chap016
TRANSCRIPT
McGraw-Hill/Irwin Copyright © 2012 by The McGraw-Hill Companies, Inc. All rights reserved.
16-16-22
Debt Policy
Changing a firm’s capital structure should not affect its value to shareholders.
This chapter analyzes several possible financing scenarios and provides an overview of the effects of taxes and costs of financial distress on a firm.
16-16-33
Does Borrowing Affect Value?
A company’s choice of capital structure does not increase the value of the firm.
16-16-44
MM’s Irrelevance Proposition
The value of a firm does not depend on its capital structure.
If this holds, can financial managers increase the value of the firm by changing the mix of securities used to
finance the company?
16-16-55
MM’s Irrelevance Proposition
Assumptions of MM’s argument: “Well functioning” capital markets
Efficient capital markets
No taxes (therefore no distortion)
Ignore costs of financial distress
16-16-66
MM’s Irrelevance PropositionExample: An all-equity financed firm has 1 million shares outstanding, currently selling at $10 per share. It considers a restructuring that would issue $4 million in debt to repurchase 400,000 shares. How does this affect overall firm value?
Before Restructuring:
After Restructuring:
16-16-77
How Borrowing Affects EPSCeteris paribus, borrowing will increase earnings per
share. However, this isn’t a source of value to shareholders.
Shareholders can easily replicate a firm’s
borrowing on their own if they choose.
16-16-88
How Borrowing Affects Risk and Return
Debt financing does not affect the operating risk of the firm.
Debt financing does affect the financial risk of the firm.
16-16-99
How Borrowing Affects Risk and Return
16-16-1010
Debt and the Cost of Equity
16-16-1111
Debt and the Cost of Equity: Example
What is the expected return on equity for a firm with a 14% expected return on assets that pays 9% on its debt, which totals 30% of assets?
16-16-1212
MM’s Proposition II
Debt increases financial risk and causes shareholders to demand higher rates of return.
16-16-1313
Debt and TaxesDebt financing advantage: the interest that a firm pays
on debt is tax deductible.
Interest tax shield:
16-16-1414
Perpetual Tax Shield
If the tax shield is perpetual, then:
16-16-1515
Perpetual Tax Shield: Example
What is the present value of the tax shields for a firm that anticipates a perpetual debt level of $12 million at an interest rate of 4% and a tax rate of 35%?
16-16-1616
Tax Shield and Shareholders’ Equity
When accounting for taxes, borrowing increases firm value and shareholders’ wealth.
16-16-1717
Taxes and WACCRecall that the WACC takes into account the required after-tax
rate of return
16-16-1818
Taxes and WACC: Example
What is the expected rate of return to shareholders if the firm has a 35% tax rate, a 10% rate of interest paid on debt, a 15% WACC, and a 60% debt-asset ratio?
16-16-1919
Costs of Financial Distress
Investors factor the potential for future distress into their assessment of current value.
Overall Market Value =
Value if all equity financed
+ PV tax shield
– PV costs of financial distress
16-16-2020
Bankruptcy CostsIf there is a possibility of bankruptcy, the current market value of the firm is reduced by the present value of all court expenses.
16-16-2121
Financial Distress Without Bankruptcy
Even if a firm narrowly escapes bankruptcy, this does not mean that costs of financial distress are avoided.
Stockholders may be tempted to play games at the expense of creditors
Betting the Bank’s Money
Not Betting Your Own Money
Loan Covenant: Agreement between a firm and lender requiring the firm to fulfill certain conditions to safeguard the loan.
16-16-2222
Explaining Financing Choices
The Trade-off Theory• Debt levels are chosen to balance interest tax shields
against the costs of financial distress.
A Pecking Order Theory:• Firms prefer to issue debt rather than equity if internal
finance is insufficient.
16-16-2323
Financial Slack
Financial managers usually place a very high value on having financial slack.
Financial Slack: Ready access to cash or debt financing.
16-16-2424
Two Faces of Financial Slack Benefits
• Long run value rests more on capital investment and operating decisions than on financing.
• Most valuable to firms with positive-NPV growth opportunities
Drawbacks• Too much financial slack may lead to lazy management.• Managers may try to increase their own perks or engage in
empire-building.