cellular vehicle communications - etsi€¦ · cellular vehicle communications preliminary results...
TRANSCRIPT
Cellular Vehicle Communications
Preliminary results from the CoCar project
C1 - PublicVodafone Group R&D
Ulrich Dietz
ETSI TC ITS Workshop 2009
Sophia Antipolis
Contents
1. Telematic services - now and in hindsight
2. The Aktiv CoCar project
3. Protocols and architecture
4. Complementary network technologies
5. CoCar Cellular Hazard Warnings (CHW) value creation architecture (VCA)
6. CoCar CHW business case
C1 - PublicVodafone Group R&D Final version
2
6. CoCar CHW business case
7. Conclusion and outlook
Vehicle Communications Landscape Has Changed Over Time - Situation Today and in Hindsight
• Slow but steadily development– GM OnStar, Volvo OnCall, BMW Assist, …
– Various proprietary fleet management systems
– None has been widely successful
• First telematics hype in the late 1990ies
C1 - PublicVodafone Group R&D Final version
3
• First telematics hype in the late 1990ies– … and disillusionment in 2002
• Basically due to immature technology and weak business models– Single service portfolio as a main roadblock
–Vertical / silo applications
– Cooperation between various industries was a challenge
– Pre-GPRS data connectivity way too complicated and inflexible
Are We There Yet?Time is Right to Take up Vehicle Communications
Some defining developments
• Technology now ready for prime time
• Proposed European ITS Directive paves way forward
• eCall as the European initiative will bring mobile communication into the vehicle
• Vehicle manufacturers have begun to drive Car-to-Car communication
C1 - PublicVodafone Group R&D Final version
4
– Wireless Access in Vehicular Environments (WAVE) / pWLAN
– 30 MHz at 5.9GHz recently granted by the Commission for safety applications
• Online is widely accepted – Web 2.0 and other technologies proof that
– This will eventually get into the car
• Mobile Network Operators drive broadband access
The Aktiv CoCar Project
• Aktiv CoCar looks into market for Cellular Hazard Warnings (CHW)– Develops lightweight protocol for the exchange of CHW
– Simulation of effects on cellular networks
– Provides an detailed cooperative business case
• Technical and commercial feasibility report to be released soon
C1 - PublicVodafone Group R&D Final version
5
• Duration: November 2006 - June 2009
• Project Cost: 4 Million Euro, 50% funding
• Funded by the German Federal Ministry of Education and Research – 01 BU 0692
http://www.aktiv-online.org/englisch/aktiv-cocar.html
!
NetworkInfrastructure
CoCarTraffic Information
Server
Cellular Hazard Warningaccident, emergency breaking, black ice, bad
road condition, road works, slow vehicle
!
CoCar CHW Utilise Cellular Communication Networks
NodeB
C1 - PublicVodafone Group R&D Final version
6
NodeB
!
!
Cellular Hazard Warning Update
CoCar Protocol Overview
C1 - PublicVodafone Group R&D Final version
7
FTAP – Fast Traffic Alert Protocol
TPDP – Traffic Probe Data Protocol
RACH – Random Access Channel
DCH - Dedicated Channel
FACH – Forward Access Channel
Network Technologies have Specific Strengths and Weaknesses
C1 - PublicVodafone Group R&D Final version
8
WAVE and Cellular are Complementary Suited for Different Services
C1 - PublicVodafone Group R&D Final version
9
CHW Customers Comprise of End Customers, Business Customers and Governmental Customers
C1 - PublicVodafone Group R&D Final version
10
CoCar CHW Value Creation Chain Includes a Broad Range of Different Actors
C1 - PublicVodafone Group R&D Final version
11
A Cooperative VCA Includes a White Labeled TSP Providing Client Related Services
C1 - PublicVodafone Group R&D Final version
12
CoCar CHW will be Available in Almost Any Car in 2023, the 10th Year of OperationsMain assumptions:
• Huge safety impact of CHW
• Visible and perceived added value
• Demand for improved safety services
• Low investment necessary compared to other (new) technologies
• NO compulsory system
Germany
C1 - PublicVodafone Group R&D Final version
13
• NO compulsory system
• Roll out combined with eCall
• Highly cooperative value creation architecture
• Explicit demand and support from EC
• 10% penetration necessary before being effective
• Subsidized line fit from 2012 on
• Retrofit starts in year 3 of introduction
CoCar CHW can Provide High Societal Benefits and Even an Attractive Business Case• CoCar CHW Benefit-Cost Ratio (BCR) (Germany):
– Safety impacts vs. total system costs: ~ 2 (inline with eImpact study)
– Safety impacts vs. subsidies: > 10– Subsidies include 50% of hardware and 25% of campaign costs, each for 3 years
– Other positive effects not yet included:–Traffic impacts (e. g. reliability of arrival times)–Employment and environmental effects
C1 - PublicVodafone Group R&D Final version
14
–Future innovation capabilities and the improved competitiveness of the EU
• CoCar CHW Business Case (Germany)– Net present value (sum of discounted cash flow) : > 4bn €
– EBITDA: always positive, due to subsidies
– Break even: in 2016, the third year of operation
EBITDA: earnings before interest, taxes, depreciation and amortization
Conclusion and Outlook
• CoCar provides technologies and business case confined to a single service– Cellular Hazard Warnings
• Business case is positive– Break even in the third year of operation
– Always positive EBITDA
• Positive Benefit-Cost Ratio– Safety impacts vs. total system costs: ~ 2
C1 - PublicVodafone Group R&D Final version
15
– Safety impacts vs. total system costs: ~ 2
– Safety impacts vs. subsidies: > 10
• It is about co-opetition – Underlying system has to be set up and run in cooperation
– Competition and differentiation on sales and services necessary
• Technical and business feasibility report will be available soon
• CoCar final demo is scheduled for May, 14th 2009 in Munich
Ulrich Dietz
Vodafone Group R&D
Vodafone Group Services GmbH
C1 - PublicVodafone Group R&D
T + 49 172 8496354
F + 49 89 [email protected]
Chiemgaustr. 116
81549 Munich
Germany