chapter 1 internal external env

Upload: niharika-gaur

Post on 05-Apr-2018

225 views

Category:

Documents


0 download

TRANSCRIPT

  • 8/2/2019 Chapter 1 Internal External Env

    1/21

  • 8/2/2019 Chapter 1 Internal External Env

    2/21

  • 8/2/2019 Chapter 1 Internal External Env

    3/21

    Macro Environment = General/Remote

    Environment

    The macro forces are generally moreuncontrollablethan micro environment.

    Success of an organization depends uponits adaptability to the environment.

    Exampleof cost of imported component

    going up because of depreciation of the

    domestic currency, solution may lie with

    domestic manufacture of the component.

  • 8/2/2019 Chapter 1 Internal External Env

    4/21

  • 8/2/2019 Chapter 1 Internal External Env

    5/21

  • 8/2/2019 Chapter 1 Internal External Env

    6/21

    THE MACRO ENVIRONMENT

    The far or macro environment relates to:

    Political Economic Global Environment

    Socio-CulturalTechnologicalEnvironmentalLegal

    These influences may impact your business,

    now or in the future.

  • 8/2/2019 Chapter 1 Internal External Env

    7/21

  • 8/2/2019 Chapter 1 Internal External Env

    8/21

    Political influences relate to government or

    constitutional policies that may affect yourbusiness.For example, potential government

    legislation may allow businesses to registerthat they do not want to receive unsolicitedcalls. This may restrict cold calling on abusiness to business basis.

    The expansion of EU boundariesmayhave an impact on certain businesses.

    E i

  • 8/2/2019 Chapter 1 Internal External Env

    9/21

    Economic

    Economic influences relate to the economy as a whole.

    Rates of interesthave an impact for example onlevels of borrowing.

    The strength of the stock markethas an impact ontypes of investment made.

  • 8/2/2019 Chapter 1 Internal External Env

    10/21

    Socio-cultural

    class age gender demographics

    issues such as culture-both local & international diversity.

    For example drinkinghabitsof people in

    France are differentto those in the UK.

  • 8/2/2019 Chapter 1 Internal External Env

    11/21

    TECHNOLOGICAL

  • 8/2/2019 Chapter 1 Internal External Env

    12/21

    use of the internet.

    advances in mobilephones.

    Bluetooth.

    wireless networks.

    data management.

    customer relationship

    management systems.

    Technological influences include

  • 8/2/2019 Chapter 1 Internal External Env

    13/21

    TECHNOLOGICAL FACTORS

  • 8/2/2019 Chapter 1 Internal External Env

    14/21

    Many businesses areimpacted today by

    environmental issues.

    Corporate socialresponsibility is now

    higher on the public'sagenda.

    Organizations such as

    Shell and Nike havebeen affected byadverse publicityrelating to

    environmental issues.

  • 8/2/2019 Chapter 1 Internal External Env

    15/21

    Legal

    Legal constraints also

    affect businessperformance.

    The Working TimeDirective, PaternityLeave and MinimumWage are examples ofthis.

    In certain industriesthere are legalconstraints imposedbyregulatory or watchdog

    bodies.

  • 8/2/2019 Chapter 1 Internal External Env

    16/21

    The gaming industry is an example of one sector which has been

    impacted by changes in the far external environment. Traditionally

    betting shops such as William Hill have always been a 'horses and

    dogs' business. As recently as 1999 this made up 80% of its

    business. The proliferation of sports and topics that people can now

    place bets on has led to huge changes in the world of

    gambling. The twin forces of technology and deregulation have also

    altered things. Gamblers can now place bets on the internet, via

    interactive TV, on WAP-enabled mobile phones, via high street

    shops or call centers. Bookmakers now open on Sundays and in the

    evenings to cater for different work and leisure patterns. There are

    proposals on the table to further modernize the gambling laws in this

    country which relate back to 1960s license and regulate the industry.

  • 8/2/2019 Chapter 1 Internal External Env

    17/21

    Microsoft Antitrust Case

    The government viewed Microsoft as a paranoidmonopolist, someone who gets up in the middleof the night and shoots at any movement.

    -Harry Edwards, Chief Judge, US District Court

    for Appeals for the District of Columbia.

    "The Sun was definitely shining in Seattle.Today's ruling really does go a long way toward

    positively resolving this matter for Microsoft, forour customers, partners, and shareholders."-Steven Ballmer, CEO, Microsoft, commenting on

    the US Court of Appeals for the District ofColumbia reversing the District Court ruling thatMicrosoft be broken into two companies.

  • 8/2/2019 Chapter 1 Internal External Env

    18/21

    MICROSOFT - A MONOPOLY?

    In the late 1990s, as Microsoft was preparing to enter the

    new millennium, the company was fighting the anti-trustproceedings initiated against it by the US government.One of the main charges against Microsoft was that itwas distributing its Internet browser software, InternetExplorer (IE), free of cost along with its WindowsOperating System. Microsoft was a late entrant into the

    Internet software market. Subsequently, it adoptedaggressive marketing tactics to catch up with the earlyentrant, Netscape Communications.

    Netscape protested against Microsoft's move calling it anattempt to shut out other software that competed on a

    stand-alone basis. Another important charge againstMicrosoft was that it had modified Sun Microsystems'Java language in order to make it Windows compatible.

  • 8/2/2019 Chapter 1 Internal External Env

    19/21

    Some analysts argued that the overwhelming marketshare that Microsoft held was a major impediment toinnovations in the software industry. Microsoft wasnot only a leading player, but also the standards

    provider for the industry. By controlling thestandards, the company was in a position to curbinnovations. Microsoft, however, maintained that itsdominance of the market was due to its superiorproducts and not because of any unfair market

    practices.

    In 2000, the US Department of Justice (DOJ) ruledthat Microsoft be split into two smaller companies toprevent it from indulging in anti competitive

    practices. However, in June 2001, the US Court ofAppeals reversed this ruling, but said that Microsoftdid have a monopoly in the market and had violatedUS antitrust laws. In August 2001, Microsoftappealed to the US Supreme Court to overturn theruling that Microsoft was an illegal monopoly. A final

    verdict on the case was expected by October 2001.

  • 8/2/2019 Chapter 1 Internal External Env

    20/21

    THE TRIAL BEGINS

    In October 1997, the DOJ began antitrustinvestigations to determine whether Microsoft wasviolating a 1994 consent decree by compelling PCmakers to ship its Internet browser free with

    Windows 95. Joel I. Klein, Assistant Attorney General for the

    antitrust division, remarked, "This kind of product-forcing is an abuse of monopoly power--and we willseek to put an end to it." Justice Thomas Penfield

    Jackson of the US District Court heard the case and,in May 1998, gave both the parties five months togather 12 witnesses each, and to fight the suit.

  • 8/2/2019 Chapter 1 Internal External Env

    21/21

    ?? Questions to Ponder ??