ch13 economic challenges. unemployment frictional unemployment – looking for new work seasonal...

26
Ch13 Economic Challenges

Upload: lorraine-robbins

Post on 31-Dec-2015

229 views

Category:

Documents


0 download

TRANSCRIPT

Ch13 Economic Challenges

Unemployment

• Frictional Unemployment – Looking for new work

• Seasonal Unemployment – Farm work, Holiday Seasons

• Structural Unemployment – Changing workplace

• Cyclical Unemployment – Business Cycles

• Underemployed – More qualified than job requires

• Discouraged workers

Inflation

• Inflation is the general increase in prices over time

• Inflation vs. Purchasing Power – How much do you get?

• Inflation is usually measured by looking at groups of common goods in a price index

Causes of Inflation

• Quantity Theory – Too much money in the supply

• Demand-Pull Theory – Demand for goods exceeds supply

• Cost-Push Theory – Costs for making goods increases

Wage–Price Spiral – The wage price spiral is where wages increase, causing increased demand, causing prices to go up, leading to a need for higher wages, etc.

Short-Run Trade-Off between Inflation and Unemployment

• Unemployment and Inflation– Society faces a short-run tradeoff between unemployment

and inflation.

– If policymakers expand aggregate demand, they can lower unemployment, but only at the cost of higher inflation.

– If they contract aggregate demand, they can lower inflation, but at the cost of temporarily higher unemployment.

– The Phillips Curve shows the short-run trade off between inflation and unemployment.

The Phillips Curve

UnemploymentRate (percent)

0

InflationRate

(percentper year)

Phillips curve

4

B6

7

A2

How the Phillips Curve is Related to Aggregate Demand

and Aggregate Supply

Quantityof Output

0

Short-runaggregate

supply

(a) The Model of Aggregate Demand and Aggregate Supply

UnemploymentRate (percent)

0

InflationRate

(percentper year)

PriceLevel

(b) The Phillips Curve

Phillips curveLow aggregate

demand

Highaggregate demand

(output is8,000)

B

4

6

(output is7,500)

A

7

2

8,000(unemployment

is 4%)

106 B

(unemploymentis 7%)

7,500

102 A

An Adverse Shock to Aggregate Supply

Quantityof Output

0

PriceLevel

Aggregatedemand

(a) The Model of Aggregate Demand and Aggregate Supply

UnemploymentRate

0

InflationRate

(b) The Phillips Curve

3. . . . andraises the price level . . .

AS2 Aggregatesupply, AS

A

1. An adverseshift in aggregate supply . . .

4. . . . giving policymakers a less favorable tradeoffbetween unemploymentand inflation.

BP2

Y2

PA

Y

Phillips curve, PC

2. . . . lowers output . . .

PC2

B

Disinflationary Monetary Policy in the Short Run and the Long

Run

UnemploymentRate

0 Natural rate ofunemployment

InflationRate

Long-runPhillips curve

Short-run Phillips curvewith high expected

inflation

Short-run Phillips curvewith low expected

inflation

1. Contractionary policy movesthe economy down along the short-run Phillips curve . . .

2. . . . but in the long run, expectedinflation falls, and the short-run Phillips curve shifts to the left.

BC

A

The Long-Run Phillips Curve

UnemploymentRate

0 Natural rate ofunemployment

InflationRate Long-run

Phillips curve

BHighinflation

Lowinflation

A

2. . . . but unemploymentremains at its natural ratein the long run.

1. When the Fed increases the growth rate of the money supply, the rate of inflation increases . . .

How the Phillips Curve is Related to Aggregate Demand and Aggregate Supply

Quantityof Output

Natural rateof output

Natural rate ofunemployment

0

PriceLevel

P

Aggregatedemand, AD

Long-run aggregatesupply

Long-run Phillipscurve

(a) The Model of Aggregate Demand and Aggregate Supply

UnemploymentRate

0

InflationRate

(b) The Phillips Curve

2. . . . raisesthe pricelevel . . .

1. An increase in the money supplyincreases aggregatedemand . . .

AAD2

B

A

4. . . . but leaves output and unemploymentat their natural rates.

3. . . . andincreases theinflation rate . . .

P2B

SHIFTS IN THE PHILLIPS CURVE: THE ROLE OF SUPPLY SHOCKS

• Historical events have shown that the short-run Phillips curve can shift due to changes in expectations.

• The short-run Phillips curve also shifts because of shocks to aggregate supply. – Major adverse changes in aggregate supply can worsen the

short-run trade-off between unemployment and inflation.

– An adverse supply shock gives policymakers a less favorable trade-off between inflation and unemployment.

The Phillips Curve in the 1960s

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 100

2

4

6

8

10

UnemploymentRate (percent)

Inflation Rate(percent per year)

1968

1966

19611962

1963

1967

19651964

The Breakdown of the Phillips Curve

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 100

2

4

6

8

10

UnemploymentRate (percent)

Inflation Rate(percent per year)

1973

1966

1972

1971

19611962

1963

1967

19681969 1970

19651964

The Supply Shocks of the 1970s

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 100

2

4

6

8

10

UnemploymentRate (percent)

Inflation Rate(percent per year)

1972

19751981

1976

1978

1979

1980

1973

1974

1977

The Volcker Disinflation

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 100

2

4

6

8

10

UnemploymentRate (percent)

Inflation Rate(percent per year)

1980 1981

1982

1984

1986

1985

1979A

1983B

1987

C

The Greenspan Era

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 100

2

4

6

8

10

UnemploymentRate (percent)

Inflation Rate(percent per year)

19841991

1985

19921986

19931994

198819871995

199620021998

1999

20002001

19891990

1997

Poverty

• The poverty threshold is the income level needed to support a families minimum needs

• Family of 4 (2 adults, 2 children) $18,850/yr (2004)

• Poverty depends on family size and location

Reasons for poverty• Lack of education• Location• Racial and Gender Discrimination• Economic Shifts• Family Problems• Health• Greed

Income Distribution

• In 2003, median family income was $43,318 (half earned more, half less)

• The Lorenz Curve shows that the wealthiest 20% made as much as the other 80% of Americans

• The GDP (Gross Domestic Product) of the poorest 48 nations (i.e. a quarter of the world’s countries) is less than the wealth of the world’s three richest people combined.

• In the 1970, the top 1% made less than 9% of all income, in 2007, the top 1% took in more than 27% of all income

Welfare Reform• Many poor receive Federal Aid, in the form of housing subsidies,

food stamps, direct cash payments, and health related services. In 1996, welfare reform was enacted because there was a growing perception that the poor were living off of the state, creating a tax burden for everyone else. This welfare reform reduced payments, and gave some training assistance, to get people into the work force.

End