chalmers university of technology results from 15 years of ...chalmers university of technology...

20
Department of Radio and Space Science 1 Onsala Space Observatory Chalmers University of Technology Results from 15 years of data from the SWEPOS network Jan Johansson, Martin Lidberg, Ragne Emardson and many others [email protected] Chalmers University of Technology SP Technical Research Institute of Sweden Swedish Meteorological and Hydrological Institute (SMHI) National Land Survey of Sweden

Upload: others

Post on 12-Mar-2021

1 views

Category:

Documents


0 download

TRANSCRIPT

Page 1: Chalmers University of Technology Results from 15 years of ...Chalmers University of Technology Results from 15 years of data from the SWEPOS network Jan Johansson, Martin Lidberg,

Department of Radio and Space Science 1 Onsala Space Observatory

Chalmers University of Technology

Results from 15 years of data from the SWEPOS network

Jan Johansson, Martin Lidberg, Ragne Emardson and many [email protected]

Chalmers University of TechnologySP Technical Research Institute of Sweden

Swedish Meteorological and Hydrological Institute (SMHI)National Land Survey of Sweden

Page 2: Chalmers University of Technology Results from 15 years of ...Chalmers University of Technology Results from 15 years of data from the SWEPOS network Jan Johansson, Martin Lidberg,

Department of Radio and Space Science 2 Onsala Space Observatory

Chalmers University of Technology

The Glacial Isostatic Adjustment (GIA) visible in Fennoscandia

Page 3: Chalmers University of Technology Results from 15 years of ...Chalmers University of Technology Results from 15 years of data from the SWEPOS network Jan Johansson, Martin Lidberg,

Department of Radio and Space Science 3 Onsala Space Observatory

Chalmers University of Technology

a) The relaxed earthb) The earth surface are depressed

due to the load from the ice-sheet.c) The earth rebounds when the ice-

load has disappearedDetermination of horizontal rates andabsolute land uplift values need aGeodetic Reference Frame

Glacial Isostatic Adjustment (GIA)

(From Bergstrand, 2002)

Page 4: Chalmers University of Technology Results from 15 years of ...Chalmers University of Technology Results from 15 years of data from the SWEPOS network Jan Johansson, Martin Lidberg,

Department of Radio and Space Science 4 Onsala Space Observatory

Chalmers University of Technology

Period of analysis:Aug. 1993 – Oct. 2008Totally: 83 sites

GAMIT/GLOBK analysis-Similar strategy as past

-ITRF2005

GIPSY- Precise Point Positioning(PPP) using JPL products

-Ambiguity fixing-Other models similar to theGAMIT setup

⇒ VALIDATION OF THEGAMIT SOLUTION

The BIFROST network

Page 5: Chalmers University of Technology Results from 15 years of ...Chalmers University of Technology Results from 15 years of data from the SWEPOS network Jan Johansson, Martin Lidberg,

Department of Radio and Space Science 5 Onsala Space Observatory

Chalmers University of TechnologyTime series of GPS positions before editing

Page 6: Chalmers University of Technology Results from 15 years of ...Chalmers University of Technology Results from 15 years of data from the SWEPOS network Jan Johansson, Martin Lidberg,

Department of Radio and Space Science 6 Onsala Space Observatory

Chalmers University of TechnologyVertical velocity

ITRF2005ITRF2000New GIA model Ekman (1998) based on:• mareographs and levellings,•1.2 mm/yr eustatic sea level

rise•change of the geoid based on

Ekman & Mäkinen (1998)

Compared to the ITRF2000values:

mean Std (mm/yr)ITRF2005 0.4 0.1GIA model -0.4 0.5 Ekman -0.4 0.6

Page 7: Chalmers University of Technology Results from 15 years of ...Chalmers University of Technology Results from 15 years of data from the SWEPOS network Jan Johansson, Martin Lidberg,

Department of Radio and Space Science 7 Onsala Space Observatory

Chalmers University of Technology

The newGAMIT/GLOBK solution (in ITRF2005)And GIA model

GIA transformed to GPS

The new station velocitiesValidation using GIPSY (0.1, 0.1, 0.2) (n,e,u) mm/yr

After a fit…

New GIA model minus GPS,“best sites”(0.3, 0.2, 0.3) (n,e,u) mm/yr

After a fit

Page 8: Chalmers University of Technology Results from 15 years of ...Chalmers University of Technology Results from 15 years of data from the SWEPOS network Jan Johansson, Martin Lidberg,

Department of Radio and Space Science 8 Onsala Space Observatory

Chalmers University of Technology

Ongoing re-analysis with GIPSY-OASIS using > 200 stations 1993-2009 (to be ready by 2010-03-01)

FennoscandianEurope

Page 9: Chalmers University of Technology Results from 15 years of ...Chalmers University of Technology Results from 15 years of data from the SWEPOS network Jan Johansson, Martin Lidberg,

Department of Radio and Space Science 9 Onsala Space Observatory

Chalmers University of Technology

Page 10: Chalmers University of Technology Results from 15 years of ...Chalmers University of Technology Results from 15 years of data from the SWEPOS network Jan Johansson, Martin Lidberg,

Department of Radio and Space Science 10 Onsala Space Observatory

Chalmers University of Technology

Tropospheric model

Location of the receiver

n2

n1

nn

n3Troposphere

n0 δρtrop(0)

Sat4Sat3Sat2

Sat1 z

δρtrop(z)

z δρtrop(z) = δρtrop(0)/cos(z) =

δρtrop(0)/sin(ε) ε

Zenith Hydrostatic Delay = ZHDZenith Wet Delay = ZWDZenith Total Delay = ZTD

ZWDZHDZTD +=

Page 11: Chalmers University of Technology Results from 15 years of ...Chalmers University of Technology Results from 15 years of data from the SWEPOS network Jan Johansson, Martin Lidberg,

Department of Radio and Space Science 11 Onsala Space Observatory

Chalmers University of Technology

Water vapour time series from GNSS observationsGNSS observations

Data Analysis

Zenith Total Delay (ZTD)(+ horizontal gradients)

Observations and/or Numerical Weather Models

Zenith WetDelay (ZWD)

Integrated Precipitable Water Vapour (IPWV)

Ground Pressure

Mean Temperature of Wet Refractivity

2 mm/hPa — mean ZWD globally is 160 mm (100 mm in the south of Sweden)

Typical value 15 K below mean surface temperature (rms error often ≈ 3 K corresponding to 1%). An error affects the IPWV with same percentage.

Page 12: Chalmers University of Technology Results from 15 years of ...Chalmers University of Technology Results from 15 years of data from the SWEPOS network Jan Johansson, Martin Lidberg,

Department of Radio and Space Science 12 Onsala Space Observatory

Chalmers University of Technology

Near Real Time (NRT) Water Vapor Estimation for Weather Forecasting

• Blue: ”cool and dry” air• Red: ”warm and humid” air

Page 13: Chalmers University of Technology Results from 15 years of ...Chalmers University of Technology Results from 15 years of data from the SWEPOS network Jan Johansson, Martin Lidberg,

Department of Radio and Space Science 13 Onsala Space Observatory

Chalmers University of Technology

• GNSS data processing center handling data from 300-500 stations every hour

• Results (i.e. integrated tropospheric water vapor) above all stations delivered to E-GVAP (EUMETNET) no later than 40 minutes after full hour.

NKG/NGAA analysis center

Page 14: Chalmers University of Technology Results from 15 years of ...Chalmers University of Technology Results from 15 years of data from the SWEPOS network Jan Johansson, Martin Lidberg,

Department of Radio and Space Science 14 Onsala Space Observatory

Chalmers University of Technology

1961 1981 2001 2021 2041 2061 2081 2100

−1

0

1

2

3

4

5

6

År

Tem

pera

turf

örän

drin

g (o C

)

Estimated Estimated ””climate changeclimate change”” in Sweden in Sweden relative to the period 1961relative to the period 1961--19901990Annual precipitation Annual mean temperature

1961 1981 2001 2021 2041 2061 2081 2100

−20

−10

0

10

20

30

40

År

Ned

erbö

rdsf

örän

drin

g (%

)

Red line shows Rossby Centres most recent simulation of ”climate change”. Grey indicates results from 4 earlier simulations.

Page 15: Chalmers University of Technology Results from 15 years of ...Chalmers University of Technology Results from 15 years of data from the SWEPOS network Jan Johansson, Martin Lidberg,

Department of Radio and Space Science 15 Onsala Space Observatory

Chalmers University of Technology

Why monitor the atmospheric water vapour content?The increase of the global mean of Integrated Precipitable WaterVapour (IPWV) is expected to be ~ 6 [%/K] (following the Clausius-Clapeyron relation assuming conservation of relative humidity [Trenberth et al., Bull. Am. Meteorol. Soc., 2003]).

The global mean of IPWV is 24.9 mm [Trenberth and Smith, J. of Climate, 2005].

ERA40 shows [Bengtsson et al. JGR, 2004]:+0.11 K/decade in global temperature 1979–2001+0.36 mm/decade in IPWV 1979–2001 — which is too large by a factor of 2 (0.11 K/decade * 6%/K * 24.9 mm = 0.16 mm/decade),which is explained by artifacts in the global observing system.

All this means that accurate observations of the IPWV are fundamental in climate monitoring / climate research.

Page 16: Chalmers University of Technology Results from 15 years of ...Chalmers University of Technology Results from 15 years of data from the SWEPOS network Jan Johansson, Martin Lidberg,

Department of Radio and Space Science 16 Onsala Space Observatory

Chalmers University of Technology

IPWV trends for some stations in Sweden and Finland

VaasaMetsähoviLovö

Arjeplog Hässleholm Kiruna

Page 17: Chalmers University of Technology Results from 15 years of ...Chalmers University of Technology Results from 15 years of data from the SWEPOS network Jan Johansson, Martin Lidberg,

Department of Radio and Space Science 17 Onsala Space Observatory

Chalmers University of Technology

IWV trends over Sweden and Finland

• Analysis period: 10 years, November 16, 1996 –November 15, 2006

• IWV trends varies from –0.5 to +1.5 kg/m2/decade

• Uncertainties in the trends are ~0.4 kg/m2/decade (taking temporal correlations into account)

Page 18: Chalmers University of Technology Results from 15 years of ...Chalmers University of Technology Results from 15 years of data from the SWEPOS network Jan Johansson, Martin Lidberg,

Department of Radio and Space Science 18 Onsala Space Observatory

Chalmers University of Technology

Comparison with climate models• The average difference between

GPS derived IPWV with IPWV from ERA and RCA models, for a few stations.

• Errorbars indicate the RMS scatter around the average.

• In general larger differences for the southern stations. Could be due to higher IPWV in the south.

• RCA3 model has a larger bias but a slightly lower RMS compared to the RCA2. This is in agreement with other investigations which indicate that RCA3 overestimates the IPWV.

KIR0 UME0 OST0 KAR0 NOR0 VIS0 ONSA−3

−2

−1

0

1

2

3

IPW

V d

iffer

ence

[mm

]

GPS−ERAGPS−RCA2GPS−RCA3

Average for all seven stations:GPS – ERA = –0.2 ± 0.4 mmGPS – RCA2 = –0.3 ± 1.0 mmGPS – RCA3 = –1.0 ± 0.9 mm

Page 19: Chalmers University of Technology Results from 15 years of ...Chalmers University of Technology Results from 15 years of data from the SWEPOS network Jan Johansson, Martin Lidberg,

Department of Radio and Space Science 19 Onsala Space Observatory

Chalmers University of Technology

Ongoing GPS data and numerical weather model analysis

More than 100 stations

GPS data processed with GIPSY 5.0

Now data from 1997 to 2006

Later this year: 1993–2009

Page 20: Chalmers University of Technology Results from 15 years of ...Chalmers University of Technology Results from 15 years of data from the SWEPOS network Jan Johansson, Martin Lidberg,

Department of Radio and Space Science 20 Onsala Space Observatory

Chalmers University of Technology

What will happen now?• Process the GPS data from > 200 European sites from 1993

to 2009• Comparisons to the numerical weather models (ECMWF and

RCA model) and geophysical models (tectonic plate motion, glacial isostatic adjustment – historic and current, etc)

• Try to understand the differences …

Conclusion: GNSS give important contributions to scientific investigations (e.g. geophysics and atmosphere – climate change) as well as weather forecasting