ch13
DESCRIPTION
TRANSCRIPT
Personality Characteristics
Chapter 13
Individual Differences In Happiness, Arousal, And Control
Why do different people have different
motivational and emotional states even in the same situation?
Happiness
Emotional Set Point
Extraversion and Happiness
Greater Venturesomene
ss (than introverts)
Greater Sociability
(than introverts)
Figure 13.2 Components of Extraversion
Neuroticism and Happiness
AROUSAL
Arousal’s Contribution to Motivation
1. A person’s arousal level is mostly a function of how stimulating the environment is.
2. People engage in behavior to increase or decrease their level of arousal.
3.
When underaroused, people seek out opportunities to increase their arousal levels, because increases in environmental stimulation are pleasurable and enhance performance whereas decreases are aversive and undermine performance.
4.
When overaroused, people seek out opportunities to decrease their arousal levels, because increases in environmental stimulation are aversive and undermine performance whereas decreases are pleasurable and enhance performance.
Performance and Emotion
Insufficient Stimulation and Underarousal
Excessive Stimulation and Overarousal
Human beings harbor motives for counteracting excessive stimulation and overarousal.
Overstimulating, Stressful Environments
Physiological Disruption
Sympathetic, Nervous system,
Hyperactivity
Cognitive Disruption
Confusion, Forgetfulness,
Impaired Concentration
Emotional Disruption
Anxiety, Irritability,
Anger
CRITICISM Of The Inverted-u Hypothesis
Neiss’s Criticism
The inverted-U hypothesis is descriptive rather than explanatory (it stops short of explaining HOW arousal facilitates or impairs performance.
Inverted-U hypothesis applies only when arousal levels are extreme (sensory deprivation studies)- does not apply to everyday affairs in which arousal level changes very little
Sensation Seeking
Sensation Seeking
Search for New Experiences• Sensation seekers continually search for novel experiences.
Risk Taking
• Sensation seekers see sensations and experiences being worth physical, social, legal, or financial risks.
Biological Basis
• Sensation seekers have low levels of monoamine oxidase (MAO).
• Sensation seekers tend to have relatively high levels of dopamine; hence, their biochemistry favors approach over inhibition.
• Sensation seekers tend to have relatively low levels of serotonin; hence, their biochemistry fails to inhibit them from risks and new experiences.
Affect Intensity
Affect-stable individuals
Affect-intense individuals
Figure 13.5 Daily Mood Reports Graphed Over 80 Consecutive Days
Affect Intensity
Figure 13.6 Affective Reactions to Good and Bad Events by Affect-Intense and Affect-Stable Individuals
Control
Perceived Control
In order to perceive that one has control over a given situation…
1. The self must be capable of obtaining the available desired outcome
2. The situation in which one attempts to exercise control needs to be at least somewhat predictable and responsive.
Perceived Control
Perceived Control Beliefs
High Perceived Control
vs.Low Perceived
Control
• Goal setting
• Task choice
• Effort
• Concentration
• Persistence in the face of difficulty
• Positive emotional states
• Problem-solving strategies
• Performance
High Perceived Control A person with high perceived control
Initiates actionExerts effortFocuses concentrationPersists in the face of difficultyDuring performance- keeps plans and strategies in
mind, maintains positive emotional state, monitors problem solving strategies, and generates and monitors feedback
Leads to strong performance and makes control over outcomes possible
Low Perceived Control A person with low perceived control
Seeks out relatively easy tasksSets lower and vaguer goalsGenerates simple plans with fewer fall back strategiesConcentration wandersConfidence is quick to dropAttention often turns to ruminating over why the task is
so difficultAs effort decreases, cognitive and emotional
engagements decline, and discouragement sets in- performance will suffer
Self-Confirming of High and Low Engagement
Aspiration Level
Response to Challenge
PersistenceAttributions for Success and Failure
High DC compared with Low DC
Select harder tasks; set goals more realistically
React with greater effort
Work at difficult task longer
More likely to attribute success to self and failure to unstable source
High DC Benefit
Higher goals are achieved
Difficult tasks are completed
Difficult tasks are completed
Motivation level remains high
High DC Liability
May attempt goals too difficult
May develop performance-inhibiting reactions
May invest too much effort
May develop an illusion of control
Desire for Control
Figure 13.7 Influence of Desire for Control during Achievement-Related Performance (Burger, 1985)
Losing Control High DC individuals exhibit distress, anxiety,
depression, dominance, and assertive coping in situations where their control is threatened or lost
Ex. Visiting the Dentist, Crowding