cayetano heredia universityrepebis.upch.edu.pe/articulos/rmh/v6n1/a6.pdf · 81.1 to 85.5% , the...

6

Upload: others

Post on 22-Sep-2020

0 views

Category:

Documents


0 download

TRANSCRIPT

Page 1: Cayetano Heredia Universityrepebis.upch.edu.pe/articulos/rmh/v6n1/a6.pdf · 81.1 to 85.5% , the evolution was better in the group who was in the three superior categories at the initial
Page 2: Cayetano Heredia Universityrepebis.upch.edu.pe/articulos/rmh/v6n1/a6.pdf · 81.1 to 85.5% , the evolution was better in the group who was in the three superior categories at the initial
Page 3: Cayetano Heredia Universityrepebis.upch.edu.pe/articulos/rmh/v6n1/a6.pdf · 81.1 to 85.5% , the evolution was better in the group who was in the three superior categories at the initial
Page 4: Cayetano Heredia Universityrepebis.upch.edu.pe/articulos/rmh/v6n1/a6.pdf · 81.1 to 85.5% , the evolution was better in the group who was in the three superior categories at the initial
Page 5: Cayetano Heredia Universityrepebis.upch.edu.pe/articulos/rmh/v6n1/a6.pdf · 81.1 to 85.5% , the evolution was better in the group who was in the three superior categories at the initial
Page 6: Cayetano Heredia Universityrepebis.upch.edu.pe/articulos/rmh/v6n1/a6.pdf · 81.1 to 85.5% , the evolution was better in the group who was in the three superior categories at the initial