Channelview ISD2005 and Beyond

• Where We Were!

• Where We Are!

• Where Do We Want To Be?

• How Do We Get There?

Where We Were!

CISD Trend Data

2005-2009

Academic Profile

Year Reading Math Writing ScienceSocial Studies

All Tests

2005 74% 60% 84% 47% 79% 48%

2006 80% 62% 86% 56% 80% 53%

2007 83% 70% 87% 61% 85% 60%

2008 85% 72% 92% 61% 88% 61%

2009 87% 78% 90% 63% 86%Not

Available

Commended Performance 2005-2009

 Reading/ELA Math Writing

Social Studies

Science

2005 16% 11% 14% 12% 6%

2006 17% 13% 18% 18% 8%

2007 19% 16% 15% 22% 5%

2008 21% 19% 20% 26% 10%

2009* 19% 23% 16% 25% 10%

*Projected

Program Profile

Year ED LEP AR CTE SPED GT

2005 4978 1779 4178 1522 884 297

2006 5405 1786 4827 1821 850 337

2007 5737 2149 5728 2094 859 358

2008 5932 2328 5752 2023 889 352

2009 6500 2287 5861 1875 847 327

Demographic Profile

Year EnrollmentNative-Amer

Asian-Amer

African-Amer

Hispanic

White

2005 7669 7 123 1212 4425 1902

2006 8035 8 126 1240 4935 1726

2007 8256 8 126 1287 5318 1517

2008 8409 9 118 1247 5642 1393

2009 8563 11 124 1207 5931 1290

Graduate Profile

Class O

f

# of G

rads

Reco

mm

end

ed &

Distin

gu

ished

P

lans

Min

. Plan

4- Yr C

om

pletio

n R

ate

AP

/Du

al Cred

it Co

urse E

nro

llmen

t

AP

Stu

den

ts Testin

g*

AP

Sco

res >3

Pct takin

g S

AT

or A

CT

Mean

SA

T S

core

Mean

AC

T S

core

2004 367 179 188 73.2% 2.9% 14.7% 15.3% 44.3% 902 18.6

2005 333 209 124 74.4% 15.3% 14.9% 19.9% 48.0% 900 19.4

2006 337 265 72 71.7% 15.0% 11.7% 19.7% 60.1% 879 17.2

2007 344 265 79 79.6% 12.0% 13.6% 16.8% 62.1% 875 17.7

2008 367 251 116 82.2% N/A 37.7% 20.8% N/A N/A N/A

2009 373 282 91 N/A N/A 52.1% 30.8% N/A N/A N/A

Discipline Referrals

3900

4000

4100

4200

4300

4400

4500

4600

4700

CISD Total Number of Referrals 2008-2009

2008 4626

2009 4171

Total0

200

400

600

800

1000

1200

CISD Discipline Referrals by Six Weeks 2008-2009

2008 391 659 695 726 1143 1013

2009 196 799 613 847 851 865

1SW 2SW 3SW 4SW 5SW 6SW

Academic Performance

2005-2009

65%

70%

75%

80%

85%

90%

CISD Reading/ELA Performance 2005-2009

Reading 74% 80% 83% 85% 87%

2005 2006 2007 2008 2009

0%

10%

20%

30%

40%

50%

60%

70%

80%

CISD Math Performance 2005-2009

Math 60% 62% 70% 72% 78%

2005 2006 2007 2008 2009

75%

80%

85%

90%

95%

CISD Writing Performance 2005-2009

Writing 84% 86% 87% 92% 90%

2005 2006 2007 2008 2009

0%

10%

20%

30%

40%

50%

60%

70%

CISD Science Performance 2005-2009

Science 47% 56% 61% 61% 63%

2005 2006 2007 2008 2009

75%

80%

85%

90%

CISD Social Studies Performance 2005-2009

Social Studies 79% 80% 85% 88% 86%

2005 2006 2007 2008 2009

0%

5%

10%

15%

20%

25%

CISD Reading/ELA Commended Performance

Reading/ELA 16% 17% 19% 21% 19%

2005 2006 2007 2008 2009*

0%

5%

10%

15%

20%

25%

CISD Math Commended Performance

Math 11% 13% 16% 19% 23%

2005 2006 2007 2008 2009*

0%

5%

10%

15%

20%

CISD Writing Commended Performance

Writing 14% 18% 15% 20% 16%

2005 2006 2007 2008 2009*

0%

5%

10%

15%

20%

25%

30%

CISD Social Studies Commended Performance

Social Studies 12% 18% 22% 26% 25%

2005 2006 2007 2008 2009*

0%

2%

4%

6%

8%

10%

CISD Science Commended Performance

Science 6% 8% 5% 10% 10%

2005 2006 2007 2008 2009*

Program Status

2005-2009

0

1000

2000

3000

4000

5000

6000

7000

Number of Economically Disadvantaged Students

ED 4978 5405 5737 5932 6500

2005 2006 2007 2008 2009

0

500

1000

1500

2000

2500

Number of LEP Students

LEP 1779 1786 2149 2328 2287

2005 2006 2007 2008 2009

0

1000

2000

3000

4000

5000

6000

Number of At-Risk Students

AR 4178 4827 5728 5752 5861

2005 2006 2007 2008 2009

0

500

1000

1500

2000

2500

Students Enrolled in Career and Technical Education

CTE 1522 1821 2094 2023 1875

2005 2006 2007 2008 2009

820

830

840

850

860

870

880

890

Students Enrolled in Special Education

SPED 884 850 859 889 847

2005 2006 2007 2008 2009

0

100

200

300

400

Students Enrolled in Gifted and Talented Education

GT 297 337 358 352 327

2005 2006 2007 2008 2009

Demographic Trends

2005-2009

CISD Student Enrollment 2005-2009

7000

7250

7500

7750

8000

8250

8500

8750

9000

Enrollment 7669 8035 8256 8409 8563

2005 2006 2007 2008 2009

CISD Af-Amer Student Enrollment 2005-2009

1000

1100

1200

1300

1400

1500

Af-Amer 1212 1240 1287 1247 1207

2005 2006 2007 2008 2009

CISD Hispanic Student Enrollment 2005-2009

3000

3500

4000

4500

5000

5500

6000

6500

7000

Hispanic 4425 4935 5318 5642 5931

2005 2006 2007 2008 2009

CISD Anglo Student Enrollment 2005-2009

1000

1250

1500

1750

2000

White 1902 1726 1517 1393 1290

2005 2006 2007 2008 2009

CISD Graduate Profile

2004-2009

300

325

350

375

400

Number of CISD Graduates, 2004-2009

Number of Graduates 367 333 337 344 367 373

2004 2005 2006 2007 2008 2009

100120140160180200220240260280300

Number of CISD Graduates on Advanced Diploma Plans, 2004-2009

Recommended &Distinguished Plans

179 209 265 265 251 282

2004 2005 2006 2007 2008 2009

50

75

100

125

150

175

200

Number of CISD Graduates on Minimum Diploma Plan, 2004-2009

Minimum Plan 188 124 72 79 116 91

2004 2005 2006 2007 2008 2009

50.0%

60.0%

70.0%

80.0%

90.0%

Percent of Students Completing High School in Four Years, 2004-2008

Four Year CompletionRate

73.2% 74.4% 71.7% 79.6% 82.2%

2004 2005 2006 2007 2008

0.0%

10.0%

20.0%

30.0%

40.0%

50.0%

Percent of AP Students with Qualifing Scores on College Board Tests, 2004-2009

AP Scores >3 15.3% 19.9% 19.7% 16.8% 20.8% 30.8%

2004 2005 2006 2007 2008 2009

0.0%

10.0%

20.0%

30.0%

40.0%

50.0%

60.0%

Percent of AP Students Participating in the College Board Tests, 2004-2009*

AP Students Testing* 14.7% 14.9% 11.7% 13.6% 37.7% 52.1%

2004 2005 2006 2007 2008 2009

Where We Are!

• Channelview ISD is a great place for employees to work and for students to learn. Here are a few of the accomplishments that make us proud to be a part of the Channelview School District.

Points of Pride

Points of PrideDistrict

• For the 6th consecutive year, the District has received a rating of “Superior Achievement” under Texas’ Schools FIRST financial accountability rating system.

• CISD campuses improved state accountability ratings.

• Students and staff members participated in the Relay for Life Campaign collecting over $8000 for the American Cancer Society.

• About 200 CISD employees and students volunteered at a POD after Hurricane Ike serving 18,000 families in two days.

• Transportation Department transported 4,718 students in 2008-09.

• Five students graduated through the MECA program to earn their Associate Degree along with their high school diploma.

• Nutrition Services prepared and served 1,100,479 Lunches, 605,184 Breakfasts and 22,451 Snacks in 2008-09. The Summer Feeding program prepared and served 16,098 Lunches and 10,348 Breakfasts.

• Students, staff members and community volunteers saved at least 285 lives this year by donating blood to the Commit for Life organization.

Points of Pride2009 Campus Accountability

0 0

1

5

8

4

0

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

Exemplary Recognized Acceptable

20082009

Points of PrideStaff

• CISD Secondary Teacher of the Year is Mr. Ruben Rodriguez of Alice Johnson Jr. High.

• CISD Elementary Teacher of the Year is Ms. Karen Ramos of Hamblen Elementary.

• Head Volleyball Coach, Sharice Gilbert, was named Coach of the Year in District 21-5A.

• Head Baseball Coach, Cory Bowyer, was named Coach of the Year in District 21-5A.

Points of PrideStudents

• Fourteen student athletes received a scholarship to play football, baseball, track, volleyball and soccer at various major universities.

• Schochler Choir competed in the Splashtown Spring Choral Festival held at Spring High School in Spring ISD. The students received a 1st division rating.

• Student athletes were extremely competitive as evidenced by the increasing number of District Championships achieved in several sports and many teams qualifying to successfully compete at Regional and State levels.

• Alice Johnson Junior High completed its 6th year with the College Bound Informational Tours. Students competed for 30 spots by preparing a 500 word essay.

• McMullan students participated in a College Day which included many students who wrote letters to universities and colleges – one 4th grade student was invited for a tour of the University of Houston Engineering College and an interview conducted by the Dean of the College.

• Two teams from McMullan Elementary advanced to the Odyssey of the Mind State Finals.

• Cobb Elementary Odyssey of the Mind Team received 2nd place at the Regional Competition.

• CISD art students earned three “Best in Show” and four “Gold Medals” in the Houston Rodeo Art Competition.

• CISD had 34 art students compete in the Visual Arts Scholastic Event and received 21 gold medals of which two individuals qualified for state competition.

Points of PrideStudents cont.

• Channelview Channelettes and Reserves competed in various dance competitions and received Sweepstakes for all 1st Division ratings, 1st Division, Showmanship Award, Outstanding Precision for Prop, and 3rs place Best in Class for Extra Large Team as well as numerous individual awards.

• Channelview Debate team participated in the UIL Academic Tournament and received two 2nd place awards in LD and CX Debate, a 3rd place in CX Debate, and a 4th place in Persuasive Speaking.

• CHS Band competed in the Region 19 UIL marching contest and received a Division 1 rating. The CHS Band also competed at the Region 19 UIL Solo and Ensemble Contest earning 94 First Division Medals, 74 were for class one performance and 20 for class two. In addition, 35 students qualified for state competition in Austin.

Points of PrideStudents cont.

Where Do We Want to Be?Goals 2009-2010

CISD Board of Trustees Goals

DEIC Goals

Campus Goals

Personal Goals

Board of Trustees GoalsChannelview ISD has:

• Active and effective communication supported throughout the district that encourages community support.

• Excellent parent involvement that promotes proper student behavior and attitudes.

• A curriculum that is aligned throughout grade levels, emphasizes critical thinking and application, and meets the social and emotional experiences and needs of all students.

• A supportive environment that results in high teacher satisfaction, retention, and tenure

• A budget and active strategies that minimize the effect of rising operational costs.

• Implemented a plan that significantly reduces student drop-out rates.

• High expectation and standards for all employees that result in student success.

DEIC Goals

• Improve Academic Performance.

• Recruit and retain highly qualified teachers.

• Create a committee to develop a Comprehensive District wide plan for integration of technology in the classroom.

• Promote opportunities to develop a relationship between the community and schools.

• Maintain a safe and focused environment for all students and staff at CISD.

• Implement a dating violence program.

• Continue to implement and monitor the Drop-out Prevention Program.

How Do We Get There?

As more is expected of all students, as the percentage of students we are having difficulty educating is increasing, & as monetary resources are more limited,

the compelling question from Texas school leaders today is:

What can we do to take our district to the “Next Level” of student success….and ensure that it is sustained?

The next level of success is:

“Recognized”

It Begins with Expectations“One of the key components to effective leadership is setting expectations. People will rise to the level of performance/behavior

that is set for them.” P. McNamara

Setting Expectations:Key Points to Consider

• Make sure your team hears you cast your expectations on a regular basis. Then monitor to ensure progress towards desired expectation.

• Not everyone is going to agree with every decision that is made.

• Everyone must be held accountable. “Holding people accountable should not take the form of a dictatorship.”

• Set expectations high…not so high that they are impractical or unreachable.

• True leaders have lots of demands on them- That is usually why they are in that role.

2009-2010 ExpectationsCISD Leadership Team

• Our students’ academic performance will continue to improve. Our goal should be at minimum “Recognized”.

• We will continue to provide a safe environment for our students.

• We will continue to provide a caring and positive learning environment for our students and staff.

• All staff will remain personally accountable for student academic performance. “Failure is personal.” Intrinsic Motivation

• All staff will take pride in being part of CISD.

• All administrators will continue to fulfill the role as a “support” resource for students and staff.

• All administrators will continue to recognize staff members for the positive contributions they make for the district and students.

• All administrators will monitor and provide support for staff members who are not performing their assigned responsibilities to their maximum ability.

• We must all continue to “Do our job” and anything else necessary to make our students and district better.

We all need to have the same core beliefs, expectations, and level of understanding.

“Why are we Here”

Board Superintendent Central Office Schools Community