chapter 2 a1
TRANSCRIPT
-
8/14/2019 Chapter 2 A1
1/6
Chapter 2
METHODS
Presented in this chapter are the research design, the subject and
respondents, the instrument, the data gathering procedure, and the statistical
treatment of the data.
RESEARCH DESIGN
A Descriptive-Correlation Method of research was employed in this study.
It is a design to estimate the proficiency to which different variables are related to
one another in the population or sample of interest. (Humol, 2008)
The term descriptive implies the attempt to describe the extent of revised
curriculum and academic performance of the students. In correlation research, it
involves collecting data to determine relationships between two variables.
This design was adopted since the main problem of the study is to identify
if there is a significant relationship between the implementation of revised
curriculum and the academic performance of BSN2 students of St. Marys
College.
Research Subject
The subjects of this study were the BSN2 students who were evaluated by
their clinical instructors in their clinical performances during their clinical
exposures. The respondents of the study were the first year nursing students of
St. Marys College, Tagum City. They belong to different sections. Section A has
-
8/14/2019 Chapter 2 A1
2/6
39 students; section B has 41 students, with a total of 80 students. They were
chosen on the basis of stratified random sampling. This sampling technique was
used in order to get the exact representation of respondents of this study.
Using the Slovins Formula, a sample of 67 student-respondents were
taken. Table 1 shows the sample size of the population and the distribution of
respondents by gender and section using stratified random sampling.
N/(1+(N*.052)
24
-
8/14/2019 Chapter 2 A1
3/6
Table 1
Distribution of Student-Respondents
Section
POPULATION SAMPLE
Gender
Male Female
TOTAL
Gender
Male FemaleTOTAL
A 9 30 39 35
B 7 34 41 37
TOTAL 16 64 80 15 55 67
25
-
8/14/2019 Chapter 2 A1
4/6
Research Instrument
The research instrument used in gathering the data was a researcher-
made questionnaire using a Likert scale. The questionnaire was made brief but
concise for easy understanding of the respondents. Each indicator under the
independent variable contains five (5) questions.
The questionnaire was checked by the research director and went through
final checking and validation for purpose of content-validity. The corrections and
suggestions were incorporated in the final draft of the questionnaire.
On another view, the academic performance of the second year nursing
students was acquired through their RLE grade composing of two categories: the
skills, knowledge and attitude in the skills laboratory during return
demonstrations.
The respondents level of perception were rated using the following scale:
For Pre-conference Strategies on Antenatal Concept
Parameter Limit Descriptive Equivalent
4.50 5.00 Always
3.50 4.49 Often
2.50 3.49 Sometimes
1.50 2.49 Seldom
1.00 1.49 Never
The 5-scale scoring has the following qualitative descriptions:
26
-
8/14/2019 Chapter 2 A1
5/6
5 Always This means that the indicator embodied in the item was very
much evident or always observed.
4 Often This means that the indicator embodied in the item was
oftenly evident or observed.
3 Sometimes This means that the indicator embodied in the item was very
much relatively evident in most cases.
2 Seldom This means that the indicator embodied in the item was
acknowledged to be present but only slightly felt.
1 Never This means that the indicator embodied in the item was
almost non-evident.
Data Gathering Procedure
The researchers undertook the following procedures in order to gather
data needed for the study:
The permission was sought from the School President of St. Marys
College, Tagum City. Upon the approval of the School President, the researchers
forwarded it to the Program Head of the Nursing Department. Then, a week after
the approval was the administration of the questionnaires to the student-
respondent to the different sections of the first year student nurses. It was done
personally by the researchers. Instructions were given to ensure that the
questions would be answered honestly, clearly, and completely. Retrieval of the
questionnaires was done immediately after the administration. The researchers
then collated and tabulated all responses given by the respondents. Responses
27
-
8/14/2019 Chapter 2 A1
6/6
were tabulated in an excel files and was submitted to the statistician for statistical
treatment and analyses to answer the problems raised in the first chapter of this
thesis.
Statistical Treatment
To answer the questions proposed in this study, the data were subjected
to statistical treatment. The following statistical operations were used:
Average Weighted Mean. This was used to determine the extent of the revised
curriculum and the level of clinical performance of the students in sub-problems 1
and 2.
Mean. It is the average of the set of data used to determine the extent of the
revised curriculum and the level of academic performance of the students in sub-
problems 1 and 2. This answered 1and 2.
t- test. This was used to determine the significant relationship between the
extent of revised curriculum and the level of academic performance of the
students.
Pearson r or Product Moment Correlation. This is a method used to compare
the degree of linear relationship of two variables. This text was used to determine
the degree of linear relationship between the extent of the implementation
revised curriculum and the level of academic performance of the students in sub-
problem number 3.
28