspondence
between durability properties of concrete and a complete abstract interpretation
and strong preservation could be formulated by the interpretation as
completeness properties. Nevertheless, the model was used to calculate the
durability properties of various PMMFRHPC mixtures produced in the
present study and the predictions were compared with experimental results
and validated, the general trend of results and the major characteristics were
discussed in terms of the discrepancies.
4.5.2.1 Validation of Durability Studies Models
Adequacy of the durability models are shown in Table 4.13.
101
Table 4.13 Adequacy of the Durability Models Durability Properties Days F t Standard
Estimate Error Significance Percentage
28 42.58 12.7726.525 0.698 1
56 47.264 10.8856.875 0.652 0.6Voids Permeability
90 36.943 7.8886.078 0.704 0.9
28 1114.083 270.0233.378 0.018 0
56 22.380 13.7614.731 0.158 1.8Water Absorption
90 372.039 96.56319.288 .014 0
28 17.806 121.5514.220 0.088 2.4
56 48.583 110.9466.970 0.079 1Permeability
90 48.583 87.3206.970 0.079 1
28 57.12 18.3497.551 258 0
56 12.976 5.6733.602 386.056 3.7RCPT
90 9.60 4.3513.099 334.16 4.8
28 19.060 197.0214.366 26.956 2.2
56 54.73 110.9466.970 0.079 1Acid Resistance
H2SO4
90 48.583 87.3206.970 0.079 1
28 14.703 164.9913.835 32.210 3.1
56 53.10 462.1767.287 11.396 1Acid Resistance
HCl
90 53.099 462.1767.287 11.396 1
28 22.253 29.4834.717 24.832 0.5
56 16.189 34.1634.024 28.918 1Impact Resistance
90 16.20 37.2124.003 27.572 1
28 7.64 7.6052.764 1.330 4
56 35.66 22.4385.972 0.307 1Corrosion
90 14.551 10.8763.815 0.401 3.2
28 7.752 3.2782.784 0.014 3.9
56 16.805 7.9624.099 0.014 0.9Drying Shrinkage
90 18.972 9.5014.356 0.015 0.7
Notes: F (statistic) = mean square (Regression)/mean square (Residual) t (statistic) = p values ranges from 0 to 0.05 Standard estimate error = square root of mean square for the residual Significance Percentage is <0.05 or 5%
102
4.5.3 Application of the Models
The models are applicable for the concretes with mineral
admixtures fly ash and metakaolin, 12.5 mm size of coarse aggregates and
PMM fibre type. The voids permeability of PMMFRHPC can be estimated
with good accuracy based on the derived model, which can be used to
estimate the durability studies of the PMMFRHPC mixtures. The models of
hardened PMMFRHPC properties would be useful to assess the performance
and thus to facilitate the usage of PMMFRHPC. The ability of models and
variation in the range of models were discussed in validity of the
PMMFRHPC models. The predicated and measured voids permeability for
28, 56 and 90 days are shown in Figure 4.24.
Figure 4.24 Measured Vs Predicted Compressive Strength for 28, 56 and 90 Days
103
4.6 CONCLUSIONS
The following conclusions are drawn from the durability studies of
PMMFRHPC:
Water absorption and voids permeability test conducted in the
laboratory gave a good result for PMMFRHPC, when
compared to the concrete without fibres. It was seen that there
is a decrease in the absorption of water after 56 and 90 days in
PMMFRHPC and voids permeability was also lower.
In 3% concentration of sulphuric acid the leaching was more
and in hydrochloric acid the leaching was less in all the
mixes. HPC with 10% fly ash and 10% metakaolin with
addition of 0.3% of PMM fibre showed an enhanced
resistance by providing a weight loss 53.5% on 28 days &
64.5% on 56 days. The weight loss percentages reduced up to
77% in H2SO4 compared to the High Performance Concrete.
In hydrochloric acid attack, HPC with 10% Fly ash and 10%
Metakaolin with addition of 0.3% of PMM fibre showed a
better resistance by providing a weight loss 49% on 28 days
and 52% on 56 days, lesser than High Performance Concrete.
Through the addition of 0.3% fibres the weight loss
percentages reduce up to 62% in HCl compared to the High
Performance Concrete.
The empirical relations obtained could be used to predict the
impact energy absorption of the PMMFHPC based on
compressive strength. Predicted values of impact energy
based on compressive strength lies within + 10 variations in
the present investigation.
104
Age affected the impact energy characteristics. The maximum
percentage of increase in impact energy absorption at 56 and
90 days was 97 and 103% respectively when compared to the
28 days impact energy absorption.
In the case of fibre concretes, the appearance of the crack was
delayed compared to plain concrete. Free drying shrinkage of
all the fibre concretes was lesser than the plain concrete. The
maximum shrinkage at 120 days was observed to be around
0.12% for plain concrete.
The rate of shrinkage decreased rapidly with time. It was
observed that 40 to 80 percent of shrinkage occurs within
90 days. The maximum percentage of the rate of shrinkage
decreased absorption at 56, 90 and 120 days is 70%, 76% and
77% respectively, when compared to the 28 days.
Rapid Chloride Penetration Test conducted in the laboratory
for HPC with 10% fly ash and 10% metakaolin gives a better
result than that of control mix concrete. The permeability of
HPC was lower than control mix concrete.
The increase in fibre dosage showed reduction in the charges
passed in HPC mixes. Also the increase in curing period
reduced the charges passed (low, very low) indicating that
there was higher penetration resistance as the fibre dosage and
curing period increased.
Thus the above conclusions show that the performance of HPC,
using mineral admixtures such as metakaolin and fly ash, over durability
characteristics was good.