ch06mgmt1362002
TRANSCRIPT
-
8/3/2019 CH06MGMT1362002
1/32
FACTOR MODELS(Chapter 6)
Markowitz Model
Employment of Factor Models
Essence of the Single-Factor Model
The Characteristic Line
Expected Return in the Single-Factor Model
Single-Factor Models Simplified Formula for
Portfolio Variance
Explained Versus Unexplained Variance
Multi-Factor Models
Models for Estimating Expected Return
-
8/3/2019 CH06MGMT1362002
2/32
Markowitz Model
Problem: Tremendous data requirement.
Number of security variances needed = M.
Number of covariances needed = (M2 - M)/2
Total = M + (M2 - M)/2
Example: (100 securities)
100 + (10,000 - 100)/2 = 5,050
Therefore, in order for modern portfolio theory to be usable forlarge numbers of securities, the process had to be simplified.
(Years ago, computing capabilities were minimal)
-
!
! !
)(r......)r,Cov(r
....
....
)r,Cov(r...)(r)r,Cov(r
)r,Cov(r...)r,Cov(r)(r
)r,Cov(rxx)(r
M2
1M
M222
12
M12112
M
1j
M
1kkjkjp
2
-
8/3/2019 CH06MGMT1362002
3/32
Employment of Factor Models
To generate the efficient set, we need estimates ofexpected return and the covariances between the
securities in the available population. Factor models
may be used in this regard.
Risk Factors (rate of inflation, growth in industrial
production, and other variables that induce stock prices
to go up and down.)
May be used toevaluate covariances ofreturn between
securities.
Expected Return Factors (firm size, liquidity, etc.)May be used toevaluateexpectedreturns ofthe securities.
In the discussion that follows, we first focus on risk
factor models. Then the discussion shifts to factors
affecting expected security returns.
-
8/3/2019 CH06MGMT1362002
4/32
Essence of the Single-Factor Model
Fluctuations in the return of a security relative to that ofanother (i.e., the correlation between the two) do not depend
upon the individual characteristics of the two securities.
Instead, relationships (covariances) between securities occur
because of their individual relationships with the overall
market (i.e., covariance with the market).
IfStock (A) is positively correlated with the market, and if
Stock (B) is positively correlated with the market, then Stocks
(A) and (B) will be positively correlated with each other.
Given the assumption that covariances between securitiescan be accounted for by the pull of a single common factor
(the market), the covariance between any two stocks can be
written as:)(r)r,Cov(r M
2kjkj !
-
8/3/2019 CH06MGMT1362002
5/32
The Characteristic Line(See Chapter 3 for a Review of the Statistics)
Relationship between the returns on an individualsecurity and the returns on the market portfolio:
Aj = intercept of the characteristic line (the expectedrate of return on stock (j) should the market happen
to produce a zero rate of return in any given period).
Fj
= beta of stock (j); the slope of the characteristic
line.
Ij,t = residual of stock (j) during period (t); the vertical
distance from the characteristic line.
(t)periodduring(j)stockonreturnofratetheisr
rAr
tj,
tj,tM,jjtj, !
-
8/3/2019 CH06MGMT1362002
6/32
Graphical Display of the Characteristic
Line
0
0.1
0.2
0.3
0.4
0 0.2 0.4 0.6
rj,t
rM,t
= Fj
Aj
-
8/3/2019 CH06MGMT1362002
7/32
The Characteristic Line (Continued)
Note: A stocks return can be broken down into twoparts:
Movement along the characteristic line (changes
in the stocks returns caused by changes in the
markets returns).
Deviations from the characteristic line (changes in
the stocks returns caused by events unique to the
individual stock).
Movement along the line: Aj + FjrM,t
Deviation from the line: Ij,t
tj,tM,jjtj, rAr !
-
8/3/2019 CH06MGMT1362002
8/32
Major Assumption of the Single-Factor Model
There is no relationship between the residuals of one
stock and the residuals of another stock (i.e., thecovariance between the residuals of every pair of
stocks is zero).0),Cov( kj !
-10
0
10
-10 0 10 20
Stock js Residuals (%)
Stock ks Residuals (%)
-
8/3/2019 CH06MGMT1362002
9/32
Expected Return in the Single-Factor Model
Actual Returns:
Expected Residual:Given the characteristic line is truly the line of best
fit, the sum of the residuals would be equal to zero
Therefore, the expected value of the residual for
any given period would also be equal to zero:
Expected Returns:
Given the characteristic line, and an expected
residual of zero, the expected return of a security
according to the single-factor model would be:
tj,tM,jjtj, rAr !
0
n
1t
tj, !!
0)E(j !
)E(rA)E(rMjjj
!
-
8/3/2019 CH06MGMT1362002
10/32
Single-Factor Models Simplified Formula for
Portfolio VarianceVarianceofan IndividualSecurity:
Given:
It Follows That:
!
!
n
1i
2jij,ij
2 )]E(r[rh)(r
)E(rA)E(r
rAr
Mjjj
ij,iM,jjij,
!
!
!!
!
!
n
1i
2ij,iij,MiM,
n
1i
ij
n
1=i
2MiM,i
2j
n
1=i
2ij,ij,MiM,j
2MiM,
2ji
n
1=i
2ij,MiM,ji
2Mjj
n
1i
ij,iM,jjij2
h)]E(r[rh2)]E(r[rh=
))]E(r[r2)]E(r[r(h=
))]E(r[r(h=
)])E(rA[]r([Ah)(r
-
8/3/2019 CH06MGMT1362002
11/32
Note:
Therefore:
3)Chapter(SeeVarianceResidual)(h
.regressionsimpleinlinefitbest
theforzerotoequalis),Cov(rSince
0=
),Cov(r2=
0)E(Since
)]E()][E(r[rh2)]E(r[rh2
)(r)]E(r[rh
j2
n
1i
2ij,i
jM
jMj
j
jij,MiM,
n
1i
ijij,MiM,
n
1i
ij
n
1=i
M22
j2
MiM,i2j
!!
!
!
!
!
!!
)()(r)(r j2
M22
jj2
!
-
8/3/2019 CH06MGMT1362002
12/32
-
8/3/2019 CH06MGMT1362002
13/32
Explained Vs. Unexplained Variance
(Systematic Vs. Unsystematic Risk)
Total Risk = Systematic Risk + UnsystematicRisk
Systematic: That part of total variance which
is explained by the variance in the markets
returns.
Unsystematic: The unexplained variance, orthat part of total variance which is due to the
stocks unique characteristics.
)()(r)(r j2
M22
jj2
!
-
8/3/2019 CH06MGMT1362002
14/32
Note:
[i.e., Fj2W2(rM) is equal to the coefficient of
determination (the % of the variance in the securitys
returns explained by the variance in the marketsreturns) times the securitys total variance]
Total Variance = Explained + Unexplained
As the number of stocks in a portfolio increases, the
residual variance becomes smaller, and the
coefficient of determination becomes larger.
)(r)(r
)(r)(r:Therefore
)(r
)(r
)(r
)(r)(r
)(r
)r,Cov(r
j22
Mj,M22
j
jMj,Mj
M
jMj,
M2
MjMj,
M2
Mjj
!
!
!!!
)()(r=
)()(r)(r
p2p22 Mp,
p2
M22
pp2
!
-
8/3/2019 CH06MGMT1362002
15/32
Explained Vs. Unexplained Variance
(A Graphical Display)
0
2
4
6
8
10
1 5 9 13 17
0
0.2
0.4
0.6
0.8
1
1.2
1 5 9 13 17
ResidualVariance
NumberofStocks
Coefficient ofDetermination
NumberofStocks
-
8/3/2019 CH06MGMT1362002
16/32
Explained Vs. Unexplained Variance
(A Two Stock Portfolio Example)
-
-
)(),Cov(),Cov()(
)(r)(r)(r)(r
B2
AB
BAA
2
M22
BM2
AB
M
2
BAM
22
A
Covariance Matrix for
Explained Variance
Covariance Matrix for
Unexplained Variance
0),Cov( mingAssu
VariancedUnexplaine)(x)(x+
VarianceExplained
)(rxx2)(rx)(rx)(r
BA
B
22
BA
22
A
M2
BABAM22
B2BM
22A
2Ap
2
!
!
-
8/3/2019 CH06MGMT1362002
17/32
Explained Vs. Unexplained Variance (A Two
Stock Portfolio Example) Continued
.overstatedbewillvarianceresidual0,),Cov(If
.dunderstatebewillvarianceresidual0,),Cov(If
)()(r=
)(x)(rx=
dUnexplaineExplained
)(x)(r)x(x)(r
BA
BA
p2
M22
p
j2
m
1=j
2jM
2
2m
1=j
jj
j2m
1j
2jM
22BBAAp
2
"
-
!
!
-
8/3/2019 CH06MGMT1362002
18/32
A Note on Residual Variance
The Single-Factor Model assumes zero correlationbetween residuals:
In this case, portfolio residual variance is expressed
as:
In reality, firms residuals may be correlated with
each other. That is, extra-market events may impact
on many firms, and:
In this case, portfolio residual variance would be:
0),Cov( kj !
!!
m
1j
j22
jp2 )(x)(
0),Cov( kj {
! !!
!
m
1j
m
1jk
kjkj
m
1j
j22
jp2 ),Cov( xx2)(x)(
-
8/3/2019 CH06MGMT1362002
19/32
Markowitz Model Versus the Single-Factor Model
(A Summaryof the Data Requirements)
Markowitz Model
Number of security variances = m
Number of covariances = (m2 - m)/2
Total = m + (m2 - m)/2
Example - 100 securities:
100 + (10,000 - 100)/2 = 5,050
Single-Factor Model
Number of betas = m
Number of residual variances = mPlus one estimate ofW2(rM)
Total = 2m + 1
Example - 100 securities:
2(100) + 1 = 201
-
8/3/2019 CH06MGMT1362002
20/32
Multi-Factor Models
Recall the Single-Factor Models formula for portfolio
variance:
If there is positive covariance between the residuals
of stocks, residual variance would be high and thecoefficient of determination would be low. In this
case, a multi-factor model may be necessary in order
to reduce residual variance.
A Two Factor ModelExample
where: rg = growth rate in industrial production
rI = % change in an inflation index
)()(r=
)()(r)(r
p2
p22
Mp,
p2
M22
pp2
!
tj,tI,jI,tg,jg,jtj, rrAr !
-
8/3/2019 CH06MGMT1362002
21/32
Two Factor Model Example - Continued
Once again, it is assumed that the covariance
between the residuals of the the individual stocks areequal to zero:
Furthermore, the following covariances are also
presumed:
Portfolio Variance in a Two Factor Model:
0),Cov( kj !
0)r,Cov(r
0),Cov(r
0),Cov(r
Ig
jI
jg
!
!
!
)()(r)(r)(r p2
I22
pI,g22
pg,p2 !
-
8/3/2019 CH06MGMT1362002
22/32
where:
Note that if the covariances between the residuals ofthe individual securities are still significantly different
from zero, you may need to develop a different model
(perhaps a three, four, or five factor model).
0),Cov( Assuming
)(x)(
x
x
kj
j2
m
1j
2jp
2
jI,
m
1j
jpI,
jg,
m
1j
jpg,
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
-
8/3/2019 CH06MGMT1362002
23/32
Note on the Assumption Cov(rg,rI ) = 0
Ifthe Cov(rg,rI) is not equal to zero, the twofactormodelbecomes a bit more complex. In general,fora twofactormodel, the systematic risk ofaportfolio can be computed using thefollowingcovariancematrix:
To simplify matters, we will assume that thefactors in a multi-factormodel are uncorrelated
with each other.
-
W
W
)Ir(2
)Ir,gCov(r)gr(2Fg,p
FI,p
Fg,p
FI,p
)Ir,gr(Covp,Ip,g2)Ir(22
p,I)gr(
22p,g)pr(
2 FFWFWF!W
-
8/3/2019 CH06MGMT1362002
24/32
Models for Estimating Expected Return
One Simplistic Approach
Use past returns to predict expected futurereturns. Perhaps useful as a starting point.
Evidence indicates, however, that the future
frequently differs from the past. Therefore,
subjective adjustments to past patterns of returns
are required.
Systematic Risk Models
One FactorSystematic Risk Model:
Given a firms estimated characteristic line and an
estimate of the future return on the market, the
securitys expected return can be calculated.
)E(rA)E(r Mjjj !
-
8/3/2019 CH06MGMT1362002
25/32
Models forEstimatingExpected Return
(Continued)
Two FactorS
ystematic Risk Model:
N FactorSystematic Risk Model:
Other Factors That MayBe Used in Predicting
Expected Return
Note that the author discusses numerous factors
in the text that may affect expected return. Areview of the literature, however, will reveal that
this subject is indeed controversial. In essence,
you can spend the rest of your lives trying to
determine the best factors to use. The following
summarizes some of the evidence.
)E(r)E(rA)E(r 2j2,1j1,jj !
)E(r+...)E(r)E(rA)E(r NjN,2j2,1j1,jj !
-
8/3/2019 CH06MGMT1362002
26/32
Other Factors That May Be Used in Predicting
Expected Return
Liquidity (e.g.,bid-asked spread)
Negatively related to return [e.g., Low liquiditystocks (high bid-asked spreads) should provide
higher returns to compensate investors for the
additional risk involved.]
ValueStock Versus Growth StockP/E Ratios
Low P/E stocks (value stocks) tend to
outperform high P/E stocks (growth stocks).
Price/(Book Value) Low Price/(Book Value) stocks (value stocks)
tend to outperform high Price/(Book Value)
stocks (growth stocks).
-
8/3/2019 CH06MGMT1362002
27/32
Other Factors That May Be Used in Predicting Expected
Return(continued)
TechnicalAnalysisAnalyze past patterns of market data (e.g., pricechanges) in order to predict future patterns ofmarket data. Volumes have been written on thissubject.
Size EffectReturns on small stocks (small market value) tendto be superior to returns on large stocks. Note:Small NYSE stocks tend to outperform smallNASDAQ stocks.
January Effect
Abnormally high returns tend to be earned(especially on small stocks) during the month ofJanuary.
-
8/3/2019 CH06MGMT1362002
28/32
Other Factors That May Be Used in Predicting Expected
Return(continued)
And the List Goes On
If you are truly interested in factors that
affect expected return, spend time in the
library reading articles in Financial Analysts
Journal, Journal of Portfolio Management,
and numerous other academic journals.
This could be an ongoing venture the rest
of your life.
-
8/3/2019 CH06MGMT1362002
29/32
Building a Multi-FactorExpected Return Model:
One Possible Approach
Estimate the historical relationship between returnand chosen variables. Then use this relationship to
predict future returns.
Historical Relationship:
Future Estimate:
...(Beta)a+Size)(FirmaRatio)(P/Eaar
1t3
1t21t10t
!
...(Beta)a+
Size)(FirmaRatio)(P/Eaar
t3
t2t101t
!
-
8/3/2019 CH06MGMT1362002
30/32
Using the Markowitz and Factor Models
to Make Asset Allocation Decisions
Asset Allocation Decisions
Portfoliooptimization is widely
employed to allocatemoney between
themajorclasses of investments: Large capitalization domestic stocks
Small capitalization domestic stocks
Domestic bonds
International stocks
Internationalbonds
Realestate
-
8/3/2019 CH06MGMT1362002
31/32
Using the Markowitz and Factor Models
to Make Asset Allocation Decisions Continued:
Strategic Versus Tactical Asset Allocation
Strategic Asset Allocation
Decisions relate torelative amounts invested
in different asset classes over thelong-term.
Rebalancingoccurs periodically toreflect
changes in assumptions regardinglong-term
risk andreturn, changes in therisk tolerance
ofthe investors, and changes in the weights of
the asset classes due to past realizedreturns.
TacticalAsset AllocationShort-term asset allocation decisions basedon
changes in economic andfinancial conditions,
and assessments as to whethermarkets are
currently underpricedoroverpriced.
-
8/3/2019 CH06MGMT1362002
32/32
Using the Markowitz and Factor Models
to Make Asset Allocation Decisions Continued
Markowitz Full Covariance ModelUse to allocate investments in the portfolio among thevarious classes ofinvestments (e.g., stocks,bonds,cash). Note that the numberofclasses is usually rathersmall.
FactorModels
Use todetermine which individual securities to includein thevarious asset classes. The numberofsecuritiesavailablemay bequitelarge. Expectedreturn factormodels could alsobeemployed to provide inputsregardingexpectedreturn into the Markowitz model.
FurtherInformationInterestedreaders may referto Chapter7,AssetAllocation,fora more indepth discussion ofthissubject. In addition, the authorhas provided handson examples ofmanipulatingdata using thePManagersoftware in the process ofmaking asset
allocation decisions.