center for shared solutions - michigan.gov€¢volunteer data for quality assessment –return sap...

12
Center for Shared Solutions Enterprise Information Management (EIM) Location Domain

Upload: lamthu

Post on 27-May-2018

213 views

Category:

Documents


0 download

TRANSCRIPT

Center for Shared SolutionsEnterprise Information Management (EIM)

Location Domain

Executive Directive No. 2013-1Data and Information Sharing, Management and Governance

• http://michigan.gov/documents/snyder/ED_2013-1_439597_7.pdf

• Establishes an Enterprise Information Management (EIM) program

• Improve service delivery and transparency

• All Executive Branch departments to participate

• Include cross-agency data sharing protocol

• Each department to establish a Chief Data Steward

• Incorporate an EIM strategy for successful cross-boundary collaboration with external partners of state departments

2

3

Master Repository for Shared Data

DOS

DCH

DEQ

MSP

CSS - DTMB Maintains & Governs common or shared data along with data stewards

Each Agency maintains their own unique sets of data to join with Location data. Each Agency has own Data Steward and Data Owner to maintain particular portions on Master Location and own unique data sets.

Shared Data

Enterprise Information Management Concept –State Government Level

Local County Governments

Data Steward Addressing & Location

Goal is to share Common Data that each Agency can use• First common set of data identified by EIM Steering Committee is

addresses/location.

• Locations have several meanings and usages by Agency.

• CSS is attempting to gather requirements by State Agency that would allow sharing of addresses/locations by Agency.

• CSS has identified that local governments may benefit from sharing of data as well and may want to participate in a Master Address Repository that will contain the cleanest and most up-to-date addresses.

• Looking to discover local government requirements needs for access and housing address information.

4

6

DHS Street Addresses

SOS Street Addresses

DCH Street Addresses

Treasury Street Addresses

ED/CEPI Addresses

Authoritative Street Addresses

UIA Street Addresses

Street Address

111 S. Capital, Lansing, MI 48933

Today - 32 million addresses Managed In DHS Data Warehouse

DCH uses address as criteria to determine identity

Maintainer of legal address

Mail unemployment checks

Mail test results – addresses provided By school districts

Personal tax filers, 40+ tax types

Simple View of Address

Common business problems• Returned mail• Address formatting cost• Managing PO Box addresses

Governance Decision• Who can modify “master” addresses?• Who can add “master” address?• Are there multiple trusted sources?• Is additional information needed • per address?

7

DHS Street Addresses

SOS Street Addresses

DCH Street Addresses

Treasury Street Addresses

ED/CEPI Addresses

Authoritative Street Addresses

UIA Street Addresses

StreetAddress

Geo Code

111 S. Capital, Lansing, MI 48933

42.733377, -84.553324

Today - 32 million addresses Managed In DHS Data Warehouse

DCH uses address as criteria to determine identityMaintainer of legal address

Mail unemployment checks

Mail test results – addresses provided By school districts

Personal tax filers, 40+ tax types

GeoSpatial View of Address

Common business problems• Location of addresses within

geographic boundaries• Returned mail• Address formatting cost• Managing PO Box addresses

Governance Decision• Who can modify “master” address?• Who can add “master” address?• Are there multiple trusted sources?• Is additional information needed • per address?

Provide accurate lat, long For each street address

Counties, Townships, Cities

Benefits to local users

• Address cleansing, verification, geocoding

• CASS Certification

• Delivery point validation

• Structure point creation

• Structure point maintenance workflow

• Cross boundary standardization / sharing

• Improved accuracy for analysis

• Structure type identification for GIS layer development

8

9

R

HC

Bridge

C

R

R

R

R

R

C

C

I

I

Park

Lake

R

Address Points Don’t always correlate correctly to places when looking at points on a map.

This is due to standardized addressing software that places the points on a map as if each address was interpolated and may be off by several feet to miles in some cases.

Jurisdictional Boundary

Interpolated Address

10

R

HC

Bridge

C

R

R

R

R

R

C

C

I

I

Park

Lake

R

A more accurate way to map addresses would be to add (X,Y) Coordinates to the locations to get better precision.

This will benefit Michigan Agencies when performing their analyses when drawing boundaries, districts or access points.

Jurisdictional Boundary

Barry County –Discrepancy Example

11

Key:

Local County Data Point

SAP Standardized Address Point

Difference in SAP and Local data point

What Address Mastering will Enable

12

Master Address Repository

Qu

alit

y o

f R

epo

sito

ry

Clean and more accurate address points

Ability to assign Agency program information to

Addresses

Cross Agency / local government analysis

Ability to assign individuals to addresses?

Leve

l of

An

alys

is

Next Steps

• Identify Local Government Addressing Needs:

• Survey to be sent out Mid-February to assess:• Addressing capabilities

• How often updated

• Coordinates added

• Type of systems used to capture and maintain data

• Volunteer data for quality assessment – Return SAP attributes

• EIM Steering Committee• Performing analysis on Agency address needs

13