challenging cases &difficult decision making issues in
TRANSCRIPT
CHALLENGING CASES &DIFFICULT DECISION MAKING ISSUES IN MICUby dr,mahmoud almahjob TMC TRIPOLI LIBYA
38years old female G5P4 transferred from remote local hospital in southern region post 2days of admission with h/o acute dyspnea & headache ,high reading of BP
and fits ,emergency c/s done there . Her clinical back ground significant for chron,s disease
also she suffered from sever hyper emesis gravid arum during current pregnancy
on arrival she was under weight of average , incubated and mechanically ventilated where the anesthesia team failed to extubate her post c/s cz her oxygen demand was high fo2/po2 was 250, so2 92% zero spontaneous breaths eye opened fixed dilated pupils
Corneal reflex absent BP 100/60 pulse 100 T37.8asculatory findings reveal to coarse crackles Rt side
mainly, pan diastolic murmur
neurological assessment revealed depressed peripheral reflexes
wbcs 13 mainly neutrophils urea 10 creat 0.2 urine analysis revealed acetone ++ no pus cells other biochemical investigation ok
ct chest revealed ground appearance with bilateral infiltration more at RT side .
DIFFICULT DECISIONS
-Do we consider this patient brain death ?
-Should we start antibiotic for her?
Brain death
Don’t make threshold too low (local guide lines important)
Fixed dilated pupils and absence of spontaneous breathing ≠BDYou should exculde mimic conditions(E2H2MD)
Electrolytes disturbance Encephalopathy(thiamine defiecency,hepaticencphalopathy)
Hypotension HypothermiaMetabolic derangement mgnesium
Drugs(adequate reverse doses )
MRI
Should we start AB?Don’t be hurry it might be false impression for
VAP
CPIS SCOREIC IT IS YOUR GUIDE FOR START&STOP ANTIBIOTICS FEVER ALONE MEANS NOTHING PURLENT SECRETION IN FEBRILE PATIENT MEANS NO THING
LEUKOCYTOSIS WITH FEVER ALSO MEAN NO THING IT SHOULD BE PACKGE
Even In the setting of ARDS, Bell et al. reported a false-negative rate of 46% for the clinical diagnosis of VAP
CPIS of >6 had a sensitivity of 93% and a specificity of 100% Pugin J, Auckenthaler R, Mili N,
Janssens JP, Lew PD, Suter PM
2nd case 34 ys old female 7th day post admission to MICU as a case of
mysthenic crisis her clinical background was significant for hypothyroidism on levothyroxine 100 microgramronic chronic use of steroid& immuran h/o ICU admission 3months back for
more than a week for same reason . her MICU admission was significant for reintubation duo to ETT
blockage with thick secretion ,also she become febrile one day before 39c . Recently, her MV sitting changed to ward increase FO2 because she became desaturated
O/E generally ill SOFA score 4 distressed conscious communicating with staff by writing on blank paper febrile 39 bp 100/60 with out ionotrope support edematous
her investigation showed that her WBCS count was high 14,000 mainly neutrophil urea 70 creat 0.3 Na 135 k 3.0 mg 1.2 s.albumin 1.5
LFT ok, TFT subnormal for all values CXR bilateral infiltration
Is she case of VAP
How we suspect vap an inflammatory response
indicators(fever wbcs counts) in >48hrs intubated patient with evedinces of
purlent secresion , new ascultatory findings , new/or progressive radiological chest infiltrations
Misleading findings
heamoptysis localized or generalized
new onset ronchi apparently normal x ray
IS IT CASE OF MDRWHICH AB SHOULD WE
STARTHOW MANY THEY ARE
HOW LONGSHOULDWEKEEPTHEM
WHAT ABOUT IF THERE IS NO IMPROVEMENT
???
Difficulty of dicesion
Unnecessaryantibiotics and adverse patient outcomes and
increased cost
Appropriate initial antibiotic while improving patient outcomes and heathcare
A Balancing Act
Choice of antibiotic
microorganism
host
antibiotics
1.MICRORGANISMS Usual sensitivity pattern
STREPTO COCCusSTAPHILOCOCCIMS
NONESBL GNB ..…ATYPICALBACTERIA
MULTI DRUG RESISTANCE BUGSEnterococcusS. aureusKlebsiella spp.AcinetobacterP. aeruginosaEnterobacter spp.
HOW WE CAN SUSPECT THE BUGS
RISK STRATIFICATION POLICY•overgeneralization to consider all HCAP ,VAP patients at increased risk for
MDR
•Recent hospitalization of at least 48 hours during the preceding 90 days – 4 points Residence in a nursing home – 3 points
•Chronic hemodialysis – 2 points •Critical illness – 1 point
•median score 4 significant for MDR
How the figure looks
like in our unit
Bacterial Pathogens that Isolated from 224 sputum samples (86% infected) in MICU,
2014
Candida sputum postive = psedomonas
ICU PATIENT ≠ WORD PATEINTHyperdynemic /hypoprfusion status
multiorgan failure antibiotic toxicity
hypoalbumenic plasma v/d
serious drug drug interactions warfarin –clarithromycin ampicillin septrin
serious disease drug interactions quinolones- arrhythmiasmyasthenia - amino glycosides& macrolides
Accurate weight adjustment (actual ,dry , leaner .TBW& adjusted BW) BWtGENTAMICIN..TBW
IN OBESE PATEINTS USE ADJUSTED BW 0.4(TBW-LBW)IN DIALYSIS PATEINTS USE DRY WIGHT
2 .HOST
MIC IS SOME THING YOU HAVE TO Clarify FROM C/S REPORT
high MIC for CABIMENEM vs CARBIMEM resistance even break point not exceeded
Pseudomonas isolated vs appropriate dosage should used\
carbapenemase-producing strains vs amino glycosides and fluoroquinolones β-lactams is time-dependent killing activity, (drug conc. exceeds the MIC value)
aminoglycoside dose depended killing activity
Resistance can be emerge during antibiotic therapy don’t prescribe amino glycosides > 5 days and don't give them alone
CONSOLIDATIN DOSE
EXSTENDED INFUSION
3 .ANTIBIOTIC .pharmacology
.Antibiogram
PK/PD IMPORTANCE
1 )Concentration dependent killing activity and moderate to prolonged persistent effects (Cmax/MIC, AUC/MIC)
AminoglycosidesFluoroquinolones
MetronidazoleColistin
RifampicinClindamycin
2 )Time dependent killing activity and minimal persistent effects (T>MIC)
Beta lactamsLinezolid
3 )Time dependent killing activity and moderate to prolonged persistent effects (AUC/MIC)
TetracyclinesVancomycin
Antimicobial characteristics related to pK/pD behaviour involving new forms of administration
GENTAMICIN CONSILDATION DOSE 7mg/kg over 2hrs once 24-48hrs
PD of gentamicin post antibiotic effect 3hrs
concentration dependent killing Effect /Nephroprotection?
(uptake by proximal tubules more with low intermittent doses)more bacterio cidal effect cz high conc).
don’t use in prolonged immunotherapy cc<40 with lasix CNS infection
GENTAMICIN LOADING DOSE REGIRME
LOADING DOSE SITE OF INFECTION TARGET PEAK CONCENTRATION
0.6 TO 1.2 mg/kg INFECTIVE ENDOCARDITIS SYNERGYSTC FOR BETALACTAMS
4 MICRO/ML
3 mg/kg SEVER GRAM NEGATIVE PNEUMONIA OR LIFETHREATNING INFECTION IN CRITICLLY ILL PATIENTS
9 micro/ml
LOCAL ANTIBIOGRAM
Antibiotic susceptibility of 37 Acinetobacter baumannii isolated from Sputum samples,
MICU-2014
Levofl
oxaci
n
Nitrofua
rntoin
Tobra
mycin
Ceftazi
dim
Ciprofl
oxaci
n
Pipera
cillin
Gentam
icinSe
ptrin
Ampi/
Sulba
ctam
Ceftria
xone
Cefazol
in
Cefoxit
in
Ampic
illin
Cefepim
e0%10%20%30%40%50%60%70%80%90%100%
Sensitive Intermediate Resistant
Antibiotic susceptibility of 11 Acinetobacter baumannii that isolated from 19 ETT
samples, MICU-2014
Ampicillin
Cefoxit
in
Cefazo
lin
Ceftria
xone
Ampi/Sulba..
.
Septri
n
Genta
micin
Piperac
illin
Ciproflox
acin
Ceftaz
idim
Tobr
amyc
in
Nitrof
uarn...
Levo
floxac
in
Merop
enem
0102030405060708090100
Sensitive Intermediate Resistant
Antibiotic susceptibility of 39 Klebsiella pneumoniae (ESBL) isolated from sputum
samples, MICU-2014
Levofl
oxaci
n
Nitrofua
rntoin
Tobra
mycin
Ceftazi
dim
Ciprofl
oxaci
n
Pipera
cillin
Gentam
icinSe
ptrin
Ampi/
Sulba
...
Ceftria
xone
Cefazol
in
Cefoxit
in
Ampic
illin
Cefepim
e
Amika
cin
Merope
nem
Imipe
nem
Augm
antin
Ertap
enem
0102030405060708090100
Sensitive Intermediate
Antibiotic susceptibility of 25 Pseudomonas aeruginosa (ESBL) isolated from Sputum
samples, MICU-2014
0%10%20%30%40%50%60%70%80%90%100%
Sensitive Intermediate Resistant
Antibiotic susceptibility of 7 Staph aureus (MRSA) that isolated from sputum samples,
MICU-2014
Vanco
mycin
Pencil
lin
Muppirocin
Teico
planin
Tetra
cycli
ne
Fusid
ic ac
id
Tigyc
yclin
e
Moxiflox
acin
Clindam
ycin
linez
olid
Oxacil
lin
Eryth
romyc
in
Fosfo
mycin
Rifampin
Levo
floxac
in
Nitrofu
rantio
n
Tobra
mycin
Genta
micin
Septri
n0102030405060708090100
Sensitive IntermediateResistant
LOOKS LIKE BAD NEWS BUT ALWAYS THERE IS SOMTHIG GOOD
We have carbemenem
resistant acitenobacter
We have other ESCAPE
carbimenem sensitive
So let we start with the sensitive and wait the resistance
PROTOCOL for deep discussion
Suspected HAP/VAP
CPIS score>6MDR risk4
SOFA/ABACHEIIIMIPENEM
/-+AMIKACI
NCPISREVIEW 2-3 DAY
ADD VANCOMYCINfor
MRSA
ADD COLICITIN
For acitenobacter
OR BOTH
IMPROVMENT
Descalate by c/s for 8 days
Difficult decision/both for
more hop full patients
miniBAL/direct BAL
Consider AB rotation
(meronam/cipro)
MRSA/RISK FACT.
THERAPEUTIC FALIURE
NO IMPROVEMENT
C/S +VE
C/S -VE
OTHER DIGNOSIS/OTHER
ATYPICAL ORGANISM
ORGANISM AB
HOST
Therapeutic failure, definition and causes
summary
Proper LRTS (QUNTITIVE PAL mini PAL
MDRM risk stratification Local resistance AntibiogramOnset of VAP development 5d cutoff pointCPIS score monitoring post 84 to 72 hrs
&C/S profile report
Strategies to optimize the use of antimicrobials in the ICU
1 )De-escalation therapy
2 )Antibacterial cycling
3 )Pre-emptive therapy
4 )Use of pharmacokinetic/pharmacodynamic parameters for dose adjustment
The scheduled rotation of one class of antibacterial
One or more different classes with comparable spectra of activity
Different mechanisms of resistance
Some weeks and a few months
ObjectiveReduce the appearance of resistances by replacing
the antibacterial before they occur and preserving its activity to be re-introduced in the hospital in a
later cycle
Antibacterial cycling
THANK YOU TMCU MICU
21thSept 2015mahmoud
almahjoob
Other diagnoses includeNONINFECTIOUS)
atelectasis ,congestive heart failure ,
venous thromboembolic disease ,pancreatitis ,
chemical pneumonitis from aspiration ,proliferative phase of acute respiratory distress
syndrome, drug fever, or pulmonary hemorrhage
(infectious) but not VAP .empyema, lung abscess,
Clostridium difficile colitis, urinary tract infection, and sinusitis