ch06mgmt1362002

Upload: kailash365

Post on 06-Apr-2018

217 views

Category:

Documents


0 download

TRANSCRIPT

  • 8/3/2019 CH06MGMT1362002

    1/32

    FACTOR MODELS(Chapter 6)

    Markowitz Model

    Employment of Factor Models

    Essence of the Single-Factor Model

    The Characteristic Line

    Expected Return in the Single-Factor Model

    Single-Factor Models Simplified Formula for

    Portfolio Variance

    Explained Versus Unexplained Variance

    Multi-Factor Models

    Models for Estimating Expected Return

  • 8/3/2019 CH06MGMT1362002

    2/32

    Markowitz Model

    Problem: Tremendous data requirement.

    Number of security variances needed = M.

    Number of covariances needed = (M2 - M)/2

    Total = M + (M2 - M)/2

    Example: (100 securities)

    100 + (10,000 - 100)/2 = 5,050

    Therefore, in order for modern portfolio theory to be usable forlarge numbers of securities, the process had to be simplified.

    (Years ago, computing capabilities were minimal)

    -

    !

    ! !

    )(r......)r,Cov(r

    ....

    ....

    )r,Cov(r...)(r)r,Cov(r

    )r,Cov(r...)r,Cov(r)(r

    )r,Cov(rxx)(r

    M2

    1M

    M222

    12

    M12112

    M

    1j

    M

    1kkjkjp

    2

  • 8/3/2019 CH06MGMT1362002

    3/32

    Employment of Factor Models

    To generate the efficient set, we need estimates ofexpected return and the covariances between the

    securities in the available population. Factor models

    may be used in this regard.

    Risk Factors (rate of inflation, growth in industrial

    production, and other variables that induce stock prices

    to go up and down.)

    May be used toevaluate covariances ofreturn between

    securities.

    Expected Return Factors (firm size, liquidity, etc.)May be used toevaluateexpectedreturns ofthe securities.

    In the discussion that follows, we first focus on risk

    factor models. Then the discussion shifts to factors

    affecting expected security returns.

  • 8/3/2019 CH06MGMT1362002

    4/32

    Essence of the Single-Factor Model

    Fluctuations in the return of a security relative to that ofanother (i.e., the correlation between the two) do not depend

    upon the individual characteristics of the two securities.

    Instead, relationships (covariances) between securities occur

    because of their individual relationships with the overall

    market (i.e., covariance with the market).

    IfStock (A) is positively correlated with the market, and if

    Stock (B) is positively correlated with the market, then Stocks

    (A) and (B) will be positively correlated with each other.

    Given the assumption that covariances between securitiescan be accounted for by the pull of a single common factor

    (the market), the covariance between any two stocks can be

    written as:)(r)r,Cov(r M

    2kjkj !

  • 8/3/2019 CH06MGMT1362002

    5/32

    The Characteristic Line(See Chapter 3 for a Review of the Statistics)

    Relationship between the returns on an individualsecurity and the returns on the market portfolio:

    Aj = intercept of the characteristic line (the expectedrate of return on stock (j) should the market happen

    to produce a zero rate of return in any given period).

    Fj

    = beta of stock (j); the slope of the characteristic

    line.

    Ij,t = residual of stock (j) during period (t); the vertical

    distance from the characteristic line.

    (t)periodduring(j)stockonreturnofratetheisr

    rAr

    tj,

    tj,tM,jjtj, !

  • 8/3/2019 CH06MGMT1362002

    6/32

    Graphical Display of the Characteristic

    Line

    0

    0.1

    0.2

    0.3

    0.4

    0 0.2 0.4 0.6

    rj,t

    rM,t

    = Fj

    Aj

  • 8/3/2019 CH06MGMT1362002

    7/32

    The Characteristic Line (Continued)

    Note: A stocks return can be broken down into twoparts:

    Movement along the characteristic line (changes

    in the stocks returns caused by changes in the

    markets returns).

    Deviations from the characteristic line (changes in

    the stocks returns caused by events unique to the

    individual stock).

    Movement along the line: Aj + FjrM,t

    Deviation from the line: Ij,t

    tj,tM,jjtj, rAr !

  • 8/3/2019 CH06MGMT1362002

    8/32

    Major Assumption of the Single-Factor Model

    There is no relationship between the residuals of one

    stock and the residuals of another stock (i.e., thecovariance between the residuals of every pair of

    stocks is zero).0),Cov( kj !

    -10

    0

    10

    -10 0 10 20

    Stock js Residuals (%)

    Stock ks Residuals (%)

  • 8/3/2019 CH06MGMT1362002

    9/32

    Expected Return in the Single-Factor Model

    Actual Returns:

    Expected Residual:Given the characteristic line is truly the line of best

    fit, the sum of the residuals would be equal to zero

    Therefore, the expected value of the residual for

    any given period would also be equal to zero:

    Expected Returns:

    Given the characteristic line, and an expected

    residual of zero, the expected return of a security

    according to the single-factor model would be:

    tj,tM,jjtj, rAr !

    0

    n

    1t

    tj, !!

    0)E(j !

    )E(rA)E(rMjjj

    !

  • 8/3/2019 CH06MGMT1362002

    10/32

    Single-Factor Models Simplified Formula for

    Portfolio VarianceVarianceofan IndividualSecurity:

    Given:

    It Follows That:

    !

    !

    n

    1i

    2jij,ij

    2 )]E(r[rh)(r

    )E(rA)E(r

    rAr

    Mjjj

    ij,iM,jjij,

    !

    !

    !!

    !

    !

    n

    1i

    2ij,iij,MiM,

    n

    1i

    ij

    n

    1=i

    2MiM,i

    2j

    n

    1=i

    2ij,ij,MiM,j

    2MiM,

    2ji

    n

    1=i

    2ij,MiM,ji

    2Mjj

    n

    1i

    ij,iM,jjij2

    h)]E(r[rh2)]E(r[rh=

    ))]E(r[r2)]E(r[r(h=

    ))]E(r[r(h=

    )])E(rA[]r([Ah)(r

  • 8/3/2019 CH06MGMT1362002

    11/32

    Note:

    Therefore:

    3)Chapter(SeeVarianceResidual)(h

    .regressionsimpleinlinefitbest

    theforzerotoequalis),Cov(rSince

    0=

    ),Cov(r2=

    0)E(Since

    )]E()][E(r[rh2)]E(r[rh2

    )(r)]E(r[rh

    j2

    n

    1i

    2ij,i

    jM

    jMj

    j

    jij,MiM,

    n

    1i

    ijij,MiM,

    n

    1i

    ij

    n

    1=i

    M22

    j2

    MiM,i2j

    !!

    !

    !

    !

    !

    !!

    )()(r)(r j2

    M22

    jj2

    !

  • 8/3/2019 CH06MGMT1362002

    12/32

  • 8/3/2019 CH06MGMT1362002

    13/32

    Explained Vs. Unexplained Variance

    (Systematic Vs. Unsystematic Risk)

    Total Risk = Systematic Risk + UnsystematicRisk

    Systematic: That part of total variance which

    is explained by the variance in the markets

    returns.

    Unsystematic: The unexplained variance, orthat part of total variance which is due to the

    stocks unique characteristics.

    )()(r)(r j2

    M22

    jj2

    !

  • 8/3/2019 CH06MGMT1362002

    14/32

    Note:

    [i.e., Fj2W2(rM) is equal to the coefficient of

    determination (the % of the variance in the securitys

    returns explained by the variance in the marketsreturns) times the securitys total variance]

    Total Variance = Explained + Unexplained

    As the number of stocks in a portfolio increases, the

    residual variance becomes smaller, and the

    coefficient of determination becomes larger.

    )(r)(r

    )(r)(r:Therefore

    )(r

    )(r

    )(r

    )(r)(r

    )(r

    )r,Cov(r

    j22

    Mj,M22

    j

    jMj,Mj

    M

    jMj,

    M2

    MjMj,

    M2

    Mjj

    !

    !

    !!!

    )()(r=

    )()(r)(r

    p2p22 Mp,

    p2

    M22

    pp2

    !

  • 8/3/2019 CH06MGMT1362002

    15/32

    Explained Vs. Unexplained Variance

    (A Graphical Display)

    0

    2

    4

    6

    8

    10

    1 5 9 13 17

    0

    0.2

    0.4

    0.6

    0.8

    1

    1.2

    1 5 9 13 17

    ResidualVariance

    NumberofStocks

    Coefficient ofDetermination

    NumberofStocks

  • 8/3/2019 CH06MGMT1362002

    16/32

    Explained Vs. Unexplained Variance

    (A Two Stock Portfolio Example)

    -

    -

    )(),Cov(),Cov()(

    )(r)(r)(r)(r

    B2

    AB

    BAA

    2

    M22

    BM2

    AB

    M

    2

    BAM

    22

    A

    Covariance Matrix for

    Explained Variance

    Covariance Matrix for

    Unexplained Variance

    0),Cov( mingAssu

    VariancedUnexplaine)(x)(x+

    VarianceExplained

    )(rxx2)(rx)(rx)(r

    BA

    B

    22

    BA

    22

    A

    M2

    BABAM22

    B2BM

    22A

    2Ap

    2

    !

    !

  • 8/3/2019 CH06MGMT1362002

    17/32

    Explained Vs. Unexplained Variance (A Two

    Stock Portfolio Example) Continued

    .overstatedbewillvarianceresidual0,),Cov(If

    .dunderstatebewillvarianceresidual0,),Cov(If

    )()(r=

    )(x)(rx=

    dUnexplaineExplained

    )(x)(r)x(x)(r

    BA

    BA

    p2

    M22

    p

    j2

    m

    1=j

    2jM

    2

    2m

    1=j

    jj

    j2m

    1j

    2jM

    22BBAAp

    2

    "

    -

    !

    !

  • 8/3/2019 CH06MGMT1362002

    18/32

    A Note on Residual Variance

    The Single-Factor Model assumes zero correlationbetween residuals:

    In this case, portfolio residual variance is expressed

    as:

    In reality, firms residuals may be correlated with

    each other. That is, extra-market events may impact

    on many firms, and:

    In this case, portfolio residual variance would be:

    0),Cov( kj !

    !!

    m

    1j

    j22

    jp2 )(x)(

    0),Cov( kj {

    ! !!

    !

    m

    1j

    m

    1jk

    kjkj

    m

    1j

    j22

    jp2 ),Cov( xx2)(x)(

  • 8/3/2019 CH06MGMT1362002

    19/32

    Markowitz Model Versus the Single-Factor Model

    (A Summaryof the Data Requirements)

    Markowitz Model

    Number of security variances = m

    Number of covariances = (m2 - m)/2

    Total = m + (m2 - m)/2

    Example - 100 securities:

    100 + (10,000 - 100)/2 = 5,050

    Single-Factor Model

    Number of betas = m

    Number of residual variances = mPlus one estimate ofW2(rM)

    Total = 2m + 1

    Example - 100 securities:

    2(100) + 1 = 201

  • 8/3/2019 CH06MGMT1362002

    20/32

    Multi-Factor Models

    Recall the Single-Factor Models formula for portfolio

    variance:

    If there is positive covariance between the residuals

    of stocks, residual variance would be high and thecoefficient of determination would be low. In this

    case, a multi-factor model may be necessary in order

    to reduce residual variance.

    A Two Factor ModelExample

    where: rg = growth rate in industrial production

    rI = % change in an inflation index

    )()(r=

    )()(r)(r

    p2

    p22

    Mp,

    p2

    M22

    pp2

    !

    tj,tI,jI,tg,jg,jtj, rrAr !

  • 8/3/2019 CH06MGMT1362002

    21/32

    Two Factor Model Example - Continued

    Once again, it is assumed that the covariance

    between the residuals of the the individual stocks areequal to zero:

    Furthermore, the following covariances are also

    presumed:

    Portfolio Variance in a Two Factor Model:

    0),Cov( kj !

    0)r,Cov(r

    0),Cov(r

    0),Cov(r

    Ig

    jI

    jg

    !

    !

    !

    )()(r)(r)(r p2

    I22

    pI,g22

    pg,p2 !

  • 8/3/2019 CH06MGMT1362002

    22/32

    where:

    Note that if the covariances between the residuals ofthe individual securities are still significantly different

    from zero, you may need to develop a different model

    (perhaps a three, four, or five factor model).

    0),Cov( Assuming

    )(x)(

    x

    x

    kj

    j2

    m

    1j

    2jp

    2

    jI,

    m

    1j

    jpI,

    jg,

    m

    1j

    jpg,

    !

    !

    !

    !

    !

    !

    !

  • 8/3/2019 CH06MGMT1362002

    23/32

    Note on the Assumption Cov(rg,rI ) = 0

    Ifthe Cov(rg,rI) is not equal to zero, the twofactormodelbecomes a bit more complex. In general,fora twofactormodel, the systematic risk ofaportfolio can be computed using thefollowingcovariancematrix:

    To simplify matters, we will assume that thefactors in a multi-factormodel are uncorrelated

    with each other.

    -

    W

    W

    )Ir(2

    )Ir,gCov(r)gr(2Fg,p

    FI,p

    Fg,p

    FI,p

    )Ir,gr(Covp,Ip,g2)Ir(22

    p,I)gr(

    22p,g)pr(

    2 FFWFWF!W

  • 8/3/2019 CH06MGMT1362002

    24/32

    Models for Estimating Expected Return

    One Simplistic Approach

    Use past returns to predict expected futurereturns. Perhaps useful as a starting point.

    Evidence indicates, however, that the future

    frequently differs from the past. Therefore,

    subjective adjustments to past patterns of returns

    are required.

    Systematic Risk Models

    One FactorSystematic Risk Model:

    Given a firms estimated characteristic line and an

    estimate of the future return on the market, the

    securitys expected return can be calculated.

    )E(rA)E(r Mjjj !

  • 8/3/2019 CH06MGMT1362002

    25/32

    Models forEstimatingExpected Return

    (Continued)

    Two FactorS

    ystematic Risk Model:

    N FactorSystematic Risk Model:

    Other Factors That MayBe Used in Predicting

    Expected Return

    Note that the author discusses numerous factors

    in the text that may affect expected return. Areview of the literature, however, will reveal that

    this subject is indeed controversial. In essence,

    you can spend the rest of your lives trying to

    determine the best factors to use. The following

    summarizes some of the evidence.

    )E(r)E(rA)E(r 2j2,1j1,jj !

    )E(r+...)E(r)E(rA)E(r NjN,2j2,1j1,jj !

  • 8/3/2019 CH06MGMT1362002

    26/32

    Other Factors That May Be Used in Predicting

    Expected Return

    Liquidity (e.g.,bid-asked spread)

    Negatively related to return [e.g., Low liquiditystocks (high bid-asked spreads) should provide

    higher returns to compensate investors for the

    additional risk involved.]

    ValueStock Versus Growth StockP/E Ratios

    Low P/E stocks (value stocks) tend to

    outperform high P/E stocks (growth stocks).

    Price/(Book Value) Low Price/(Book Value) stocks (value stocks)

    tend to outperform high Price/(Book Value)

    stocks (growth stocks).

  • 8/3/2019 CH06MGMT1362002

    27/32

    Other Factors That May Be Used in Predicting Expected

    Return(continued)

    TechnicalAnalysisAnalyze past patterns of market data (e.g., pricechanges) in order to predict future patterns ofmarket data. Volumes have been written on thissubject.

    Size EffectReturns on small stocks (small market value) tendto be superior to returns on large stocks. Note:Small NYSE stocks tend to outperform smallNASDAQ stocks.

    January Effect

    Abnormally high returns tend to be earned(especially on small stocks) during the month ofJanuary.

  • 8/3/2019 CH06MGMT1362002

    28/32

    Other Factors That May Be Used in Predicting Expected

    Return(continued)

    And the List Goes On

    If you are truly interested in factors that

    affect expected return, spend time in the

    library reading articles in Financial Analysts

    Journal, Journal of Portfolio Management,

    and numerous other academic journals.

    This could be an ongoing venture the rest

    of your life.

  • 8/3/2019 CH06MGMT1362002

    29/32

    Building a Multi-FactorExpected Return Model:

    One Possible Approach

    Estimate the historical relationship between returnand chosen variables. Then use this relationship to

    predict future returns.

    Historical Relationship:

    Future Estimate:

    ...(Beta)a+Size)(FirmaRatio)(P/Eaar

    1t3

    1t21t10t

    !

    ...(Beta)a+

    Size)(FirmaRatio)(P/Eaar

    t3

    t2t101t

    !

  • 8/3/2019 CH06MGMT1362002

    30/32

    Using the Markowitz and Factor Models

    to Make Asset Allocation Decisions

    Asset Allocation Decisions

    Portfoliooptimization is widely

    employed to allocatemoney between

    themajorclasses of investments: Large capitalization domestic stocks

    Small capitalization domestic stocks

    Domestic bonds

    International stocks

    Internationalbonds

    Realestate

  • 8/3/2019 CH06MGMT1362002

    31/32

    Using the Markowitz and Factor Models

    to Make Asset Allocation Decisions Continued:

    Strategic Versus Tactical Asset Allocation

    Strategic Asset Allocation

    Decisions relate torelative amounts invested

    in different asset classes over thelong-term.

    Rebalancingoccurs periodically toreflect

    changes in assumptions regardinglong-term

    risk andreturn, changes in therisk tolerance

    ofthe investors, and changes in the weights of

    the asset classes due to past realizedreturns.

    TacticalAsset AllocationShort-term asset allocation decisions basedon

    changes in economic andfinancial conditions,

    and assessments as to whethermarkets are

    currently underpricedoroverpriced.

  • 8/3/2019 CH06MGMT1362002

    32/32

    Using the Markowitz and Factor Models

    to Make Asset Allocation Decisions Continued

    Markowitz Full Covariance ModelUse to allocate investments in the portfolio among thevarious classes ofinvestments (e.g., stocks,bonds,cash). Note that the numberofclasses is usually rathersmall.

    FactorModels

    Use todetermine which individual securities to includein thevarious asset classes. The numberofsecuritiesavailablemay bequitelarge. Expectedreturn factormodels could alsobeemployed to provide inputsregardingexpectedreturn into the Markowitz model.

    FurtherInformationInterestedreaders may referto Chapter7,AssetAllocation,fora more indepth discussion ofthissubject. In addition, the authorhas provided handson examples ofmanipulatingdata using thePManagersoftware in the process ofmaking asset

    allocation decisions.