chapter 18 the research report winston jackson and norine verberg methods: doing social research, 4e
DESCRIPTION
18-3© 2007 Pearson Education Canada General Orientation (cont’d) 4. Avoiding Sexist Language Use pronouns that do not gender stereotype using he implies the person is male; better to use he or she, or they Use neutralizing gender terms e.g., mailman/letter carrier; salesman/sales agent (other examples on page 473, Table 18.1) Use parallel gender references e.g., change man and wife to husband and wife (other examples on page 474, Table 18.2)TRANSCRIPT
Chapter 18The Research Report
Winston Jackson and Norine VerbergMethods: Doing Social Research, 4e
18-2 © 2007 Pearson Education Canada
General Orientation
1. Audience Journal, general audience, technical audience
2. Style Journals have set format; for other audiences,
use appropriate level of writing and headings3. Avoiding Plagiarism
“Unacknowledged borrowing of other authors’ ideas or words”
Use proper referencing style (e.g., APA)
18-3 © 2007 Pearson Education Canada
General Orientation (cont’d)
4. Avoiding Sexist Language Use pronouns that do not gender stereotype
using he implies the person is male; better to use he or she, or they
Use neutralizing gender terms e.g., mailman/letter carrier; salesman/sales
agent (other examples on page 473, Table 18.1) Use parallel gender references
e.g., change man and wife to husband and wife (other examples on page 474, Table 18.2)
18-4 © 2007 Pearson Education Canada
Organization A paper should be organized into sections
with headings, such as the following: Introduction Review of Literature Hypotheses and Research Design Data Collection Procedures Description of the Sample Description of Indexes, Measurements Results (or Findings) Discussion and Conclusion
18-5 © 2007 Pearson Education Canada
Organization (cont’d)
1. Introduction Inform reader about what the project is about
Indicate general approach + focus of project
2. Review of Literature Provides an overview of the state of the
scientific knowledge on your subject Review the theoretical approaches and empirical
findings, noting consistencies and inconsistencies Refer to instructions in Chapter 12 on how to
present the summary of previous research
18-6 © 2007 Pearson Education Canada
Organization (cont’d)
3. Hypotheses and Research Design State the hypotheses after the literature review
State them precisely and say how they relate to the literature
Draw the causal model (see Figure 18.1, next slide)
State rationale for the design Note advantages over alternative designs Say which designs have been used by others
18-7 © 2007 Pearson Education Canada
Figure 18.1 Causal Model For Unwanted Intimacy Study
18-8 © 2007 Pearson Education Canada
Organization (cont’d)
4. Data-Collection Procedures Describe the measurement, sample selection,
and data collection procedures Note any problems encountered Document key aspects of survey or interview
schedule (note if material is in an appendix)5. Description of the Sample
Report sample size and description of sample (e.g., distribution of age, gender, etc.)
Note the representativeness of sample
18-9 © 2007 Pearson Education Canada
Organization (cont’d)
6. Description of the Indexes, Measurement Procedures Describe and evaluate the indexes; report
means7. Results (or Findings)
Report variations in the dependent variable Use summary tables, graphs, and charts If using tests of significance, report whether
findings are statistically significant or not Says whether findings are consistent or
inconsistent with past research
18-10 © 2007 Pearson Education Canada
Organization (cont’d)
8. Organizing Summary Tables Provide well-designed summary The next series of slides provides examples of
how one might go about summarizing:A. Univariate statistics (nominal or ratio variables)B. Contingency tablesC. Mean values for a dependent variableD. Correlations
Note that all tables have a number, a title, and clearly labelled column and row headings
18-11 © 2007 Pearson Education Canada
Summary Tables: Table 18.3 Summarizing Univariate Statistics
A. NOMINAL/ORDINAL VARIABLES NUMBER PERCENTAGE
Gender
Male 82 48.0
Female 89 52.0
Status
Student 26 15.2
Retired 2 1.2
Unemployed, looking for work 13 7.6
Unemployed, not looking for work 4 2.3
Employed part-time 19 11.1
Employed full-time 107 62.6
Size of home community
Under 5,000 17 9.0
5,000 – 19,999 24 12.7
20,000 – 99,999 16 8.5
100,000 – 999,999 108 57.1
1,000,000 or more 24 12.7
18-12 © 2007 Pearson Education Canada
Summary Tables: Table 18.3 Summarizing Univariate Statistics (cont’d)
B. RATIO VARIABLES
MEANSTANDARD DEVIATION
NUMBER OF CASES
Age 29.60 14.70 183
Income $43,257.00 16,419.00 77
Seniority 8.87 3.76 104
Number of children 1.37 1.06 78
18-13 © 2007 Pearson Education Canada
Summary Tables:Summarizing Contingency Tables
TABLE 18.4 SMOKING BEHAVIOUR BY SELECTED INDEPENDENT VARIABLESINDEPENDENT VARIABLES
PERCENTAGE OF SMOKERS
NUMBER OF CASES: COLUMN TOTAL
PROBABILITY (CHI-SQUARE)
TREND
Residence
On campus 19.8 101 .98283 ?
Off campus 20.4 54
SES of Father
Low SES 22.2 54 .61304 +
Mid to high SES 18.8 101
Respondent’s Age
19 or younger 19.7 76 .93597 +
20 or older 20.3 79
Level of Self-Esteem
Low 19.5 77 .87237 –
High 20.5 78Source: Adapted from Michelle Lee (1992). “Smoking Behaviours.” Antigonish: St. Francis Xavier University, Research Methods Paper. Cited with permission.
18-14 © 2007 Pearson Education Canada
Summary Tables:Summarizing Mean Values
TABLE 18.5 GRADE PERFORMANCE OF GRADE 12 STUDENTS
INDEPENDENT VARIABLES MEAN STANDARD DEVIATION
NUMBER OF CASES
TEST OF SIGNIFICANCE
TREND
Eats breakfast No 68.9 12.7 46 .0003 +
Yes 76.3 10.0 95
Breakfast eaten in last 7 days No 69.5 9.9 39 .0049 +
Yes 75.4 11.5 106
Breakfast maker Others 72.7 14.4 42 .2731 –
Self 75.1 10.0 85
Lunch maker Others 73.8 11.7 105 .8412 *
Self 74.3 11.6 29
Supper maker Others 74.1 11.6 117 .6416 *
Self 72.9 10.6 27
+ Trend predicted correctly – Trend predicted incorrectly * Trend not predicted
Source: Adapted from Annette Fougere (1992). “Effects of Eating Breakfast on Grade Performance.” Antigonish: St. Francis Xavier University, Research Methods Paper. Cited with permission.
18-15 © 2007 Pearson Education Canada
Summary Tables:Summarizing Correlations
TABLE 18.6 CORRELATIONS BETWEEN FIRST-YEAR UNIVERSITY AVERAGE, AVERAGE HIGH-SCHOOL GRADE, AND ENGLISH HIGH-SCHOOL GRADE (N = 3617)
CORRELATIONS
FIRST-YEAR UNIVERSITY
AVERAGE
AVERAGE HIGH-SCHOOL
GRADE
ENGLISH HIGH-SCHOOL
GRADE
First-year university average
1.000
Average high-school grade
.573 1.000
English high-school grade .464 .662 1.000
Source: Winston Jackson
18-16 © 2007 Pearson Education Canada
Organization (cont’d)9. Using Graphs, Charts (examples on following
slides) Bar chart – Figure 18.2 – suitable when
independent variable is nominal/ordinal Graph – Figure 18.3 – suitable for ratio variable
10. Evaluating Hypotheses, Models Interpret findings in light of hypotheses/ model
11. Discussion: tie project together; note relevance to theory and empirical literature
12. Conclusion: review problem + conclusions
18-17 © 2007 Pearson Education Canada
Using Graphs, Charts: Bar Chart
18-18 © 2007 Pearson Education Canada
Using Graphs, Charts: Plot