center for radiative shock hydrodynamics fall 2011 review

23
Center for Radiative Shock Hydrodynamics Fall 2011 Review Experimental data from CRASH experiments Carolyn Kuranz

Upload: gyala

Post on 24-Feb-2016

39 views

Category:

Documents


0 download

DESCRIPTION

Center for Radiative Shock Hydrodynamics Fall 2011 Review. Experimental data from CRASH experiments Carolyn Kuranz. CRASH experiments have produced data from shock breakout to 30 ns. Shock Breakout data (~450 ps ) Diagnostics Active Shock Breakout (ASBO) Streaked Optical Pyrometer (SOP) - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

TRANSCRIPT

Page 1: Center for Radiative Shock  Hydrodynamics Fall 2011 Review

Center for Radiative Shock Hydrodynamics

Fall 2011 Review

Experimental data from CRASH experiments

Carolyn Kuranz

Page 2: Center for Radiative Shock  Hydrodynamics Fall 2011 Review

2

CRASH experiments have produced data from shock breakout to 30 ns

Shock Breakout data (~450 ps)o Diagnostics

Active Shock Breakout (ASBO) Streaked Optical Pyrometer (SOP)

Early-time data (~2 – 7 ns)o Diagnostic Techniques

Gated imaging x-ray radiography Streaked x-ray radiography

Late-time data (~13 – 30 ns)o Diagnostic Technique

Ungated x-ray radiographyo Preliminary Variations in Geometry

Elliptical Nozzle Tubes Cylindrical Nozzle Tubes Wide Cylindrical Tubes

Nominal CRASH experiment

Page 3: Center for Radiative Shock  Hydrodynamics Fall 2011 Review

3

ASBO and SOP can detect the shock breakout from a Be disk

Active Shock Breakout (ASBO) uses a probe beam to detect the rate of change in the derivative of the optical path to a surface

A Streaked Optical Pyrometer (SOP) passively detects the thermal emission from a surface

Page 4: Center for Radiative Shock  Hydrodynamics Fall 2011 Review

4

Shock breakout time is observed on both diagnostics

SOP ASBO

Pos

ition

Pos

ition

Time Time

shockbreakout

shockbreakout

Page 5: Center for Radiative Shock  Hydrodynamics Fall 2011 Review

5

We have obtained breakout data nominally 20 µm Be disks

Systematic erroris ± 50 ps

Page 6: Center for Radiative Shock  Hydrodynamics Fall 2011 Review

6

Early-time data is obtained using gated x-ray radiography

The detector can use a gated camera or streak camera

Page 7: Center for Radiative Shock  Hydrodynamics Fall 2011 Review

7

Early-time data are obtained using gated x-ray radiography

A V foil and gated 4-strip camera are usedo 16 (4x4) pinhole array is

in front of the camerao We have obtained data at

magnifications of 6 and 8

Possible to obtain a time sequence and multiple data points

Can be done in 2 views or with streaked radiography

Target design yields highly accurate targets

Page 8: Center for Radiative Shock  Hydrodynamics Fall 2011 Review

8

The strips on the camera can be pulsed at different delays corresponding to a long pulse backlighter

(2,2)

The shock is at 606 ± 30 µm at 4.5 ns

t = 3.5 ns

t = 4.0 ns

t = 4.5 ns

t = 5.0 ns

Page 9: Center for Radiative Shock  Hydrodynamics Fall 2011 Review

9

We have obtained data with this technique from ~ 3 - 7 ns

Page 10: Center for Radiative Shock  Hydrodynamics Fall 2011 Review

10

Streaked radiographs provide shock position over several nanoseconds

Streak cameras are time-resolved detectors that convert x-ray signal to an electron pulse

Electrons are accelerated by an electric field and deflected by a voltage ramp

Resulting image is resolved in space and time

Can be done in conjunction with area radiography

fiducial wire

Page 11: Center for Radiative Shock  Hydrodynamics Fall 2011 Review

11

We used streaked radiographs to obtain early-time shock position

shock front

fiducial wire

Tim

e

Space

Page 12: Center for Radiative Shock  Hydrodynamics Fall 2011 Review

12

Late-time data can be obtained using ungated radiography

A pinhole backlighter is used to create one image onto ungated filmo Technique requires large amount

of shieldingo Can observe target from 2 views

We have used varying tube geometries

Tube is inserted in acrylic shield

Page 13: Center for Radiative Shock  Hydrodynamics Fall 2011 Review

13

Ungated x-ray radiographic images of cylindrical tube experiments

13 ns 26 ns

We have obtained data with this technique at ~13 ns and ~26 ns

Doss, HEDP 2010

Page 14: Center for Radiative Shock  Hydrodynamics Fall 2011 Review

14

We have performed preliminary experiments to vary tube geometry to prepare for the 5th year experiment

To fabricate the unique nozzle targets we utilized 2 methods

Page 15: Center for Radiative Shock  Hydrodynamics Fall 2011 Review

15

All-polyimide tubes were almost good enough

Manufactured at General Atomics and Luxel with parts provided by Michigan

Copper mandrels were dipped in polyimide and rotated while heated

Desired thickness difficult to obtain (measured by interferometry)o However, both vendors

learned a lot about the process and can improve it

See SR Klein poster

Page 16: Center for Radiative Shock  Hydrodynamics Fall 2011 Review

16

Acrylic nozzles with polyimide tubes is the approach that worked well

Acrylic nozzle is machined and elliptical or cylindrical tube is inserted into acrylic

Elliptical tube is formed by sandwiching between 2 plates and heatingo A repeatable method has

been achieved and results in within 3% of specification

o Fairly easy to make so we make a large batch and choose the best

See SR Klein poster

Page 17: Center for Radiative Shock  Hydrodynamics Fall 2011 Review

17

Target tubes were secured with an acrylic cap

Narrow view Wide view

Acrylic nozzle

Page 18: Center for Radiative Shock  Hydrodynamics Fall 2011 Review

18

Radiographic images from an elliptical nozzle target at 28 ns and 30 ns

t = 28 ns

t = 30 ns

Page 19: Center for Radiative Shock  Hydrodynamics Fall 2011 Review

19

Radiographic images from a cylindrical nozzle target at 26 ns

t = 26 nst = 26 ns

Page 20: Center for Radiative Shock  Hydrodynamics Fall 2011 Review

20

Radiographic images from a wide cylindrical target at 26 ns

t = 26 nst = 26 ns

Page 21: Center for Radiative Shock  Hydrodynamics Fall 2011 Review

21

Shock positions of different tube geometries

Page 22: Center for Radiative Shock  Hydrodynamics Fall 2011 Review

22

We have obtained a wide range of data with several diagnostic techniques

Differences among shots:• Geometry• Laser energy• Disk Thickness• Xe pressure• Tube material

(acrylic/polyimide)

Error bars are the size of the markers or smaller

Page 23: Center for Radiative Shock  Hydrodynamics Fall 2011 Review

23

Conclusions and future directions

We have obtained over 100 data points from ~ 35 data shots

Data ranges from shock breakout (~450 ps) to 30 ns and is obtained with several diagnostics techniques

We use a new technique to measure the Be disks that reduces uncertainty in thickness

We have worked with the Omega Laser Facility to reduce timing uncertainty in backlighter pulse timing relative to the drive pulse

We plan to work with General Atomics and Luxel to improve polyimide tubes for Year 5 experimentso This will allow us to observe shock evolution in the nozzle