台灣螺絲扣件產業成功關鍵因素之探討dba.kuas.edu.tw/files/archive/163_bc8f2f6f.pdf ·...
TRANSCRIPT
-
1057
A Study of the Key Success Factor for Taiwan Fasteners Industry
TS16949
(AHP)
2003 6
2004 44 2004 1.69 /
1.01 /
2003200624
4521-1
(1/kg)
-
1058
TS16949
(1)
(2)
(Analytical Hierarchy
ProcessAHP)
(3)
1.
80%
-
1059
()88
1999623
FQA(Fastener Quality Act)
WTO
16002
110018000()
()38%27%
(industrial cluster)
2078%400
400095%
3
2.
2010580
20091,379
1.
(key success factorsKSF) Daniel 1961 Management Information
Crisis
( 2-1)
2.
Ferguson and Dickson
(1)
(2)
(3)(4)
(5)
-
1060
KSF
3.
Hofer and Schendle Strategy Formulation and Analytic Concepts
(1)(2)(3)
(4)(5)
Leidecker and Bruno (1)
(2)
Porter
(3)-
(4)
(5)
(6)
(7)-
(AHP)
(AHP) 5 7
- =0.75 () 0.75
(1989)
1. QS9000
QS-9000 1994 8 GM Ford Chrysler
ISO9000 ISO
90011994 ++PPAP
QS9000
2006 12 TS16949
2. ISO/TS16949
TS Technical SpecificationISO/TS 16949 ISO
/ 1999 3
-
1061
1 2002 3 1 ISO/TS 16949
(IATFInternational Automotive Task Force) AIAG
() VDA/QMC () SMMT () ANFIA () CCFA/FIEV ()
ISO/TS 16949 ISO/TS 16949 QS 9000 (
)VDA 6.1()( EAQF 94() AVSQ 94 ())
ISO/TS 16949
3. ()
() CNS ()()CNS
CNS
() CNS ()CNS mark
()
()(TAF)
() TAF ()
TAF IAF MLA
TAF (Conformity Assessment Procedure) ISO Guide 67
()/CE () SAE. ASTM, ASME, IFI, ISO, EN, DIN, BS
/(//()
) ISO Guide 65
(WTO TBT)
()
(Analytic Hierarchy ProcessAHP) Thomas L.Saaty 1971
(Nominal Scale)(Pairwise Comparison)
(Comparison Matrix)(Eigenvector)-
(Eigenvalue)
AHP
AHP
(1).
(2).
(3).
-
1062
(4).
(5).(pairwise comparison)(positive reciprocal matrix)
(6).(A BB C A C)(A B B
C A C )
(7).(consistency)
(8).(weighting principal)
(9).
AHP 1357
9 2468 1
1 AHP
1 (equal importance)
3 (weak importance)
5 (essential importance)
7 (very strong importance)
9 (absolute importance)
2468 (intermediate importance)
AHP
n
n(n-1)/2 n/7
(1)(pairwise comparison matrix)
1/9
1/8 1/212389 n
1
(2)
Saaty
(consistency index) 0.1 ( C.R
-
1063
KSF
KSF
AHP
KSF
KSF
1
()
;
1.
(1):
(2)
(3)
2.
(primary data (secondary
data), :
(Stewart, 1984Kiecolt and Nathan1988; 2000
(1)
(2)
-
1064
(3)
(4)
(5)
3.
(1)
?
(2)~
(3)
1.
2.
3.
4.:
(4) ( missing data) ,
( )
-
1065
1.
Porter1980
13
2
2
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9 /
10
11
12
13
2.
15 3
3.
Strategy Strategies
Porter(1980) Competitive Strategy
( 4)
14 5
-
1066
3
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
4 Porter
1.
2.
3.
5
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
-
1067
AHP
(1)
(2)
/()
(AD)
AD/(R)AHP
10 10100 %
6
6
()
()
()
()
1 4 3 2 0 (3)
(AHP)
1989 7 AHP 5
7 AHP
-
0.75()(0.75)() 0.75
(1989)
0.75
0.75
4-1
0.75
0.75
0.75
-
1068
AHP
2 AHP
Thomas L.Saaty(1980)
(1)(3)(5)(7)
(9)(2)(4)(6)(8)
302583%
AHP
7
2
-
1069
7
0.25 0.0475 11
0.12 0.0228 14
0.35 0.0665 8
0.04 0.0076 16
0.09 0.0171 15
0.16 0.0304 13
0.17 0.0493 10
0.22 0.0638 9
0.15 0.0435 12
0.23 0.0667 7
0.24 0.0696 6
0.22 0.1122 3
0.23 0.1173 2
0.14 0.0714 4
0.27 0.1377 1
0.14 0.0714 4
(AHP)
ISO/TS 16949 ISO/TS 16949
ISO/TS 16949
ISO/TS 16949 PPAP
-
1070
4-6
[1] 2010 2011 10
[2] (AHP)() 27(6) 1-20
1989
[3] (AHP)() 27(7) 5-22
1989
[4] KSF
2003
[5] 2000
[6] S
(EMBA)2005
[7] 2001
[8] 2000
[9] 2010
[10] ()
[11]
[12] 10
[13] (NFDA) 126
[14]
2008
[15] David W. StewartMichael A. Kamins2000
[1] Saaty,T.L.,The analytic hierarchy processMcGraw-Hill, New York1980
-
1071
[1] http://www.google.com.tw/url?sa=t&source=web&cd=5&ved=0CDQQFjAE&url=http%3A%2F%2Fmail2.tmue.
edu.tw%2F~g961209%2F961126.doc&ei=fH3iTeujHIeivgO93piEBw&usg=AFQjCNERNHkuNSsoZX6wVXqH
HXqBqfbrnw
[2] http://www.google.com.tw/url?sa=t&source=web&cd=6&ved=0CDsQFjAF&url=http%3A%2F%2Fweb.ydu.edu.
tw%2F~deniel%2F981RS%2Fch14.ppt&ei=fH3iTeujHIeivgO93piEBw&usg=AFQjCNFkN3MEh4GNN667sLx
NbYctx3Twqw