cc2 sp 11 3.1 arguments
DESCRIPTION
TRANSCRIPT
![Page 1: Cc2 sp 11 3.1 arguments](https://reader037.vdocuments.us/reader037/viewer/2022102813/546f9398af7959ec558b4586/html5/thumbnails/1.jpg)
CC2 SP11 3.1
CC2 SP 11 3.2
Methods of Persuasion 2:Analyzing & Evaluating Arguments
![Page 2: Cc2 sp 11 3.1 arguments](https://reader037.vdocuments.us/reader037/viewer/2022102813/546f9398af7959ec558b4586/html5/thumbnails/2.jpg)
Abbey: In class writing
In what ways do you find his argument true/false/persuasive/unpersuasive?
How does this compare with your classmates?
![Page 3: Cc2 sp 11 3.1 arguments](https://reader037.vdocuments.us/reader037/viewer/2022102813/546f9398af7959ec558b4586/html5/thumbnails/3.jpg)
Edward Abbey
1. Do you understand the argument?Summarize it in two sentences.Compare your summary with others.Revise your summary if need be.2. The doubting and believing game.What might you believe if you stretched your
imagination? How does this compare with your classmates?What does this enable you to see about the argument?
![Page 4: Cc2 sp 11 3.1 arguments](https://reader037.vdocuments.us/reader037/viewer/2022102813/546f9398af7959ec558b4586/html5/thumbnails/4.jpg)
Edward Abbey
• Ask pertinent questions: What questions did this text raise?
![Page 5: Cc2 sp 11 3.1 arguments](https://reader037.vdocuments.us/reader037/viewer/2022102813/546f9398af7959ec558b4586/html5/thumbnails/5.jpg)
Edward Abbey
• Determine the author’s point of view/spin.What are his biases?How do they compare with your point of
view?
![Page 6: Cc2 sp 11 3.1 arguments](https://reader037.vdocuments.us/reader037/viewer/2022102813/546f9398af7959ec558b4586/html5/thumbnails/6.jpg)
Edward Abbey
• What is the cultural context?• 1980- Love Canal- 700 families relocated• 1980- Acid Rain Deposition Act.• 1983- EPA cuts back on research about ozone
depletion• 1984- Bhopal disaster. Fertilizer plant leaks
chemical that kills 2000 and disables another 50,000.
![Page 7: Cc2 sp 11 3.1 arguments](https://reader037.vdocuments.us/reader037/viewer/2022102813/546f9398af7959ec558b4586/html5/thumbnails/7.jpg)
Abbey: Appeals based on Emotion
• Introduction: Analogy between corporate use of the wilderness and armed robbery.
• Imagery: “three-piece-suited gangsters” “bandit enterprises” “jellyfish government agencies”
![Page 8: Cc2 sp 11 3.1 arguments](https://reader037.vdocuments.us/reader037/viewer/2022102813/546f9398af7959ec558b4586/html5/thumbnails/8.jpg)
Abbey: Appeals based on Ethics/Character
• How does he use voice and tone to establish his character?
• How does he use humor?• What are the benefits of these strategies?• What are the risks?
![Page 9: Cc2 sp 11 3.1 arguments](https://reader037.vdocuments.us/reader037/viewer/2022102813/546f9398af7959ec558b4586/html5/thumbnails/9.jpg)
Abbey: Appeals Based on Logic
Claim: Reasons:
Assumptions:
Qualifiers Evidence:
![Page 10: Cc2 sp 11 3.1 arguments](https://reader037.vdocuments.us/reader037/viewer/2022102813/546f9398af7959ec558b4586/html5/thumbnails/10.jpg)
Abbey: Appeals Based on Logic
• Claim: Wilderness is under attack• Reasons: Mining and beef industry are using
public land for profit.• Evidence: ?• Assumptions: Value wilderness over
capital/economic profits.• Qualifiers: none!
![Page 11: Cc2 sp 11 3.1 arguments](https://reader037.vdocuments.us/reader037/viewer/2022102813/546f9398af7959ec558b4586/html5/thumbnails/11.jpg)
Abbey. Logic. 2.
• Claim: “Representative democracy in the US has broken down.”
• Reasons: Money influences politics more than the interests of the public.
• Evidence: Reference to authority (Lewis Mumford).
• Assumptions: Value of democracy.• Qualifiers: none!
![Page 12: Cc2 sp 11 3.1 arguments](https://reader037.vdocuments.us/reader037/viewer/2022102813/546f9398af7959ec558b4586/html5/thumbnails/12.jpg)
Abbey. Logic. 3.
• Claim: The wilderness is our home.• If a bandit threatens our home, we are
entitled to protect it.• Industry is threatening the wilderness.• We should protect the wilderness, with force
if necessary. What are the assumptions underlying this
argument?
![Page 13: Cc2 sp 11 3.1 arguments](https://reader037.vdocuments.us/reader037/viewer/2022102813/546f9398af7959ec558b4586/html5/thumbnails/13.jpg)
Abbey: In class writing post-discussion
In what ways do you find his argument true/false/persuasive/unpersuasive?
How does this compare with your classmates?
![Page 14: Cc2 sp 11 3.1 arguments](https://reader037.vdocuments.us/reader037/viewer/2022102813/546f9398af7959ec558b4586/html5/thumbnails/14.jpg)
David Orr
In what ways do you find his argument true/false/persuasive/unpersuasive?
How does this compare with your classmates?
![Page 15: Cc2 sp 11 3.1 arguments](https://reader037.vdocuments.us/reader037/viewer/2022102813/546f9398af7959ec558b4586/html5/thumbnails/15.jpg)
David Orr
1. Do you understand the argument?Summarize it in two sentences.Compare your summary with others.Revise your summary if need be.
2. The doubting and believing game. What does this enable you to see about the
argument?
![Page 16: Cc2 sp 11 3.1 arguments](https://reader037.vdocuments.us/reader037/viewer/2022102813/546f9398af7959ec558b4586/html5/thumbnails/16.jpg)
David Orr
• Ask pertinent questions: What questions did this text raise?
![Page 17: Cc2 sp 11 3.1 arguments](https://reader037.vdocuments.us/reader037/viewer/2022102813/546f9398af7959ec558b4586/html5/thumbnails/17.jpg)
David Orr. Cultural Context. 2008
• Iraq War.• Climate Change.• Economic Recession.
![Page 18: Cc2 sp 11 3.1 arguments](https://reader037.vdocuments.us/reader037/viewer/2022102813/546f9398af7959ec558b4586/html5/thumbnails/18.jpg)
David Orr. Appeals based on Emotion.
• Use of authority to establish trust.• Use of “we” to connect to audience.• Attention to “ordinary people” as audience
with power to enact change.
![Page 19: Cc2 sp 11 3.1 arguments](https://reader037.vdocuments.us/reader037/viewer/2022102813/546f9398af7959ec558b4586/html5/thumbnails/19.jpg)
David Orr. Appeals based on Ethics/Character
• How does he use voice, tone, and research to establish his character?
![Page 20: Cc2 sp 11 3.1 arguments](https://reader037.vdocuments.us/reader037/viewer/2022102813/546f9398af7959ec558b4586/html5/thumbnails/20.jpg)
David Orr. Logic. 1.
• Claim: Brute force will lead to destruction of human and biotic worlds.
• Reasons: Appeal to common knowledge• Evidence: Historical evidence. Scientific
evidence.• Assumptions: Humans have the capacity to
change.• Qualifiers: Since WW2, some improvement.
![Page 21: Cc2 sp 11 3.1 arguments](https://reader037.vdocuments.us/reader037/viewer/2022102813/546f9398af7959ec558b4586/html5/thumbnails/21.jpg)
David Orr. Logic. Group Activity.
• Review the section I assign to you and your group.
• Analyze and assess the following categories:– Claims– Reasons– Evidence– Assumptions– Qualifiers
![Page 22: Cc2 sp 11 3.1 arguments](https://reader037.vdocuments.us/reader037/viewer/2022102813/546f9398af7959ec558b4586/html5/thumbnails/22.jpg)
David Orr: Post discussion writing
In what ways do you find his argument true/false/persuasive/unpersuasive?
How does this compare with your classmates?
![Page 23: Cc2 sp 11 3.1 arguments](https://reader037.vdocuments.us/reader037/viewer/2022102813/546f9398af7959ec558b4586/html5/thumbnails/23.jpg)
In class writing
• What did today’s lesson teach you about persuasive writing, audience, and methods of persuasion.
![Page 24: Cc2 sp 11 3.1 arguments](https://reader037.vdocuments.us/reader037/viewer/2022102813/546f9398af7959ec558b4586/html5/thumbnails/24.jpg)
![Page 25: Cc2 sp 11 3.1 arguments](https://reader037.vdocuments.us/reader037/viewer/2022102813/546f9398af7959ec558b4586/html5/thumbnails/25.jpg)
In what ways is the argument persuasive/unpersuasive
![Page 26: Cc2 sp 11 3.1 arguments](https://reader037.vdocuments.us/reader037/viewer/2022102813/546f9398af7959ec558b4586/html5/thumbnails/26.jpg)
![Page 27: Cc2 sp 11 3.1 arguments](https://reader037.vdocuments.us/reader037/viewer/2022102813/546f9398af7959ec558b4586/html5/thumbnails/27.jpg)
![Page 28: Cc2 sp 11 3.1 arguments](https://reader037.vdocuments.us/reader037/viewer/2022102813/546f9398af7959ec558b4586/html5/thumbnails/28.jpg)
![Page 29: Cc2 sp 11 3.1 arguments](https://reader037.vdocuments.us/reader037/viewer/2022102813/546f9398af7959ec558b4586/html5/thumbnails/29.jpg)
![Page 30: Cc2 sp 11 3.1 arguments](https://reader037.vdocuments.us/reader037/viewer/2022102813/546f9398af7959ec558b4586/html5/thumbnails/30.jpg)
![Page 31: Cc2 sp 11 3.1 arguments](https://reader037.vdocuments.us/reader037/viewer/2022102813/546f9398af7959ec558b4586/html5/thumbnails/31.jpg)
![Page 32: Cc2 sp 11 3.1 arguments](https://reader037.vdocuments.us/reader037/viewer/2022102813/546f9398af7959ec558b4586/html5/thumbnails/32.jpg)
![Page 33: Cc2 sp 11 3.1 arguments](https://reader037.vdocuments.us/reader037/viewer/2022102813/546f9398af7959ec558b4586/html5/thumbnails/33.jpg)
![Page 34: Cc2 sp 11 3.1 arguments](https://reader037.vdocuments.us/reader037/viewer/2022102813/546f9398af7959ec558b4586/html5/thumbnails/34.jpg)
![Page 35: Cc2 sp 11 3.1 arguments](https://reader037.vdocuments.us/reader037/viewer/2022102813/546f9398af7959ec558b4586/html5/thumbnails/35.jpg)
![Page 36: Cc2 sp 11 3.1 arguments](https://reader037.vdocuments.us/reader037/viewer/2022102813/546f9398af7959ec558b4586/html5/thumbnails/36.jpg)