ccss 2015 petri

39
Using Technology to Provide Peer Feedback on Historical Writing California Council for the Social Studies 54 th Annual Conference March 6, 2015 Dr. Scott M. Petri

Upload: los-angeles-unified-school-district

Post on 18-Jul-2015

752 views

Category:

Documents


1 download

TRANSCRIPT

Page 1: Ccss 2015 petri

Using Technology to Provide Peer Feedback on Historical Writing

California Council for the Social Studies 54th Annual Conference

March 6, 2015 Dr. Scott M. Petri

Page 2: Ccss 2015 petri

Why History Teachers Drink in the Afternoon

Page 3: Ccss 2015 petri

1. Goal-setting approaches to student writing

2. Peer Review (with & without tech)

3. Pairing robo-graders with peer review

You should leave this presentation determined to double the amount of writing you normally assign in your class.

Page 4: Ccss 2015 petri
Page 5: Ccss 2015 petri

Previously Analyzed Measures

1. Word Count/Length2. Claims3. Rebuttals4. Argumentative Strategies5. Document Use6. Total Number of Citations7. Number of Unique Documents8. Highest Level of Document Use

Page 6: Ccss 2015 petri

P2 – Napoleon Essay

(N=31) 6 missing assignmentsLow=48Median=338High=760

A B C D

Page 7: Ccss 2015 petri

Cohort II DBQ Performance Summary

Class Per.

Total Student Load Low Median High

Missing/Incomplete

Didn't Compl % Compl %

P1 44 125 350 600 12 27% 73%

P2 42 220 410 608 13 31% 69%

P3 44 28 271 519 20 45% 55%

P5 44 36 250 415 21 48% 52%

P7 30 101 345 546 12 40% 60%

P8 25 52 203 405 10 40% 60%

AVG 38 94 305 516 15 39% 61%

Page 8: Ccss 2015 petri

Moving Forward

Using peer reviewto move the burden of

evaluation from teacher to student

Page 9: Ccss 2015 petri

Peer Review Experiment(N=116)

Page 10: Ccss 2015 petri
Page 11: Ccss 2015 petri

Eugenics was also known as the science of good breeding. During the early 1900s through the 1930’s, eugenics was a well-respected and popular movement. After Hitler used eugenics to justify the killing of Jews, gays, and people with disabilities, the eugenics movement declined in popularity. Despite this, the eugenics movement should be viewed as positive because it ______________, ________________, and ______________.

uses good breeding techniques to make

Page 12: Ccss 2015 petri
Page 13: Ccss 2015 petri
Page 14: Ccss 2015 petri
Page 15: Ccss 2015 petri

Student Comments on their Peers’ Writing

I gave him this grade because he didn’t really have everything for the thesis. He didn’t really write the three reasons why this is his thesis.

Every single one of his paragraphs supports his three legs from his thesis statement. He provides strong facts and supporting evidence.

She gives a thesis and explains it in each separate paragraph, and you can clearly see when she talks about a new paragraph.

Page 16: Ccss 2015 petri

Peer Review Activity

Page 17: Ccss 2015 petri

How Reliable is Peer Review?

Page 18: Ccss 2015 petri

What if I have No Tech?

Page 19: Ccss 2015 petri
Page 20: Ccss 2015 petri
Page 21: Ccss 2015 petri

Robo-Readers

Page 22: Ccss 2015 petri

Mayfield argues that automated essay scorers belong in the students hands because they “change the locus of control, making essay revision a choice led by a student at his or her own pace, instead of a punitive requirement from a teacher.”

Page 23: Ccss 2015 petri

This change has two benefits: (1) the negativity associated with assessment is under the student’s control. The student knows where they stand, so they seek to collaborate with the teacher to improve. The teacher and student now have the same goal. (2) automated revision histories enable students to “show their work” effortlessly. This gives teachers a better picture of student progress.

Page 24: Ccss 2015 petri

Revision Assistant

Page 25: Ccss 2015 petri

Hemingway App

Page 26: Ccss 2015 petri

Paper Rater

Page 27: Ccss 2015 petri
Page 28: Ccss 2015 petri
Page 29: Ccss 2015 petri
Page 30: Ccss 2015 petri
Page 31: Ccss 2015 petri
Page 32: Ccss 2015 petri
Page 33: Ccss 2015 petri
Page 34: Ccss 2015 petri
Page 35: Ccss 2015 petri
Page 36: Ccss 2015 petri

If we truly want to make students college and career ready, then we need to dramatically increase the amount of writing assigned to students across all subjects in high school.

Page 37: Ccss 2015 petri

Tweeting in 140 characters does little to prepare students for the kind of writing they will be expected to do in college. – Carol Jago

Page 38: Ccss 2015 petri

1. Use goal-setting to evaluate student writing

2. Try Peer Review (with or without tech)

3. Pair this with robo-graders

Double the amount of writing you assign in your class!

Page 39: Ccss 2015 petri

Contact: [email protected] @scottmpetriwww.HistoryRewriter.com

Thank You