cc global justice
TRANSCRIPT
![Page 1: Cc global justice](https://reader033.vdocuments.us/reader033/viewer/2022052907/559404251a28aba9458b47d9/html5/thumbnails/1.jpg)
GLOBAL JUSTICE & CLIMATE CHANGE
![Page 2: Cc global justice](https://reader033.vdocuments.us/reader033/viewer/2022052907/559404251a28aba9458b47d9/html5/thumbnails/2.jpg)
WE CREATED A WEBSITE WHERE YOU CAN WRITE YOUR QUESTIONS
AND COMMENTS. !
WWW.GLOBAL-JUSTICE.WIX.COM/LUISS
AT THE END OF THE PRESENTATION WE WILL ANSWER TO YOUR QUESTIONS
![Page 3: Cc global justice](https://reader033.vdocuments.us/reader033/viewer/2022052907/559404251a28aba9458b47d9/html5/thumbnails/3.jpg)
OUR ASSUMPTIONS • CLIMATE CHANGE IS A PROBLEM
IS IT A GLOBAL ISSUE?
• ANTHROPOGENIC EMISSIONS
• RICH vs POOR
CAUSES - EFFECTS - RISK OF A CATASTROPHE
![Page 4: Cc global justice](https://reader033.vdocuments.us/reader033/viewer/2022052907/559404251a28aba9458b47d9/html5/thumbnails/4.jpg)
WHO’S IN CHARGE?
THE AGENTS: !
!
• NATION STATES !
• GLOBAL INSTITUTIONS !
• INDIVIDUALS
![Page 5: Cc global justice](https://reader033.vdocuments.us/reader033/viewer/2022052907/559404251a28aba9458b47d9/html5/thumbnails/5.jpg)
CAN CC BE CONSIDERED AS A PROBLEM OF GLOBAL JUSTICE?
THREE FEATURES: !
•INTERGENERATIONAL JUSTICE !
•INTERNATIONAL JUSTICE !
•GLOBAL GOVERNANCE !
![Page 6: Cc global justice](https://reader033.vdocuments.us/reader033/viewer/2022052907/559404251a28aba9458b47d9/html5/thumbnails/6.jpg)
HOW TO DEAL WITH CC?
•OLD PARADIGMS HAVE FAILED
• CLIMATE CHANGE: WE NEED A NEW OUTLOOK
![Page 7: Cc global justice](https://reader033.vdocuments.us/reader033/viewer/2022052907/559404251a28aba9458b47d9/html5/thumbnails/7.jpg)
INTERGENERATIONAL JUSTICEPAST GENERATIONS
![Page 8: Cc global justice](https://reader033.vdocuments.us/reader033/viewer/2022052907/559404251a28aba9458b47d9/html5/thumbnails/8.jpg)
THE QUESTION OF INTERGENERATIONAL JUSTICE
INTERGENERATIONAL JUSTICE IS ABOUT THE MORAL OBLIGATIONS PRESENTLY EXISTING MORAL AGENTS OWE TO PAST AND FUTURE GENERATIONS !• PAST GENERATIONS: SHOULD WE PAY FOR PAST GENERATIONS’ EMISSIONS?AND IF YES, WHO SHOULD PAY? !• FUTURE GENERATIONS: SHOULD THE CLIMATE SYSTEM BE PROTECTED FOR THEIR BENEFIT?
![Page 9: Cc global justice](https://reader033.vdocuments.us/reader033/viewer/2022052907/559404251a28aba9458b47d9/html5/thumbnails/9.jpg)
PAST GENERATIONS
TWO ISSUES: !
• DO WE HAVE TO PAY FOR HARM CAUSED BY PAST GENERATIONS?
!
•WHO PAYS WHEN THE POLLUTERS ARE NO LONGER ALIVE? !
![Page 10: Cc global justice](https://reader033.vdocuments.us/reader033/viewer/2022052907/559404251a28aba9458b47d9/html5/thumbnails/10.jpg)
DO WE HAVE TO PAY?
YESNO
EXCUSABLE IGNORANCE
BENEFICIARY PAYS PRINCIPLE
(BPP)
HYBRID ACCOUNT
![Page 11: Cc global justice](https://reader033.vdocuments.us/reader033/viewer/2022052907/559404251a28aba9458b47d9/html5/thumbnails/11.jpg)
WHO PAYS?
• BPP, INDIVIDUALS MUST PAY !
•CANEY’S OBJECTION: THE NON-IDENTITY PROBLEM !
!
• COLLECTIVE APPROACH IS MORE COHERENT BUT IT IS UNFAIR
!
!
![Page 12: Cc global justice](https://reader033.vdocuments.us/reader033/viewer/2022052907/559404251a28aba9458b47d9/html5/thumbnails/12.jpg)
INTERGENERATIONAL JUSTICEFUTURE GENERATIONS
![Page 13: Cc global justice](https://reader033.vdocuments.us/reader033/viewer/2022052907/559404251a28aba9458b47d9/html5/thumbnails/13.jpg)
WHY DO WE TAKE INTO ACCOUNT FUTURE GENERATIONS?
• DEFINITION OF S. D. , BRUNTLAND COMMISSION, 1987
• WE HAVE TO DECIDE TODAY WHO PAYS FOR THE HARM CAUSED BY CC
• IT IS DIFFICULT TO DECIDE TO PAY TODAY BECAUSE COSTS ARE TOO HIGH AND THE RESULTS ARE IN THE FUTURE
![Page 14: Cc global justice](https://reader033.vdocuments.us/reader033/viewer/2022052907/559404251a28aba9458b47d9/html5/thumbnails/14.jpg)
WHY WE HAVE TO PAY FOR FUTURE GENERATIONS?
SOME APPROACHES !
!
•INDIRECT RECIPROCITY !
• MUTUAL ADVANTAGE !
![Page 15: Cc global justice](https://reader033.vdocuments.us/reader033/viewer/2022052907/559404251a28aba9458b47d9/html5/thumbnails/15.jpg)
DUTY OF JUSTICE
• THE DUTY NOT TO HARM OTHER PEOPLE. IT IS DUE TO INDIVIDUALS
• THE INTUITION OF NEUTRALITY IS FALSE
• EXISTENTIAL RISK AND RISK OF A CATASTROPHE
![Page 16: Cc global justice](https://reader033.vdocuments.us/reader033/viewer/2022052907/559404251a28aba9458b47d9/html5/thumbnails/16.jpg)
PROBLEMS IN EVALUATING THE FUTURE
•EVALUATION OF FUTURE (DISCOUNT RATE)
•INCOMMENSURABILITY
!
•AGGREGATION
![Page 17: Cc global justice](https://reader033.vdocuments.us/reader033/viewer/2022052907/559404251a28aba9458b47d9/html5/thumbnails/17.jpg)
INTERNATIONAL JUSTICECLIMATE CHANGE & GLOBAL JUSTICE
![Page 18: Cc global justice](https://reader033.vdocuments.us/reader033/viewer/2022052907/559404251a28aba9458b47d9/html5/thumbnails/18.jpg)
UNEQUAL BURDENS
IF SOMEONE IMPOSES COST UPON OTHER PEOPLE WE ARE JUSTIFIED IN REVERSING THE INEQUALITY BY IMPOSING EXTRA BURDENS UPON THE PRODUCER OF THE INEQUALITY !• EXTRA BURDENS !• THE MINIMUM EXTENT OF THE COMPENSATORY BURDEN IS ENOUGH TO CORRECT THE INEQUALITY PREVIOUSLY UNILATERALLY IMPOSED
![Page 19: Cc global justice](https://reader033.vdocuments.us/reader033/viewer/2022052907/559404251a28aba9458b47d9/html5/thumbnails/19.jpg)
1st PRINCIPLE OF EQUITY
WHEN A PARTY HAS IN THE PAST TAKEN AN UNFAIR ADVANTAGE OF OTHERS BY IMPOSING COSTS UPON THEM WITHOUT THEIR CONSENT, THOSE WHO HAVE BEEN UNILATERALLY PUT AT A DISADVANTAGE ARE ENTITLED TO DEMAND THAT IN THE FUTURE THE OFFENDING PARTY SHOULDER BURDENS THAT ARE UNEQUAL AT LEAST TO THE EXTENT OF THE UNFAIR ADVANTAGE PREVIOUSLY TAKEN, IN ORDER TO RESTORE EQUALITY.
(Shue, 1999)
![Page 20: Cc global justice](https://reader033.vdocuments.us/reader033/viewer/2022052907/559404251a28aba9458b47d9/html5/thumbnails/20.jpg)
COUNTER-ARGUMENTS OF DCs
1. THE LDCs HAVE ALSO BENEFITED FROM THE ENRICHMENT OF THE DCs
!2. WHATEVER ENVIRONMENTAL DAMAGE HAS BEEN DONE WAS UNINTENTIONAL !3. IT IS NOT FAIR TO HOLD THE PERSON RESPONSIBLE DAMAGE HE DID NOT DO HIMSELF
![Page 21: Cc global justice](https://reader033.vdocuments.us/reader033/viewer/2022052907/559404251a28aba9458b47d9/html5/thumbnails/21.jpg)
2nd PRINCIPLE OF EQUITY
AMONG A NUMBER OF PARTIES, ALL OF WHOM ARE BOUND TO CONTRIBUTE TO SOME COMMON ENDEAVOR, THE PARTIES WHO HAVE THE MOST RESOURCES NORMALLY SHOULD CONTRIBUTE THE MOST TO THE ENDEAVOR.
(Shue, 1999)
![Page 22: Cc global justice](https://reader033.vdocuments.us/reader033/viewer/2022052907/559404251a28aba9458b47d9/html5/thumbnails/22.jpg)
RADICAL INEQUALITY
SUCH AN INEQUALITY IS RADICAL BECAUSE THE TOTAL OF AVAILABLE RESOURCES IS SO GREAT THAT THERE IS NO NEED TO REDUCE THE BEST-OFF PEOPLE TO ANYWHERE NEAR THE MINIMUM LEVEL IN ORDER TO BRING THE WORST-OFF PEOPLE UP TO THE MINIMUM.
(Nagel, 1977)
![Page 23: Cc global justice](https://reader033.vdocuments.us/reader033/viewer/2022052907/559404251a28aba9458b47d9/html5/thumbnails/23.jpg)
3rd PRINCIPLE OF EQUITY
WHEN SOME PEOPLE HAVE LESS THAN ENOUGH FOR A DECENT HUMAN LIFE, OTHER PEOPLE HAVE FAR MORE THAN ENOUGH, AND THE TOTAL RESOURCES AVAILABLE ARE SO GREAT THAT EVERYONE COULD HAVE AT LEAST ENOUGH WITHOUT PREVENTING SOME PEOPLE FROM STILL RETAINING CONSIDERABLY MORE THAT OTHERS HAVE, IT IS UNFAIR NOT TO GUARANTEE EVERYONE AT LEAST AN ADEQUATE MINIMUM.
(Shue, 1999)
![Page 24: Cc global justice](https://reader033.vdocuments.us/reader033/viewer/2022052907/559404251a28aba9458b47d9/html5/thumbnails/24.jpg)
OBJECTIONS
1. OVER-POPULATION !2. IT IS NOT FAIR TO EXPECT MEMBERS OF ONE SOCIETY TO HELP TO MAINTAIN A GUARANTEE OF A MINIMUM FOR MEMBERS OF ANOTHER SOCIETY
![Page 25: Cc global justice](https://reader033.vdocuments.us/reader033/viewer/2022052907/559404251a28aba9458b47d9/html5/thumbnails/25.jpg)
CONCLUSION
WHATEVER NEEDS TO BE DONE BY WEALTHY INDUSTRIALIZED STATES OR BY POOR NON-INDUSTRIALIZED STATES ABOUT GLOBAL ENVIRONMENTAL PROBLEMS LIKE OZONE DESTRUCTION AND GLOBAL WARMING, THE COSTS SHOULD INITIALLY BE BORNE BY THE WEALTHY INDUSTRIALIZED STATES.
(Shue, 1999)
![Page 26: Cc global justice](https://reader033.vdocuments.us/reader033/viewer/2022052907/559404251a28aba9458b47d9/html5/thumbnails/26.jpg)
COSTS ALLOCATIONCLIMATE CHANGE & GLOBAL JUSTICE
![Page 27: Cc global justice](https://reader033.vdocuments.us/reader033/viewer/2022052907/559404251a28aba9458b47d9/html5/thumbnails/27.jpg)
ALLOCATING THE COSTS OF PREVENTION
• IS IT FAIR TO REQUIRE SACRIFICE TO THE POOREST COUNTRIES?
TWO CHALLENGES: !• LDC MUST DEVELOP THROUGH CLEAN ENERGY
• CO2 EMISSIONS OF THE WEALTHY SHOULD BE REDUCED OF A HIGHER AMOUNT THAN THE INCREASE OF LDC
![Page 28: Cc global justice](https://reader033.vdocuments.us/reader033/viewer/2022052907/559404251a28aba9458b47d9/html5/thumbnails/28.jpg)
ALLOCATING THE COSTS OF COPING
TWO MISLEADING PRINCIPLES:
• TO EACH HIS OWN: EVERY NATION STATES DEALS WITH ITS OWN PROBLEMS
• WAIT AND SEE: DISCUSSING THE ALLOCATION OF RESPONSIBILITY FOR POTENTIAL PROBLEMS AFTER THEY ACTUALLY ARISE
![Page 29: Cc global justice](https://reader033.vdocuments.us/reader033/viewer/2022052907/559404251a28aba9458b47d9/html5/thumbnails/29.jpg)
PROVING “TO EACH HIS OWN” WRONG
• THE EFFECTS OF CC DO NOT FALL INSIDE ONE NATION STATE
• ACTUAL RESPONSIBILITY IS HARD TO DETECT
• DO NATION STATES REALLY HAVE THE CONTROL OVER THEIR OWN RESOURCES?
![Page 30: Cc global justice](https://reader033.vdocuments.us/reader033/viewer/2022052907/559404251a28aba9458b47d9/html5/thumbnails/30.jpg)
CONFUTING THE “WAIT AND SEE” PRINCIPLE
• PREVENTION COSTS AND COPING COSTS INFLUENCE EACH OTHER
• WOULD IT BE FAIR TO ADOPT DIFFERENT PRINCIPLES RO DEAL WITH DIFFERENT SETS OF TERMS AND EXPECTING EVERY COUNTRY TO AGREE ON THE TWO IN ADVANCE?
![Page 31: Cc global justice](https://reader033.vdocuments.us/reader033/viewer/2022052907/559404251a28aba9458b47d9/html5/thumbnails/31.jpg)
BACKGROUND ALLOCATION OF RESOURCES AND FAIR BARGAINING
• NEGOTIATING BOTH SETS OF TERMS IN A COMPLEMENTARY WAY PREVENTS UNFAIR TERMS OF COPING
MORALLY ACCEPTABLE BARGAINS DEPEND UPON INITIAL HOLDINGS THAT ARE NOT MORALLY UNACCEPTABLE- NOT, FOR ONE THING, SO OUTRAGEOUSLY UNEQUAL THAT SOME PARTIES ARE AT THE MERCY OF OTHERS.
(Shue, 1993)
![Page 32: Cc global justice](https://reader033.vdocuments.us/reader033/viewer/2022052907/559404251a28aba9458b47d9/html5/thumbnails/32.jpg)
ALLOCATING EMISSIONS : TRANSITION AND GOAL
• PROGRESSIVELY DECLINING CEILING SHOULD BE PLACED UPON TOTAL EMISSIONS
• IF THE PREVIOUS ISSUES CONCERNED MONEY, THE LAST ONE CONCERNS CO2 ITSELF
![Page 33: Cc global justice](https://reader033.vdocuments.us/reader033/viewer/2022052907/559404251a28aba9458b47d9/html5/thumbnails/33.jpg)
WHO SHOULD BEAR THE BURDENS OF GLOBAL CC?
THE HYBRID SOLUTION OF CANEY
![Page 34: Cc global justice](https://reader033.vdocuments.us/reader033/viewer/2022052907/559404251a28aba9458b47d9/html5/thumbnails/34.jpg)
METHODOLOGY 1/2
THEORIES OF JUSTICE USUALLY TEND TO FOCUS ON HOW INCOME AND WEALTH ARE DISTRIBUTED
![Page 35: Cc global justice](https://reader033.vdocuments.us/reader033/viewer/2022052907/559404251a28aba9458b47d9/html5/thumbnails/35.jpg)
METHODOLOGY 2/2
BUT: !•IT IS HARD TO VALUE ENVIRONMENT (INCOMMENSURABILITY) •GLOBAL DISTRIBUTION VS INTRASTATE DISTRIBUTION •INTERGENERATIONAL PROBLEM
![Page 36: Cc global justice](https://reader033.vdocuments.us/reader033/viewer/2022052907/559404251a28aba9458b47d9/html5/thumbnails/36.jpg)
RESPONSIBILITY 1/2
• TYPICAL JUSTICE: WHO CAUSES THE HARM PAYS THE BILL !• POLLUTER PAYS PRINCIPLE
![Page 37: Cc global justice](https://reader033.vdocuments.us/reader033/viewer/2022052907/559404251a28aba9458b47d9/html5/thumbnails/37.jpg)
WHO IS WHO?
• SHUE: STATES !!• CANEY: MIX OF INDIVIDUALS, ECONOMIC CORPORATIONS,
STATES, INTERNATIONAL REGIMES AND INSTITUTIONS
![Page 38: Cc global justice](https://reader033.vdocuments.us/reader033/viewer/2022052907/559404251a28aba9458b47d9/html5/thumbnails/38.jpg)
RESPONSIBILITY 2/2
PPP CANNOT COPE WITH THREE KINDS OF GHGS, THOSE CAUSED BY:
!• EARLIER GENERATIONS (CANNOT PAY) !• THOSE WHO ARE EXCUSABLY IGNORANT (SHOULD NOT BE
EXPECTED TO PAY) !• THOSE WHO DO NOT COMPLY WITH THEIR DUTY NOT TO
EMIT EXCESSIVE AMOUNTS OF GHGS (WILL NOT PAY)
![Page 39: Cc global justice](https://reader033.vdocuments.us/reader033/viewer/2022052907/559404251a28aba9458b47d9/html5/thumbnails/39.jpg)
HYBRID SOLUTION-ASSUMPTIONS 1/3
A PERSON HAS A RIGHT TO X WHEN X IS A FUNDAMENTAL INTEREST THAT IS WEIGHTY ENOUGH TO GENERATE OBLIGATION ON OTHERS.
(Caney, 2005)
![Page 40: Cc global justice](https://reader033.vdocuments.us/reader033/viewer/2022052907/559404251a28aba9458b47d9/html5/thumbnails/40.jpg)
HYBRID SOLUTION-ASSUMPTIONS 2/3
PERSONS HAVE FUNDAMENTAL INTERESTS IN NOT SUFFERING FROM:
!• DROUGHT AND CROP FAILURE • HEATSTROKE • INFECTIOUS DISEASES • FLOODING • ENFORCED RELOCATION • RAPID, UNPREDICTABLE AND DRAMATIC CHANGES TO THEIR
SOCIAL AND ECONOMIC WORLD* !*THIRD ASSESSMENT REPORT OF IPCC CLAIMS THAT THESE EFFECTS ARE GENERATED BY
CLIMATE CHANGE.
![Page 41: Cc global justice](https://reader033.vdocuments.us/reader033/viewer/2022052907/559404251a28aba9458b47d9/html5/thumbnails/41.jpg)
HYBRID SOLUTION-ASSUMPTIONS 2/3
• THIS ARGUMENT IS NOT NECESSARILY BASED ON THE ASSUMPTION THAT CLIMATE CHANGE IS HUMAN-INDUCED.
!!• THE DUTIES THAT FOLLOWS THE RIGHT OF NOT SUFFERING
FROM THE EFFECTS OF CC ARE NOT MITIGATION RELATED BUT ADAPTATION RELATED.
![Page 42: Cc global justice](https://reader033.vdocuments.us/reader033/viewer/2022052907/559404251a28aba9458b47d9/html5/thumbnails/42.jpg)
SOLUTIONWE ASSIGN THE COSTS NO MATTER WHO HOLDS THE RESPONSIBILITY BUT ACCORDING TO TWO INDEPENDENT PRINCIPLES:
• THOSE WHO EXCEED THEIR QUOTA (SINCE 1990) HAVE TO COMPENSATE OTHERS (VERSION OF PPP)
!• THE MOST ADVANTAGED HAVE TO REDUCE THEIR
EMISSION OR PAY ADAPTATION COSTS TO COMPENSATE THE INCOMPLETENESS OF PPP. ACCORDING TO AN ABILITY TO PAY PRINCIPLE AND MAKING AN EFFORT TO ENHACT INSTITUTIONS WHICH GRANT COMPLIANCE
![Page 43: Cc global justice](https://reader033.vdocuments.us/reader033/viewer/2022052907/559404251a28aba9458b47d9/html5/thumbnails/43.jpg)
CRITICISM- WHY SHOULD THEY DO IT?
!• CHARITY?
IF THE CHOICE IS EITHER ASCRIBING DUTIES TO THE POOR OR ALLOWING SERIOUS HARM TO BEFALL PEOPLE OR ASCRIBING DUTIES TO THE MOST ADVANTAGED, IT WOULD SEEM PLAUSIBLE TO GO FOR THAT THIRD OPTION !
(Caney, 2005)
EXCLUDENDO:
![Page 44: Cc global justice](https://reader033.vdocuments.us/reader033/viewer/2022052907/559404251a28aba9458b47d9/html5/thumbnails/44.jpg)
GLOBAL GOVERNANCECLIMATE CHANGE & GLOBAL JUSTICE
![Page 45: Cc global justice](https://reader033.vdocuments.us/reader033/viewer/2022052907/559404251a28aba9458b47d9/html5/thumbnails/45.jpg)
WHY GLOBAL?
• CLIMATE CHANGE IS A GLOBAL THREAT THAT REQUIRES A COORDINATED GLOBAL SOLUTION (The Hartwell Paper, 2010)
• JUST GOVERNMENTS CAN FIX “CC” (Sinnot-Armstrong, 2010)
![Page 46: Cc global justice](https://reader033.vdocuments.us/reader033/viewer/2022052907/559404251a28aba9458b47d9/html5/thumbnails/46.jpg)
WHY GLOBAL?
CLIMATE CHANGE IS A PROBLEM WITH GLOBAL CAUSES AND CONSEQUENCES. A COORDINATED INTERNATIONAL EFFORT IS THEREFORE REQUIRED TO ACHIEVE COST EFFECTIVE AND SUCCESSFUL MITIGATION POLICIES.
(Held - Hervey, 2009)
![Page 47: Cc global justice](https://reader033.vdocuments.us/reader033/viewer/2022052907/559404251a28aba9458b47d9/html5/thumbnails/47.jpg)
FROM RIO TO COPENHAGEN
1992. THE “RIO EARTH SUMMIT”
1997. KYOTO’S PROTOCOL
2009. COPENHAGEN “CC” CONFERENCE
![Page 48: Cc global justice](https://reader033.vdocuments.us/reader033/viewer/2022052907/559404251a28aba9458b47d9/html5/thumbnails/48.jpg)
RESULTS?
![Page 49: Cc global justice](https://reader033.vdocuments.us/reader033/viewer/2022052907/559404251a28aba9458b47d9/html5/thumbnails/49.jpg)
“THE WRONG TROUSERS”
(Prins - Rayner, 2007)
![Page 50: Cc global justice](https://reader033.vdocuments.us/reader033/viewer/2022052907/559404251a28aba9458b47d9/html5/thumbnails/50.jpg)
WHY DID IT FAIL?
• THERE ARE VARIOUS WAYS OF CONCEPTUALIZING THE PROBLEM
• CLIMATE CHANGE IS A “WICKED” PROBLEM
(Jamieson - Di Paola, 2014)
(Prins - Rayner, 2007)
![Page 51: Cc global justice](https://reader033.vdocuments.us/reader033/viewer/2022052907/559404251a28aba9458b47d9/html5/thumbnails/51.jpg)
WHY DID IT FAIL?in addition..
• CLIMATE CHANGE IS SUBORDINATED TO NATIONAL INTERESTS AND OTHER POWERFUL INSTITUTIONS
•MORE ACTORS INVOLVED
(Jamieson - Di Paola, 2014)
(Held - Hervey, 2009)
![Page 52: Cc global justice](https://reader033.vdocuments.us/reader033/viewer/2022052907/559404251a28aba9458b47d9/html5/thumbnails/52.jpg)
OUTCOME
• AFTER 20y OF CLIMATE DIPLOMACY, THE UNDENIABLE FACT IS THAT THE MAIN FACTORS THAT HAVE REDUCED GHGs EMISSIONS ARE NOT TRACEABLE TO ANY FEAT OF GLOBAL COOPERATION (...)
(Jamieson - Di Paola, 2014)
![Page 53: Cc global justice](https://reader033.vdocuments.us/reader033/viewer/2022052907/559404251a28aba9458b47d9/html5/thumbnails/53.jpg)
WHAT’S NEXT?
• COLLECTION OF POLICIES AND PRACTICES ADOPTED BY PARTICULAR COUNTRIES
(Jamieson - Di Paola, 2014)
THESE POLICIES WILL REFLECT A MIX OF SELF-INTEREST AND ETHICAL IDEALS CONSTRUCTED IN DIFFERENT WAYS BY DIFFERENT PEOPLES
![Page 54: Cc global justice](https://reader033.vdocuments.us/reader033/viewer/2022052907/559404251a28aba9458b47d9/html5/thumbnails/54.jpg)
OUR THESIS GLOBAL JUSTICE INTO SUSTAINABLE
DEVELOPMENT
![Page 55: Cc global justice](https://reader033.vdocuments.us/reader033/viewer/2022052907/559404251a28aba9458b47d9/html5/thumbnails/55.jpg)
OLD PARADIGM
• TRADITIONALLY CC WAS SEEN ESSENTIALLY AS A PROBLEM OF JUSTICE BETWEEN STATES
• INJUSTICE FROM RICH TO POOR
• THE AGENTS ARE THE GOVERNMENT AND THE NATIONS STATES
![Page 56: Cc global justice](https://reader033.vdocuments.us/reader033/viewer/2022052907/559404251a28aba9458b47d9/html5/thumbnails/56.jpg)
CC IS NOT A CLASSICAL PROBLEM OF GLOBAL JUSTICE
FOUR FEATURES: !
• IGNORANCE !
• UNINTENTIONAL !
• DISPERSION !
• URGENCY & CATASTROPHE !
![Page 57: Cc global justice](https://reader033.vdocuments.us/reader033/viewer/2022052907/559404251a28aba9458b47d9/html5/thumbnails/57.jpg)
COMMUNITY RATHER THAN STATES
GLOBAL JUSTICE INTO THE WIDER PERSPECTIVE OF SUSTAINABLE DEVELOPMENT
!
COMMUNITY (NAGEL) !
FROM LOCALISM TO GLOCALISM !
!
![Page 58: Cc global justice](https://reader033.vdocuments.us/reader033/viewer/2022052907/559404251a28aba9458b47d9/html5/thumbnails/58.jpg)
CRITICS•ECONOMIC SYSTEM - MULTINATIONAL CORPORATIONS AND
GROUP OF INTERESTS
•LONG-TERM EFFECTS
• NEED OF DEMOCRACY AND AWARENESS
![Page 59: Cc global justice](https://reader033.vdocuments.us/reader033/viewer/2022052907/559404251a28aba9458b47d9/html5/thumbnails/59.jpg)
WE START FROM NOW, LET’S FIGHT CLIMATE CHANGE!
![Page 60: Cc global justice](https://reader033.vdocuments.us/reader033/viewer/2022052907/559404251a28aba9458b47d9/html5/thumbnails/60.jpg)
WE START FROM NOW, LET’S FIGHT CLIMATE CHANGE!
![Page 61: Cc global justice](https://reader033.vdocuments.us/reader033/viewer/2022052907/559404251a28aba9458b47d9/html5/thumbnails/61.jpg)
NOW, IT’S YOUR TURNLET’S GO TO
!
WWW.GLOBAL-JUSTICE.WIX.COM/LUISS !
AND JOIN THE CHALLENGE!!
![Page 62: Cc global justice](https://reader033.vdocuments.us/reader033/viewer/2022052907/559404251a28aba9458b47d9/html5/thumbnails/62.jpg)
THANK YOU!