ch01 nikola anastasijevic
TRANSCRIPT
-
8/13/2019 Ch01 Nikola Anastasijevic
1/15
JuCaTecJUMBO ELECTRODE TECHNOLOGY
FOR COPPER ELECTROWINNING
N. Anastasijevic1, J.-P.Nepper2 and Michael H. Barker3
Outokumpu Technology GmbH, Ludwig-Erhard-Strasse 21, D-61440 Oberursel, Germany.1 Vice President. R & D, Telephone + 49 6171 96963 255
2 Senior Product Manager Copper, Telephone + 49 6171 96963 [email protected]
3 Senior Research Metallurgist - Electrochemistry
Outokumpu Research Oy, Kuparitie 10, FIN-28101 Pori, Finland.
-
8/13/2019 Ch01 Nikola Anastasijevic
2/15
JuCaTecAnastasijevic, Nepper, Barker
* approx. figures
METAL ELECTROWINNING
Production* t/y
7,900,000
2,800,000
Major ProcessesZinc
Copper
-
8/13/2019 Ch01 Nikola Anastasijevic
3/15
The cathode size currently used in copper electrowinning is
driven more by history and product marketing than bytechnological reasons.
Taken from the copper refinery process
at the time when SX-EW was introduced (acceptance).
EW and copper refinery share the same
development in terms of cell design, size
and cathode design (permanent cathode),
handling, stripping etc..
JuCaTecAnastasijevic, Nepper, Barker
-
8/13/2019 Ch01 Nikola Anastasijevic
4/15
0
0.5
1
1.5
2
2.5
3
3.5
4
1900 1920 1940 1960 1980 2000
Imm
ersedarea,
singlec
athode(m).
JuCaTecAnastasijevic, Nepper, Barker
0
20
40
60
80
100
120
1900 1920 1940 1960 1980 2000
Cathod
esperCell Zinc
Copper
Increase of cathode size not yet
implemented in copper
electrowinning ( )
Increase in cell and cathode size
has been used successfully to
reduce production costs of
Zn electrowinning(Cathode/bar contact has been
a bottleneck for enlargement
of Zinc cathode)
-
8/13/2019 Ch01 Nikola Anastasijevic
5/15
JuCaTecAnastasijevic, Nepper, Barker
Is the Jumbo size cathode feasible
for Copper electrowinning?
If yes, does it work?
Next Step?
-
8/13/2019 Ch01 Nikola Anastasijevic
6/15
JuCaTecAnastasijevic, Nepper, Barker
FEASIBILITY / BASE CASE:
130 000 t/y copper EW tankhouse in Chile
Lead anodes and stainless steel cathodes.
Same electrolyte composition(40 to 37 g/l Copper and 180 to 185 g/l free acid).
Same assumptions for both plants:average crane velocity, current density (300 A/m) and 95% availability.
Use of biggest possible commercially available cell
84 cathodes for state-of-the-art technology and
114 cathodes/cell for JuCaTec
(biggest Jumbo cell used in Zinc electrolysis). Stripping machine capacities:
450 cathodes/hr for the state-of-the-art technology and
350 for JuCaTec size cathodes/h (conservative approach).
-
8/13/2019 Ch01 Nikola Anastasijevic
7/15
JuCaTecAnastasijevic, Nepper, Barker
FEASIBILITY / BASE CASE (continuation):
4m vs. 2m immersed cathode area comparison.
Investment costs included
equipment (stripping machine(s), storage racks, crane(s)),
cell area, power supply, electrolyte piping, cell ventilation systems,engineering, transport to the site and packaging.
Operating costs included
power consumption, labour and others e.g. chemicals and consumables.
Impact of plant size consideredrange: 100,000 to 500,000 t/y electrowon copper
-
8/13/2019 Ch01 Nikola Anastasijevic
8/15
JuCaTecAnastasijevic, Nepper, Barker
FEASIBILITY / RESULTS:
Savings potential with JuCaTec:
- lower investment costs, up to 20% savings
- lower operating costs (up to 10%).
Reasons:
- more compact tankhouse (smaller tankhouse footprint)
- shorter crane distances,
- less handling (means less labour),
- reduced number of stripping machines and cranes.
-
8/13/2019 Ch01 Nikola Anastasijevic
9/15
JuCaTecAnastasijevic, Nepper, Barker
VERIFICATION:
Single Electrode Test
with artificial electrolyte (done)
Industrial size Prototype cell test
(pending)
-
8/13/2019 Ch01 Nikola Anastasijevic
10/15
JuCaTecAnastasijevic, Nepper, Barker
Single Cathode Test Conditions:
Electrode sizes:
500 x 2105mm cathode (JuCaTec)500 x 1105mm cathode (state-of-the-art height)
Anode-to-anode
centre spacing 100 mm
Electrolyte at inlet:
40g/l Cu + 150g/l free acid @ 40C
C.D. 300 A/m
Manual stripping
-
8/13/2019 Ch01 Nikola Anastasijevic
11/15
JuCaTecAnastasijevic, Nepper, Barker
19
8
65
3
4
2 7
6
10
9a
8a
K
A A A AA
K K
Electrically both cells connected in series.
-
8/13/2019 Ch01 Nikola Anastasijevic
12/15
JuCaTecAnastasijevic, Nepper, Barker
easy stripping,
copper was removed as a single rigid panel
-
8/13/2019 Ch01 Nikola Anastasijevic
13/15
JuCaTecAnastasijevic, Nepper, Barker
During the run monitoring of:
Cell voltage, TINLET/C & TOUTLET/C
Electrolyte analysisSampled manually from overflow of CuO enrichment tank
Cathode analysis
Cathode ID, map & numbering
Photos of whole cathode
After stripping, masses & length of 4 parts measured
Samples punched (2cm discs)Micrographs
Cathode Chemical analysis
-
8/13/2019 Ch01 Nikola Anastasijevic
14/15
JuCaTecAnastasijevic, Nepper, Barker
MAIN RESULTS OF THE SINGLE ELECTRODE
VERIFICATION TEST
Tests with a single jumbo cathode and artificial electrolyte
successfully performed:
- Current Efficiencies > 90%
- Same Cathode Microstructure and impurity level, e.g.same cathode quality as with normal sized EW cathodes
- Practically same cell voltage
-
8/13/2019 Ch01 Nikola Anastasijevic
15/15
JuCaTecAnastasijevic, Nepper, Barker
Next step:
Test of a Prototype industrial size cell
In-plant Verification (SX-EW)