centres ‘down under’: mapping australia’s neighbourhood centres … · services literature...
TRANSCRIPT
![Page 1: Centres ‘Down Under’: Mapping Australia’s neighbourhood centres … · services literature (e.g. Coleman 1995, Connor 1993, Otto & Onyx 2006, Suhood, Marks, Waterford & Song](https://reader033.vdocuments.us/reader033/viewer/2022060308/5f0a27ba7e708231d42a4775/html5/thumbnails/1.jpg)
Australian Journal of Adult Learning Volume 51, Number 2, July 2011
Centres ‘Down Under’: Mapping Australia’s neighbourhood centres and learning
Donna RooneyUniversity of Technology, Sydney
The overarching aim of this paper is to ‘talk up’ learning in the Australian neighbourhood centre sector, realising this aim is premised on a need to understand neighbourhood centres themselves. Hence, the paper tentatively offers a mapping of the sector by first asking: ‘What is a neighbourhood centre?’. Next, the paper provides an introductory scoping of learning in centres in an effort to invite further consideration. Two important conclusions are made. The first is that centres’ capacity for continual re-shaping, while retaining some very particular values, marks them in ways that differ from organisations for which adult education is the primary purpose. The second is that the range of learning possibilities in centres is far-reaching, and makes significant and valuable contributions to individuals and communities, and ultimately to the Australian nation.
![Page 2: Centres ‘Down Under’: Mapping Australia’s neighbourhood centres … · services literature (e.g. Coleman 1995, Connor 1993, Otto & Onyx 2006, Suhood, Marks, Waterford & Song](https://reader033.vdocuments.us/reader033/viewer/2022060308/5f0a27ba7e708231d42a4775/html5/thumbnails/2.jpg)
204 Donna Rooney
Introduction
Whatdoatake-a-wayshop,café,lawnmowingserviceandawineryallhaveincommon?Thereareseveralanswerstothis,butoneisthattheyallarepartoftheworkofAustralianneighbourhoodcentres1.Asecondisthattheyallinvolveadultslearning,andapossiblethirdisthatthislearningmaynotbecapturedbythemechanismsthatreportonadultcommunityeducationinAustralia.
Whilethereisageneralagreementthatlearningoccursbeyondeducationalinstitutions,traditionallythoseinterestedinmeasuring,accountingforandreportingonadultlearninginAustraliahavelookedtowardsrecognisededucationalinstitutionswhencompilingtheiraccounts.Whilethishasbeenanappropriatestartingpointthathasfacilitatedtheproductionofmanyimportantnationalaccountsoflearning,ithasfailedtoaccountforlearningprovidedinothersettings.ThestartingpointhereisacollectiveoforganisationsacrossAustraliathatisnotnecessarilyconsideredtobepartofAustralia’seducationalframework(Rooney2004,Rule2005).Unlikeschools,collegesoruniversitiesthatareeasilyidentifiedbyeducationalresearchersasbeingeducational,theorganisationscentraltothispaperarenotalwaysvisible,letaloneobvioustothoseinterestedinlearning.Theorganisationscentraltothispaperareneighbourhoodcentres.Thereareover1,000oftheselocatedacrossAustralia.Whileamoredetaileddescriptionisforthcoming,ahelpfulfirstdefinitionisthataneighbourhoodcentreisasmall,community-ownedandmanaged,non-profitorganisationthattypicallysubscribestotheideasofcommunitydevelopment.
Communitydevelopmentisacontestedterm,butgenerallyreferstoa‘bottom-uppractice’(Ife2009:9).Whatthismeansisthatpeopleandcommunitiesareinvolvedindefiningandtakingactionontheissuesthataffectthem(Tett2005:126).Itisa‘politicalactivity’(Kenny2010:2)thatvaluesthewisdomandskillsoflocalpeople,sustainability,diversityandinclusiveness,andtheimportanceof
![Page 3: Centres ‘Down Under’: Mapping Australia’s neighbourhood centres … · services literature (e.g. Coleman 1995, Connor 1993, Otto & Onyx 2006, Suhood, Marks, Waterford & Song](https://reader033.vdocuments.us/reader033/viewer/2022060308/5f0a27ba7e708231d42a4775/html5/thumbnails/3.jpg)
Centres ‘Down Under’ 205
process(Ife2009:9–28).Itaimstochallengediscriminationandinequalityandworkstowardasociallyjustsociety(Tett2005:126).Communitydevelopmentworkersuse‘tools’likeadvocacy,referral,informationsharing,andemotionalandmaterialsupportaspartoftheircommunitydevelopmentwork.Ofimportancetothispaper,educationisalsoatoolforcommunitydevelopment(McArdle1999,Tett2005&2006).
Despitelearningbeingamongthepracticeswithinneighbourhoodcentres,nationalstudiesseldomfocusontheseorganisationsasbeingsitesoflearning(Ducie1994,Rooney2004).Withtheexceptionofsomecentres(mostlyinVictoria)formallyfundedtoprovideadulteducation,centresbyandlargearenotconsideredlegitimateplayersintheeducationallandscape.Alongwithanestimated500,000othernon-profitorganisations(ProductivityCommission2009:8)forwhomeducationisnottheirprimepurpose,neighbourhoodcentresarethefocusofresearchtextstypicallyfromdisciplinaryareasotherthaneducation.Forexample,theycanfeatureinsocialservicesliterature(e.g.Coleman1995,Connor1993,Otto&Onyx2006,Suhood,Marks,Waterford&Song2006),inorganisationaland/orsectoralreports(ANHLC1997,Bullen&Onyx1999,Ducie1994,LCSA2002&2004),orinbroadercommentaryaboutthirdsectororganisations(Lyons2001).Ingeneral,thesetextsspeaktodifferentaudiencesandseldomcapturetheattentionofeducationalresearchersorauthorities.
Afailuretoacknowledgethelearningpotentialofcentresisaconsiderableoversightgiventhatacommunitydevelopmentfocustypicallymeansthatthosepeopleinvolvedareoftenhighlyrepresentativeofpeopleunder-representedinothereducationalsettings(McIntyre&Kimberley1996,Rooney2004&2007,Suhoodetal.2006).Learninghowtoprovidemoreeffectiveeducationalopportunitiesforsuchpeopleissaidtobeanationalpriority(Rudd&Smith2007,MCEETYA2002).Indeed,researchthatconceptualises
![Page 4: Centres ‘Down Under’: Mapping Australia’s neighbourhood centres … · services literature (e.g. Coleman 1995, Connor 1993, Otto & Onyx 2006, Suhood, Marks, Waterford & Song](https://reader033.vdocuments.us/reader033/viewer/2022060308/5f0a27ba7e708231d42a4775/html5/thumbnails/4.jpg)
206 Donna Rooney
learninginthesetypesoforganisationspromiseseducationalinstitutionsnewunderstandingsofhowlearningmightbebetterprovidedfordisadvantagedandmarginalisedpeople.Suchpromiseprovidesthewarrantforthisresearch.
Thispaperrepresentsafirstphaseofaresearchprojectthathasanoverarchingaimof‘talkingup’learninginneighbourhoodcentresintoeducationaldiscourses,yetrealisingthisaimispremisedonanunderstandingofthesectoritself.Thisunderstandingcanbeachievedbytheprovisionofamappingofthescopeanduniquenessofthesector.Therefore,drawingempiricaldatafromdocumentarysources,interviewsandfocusgroupsfromacrossAustralia,thispapertentativelypresentssuchamapping.Inotherwords,thedeceptivelysimpletaskofthispaperisfirsttoaddressthequestionof ‘whatisaneighbourhoodcentre?’.Asecondaryaimistoprovideanintroductoryscopingoflearningincentresinanefforttoinvitefurtherconsideration.Whileamorecomprehensiveconceptualisationoflearningisbeyondtheaimofthispaper,thediscussionofferedherelaysthegroundworkforsuchworktobegin.
Thepaperispresentedinfoursections.ItbeginsbycontextualisingboththeresearchprojectandtheAustralianneighbourhoodcentresector.Inthesecondsection,itpresentsapreliminarymappingbyaddressingthequestionofwhatisaneighbourhoodcentre.Withaprovisionalmapestablished,thepaperthenaddsfurtherdetailinthethirdsectionwherethefocusisonlearningincentres.Inparticular,thissectiondrawsattentiontothebroadscopeoflearningandtothecontributioncentresaremakingtothelearninglandscapeintermsofhuman,socialandidentitycapitals.
Takingthecomplexitiesevenfurther,thefourthsectionproblematisesearlierattemptstodefinewhataneighbourhoodcentreis,andconcludesthat,whilecentressharemanysimilarities,asacollectiveoforganisationstheyarefarfromhomogenous.Overall,thepaperactuallymapsandthenunmapsneighbourhoodcentres.Thisstrategy
![Page 5: Centres ‘Down Under’: Mapping Australia’s neighbourhood centres … · services literature (e.g. Coleman 1995, Connor 1993, Otto & Onyx 2006, Suhood, Marks, Waterford & Song](https://reader033.vdocuments.us/reader033/viewer/2022060308/5f0a27ba7e708231d42a4775/html5/thumbnails/5.jpg)
Centres ‘Down Under’ 207
isusefulsothatontheonehandthevalueoftheseorganisationsmightbeacknowledged,andontheother,thedifferencesarekeptinplay.
Twoimportantobservationsaremadefromthismapping(andunmapping)exercise.Thefirstisthatcentres’capacityforcontinualre-shaping,whileretainingsomeveryparticularvalues,markstheminwaysthatdifferfromorganisationsforwhichadulteducationistheprimarypurpose.Thesecondisthattherangeoflearningpossibilitiesincentresisfar-reaching,andmakessignificantandvaluablecontributionstoindividualsandcommunities,andultimatelytotheAustraliannation.
Background
Research project
Theempiricalmaterialonwhichthispaperdrawscomesfromfieldworkundertakenoverasix-monthperiodin2009.Threemaindatacollectionmethodswereutilised.First,analysiswasundertakenofover200publicdocumentswheretheinterestwasinhowvariouscentresacrossAustraliapresentedthemselves—thatis,thepublicidentitytheyprojectedintheformof‘identitystatements’.BythisImeanthestatementsthatorganisationswriteaboutthemselves(e.g.‘Xcentreis...’).Theseidentitystatementsservethepurposeofinformingotherswhatcentresareandwhattheydo.Theycanbefoundonthewebpagesofcentresaswellasincentres’prospectuses.Second,semi-structuredinterviewswereconductedwith24representativesacrosseachAustralianStateandTerritorywiththeintentionofelicitingrichaccountsintermsofthescopeandbreadthofcentres’work,fundingarrangementsandgenerallywhatgoeson.Over19hoursofinterviewswererecorded,transcribedand,alongwiththeidentitystatements,subjectedtothematicanalysis.Finally,15centresfromacrossAustraliawerevisited,enablingunstructuredobservationsandinformalconversations.Thesevisits,andthe
![Page 6: Centres ‘Down Under’: Mapping Australia’s neighbourhood centres … · services literature (e.g. Coleman 1995, Connor 1993, Otto & Onyx 2006, Suhood, Marks, Waterford & Song](https://reader033.vdocuments.us/reader033/viewer/2022060308/5f0a27ba7e708231d42a4775/html5/thumbnails/6.jpg)
208 Donna Rooney
conversationsoccurringbecauseofthem,affordedafeelforcentresinaction.
Historical context
WhilethispaperisconcernedwithAustralianorganisations,neighbourhoodcentres,ororganisationsresemblingthem,arefoundglobally.Forinstance,Finland’snetworkofSetlementti, Vancouver’sNeighbourhoodHouses,Israel’sCommunityCenters[sic],Germany’sNachbarschaftshäuser,andBritain’sSettlements,areexamplesoforganisationsresemblingthosefoundinAustralia.Someoftheseinternationalorganisationshavebeeninexistenceforover200years(Parker2009),andhaveinspiredtheestablishmentofsimilarorganisationsinternationally(InternationalFederationofSettlementsandNeighbourhoodCentres2009).
Incontrasttolonghistorieselsewhere,theintroductionofneighbourhoodcentresinAustraliaismorerecent.Whileafewisolatedcentreswereinoperationinthe1960s,thereisageneralagreementthattheyamassedalongsidethewomen’smovementinthe1970s(Golding,Kimberley,Foley&Brown2008,Henry2000,LCSA1994).Thisdevelopmentwasfosteredbytheconsiderablelegislativereformsoftheera’ssociallyprogressivegovernment.Upuntilthispoint,benevolentandcharitableinstitutions(typicallyfaith-based)providedmanysocialservices.TheAustralianAssistanceProgram,introducedaspartofthesereforms,servedtoestablishorganisations(likeneighbourhoodcentres)thatespousedcommunitydevelopmentapproaches.
Communitydevelopment,then,andorganisationslikeneighbourhoodcentresthatespousedit,presentedanalternativetothealtruismoffaith-basedand/orbenevolentserviceprovision.Whatthismeantinpracticeisthattheseorganisationswereownedandmanagedbytheverypeoplewhomtheyweresaidtoserve.Self-determinationwas(andremains)highlyprized,andvisionsof
![Page 7: Centres ‘Down Under’: Mapping Australia’s neighbourhood centres … · services literature (e.g. Coleman 1995, Connor 1993, Otto & Onyx 2006, Suhood, Marks, Waterford & Song](https://reader033.vdocuments.us/reader033/viewer/2022060308/5f0a27ba7e708231d42a4775/html5/thumbnails/7.jpg)
Centres ‘Down Under’ 209
socialjusticeprovidedthewarrantfortheactivitiestheorganisationsengagedin(ornot).
Relationshipsbetweentheorganisationsandtheirfunders(thatis,thegovernment)havechangedsincetheseearlydays.Likeelsewhere,neoliberalpolicieswereembracedinAustraliaintheearly1980s,andthiscontinuesthroughtothepresentday.Thishasseen(amongotherthings)thecreationofmarketswheretheyhadpreviouslynotexisted(Marginson1997,NewSouthWalesCouncilofSocialServices1999).Fornon-governmentorganisationslikeneighbourhoodcentres,the1980smarkedatimewheretheywerere-positionedintopurchaser/providerrelationshipswithgovernment,andwereexpectedtoparticipateinmarketprocesses.Moreover,fororganisationswithahistoryofworkingcollaborativelywitheachotherandwithlike-mindedorganisations,thisnewspacepresentedchallenges(NewSouthWalesCouncilofSocialServices1999:51).However,thisspacealsopresentedopportunitiestodevelopnewwaysofbeing(e.g.consortiaofsmallorganisationsproducingjointtenders)andofnegotiatingwhatwasunderstoodasunfavourableconditionsinwaysthatretainedtheirsocialjusticepurpose(Lane1999,Rule2005).
What is a neighbourhood centre?
So,whatisaneighbourhoodcentre?Afirstanswertothisquestionisthatsuchacentreisanentityofsomesort—aplace,building,organisationorassociation.However,manycentresqualifywhatkindofentitytheyare.Forinstancetheyusetermslikesafe,warm,friendlyand/orfun.Many(liketheintervieweebelow)alsopointoutwhatacentreisnot.
Technically,usingtheinternationalclassificationsofnot-for-profitorganisationsastheProductivityCommissionuses,[centresare]alocally-based,multi-activitysocialserviceanddevelopmentorganisation.
![Page 8: Centres ‘Down Under’: Mapping Australia’s neighbourhood centres … · services literature (e.g. Coleman 1995, Connor 1993, Otto & Onyx 2006, Suhood, Marks, Waterford & Song](https://reader033.vdocuments.us/reader033/viewer/2022060308/5f0a27ba7e708231d42a4775/html5/thumbnails/8.jpg)
210 Donna Rooney
Termslikenot-for-profit,non-government,non-religiousand/ornon-discriminatingarecommonamongtheidentitystatementsofcentres.Theuseofthesetermsflagsthatcentresarepurposefullydifferentiatingtheirorganisationsfromothers(forexample,thosethataregovernment,profit-making,religiousetc.).
Thecommentabovealsodrawsattentiontomulti-activities,andmostcentres’illustratethisviathetypesofprocessestheyuseintheiridentitystatements.Therearemanyprocesses(material,mentalandrelational)mentionedandthesegiveanindicationofwhatcentresdo(orsaytheydo).Whilesomereferenceismadetomental(e.g.evolve,seek,believe)andrelational(e.g.belongto,are,is)processes,themostcommontypeofprocesses(byfar)arematerial.Forexample,centressaythatthey:address,change,connect,create,deliver,develop,improve,initiate,link,lobby,reduce,research,run,serve,stimulate,strengthen,andsupportetc.Theprevalenceofmaterialprocessesinthedescriptions ofcentressuggeststhatcentresaredynamicandactiveorganisations,andthisissupportedwhenlookingattheprogramsandactivitiesonoffer.
Funding and focus
Australia’smodeloffederalisationcomplicatesanationalpictureofneighbourhoodcentresbecausecentresaregenerallyfundedatstatelevel.Centrefundingcanrangefromafewmilliontozerodollars,althoughthemedianisalittleover200,000.Whilecorefundingmaybeprovided(admittedlyinsomestatesbetterthanothers),almostallcentresrelyupononadditionalfundingforspecificpurposesaswellasfromvolunteerinputand/orfromfundraising.Inotherwords,mosthavemultiplesourcesoffunding:anextremeexampleisacentrewithover40differentfundingsources(alongwithasmanyacquittalprocesses).
Whiletheaimoftheresearchwasnottocomparecentresinvariousstatesandterritories,someinter-stateidiosyncrasiesareworth
![Page 9: Centres ‘Down Under’: Mapping Australia’s neighbourhood centres … · services literature (e.g. Coleman 1995, Connor 1993, Otto & Onyx 2006, Suhood, Marks, Waterford & Song](https://reader033.vdocuments.us/reader033/viewer/2022060308/5f0a27ba7e708231d42a4775/html5/thumbnails/9.jpg)
Centres ‘Down Under’ 211
noting.Ofparticularinterestisthewaythehoststates’prioritiesshapetheworkofcentresandthisisseeninthe‘taglines’offundingprogramsthatprioritise:strong,vibrantcommunities(inWesternAustralia);communitybuilding,communitydevelopmentandpreventativehealth(inTasmania);andvulnerablegroupsandthosemostinneed(inVictoria).Thismeansthat,whileallcentresworkwithinfederalagendas(e.g.SocialInclusion),differencesinstatefociinfluencetheworkofcentresinsubtleways.ApoignantexampleisthesituationinNewSouthWaleswherearecentshiftinfundingprogramshasalsoseenprioritiesshiftfromchildprotectiontobuildingstrongercommunities.
Asearliernoted,anothercommonalityacrossallstatesisanespousedinvestmentintheprinciplesofcommunitydevelopment.Withthatsaid,communitydevelopmentmanifestsindifferentwaysincentres’identitystatements.Someembedcommunitydevelopmentintheirpublicstatementsbydescribinghowpeople‘areencouragedtoparticipateintherunningofthecentreandtobecomeinvolvedinavarietyofprojects[…]orinthemanagementareas’;othersaremoreexplicit,andanexampleofthisisacentrethatstateshowitis‘committedtosocialjusticeprinciples,believingthatpeoplehavetherighttoparticipateindecisionsthatwillaffecttheirlives[…]andtoadvocateforafairerdistributionofresources’.
Location/place
Centresemphasisethelocalintheiridentitystatements,andthistooisinkeepingwiththetenetsofcommunitydevelopment.Theemphasisismorethanaddinganaddressthough.Mostcentres(regardlessofstateorterritory)explicitlylocatethemselvesusingtermslike community-based,localorganisation,heartofthecommunityandsoon.Theeffectofthissignifiesastrongidentification,orembedding, withinaparticulargeographicalarea,regionand/orcommunity.Centresdonotseethemselvesas
![Page 10: Centres ‘Down Under’: Mapping Australia’s neighbourhood centres … · services literature (e.g. Coleman 1995, Connor 1993, Otto & Onyx 2006, Suhood, Marks, Waterford & Song](https://reader033.vdocuments.us/reader033/viewer/2022060308/5f0a27ba7e708231d42a4775/html5/thumbnails/10.jpg)
212 Donna Rooney
simplyexisting,ordoing.Rather,theyexist(anddo)somewhereinparticular.Locationmatters!Intervieweesconcur—asonesaid,‘it’saboutplace’.
Notwithstandinganemphasisonplace,itbecomesapparentininterviewsandobservationsthatcentresexceedplace.Centresarenotmerely‘containers’whereactionhappens,rathermuchactionhappensbeyondtheboundariesoftheactualbuildings.Oneexampleisatake-away-foodshopthatacentreestablishedtoaddresssocial,economic,employmentandeducationalissuesofconcerntolocalpeople.Otherexamplesincludeawinery,alawnmowingbusinessandasocialactioncampaignaroundturtles—allofwhichoccurbeyondthebricksandmortarofcentres.
Finally,centresstresstheimportanceofpeople.Whileafewclaimtodirecttheireffortstoeveryone,mostsuggestthattheyworkwitheveryonewithinthespecificlocation,communityorregioninwhichtheyaresituated. Moreover,effortsareoftentargetedtospecificgroupsofpeople(e.g.thoseonlowincomes,peoplereturningtowork,vulnerablepeople,peoplelivingwithadisability,familiesetc.).Itisherethattheimportanceofsafe/friendlyplacesresonates(asexemplifiedbytheintervieweebelow):
[Thevalueofcentresis]inreachinghard-to-reachlearners,youknow,providingpeoplewhowouldneversetfootinanythingremotelyresemblingaschooltosomewherethat’sasafelearningenvironmentforthemtogointoandtrytore-engageinanykindofeducationprocess.
Centres and learning
Thecommentaboveleadsnicelytothefourthsectionofthispaper,wherethefocusisoncentresandlearning.However,thisdiscussionisalsocomplicatedbyfederalisationbecausetherearevariousdefinitionsofadultcommunityeducation(ACE)acrossAustralia(Borthwick,Knight,Bender&Laveder2001,Choy,Haukka&Keyes
![Page 11: Centres ‘Down Under’: Mapping Australia’s neighbourhood centres … · services literature (e.g. Coleman 1995, Connor 1993, Otto & Onyx 2006, Suhood, Marks, Waterford & Song](https://reader033.vdocuments.us/reader033/viewer/2022060308/5f0a27ba7e708231d42a4775/html5/thumbnails/11.jpg)
Centres ‘Down Under’ 213
2006,McIntyre2001).InsomestatesthereisavisibleACEsector(e.g.NSW,Victoria,SA,Tasmania)comprisingentitiesreceivingpublicfundsspecificallyfortheprovisionofadultcommunityeducationprograms.Someoftheseentitieshavesuccumbedtopublicpolicyimperativestoanextentthattheyresemblevocationaleducationandtraining(VET)providersratherthantheadultcommunityeducationorganisationsthatmostbeganas(Tennant&Morris2009).Inotherstatesadultcommunityeducationisatypeofnon-publically-fundedprovision,yetrecognisedasaworthwhileactivityandsupportedviadistance(e.g.WA).Finally,inotherstates(e.g.Queensland)itisdifficulttodiscussanadultcommunityeducationsector,whichisnottosaythatadultcommunityeducationdoesnotoccur(Schwencke1997).
RelationshipsbetweenneighbourhoodcentresandACEaredependentonthehoststate’sdefinitions.InsomestatescentresandACEaremutuallyexclusive(e.g.NSWandTasmania).Howeverthereareexamplesofcomplementaryrelationshipsbetweensectors.Forinstance,stateeducationauthoritiesmayfundsmallprojectswherecentresworkinpartnershipwith‘real’providers(LCSA2001).Itislittlewonder,then,thattheidentitystatementsfromthesestatesrarelyappeartoforegroundadulteducationorlearning.Withthatsaid,manysuggestthattheyprovidedopportunitiesto‘meetnewfriends,joinagroup,shareaskillorfindingoutabout’.Thesetypesofstatementsimplylearning,butdonotexplicitlyforegroundit.
InotherstatestherelationshipbetweenneighbourhoodcentresandACEisintegrated(e.g.Victoria,WAandSA).Inthesestatesthestatutorybodyresponsibleforadultlearningexplicitlysupportscentrestoprovideadulteducationprograms(includingVET).InVictoria,centresaresupporteddirectlythroughrecurrentandincreasinglycontestablefunding.InWesternAustralia,thepeakorganisationisfundedtosupportthevoluntaryACEdeliveryofcentresbutthecentresthemselvesreceivelittleornofunding.In
![Page 12: Centres ‘Down Under’: Mapping Australia’s neighbourhood centres … · services literature (e.g. Coleman 1995, Connor 1993, Otto & Onyx 2006, Suhood, Marks, Waterford & Song](https://reader033.vdocuments.us/reader033/viewer/2022060308/5f0a27ba7e708231d42a4775/html5/thumbnails/12.jpg)
214 Donna Rooney
SouthAustralia,centresreceiveaquarterofthestate’sACEbudget,andareabletocontesttheremainder.Inthesestates,andinparticularinVictoria,centresmakefulluseofeducationaldiscourses.Forinstance,centresmadeclearuseofeducationaldiscoursesandinfrastructureintheiridentitystatements,usingtermsliketraining,courses,accreditationandregisteredtrainingorganisations.
Finally,inotherjurisdictions(e.g.QueenslandandNorthernTerritory)relationshipsareelusive.Thisisbecauseoneorbothsectorsaresolooselydefined(seeArnott2003andSchwencke1997).Forinstance,inQueenslandthereisabroadcollectiveoforganisationsthatworkssimilarlytoneighbourhoodcentres,butarecognisableACEsectorismoredifficulttoestablish.IntheNorthernTerritorybothsectorsarelooselydefinedsothatanycommentaryontherelationshipbetweenthemisproblematic.
Overall,lessthanhalfofAustralia’s1,000pluscentresreceivefundingspecificallyfortheprovisionofadultcommunityeducation.Despitenotbeingfundedforthispurpose,almostallprovidearangeoflearningopportunitiesincludingwhatmightbedescribedasadultcommunityeducation.Thisishardlysurprisinggiventhatcommunitydevelopmentandadultcommunityeducationarecloselyallied(Tett2005:126).However,inasense(capital)ACEisnotatypeoflearningthatisofparticularinteresthere—notbecauseitisunworthy,ratherbecauseithasbeenrelativelywelldocumented(McIntyre2001;McIntyre&Kimberley1998).Withthatsaid,eventhisfundedACEdeliverydelivers‘somethingmore’—asanACErepresentativeexplained:
Weareveryluckybecausewhatthecentrescandovalue-addstothepiddlylittlebitofmoneythatwehaveavailablefortheactivities...We’renotpayingfortherealcost,we’repayingforalittlebit,butalltheotherservicesthatthecentresprovidearewhatmakesasuccessofit.It’snotthebitwepayfor.
![Page 13: Centres ‘Down Under’: Mapping Australia’s neighbourhood centres … · services literature (e.g. Coleman 1995, Connor 1993, Otto & Onyx 2006, Suhood, Marks, Waterford & Song](https://reader033.vdocuments.us/reader033/viewer/2022060308/5f0a27ba7e708231d42a4775/html5/thumbnails/13.jpg)
Centres ‘Down Under’ 215
ThisintervieweedrawsattentiontotheadditionalsupportmechanismsandservicesprovidedbycentresandhowtheseaddvaluetofundedACEprograms.However,asalreadysuggested,specificallyfundedlearning,whilevaluable,isonlythetipoftheiceberg.Inothercentres,indeedeveninthecentresthatalsoprovide‘real’ACE,thereisevenmoreadultlearning(Rooney2007).Butthislearningcomesundertherubricofcommunitydevelopmentand,atleastinsomestates,thereareproblemswithcallingitlearning.
Toillustratethislastpoint,anintervieweerecountstheresponsehereceivedfromagovernmentagencyduringafundingprogramreview.Theintervieweetoldofhowheincludedadulteducationasoneofthecentre’soutputs.Theresponsehereceivedfromthefunderswasthat‘weactuallycan’tfund[that]’.Whatweseehereisthatwhileadulteducationisalegitimateactivityinsomecentres,itisnotforall.Moreover,itisnotalegitimate(readfundable)activityinastatewhereadulteducationandcommunitydevelopmentaresiloed.
Atthispointitisimportanttoreiteratethatnotbeingfundedtoprovideadultlearningdoesnotalsoprecludeitfrombeingprovided.Neighbourhoodcentres,asgeneralistorganisations,arenotlimitedtoprovidingjustoneparticulartypeofservice(includingadulteducation).Theirapproachmeansthatthereisalwaysacapacityfordifferencegiventhatgeography,demographicsandpoliticalcontextinwhichtheyarelocatedwillalsodiffer.Forexample,thelearningneedsofametropolitancommunitywithlargenumbersofculturallyandlinguisticallydifferentpeoplewilllikelydifferfromthoseofaregionaltownwithanagingandhomogeneouspopulation.Withthisinmind,thepaperturnstointroducethescopeandcomplexityoflearningincentres.
Scope and complexities of learning in centres
Learningincentrestakesmanyforms.Someoftheseareeasilyidentifiedaslearningandcaptureattentionwithintheeducational
![Page 14: Centres ‘Down Under’: Mapping Australia’s neighbourhood centres … · services literature (e.g. Coleman 1995, Connor 1993, Otto & Onyx 2006, Suhood, Marks, Waterford & Song](https://reader033.vdocuments.us/reader033/viewer/2022060308/5f0a27ba7e708231d42a4775/html5/thumbnails/14.jpg)
216 Donna Rooney
purview.Forexamplethereisanarrayofformalaccredited,vocationaleducationprogramsofferedincentres,aswellasmanynon-accredited,pre-vocationalcoursesthataimtosupportlearnerstotakethenextstepintoaccredited,vocationalprograms.ThereareformalEnglishlanguageprogramsaswellasinformalgroupswhereparticipantscanpractisetheirEnglish.Therearealsotrainingprogramsforthesector’smanyvolunteers.
However,thereareotherformsoflearningactivityofferedincentresthatarenotsoeasilycapturedinpublicaccountsoflearning.Forinstance,thereareinformalleisure-learningcourses(e.g.craft,cooking).Thesegroupsmayhaveateacher,ortheroleofteachercanberotatedamongparticipants.Therearemanyprogramsthatfocusonhealth(e.g.gentleexercise,managingdiabetes).Thereareworkshopsandone-offactivitiesthataddresscommonconcerns(e.g.recycling,parentingteenagers)thatmaybeledbyexperts.Thereareleaderlessgroupsthatsupportmemberswhoexperienceacommonhardship(e.g.amputee,divorcee).Therearesocialgroupsforpeoplewhoshareacharacteristic(e.g.oldermen,recentarrivals).Andfinally,therearesocialactiongroupsformedbecauseofaneedtoaddressalocalissueofconcern(e.g.theplacementofanewfreeway,anewbusroute).Thislistisbynomeansexhaustive,butitbeginstodemonstratethediversityandscopeoflearningincentres.Moreover,asimilardiversityandscopeisseenintheoutcomesoftheseactivities.
Outcomes of learning in centres
Theoutcomesforparticipantsoftheseformsoflearningaremanyandvaried.Forsome,likevocationalprograms,theoutcomesmayseemclear(e.g.ajoborsomeprogressalongthepathtoobtainingone).However,theoutcomesoflearningactivitiesmaynotbeasclearasmightfirstbeassumed.Takethecommentsofaparticipantinaquiltinggroupforexample:
![Page 15: Centres ‘Down Under’: Mapping Australia’s neighbourhood centres … · services literature (e.g. Coleman 1995, Connor 1993, Otto & Onyx 2006, Suhood, Marks, Waterford & Song](https://reader033.vdocuments.us/reader033/viewer/2022060308/5f0a27ba7e708231d42a4775/html5/thumbnails/15.jpg)
Centres ‘Down Under’ 217
Well,Ialwayswantedtodoquilting.Istarteddoingthat—sothewomeninthequilters’group,weallswapbooksandthings.UntilIjoinedIhadn’treadthesortofbooksthatthey’reintothough,soit’spickedupmy—whatIreadnow—andthat’spartofthequiltersgroup.
Firstofall,thecentre’sjustificationforprovidingthisgroupmaybeinorderthatisolatedpeoplemakefriendsratherthanmerelytoincreasewomen’squiltingskills.Whiletheparticipantmayindeedmakesomefriends,shedescribesaquiltinggroupthatdoublesasareadinggroup—whereshehas‘pickedup’herreading.Itisunlikelythataquilters’groupwouldbeconsideredasaliteracyprogram,moreoveritmightbeunlikelythatshewouldjoinaliteracyprogram.Yet,thisbriefexamplebeginstoillustrateallthesepossibilitiesoflearningprovidedbyorganisationsforwhicheducationisnottheprimepurpose.
OnewaytothinkaboutthecomplexitiesoflearningincentresisprovidedbySchuller(2004).Heillustratesarangeofoutcomesoflearningusingatriangularmodelofinterrelatedhuman,socialandidentitycapitals.Theacquisitionordevelopmentofknowledgeandskillsthatenablepeopleto‘functioneffectivelyineconomicandsociallife’areencapsulatedinthedimensionofhumancapital(p.14).The(above)quilter’scapacitytoread,orpeoplereceivingsomesortofqualification,wouldconstituteanincreaseinhumancapital.Butitistheothertwocapitalsthataremoreinterestinginrelationtocentresandlearning.Identitycapitalrefersto‘thecharacteristicsoftheindividualthatdefinehisorheroutlookandself-image’and‘includesconceptslikeself-esteemandsenseofself’(p.22).Reportsoflearningincentresarerepletewithreferencesofincreasedidentitycapital(LCSA2001),anditislikelythatthequilterhasanewsenseofselfbecauseofherachievementsinreading.Finally,socialcapitalreferstotherelationshipsbetweenpeople(p.17)andthisconstitutesthethirddimensionofSchuller’smodel.Thisthirddimensionisanotherwayofthinkingaboutthecommunitythatiscentraltocommunity
![Page 16: Centres ‘Down Under’: Mapping Australia’s neighbourhood centres … · services literature (e.g. Coleman 1995, Connor 1993, Otto & Onyx 2006, Suhood, Marks, Waterford & Song](https://reader033.vdocuments.us/reader033/viewer/2022060308/5f0a27ba7e708231d42a4775/html5/thumbnails/16.jpg)
218 Donna Rooney
developmentwork.Again,itislikelythatthequilterdevelopedrelationshipsbetweenherselfandothers.
ThevalueofSchuller’smodelistheacknowledgmentoftheinter-relationshipbetweenitsvariousdimensions(2004:22),ratherthanfocusingonjustone.Themodeldrawsattentiontohowaperson’sidentitycapital(senseofself)willimpactontheircapacitytodevelophumancapital(skills)and/orsocialcapital(relationshipswithothers).Thisisnotnecessarilyanewidea,butinamilieudominatedbyeconomicconcernsandamistrustofothers,itisworthemphasisingtherelationship.
Afinalvignetteofacentrevolunteerservestoillustratethisrelationshipfurther.Thecentrewherethevolunteerworksislocatedinaregionwherethereisalow-securityprison.Theusersofthecentreincludeprisonersandtheirfamilies.Thevolunteerrecallshowhisworkbroughthimincontactwithpeopleheconsidereddifferenttohimself:
Ithoughtthatwasjustsomethingthathappenedtootherpeople—ithappenedinthenews,andthenallofasuddenyouhavecontactwiththesepeople.It’snotjustthepersoninjailthatsuffers—youhavethefamilyandit’snottheirfaulteither.[It]makesyouaskwhytheydidit.There’salwaystwosidestoeverystory[but]youonlyeverget[the]news—thecriminal—thepoliceside.
Itseemsreasonabletosurmisethatthisvolunteerhasdevelopedempathyandmaynowunderstandhimselfinrelationtoothersdifferently(identitycapital).Moreover,withabetterunderstandingofthepeoplewithwhomhelivesandworks(socialcapital),hecanperformhisroleasvolunteerevenbetter(humancapital).Thepointisnotaboutthetruthofthisconjecture,butmoreabouthowthedevelopmentofeachcapitalisreliantonthedevelopmentofanother.
![Page 17: Centres ‘Down Under’: Mapping Australia’s neighbourhood centres … · services literature (e.g. Coleman 1995, Connor 1993, Otto & Onyx 2006, Suhood, Marks, Waterford & Song](https://reader033.vdocuments.us/reader033/viewer/2022060308/5f0a27ba7e708231d42a4775/html5/thumbnails/17.jpg)
Centres ‘Down Under’ 219
Un mapping
DespitehavingpresentedabriefmappingofAustralianneighbourhoodcentrestoaddressthequestionofwhatisaneighbourhoodcentre,thispartnowmovestoconcludewithatwist.Thetwististhatmostintervieweesfoundthequestionproblematic.Asoneclaimed,‘it’sthebarbecuestopper,becauseyoucan’tanswerit’. Anothersuggested,‘peoplecan’tdefinecommunitydevelopment,theycan’tdefine[a]neighbourhoodcentre[...]thatisaweaknessasasector’.
Thetaskofansweringwhatseemsaneasyquestionismoredifficultthanfirstrealisedbecausethemodus operandiofcentresmeansthattheyarecontinuallyshapedandre-shapedbysocio-politicalcontextsaswellasbytheircommunitydevelopmentwork.Theideaofpeople‘takingactiononissuesaffectingthem’(Tett2005:246)leavesthedooropenforanalmostunlimitedrangeofissues.Fiveexamplesofissueswherepeople‘cametogether’include:
• Aregionaltown,withlittlelocalinfrastructure,whoselocaltake-a-wayfoodstorecloseddown.Thismeantthatnotonlycouldlocalsnolongerpurchasetake-a-wayfood,butalsothattouristsnolongerstoppedover—whichfurtherimpactedonthelocaleconomy.
• Ametropolitansuburbwhereitwasnotedthattherewasahighproportionofpeoplewithamentalillnessandfewlocalservices.
• Asuburbwhereagrowingnumberofyoungpeoplewerecausinganxietybyhangingaroundthelocalshopsduringschoolhours.Thesepeopleweretooyoungfor‘official’youthprograms,andactionbyschoolauthoritieswasseentobeinadequate.
• Anotedincreaseinviolenceperpetratedbymeninahousingdepartmentestatewherethereweremarkedincreasesinunemploymentofmen(mostofwhomwerelow-skilled).
![Page 18: Centres ‘Down Under’: Mapping Australia’s neighbourhood centres … · services literature (e.g. Coleman 1995, Connor 1993, Otto & Onyx 2006, Suhood, Marks, Waterford & Song](https://reader033.vdocuments.us/reader033/viewer/2022060308/5f0a27ba7e708231d42a4775/html5/thumbnails/18.jpg)
220 Donna Rooney
• Aregionalareawhereincreasedsalinityinthelocalriverresultedinturtlesbeingcoveredwithscales.
Communitydevelopmentapproachestotheseissuesresultedinthelocalcentresmorphingintoatake-a-wayfoodstore,café,lawn-mowingbusiness,winery,andasocialactioncampaign.Theselocalsolutionsresultedinmodesteconomicgains:forexample,increasingthecapitaloflocalinfrastructure(e.g.throughmaintaininglocaltourism,provisionofgoodsandservices)andsecuringadditionalfundingsourcesforcentres(e.g.sustainability).Moreover,potentialoutcomesacrosstheseexampleswouldalsoincludeincreasedhumancapital.Forinstance,severalprovidedaccreditedtrainingresultinginincreasedqualifications.Severalalsoresultedinpeoplegainingworkexperienceandsomelocalpeoplegainedmeaningfulemployment.Theseareindeedvaluableoutcomesandlikelytobelaudedbyeducationalauthorities.
However,returningtoSchuller’s(2004)model,thereareevenmorepossibleoutcomes,someofwhichincreasesocialcapitalandidentitycapitalaswell.Forinstance,thepeopleinvolvedinplanningdevelopnewunderstandingsoftheircommunitiesandbroadersocietyastheyresearchhowtosetupandmanagewhatostensiblyaresmallbusinesses(e.g.wineries,cafés,lawn-mowingetc.).Allinvolvedmaydevelopnewunderstandingsofdifference,andofissuesfacedbypeoplewithamentalillness,men,and/oryouthetc.Suchactivitieshavethepotentialtodeveloptrustbetweenvarioussegmentsofcommunityandbetweenpeopleandorganisations,likethevolunteerpeopleinvolvedmaylearntoknowdifferencedifferently.These‘spillover’outcomeshavepotentialtocontributetothesocialfabric(capital)ofcommunities.Furthermore,thepeopleinvolvedcandevelopnewunderstandingsaboutthemselvesandinsodoing,experienceincreaseinself-worth.Lonelypeoplemaymakefriends.Othersmaydevelopstrategiesforgettingalongwithpeoplewhomtheyconsiderdifferent.Inotherwords,thisactivitybuildsidentitycapitalaswell.Allthesecapitalgainsmadepossiblebecausefive
![Page 19: Centres ‘Down Under’: Mapping Australia’s neighbourhood centres … · services literature (e.g. Coleman 1995, Connor 1993, Otto & Onyx 2006, Suhood, Marks, Waterford & Song](https://reader033.vdocuments.us/reader033/viewer/2022060308/5f0a27ba7e708231d42a4775/html5/thumbnails/19.jpg)
Centres ‘Down Under’ 221
smallorganisationswere‘nimbleandflexible’enoughtorespondtolocalneeds(LCSA2002)—notbecausethesefivecentreswere butbecausetheywere able to become!
Some concluding observations
Themapping,andunmapping,workofthispaperprovidesthebasisfortwoconcludingobservations.Thefirstisthatcentres’capacityforcontinualre-shaping,whileretainingsomeveryparticularvalues,markstheminwaysthatdifferfromorganisationsforwhichadulteducationistheprimarypurpose.Thissuggeststhatthecapacitytoprovidebespokeactivities,servicesandresponsestolocalissuesisbetterachievedwhenactivitiesandservicesarenotprescribedfromtheonset.Intheexamplesprovidedhere,localsolutionswerecreatedtoaddresstheidiosyncrasiesofissuesinwaysthatuniversalsolutionscouldnot.Sothatevenwhileaninabilitytodefinecentresandtheirworkisseenbysomeasaweakness,theambiguitycanalsobeunderstoodasastrength.Freedomfromtheconstraintsandboundariesassociatedwithrobustdefinitionsaffordneighbourhoodcentressubstantialfluidityindevelopingappropriateorganisationalidentities.
Asecondobservationisthattherangeoflearningpossibilitiesinneighbourhoodcentresisbroad-ranging,andmakessignificantandvaluablecontributionstoindividualsandcommunities,andultimatelytotheAustraliannation.Underpinningtheseactivitiesareconcernsthatextendbeyondlearningalone.Thisresultsinoutcomesoflearningincentresthatarealsobroad-ranging.Whiletheoutcomesmaywellcontributetoimportanteconomicpriorities,theyalsomakeasignificantcontributiontotheindividual,socialandhumancapitalofparticipants,andcommunities,andultimatelytheAustraliannation.Thesecontributionsandlearninginvitefurtherconsideration.
![Page 20: Centres ‘Down Under’: Mapping Australia’s neighbourhood centres … · services literature (e.g. Coleman 1995, Connor 1993, Otto & Onyx 2006, Suhood, Marks, Waterford & Song](https://reader033.vdocuments.us/reader033/viewer/2022060308/5f0a27ba7e708231d42a4775/html5/thumbnails/20.jpg)
222 Donna Rooney
References
ANHCA(2009).‘AboutANHCA’,http://www.anhlc.asn.au/ANHCA[viewedNovember2009].
ANHLC.(1997).What is a neighbourhood house,Melbourne:AssociationofNeighbourhoodHousesandLearningCentresInc.
Arnott,A.(2003).‘Learningfromthepast:ImplicationsforeffectiveVETdeliveryofadulteducationservicesintheNorthernTerritory’,Australian Journal of Adult Learning, 43(1):43–72.
Borthwick,J.,Knight,B.,Bender,A.&Loveder,P.(2001).Scope of ACE in Australia: Implications for improved data collection and reporting,vol.1,Leabrook,SouthAustralia:AustralianNationalTrainingAuthority.
Bullen,P.&Onyx,J.(1999).Social capital: Family support and neighbourhood centres in NSW,Sydney:LocalCommunityServicesAssociation.
Choy,S.,Haukka,S.&Keyes,E.(2006).Adult and community education: A meta-analysis to explore the capacity of ACE for skilling Australia,Brisbane:AdultLearningAustralia,QueenslandUniversityofTechnologyandLearningNetworkQueensland.
Coleman,J.(1995).‘Learningthroughcollaborationinthecreationofapeople’spark’,The National Bulletin of Good Practice in Adult Community Education, 3 (UTS),17–21.
Connor,C.(1993).‘Houseofmanypeoples’,Community Quarterly,(27):25–27.
Ducie,V.(1994).Opening doors: A report on community neighbourhood houses and learning centres’ influence on personal development, skills development, learning outcomes,Perth:LearningCentreLink.
Golding,B.,Kimberley,H.,Foley,A.&Brown,M.(2008).‘HousesandshedsinAustralia:Anexplorationofthegenesisandgrowthofneighbourhoodhousesandmen’sshedsincommunitysettings’,Australian Journal of Adult Learning, 48(2):237–262.
Henry,K.(2000).Like a circle: A story of LCSA. The first 25 years,Sydney:LocalCommunityServicesAssociation.
Ife,J.(2009).Human rights from below: Achieving rights through community development,PortMelbourne,Victoria:CambridgeUniversityPress.
InternationalFederationofSettlementsandNeighbourhoodCentres(2009).‘AboutISF’,www.ifsnetwork.org/Membership/CurrentMembers/tabid/463/Default.aspx[viewedDecember2009].
![Page 21: Centres ‘Down Under’: Mapping Australia’s neighbourhood centres … · services literature (e.g. Coleman 1995, Connor 1993, Otto & Onyx 2006, Suhood, Marks, Waterford & Song](https://reader033.vdocuments.us/reader033/viewer/2022060308/5f0a27ba7e708231d42a4775/html5/thumbnails/21.jpg)
Centres ‘Down Under’ 223
Kenny,S.(2010).Developing communities for the future: Community development in Australia(Fourthed.),SouthMelbourne,Victoria:CengageLearning.
Lane,M.(1999).‘Communitydevelopmentandapostmodernofresistance’,inJ.Fook(ed.),Transforming social work practice: Postmodern critical perspectives,Florence,KY:Routledge:135–149.
LocalCommunityServicesAssociation(LCSA)(1994).We just grew like topsy: A resource manual for understanding and managing multi-purpose Neighbourhood Centres,Sydney:LocalCommunityServicesAssociation.
LocalCommunityServicesAssociation(LCSA)(2001).Partnerships in ACE: A report to BACE,Sydney:LocalCommunityServicesAssociation.
LocalCommunityServicesAssociation(LCSA)(2002).Odd socks: Why the survival of small community organisations is critical,Sydney:LocalCommunityServicesAssociation.
LocalCommunityServicesAssociation(LCSA)(2004).Neighbourhood centres in NSW: 2003 facts and figures,Sydney:LocalCommunityServicesAssociation.
Lyons,M.(2001).Third sector: The contribution of nonprofit and cooperative enterprises in Australia,Sydney:Allen&Unwin.
Marginson,S.(1997).Markets in education,Sydney:Allen&Unwin.McArdle,J.(1999).Community development in the market economy,
StKilda:VistaPublications.MCEETYA(2002).Ministerial declaration on adult community education,
Melbourne:DepartmentofEducationandTraining.McIntyre,J.(2001).‘ThediscursiveconstructionofACEinnationalpolicy’,
Australian Journal of Adult Learning, 41(1):56–71.McIntyre,J.&Kimberley,H.(1996).Planning pathways: A resource for
providers developing pathways for women from ACE to VET,Sydney:CentreforVocationalEducationandTraining,UniversityofTechnology.
McIntyre,J.&Kimberley,H.(1998).Planning pathways: A resource for providers developing pathways for women from ACE to VET.Perth:WesternAustralianDepartmentofTraining.
NewSouthWalesCouncilofSocialServices(1999).Shifting ground: Competition policy and tendering in the community services,SurryHills:J.Bell&Co.
Otto,A.&Onyx,J.(2006).Developing social capital among older ethnic communities,Workingpaperno.73,Sydney:CentreforAustralianCommunityOrganisationsandManagement(CACOM).
![Page 22: Centres ‘Down Under’: Mapping Australia’s neighbourhood centres … · services literature (e.g. Coleman 1995, Connor 1993, Otto & Onyx 2006, Suhood, Marks, Waterford & Song](https://reader033.vdocuments.us/reader033/viewer/2022060308/5f0a27ba7e708231d42a4775/html5/thumbnails/22.jpg)
224 Donna Rooney
Parker,M.(2009).‘Thepast,thepassionandthepotential:HowthehistoryoftheSettlementMovementinformsourpursuitofsocialjusticetoday’,inBritishAssociationofSettlementsandSocialActionCentres(ed.),London:BASSAC.
ProductivityCommission(2009).Contribution of the not for profit sector: Productivity issues paper,Canberra:AustralianGovernment.
Rooney,D.(2004).‘Cinderellahasballs?:Othersitesforadultlearning’,Australian Journal of Adult Learning, 44(2):143–157.
Rooney,D.(2007).‘Writingup’neighbourhoodcentresand‘writingin’theprofessionaldoctorate’,Sydney:UniversityofTechnology,Sydney.
Rudd,K.&Smith,S.(2007).The Australian economy needs an educational revolution: New directions paper on the critical link between long-term prosperity, productivity growth and human capital investment,Canberra:AustralianLaborParty.
Rule,J.(2005).‘Tracingdiscoursesofsocialaction:Inner-citySydneyneighbourhoodcentres’,Studies in Continuing Education,27(2):135–153.
Schwencke,H.(1997).Adult and community education: A snapshot,Paddington,Queensland:AdultLearningAustralia(QueenslandBranch).
Schuller,T.(2004).‘Threecapitals:Aframework’,inThe benefits of learning: The impact of education on health, family life and social capital,London:RoutledgeFalmer:12–33.
Suhood,T.,Marks,C.,Waterford,M.&SONG(2006).Voice of SONG—the way forward: Tackling the issues confronting small community organisations,issuespaper,VoiceofSONG.
Tennant,M.&Morris,R.(2009).‘ThechangingfaceofadulteducationinAustralia’,inP.Jarvis(ed.),The Routledge international handbook of lifelong learning,NewYork:Routledge:470–478.
Tett,L.(2005).‘CommunityDevelopment’,inL.English(ed.),International encyclopedia of adult education,NewYork:PalgraveMacmillan:126–131.
Tett,L.(2006).Community education, lifelong learning and social inclusion(Seconded.),Edinburgh:DunedinAcademicPressLtd.
Endnotes1 TheseorganisationsareknownbydifferentnamesindifferentAustralian
StatesandTerritories.However,theterm‘NeighbourhoodCentres’isusedhere(unlessotherwisestated)intheserviceofclarity.
![Page 23: Centres ‘Down Under’: Mapping Australia’s neighbourhood centres … · services literature (e.g. Coleman 1995, Connor 1993, Otto & Onyx 2006, Suhood, Marks, Waterford & Song](https://reader033.vdocuments.us/reader033/viewer/2022060308/5f0a27ba7e708231d42a4775/html5/thumbnails/23.jpg)
Centres ‘Down Under’ 225
About the author
Dr Donna Rooney is an early career researcher and lecturer in adult education at the University of Technology, Sydney (UTS). Her doctoral research focused on learning in New South Wales’ neighbourhood centres. Her broader research interests focus on adult learning outside of educational institutions. This includes community-based learning as well as learning in workplaces.
Contact details
Faculty of Arts and Social Sciences, University of Technology, Sydney, PO Box 123, Broadway, 2007, Australia. Tel: +61 2 9514 3044 Fax: +61 2 9514 3737 Email: [email protected]