chalmers university of technology results from 15 years of ...chalmers university of technology...
TRANSCRIPT
Department of Radio and Space Science 1 Onsala Space Observatory
Chalmers University of Technology
Results from 15 years of data from the SWEPOS network
Jan Johansson, Martin Lidberg, Ragne Emardson and many [email protected]
Chalmers University of TechnologySP Technical Research Institute of Sweden
Swedish Meteorological and Hydrological Institute (SMHI)National Land Survey of Sweden
Department of Radio and Space Science 2 Onsala Space Observatory
Chalmers University of Technology
The Glacial Isostatic Adjustment (GIA) visible in Fennoscandia
Department of Radio and Space Science 3 Onsala Space Observatory
Chalmers University of Technology
a) The relaxed earthb) The earth surface are depressed
due to the load from the ice-sheet.c) The earth rebounds when the ice-
load has disappearedDetermination of horizontal rates andabsolute land uplift values need aGeodetic Reference Frame
Glacial Isostatic Adjustment (GIA)
(From Bergstrand, 2002)
Department of Radio and Space Science 4 Onsala Space Observatory
Chalmers University of Technology
Period of analysis:Aug. 1993 – Oct. 2008Totally: 83 sites
GAMIT/GLOBK analysis-Similar strategy as past
-ITRF2005
GIPSY- Precise Point Positioning(PPP) using JPL products
-Ambiguity fixing-Other models similar to theGAMIT setup
⇒ VALIDATION OF THEGAMIT SOLUTION
The BIFROST network
Department of Radio and Space Science 5 Onsala Space Observatory
Chalmers University of TechnologyTime series of GPS positions before editing
Department of Radio and Space Science 6 Onsala Space Observatory
Chalmers University of TechnologyVertical velocity
ITRF2005ITRF2000New GIA model Ekman (1998) based on:• mareographs and levellings,•1.2 mm/yr eustatic sea level
rise•change of the geoid based on
Ekman & Mäkinen (1998)
Compared to the ITRF2000values:
mean Std (mm/yr)ITRF2005 0.4 0.1GIA model -0.4 0.5 Ekman -0.4 0.6
Department of Radio and Space Science 7 Onsala Space Observatory
Chalmers University of Technology
The newGAMIT/GLOBK solution (in ITRF2005)And GIA model
GIA transformed to GPS
The new station velocitiesValidation using GIPSY (0.1, 0.1, 0.2) (n,e,u) mm/yr
After a fit…
New GIA model minus GPS,“best sites”(0.3, 0.2, 0.3) (n,e,u) mm/yr
After a fit
Department of Radio and Space Science 8 Onsala Space Observatory
Chalmers University of Technology
Ongoing re-analysis with GIPSY-OASIS using > 200 stations 1993-2009 (to be ready by 2010-03-01)
FennoscandianEurope
Department of Radio and Space Science 9 Onsala Space Observatory
Chalmers University of Technology
Department of Radio and Space Science 10 Onsala Space Observatory
Chalmers University of Technology
Tropospheric model
Location of the receiver
n2
n1
nn
n3Troposphere
n0 δρtrop(0)
Sat4Sat3Sat2
Sat1 z
δρtrop(z)
z δρtrop(z) = δρtrop(0)/cos(z) =
δρtrop(0)/sin(ε) ε
Zenith Hydrostatic Delay = ZHDZenith Wet Delay = ZWDZenith Total Delay = ZTD
ZWDZHDZTD +=
Department of Radio and Space Science 11 Onsala Space Observatory
Chalmers University of Technology
Water vapour time series from GNSS observationsGNSS observations
Data Analysis
Zenith Total Delay (ZTD)(+ horizontal gradients)
Observations and/or Numerical Weather Models
Zenith WetDelay (ZWD)
Integrated Precipitable Water Vapour (IPWV)
Ground Pressure
Mean Temperature of Wet Refractivity
2 mm/hPa — mean ZWD globally is 160 mm (100 mm in the south of Sweden)
Typical value 15 K below mean surface temperature (rms error often ≈ 3 K corresponding to 1%). An error affects the IPWV with same percentage.
Department of Radio and Space Science 12 Onsala Space Observatory
Chalmers University of Technology
Near Real Time (NRT) Water Vapor Estimation for Weather Forecasting
• Blue: ”cool and dry” air• Red: ”warm and humid” air
Department of Radio and Space Science 13 Onsala Space Observatory
Chalmers University of Technology
• GNSS data processing center handling data from 300-500 stations every hour
• Results (i.e. integrated tropospheric water vapor) above all stations delivered to E-GVAP (EUMETNET) no later than 40 minutes after full hour.
NKG/NGAA analysis center
Department of Radio and Space Science 14 Onsala Space Observatory
Chalmers University of Technology
1961 1981 2001 2021 2041 2061 2081 2100
−1
0
1
2
3
4
5
6
År
Tem
pera
turf
örän
drin
g (o C
)
Estimated Estimated ””climate changeclimate change”” in Sweden in Sweden relative to the period 1961relative to the period 1961--19901990Annual precipitation Annual mean temperature
1961 1981 2001 2021 2041 2061 2081 2100
−20
−10
0
10
20
30
40
År
Ned
erbö
rdsf
örän
drin
g (%
)
Red line shows Rossby Centres most recent simulation of ”climate change”. Grey indicates results from 4 earlier simulations.
Department of Radio and Space Science 15 Onsala Space Observatory
Chalmers University of Technology
Why monitor the atmospheric water vapour content?The increase of the global mean of Integrated Precipitable WaterVapour (IPWV) is expected to be ~ 6 [%/K] (following the Clausius-Clapeyron relation assuming conservation of relative humidity [Trenberth et al., Bull. Am. Meteorol. Soc., 2003]).
The global mean of IPWV is 24.9 mm [Trenberth and Smith, J. of Climate, 2005].
ERA40 shows [Bengtsson et al. JGR, 2004]:+0.11 K/decade in global temperature 1979–2001+0.36 mm/decade in IPWV 1979–2001 — which is too large by a factor of 2 (0.11 K/decade * 6%/K * 24.9 mm = 0.16 mm/decade),which is explained by artifacts in the global observing system.
All this means that accurate observations of the IPWV are fundamental in climate monitoring / climate research.
Department of Radio and Space Science 16 Onsala Space Observatory
Chalmers University of Technology
IPWV trends for some stations in Sweden and Finland
VaasaMetsähoviLovö
Arjeplog Hässleholm Kiruna
Department of Radio and Space Science 17 Onsala Space Observatory
Chalmers University of Technology
IWV trends over Sweden and Finland
• Analysis period: 10 years, November 16, 1996 –November 15, 2006
• IWV trends varies from –0.5 to +1.5 kg/m2/decade
• Uncertainties in the trends are ~0.4 kg/m2/decade (taking temporal correlations into account)
Department of Radio and Space Science 18 Onsala Space Observatory
Chalmers University of Technology
Comparison with climate models• The average difference between
GPS derived IPWV with IPWV from ERA and RCA models, for a few stations.
• Errorbars indicate the RMS scatter around the average.
• In general larger differences for the southern stations. Could be due to higher IPWV in the south.
• RCA3 model has a larger bias but a slightly lower RMS compared to the RCA2. This is in agreement with other investigations which indicate that RCA3 overestimates the IPWV.
KIR0 UME0 OST0 KAR0 NOR0 VIS0 ONSA−3
−2
−1
0
1
2
3
IPW
V d
iffer
ence
[mm
]
GPS−ERAGPS−RCA2GPS−RCA3
Average for all seven stations:GPS – ERA = –0.2 ± 0.4 mmGPS – RCA2 = –0.3 ± 1.0 mmGPS – RCA3 = –1.0 ± 0.9 mm
Department of Radio and Space Science 19 Onsala Space Observatory
Chalmers University of Technology
Ongoing GPS data and numerical weather model analysis
More than 100 stations
GPS data processed with GIPSY 5.0
Now data from 1997 to 2006
Later this year: 1993–2009
Department of Radio and Space Science 20 Onsala Space Observatory
Chalmers University of Technology
What will happen now?• Process the GPS data from > 200 European sites from 1993
to 2009• Comparisons to the numerical weather models (ECMWF and
RCA model) and geophysical models (tectonic plate motion, glacial isostatic adjustment – historic and current, etc)
• Try to understand the differences …
Conclusion: GNSS give important contributions to scientific investigations (e.g. geophysics and atmosphere – climate change) as well as weather forecasting