cathay casestudy

Upload: tony-law

Post on 07-Apr-2018

218 views

Category:

Documents


0 download

TRANSCRIPT

  • 8/3/2019 Cathay casestudy

    1/4

    Cathay Pacic

    Case studyFuel efciency projects andairmiles carbon osets

  • 8/3/2019 Cathay casestudy

    2/4

    Cathay Pacifc case study

    | 1 |

    Fuel efciency projects and airmiles carbon osets

    The Cathay Pacifc Group is part o the Swire Group o Companies, with Swire Pacifc as the largest single shareholder.

    They have their own listing on the Hong Kong Stock Exchange and in addition to their 114 strong aircrat eet, their

    operations include catering services, aircrat maintenance acilities, and ground handling companies. Their corporate

    headquarters are at Hong Kong International Airport. Cathay Pacifc has been reporting since 1997 as part o a

    commitment to transparency and accountability to their stakeholders. Reporting enables them to communicate Cathay

    Pacifcs impact on the environment and the communities in which they operate, as well as the eorts they are making

    towards managing those impacts. The case study gives a avour o their external reporting, and some o the ways they

    have generated uel efciency savings, and reduced emissions over the last ew years. Their green credentials include the

    very frst carbon oset scheme to be launched by an Asian airline.

    Much o our long-term strategy is about anticipating and managing change. Future environmental challenges and

    tougher environmental regulations mean we will have to do many things dierently. Christopher Pratt, Chairman,

    Cathay Pacifc.

    Cathay Pacifc was one o the frst airlines to monitor and publicly report its environmental perormance. It began

    monitoring perormance in 1997.

    In 2008, Cathay was responsible or a total o 14.4 million tonnes o CO2

    (tCO2) emissions, bringing a total efciency

    improvement o 22.5% since 1998. It achieved efciency savings o 6% in 2005, well on its way to the IATA goal o 25%

    uel efciency improvement by 2020, based on 2005 levels. An extract o their historic environmental perormance

    presented in their external CSR report is shown overlea.

  • 8/3/2019 Cathay casestudy

    3/4

    Cathay Pacifc case study

    | 2 |

    Over the years Cathay Pacifc has made a number o successul investments which have driven the sustainability

    agenda. It completed eco riendly initiatives in the ollowing areas.

    Cathay invested in a number o new greener planes introducing our more Boeing 777-300 and three more Airbus 220-300s. The business cases clearly demonstrated signifcant efciency gains through reduced uel consumption and eet

    maintenance costs.

    To urther improve efciency and uel savings, in 2008 they established better routing. For example, the Hong Kong to

    Europe route was reduced by 18 nautical miles and routes via the Russian Far East by up to 12 nautical miles. This not

    only generated uel savings, but also between 0.6 and 0.9 tCO2

    per ight on these routes.

    Environmental performance tables

    Aircraft Operations

    Indicators Units

    Power/fuel

    Electricity consumption

    CO2

    emissions from electricity

    Ground vehicle fuel consumption

    CO2

    emissions from ground vehicles

    Purchased town gas

    CO2emissions from town gas

    Fuel dumped due to operational reqs

    % of fuel dumped

    Water

    Seawater consumption

    Potable water consumption

    Maintenance water consumption

    Indicators

    Paper

    Paper consumed in offices

    % of paper recycled vs. consumed

    Printer cartridges

    Printer cartridges purchased

    Printer cartridges refilled

    Printer cartridges recycled

    Refrigerants containing HFCs

    Recycled materials

    Aluminium cans recycled

    Plastic recycled

    Metal waste recycled

    Waste lubrication oil recycled

    Disposed materials

    Office waste disposed of

    Food waste disposed of

    tonnes

    tonnes

    467

    194mWh

    tonnes

    litre

    tonnes

    unit

    tonnes

    tonnes

    %

    m3

    m3

    m3

    tonnes

    %

    no.

    no.

    pcs

    kg

    kg

    kg

    kg

    L

    2008 Units

    42,267

    22,924

    75,912

    183

    65,473

    39

    1,333

    0.03%

    7,440,000

    29,175

    106,290

    2008 Indicators Units 2008

    1,616

    15%

    2,654

    1,076

    2,447

    17,653

    24,459

    31,687

    234,924

    2,203

    UnitsATK

    RTK

    RPK

    All rights

    Fuel consumption

    Fuel efficiency

    Global CO2

    emissions

    Global NOx emissions

    Global CO emissions

    Global HC emissions

    Flights only

    Fuel consumption

    Fuel efficiency

    (*) incorporates KA

    million

    million

    million

    thousand tonnes

    grammes/ATK

    improvement since 1998%

    grammes/RTK

    improvement since 1998%

    thousand tonnes in CO2

    (1)

    grammes/ATK

    improvement since 1998%

    grammes/RTK

    improvement since 1998%

    tonnes

    grammes/ATK

    improvement since 1998%

    grammes/RTK

    improvement since 1998%tonnes

    tonnes

    thousand tonnes

    share of total fuel consumption %

    grammes/RPK

    improvement since 1998%

    (1) GWP of CO2

    is 1; assumes that all other GHG gases are negligible as these impacts still uncertain.

    1998

    10,544

    6,974

    40,594

    2,343

    222

    0.0%

    338

    0.0%

    7,380

    701

    0.0%

    1,060

    0.0%

    40,294

    4

    0.0%

    6

    0.0%13,982

    5,736

    2,007

    85.7%

    49

    0.0%

    1999

    10,379

    7,431

    41,247

    2,263

    218

    1.9%

    305

    9.4%

    7,138

    688

    1.9%

    961

    9.3%

    37,900

    4

    5.3%

    5

    12.1%9,827

    3,401

    1,953

    86.3%

    47

    4.2%

    2000 2001

    11,121

    8,275

    47,042

    2,429

    218

    1.7%

    294

    12.6%

    7,661

    689

    1.7%

    926

    12.6%

    39,061

    3

    10.5%

    5

    20.7%8,751

    2,560

    2,069

    85.1%

    44

    11.1%

    11,452

    7947

    44,466

    2,431

    212

    4.5%

    306

    8.9%

    7,667

    670

    4.4%

    965

    9.0%

    36,402

    3

    15.8%

    5

    20.7%8,062

    2,090

    2,068

    84.3%

    46

    6.8%

    2002

    12,493

    9,256

    49,661

    2,583

    207

    7.0%

    279

    16.9%

    8,147

    652

    7.0%

    880

    17.0%

    39,213

    3

    18.4%

    4

    27.6%8,268

    1,885

    2,074

    80.3%

    42

    15.5%

    2003

    12,976

    9,114

    44,006

    2,590

    200

    10.2%

    284

    15.4%

    8,169

    630

    10.1%

    896

    15.5%

    38,537

    3

    21.1%

    4

    27.6%8,873

    2,112

    1,953

    75.4%

    44

    10.2%

    2004

    15,244

    11,182

    57,167

    3,077

    202

    9.2%

    275

    18.1%

    9,705

    637

    9.1%

    868

    18.1%

    45,271

    3

    21.1%

    4

    31.0%10,056

    2,228

    2,404

    78.1%

    42

    14.9%

    2005

    16,634

    12,047

    65,018

    3,325

    200

    10.0%

    276

    17.8%

    10,487

    630

    10.1%

    871

    17.8%

    48,566

    3

    23.7%

    4

    31.0%10,190

    2,171

    2,646

    79.6%

    41

    17.7%

    2006

    18,173

    13,362

    71,099

    3,598

    198

    11.0%

    269

    19.9%

    11,342

    624

    11.0%

    849

    19.9%

    52,542

    3

    23.7%

    4

    32.8%10,959

    2,233

    2,825

    78.6%

    40

    19.6%

    2007*

    23,140

    16,713

    82,206

    4,371

    189

    14.9%

    262

    22.2%

    13,786

    596

    15.0%

    825

    22.2%

    55,951

    3

    31.6%

    4

    37.9%13,077

    2,271

    3,217

    73.6%

    39

    20.1%

    2008*

    24,483

    17,547

    91,499

    4,589

    187

    15.9%

    260

    22.5%

    14,411

    589

    16.0%

    821

    22.5%

    70,546

    3

    24.2%

    4

    30.7%13,436

    2,107

    3,627

    79.4%

    40

    19.1%

    This year, due to the change in the sco pe of reporting, the 2008

    data is not directly comparable to the 1998-2007 results. Please

    note that this only includes Cathay Pacific and Dragonair head

    office operations in Hong Kong.

  • 8/3/2019 Cathay casestudy

    4/4

    Cathay Pacifc case study

    | 3 |

    On the ground, Cathay installed energy saving equipment in its Hong Kong headquarters, including computer

    controlled air conditioning, lighting and lits, low emission lights, double glazed windows and sensor controlled window

    shades.

    On board they have developed protocols to reduce inight meal wastage. They also operate an inight waste recycling

    programme that was launched in 2006. In 2008, 4.6 million items, including plastic bottles, cups and tin cans, were

    collected rom their aircrats or recycling.

    In 2007 Cathay initiated FLY greener, the frst carbon oset scheme o its kind to be launched by an Asian airline.

    Passengers can support the initiative by contributing cash or Asia Miles points, which are used or projects that oset

    carbon-dioxide emissions associated with their travel. Projects currently being supported include a natural gas uel

    switch project in Beijing; a natural run o river hydro plant project in Guizhou; and a group o 20 wind turbines in

    Heilongjiang, Mainland China. In 2008 this resulted in passengers and companies in Hong Kong, China and Taiwan,

    osetting 3.457tCO2.

    Cathay Pacifc continues to consider the implications o possible carbon pricing on investment decisions, and in

    recognition o increasing consumer demand or green credentials, has set up a carbon oset scheme.

    Read CIMAs latest reportAccounting for Climate Change at www.cimaglobal.com/sustainability

    The report includes case studies rom other organisations and looks at how management accountants, their skills

    and their tools can provide business intelligence to support strategy and inuence decision making, driving their

    organisations to mitigate and adapt to climate change.

    I you are interested in sharing your own insights and experiences in this area, we would be delighted to hear rom you.Please email us at [email protected]

    978-1-85971-638-0 (pd)

    December 2009

    Chartered Institute of

    Management Accountants

    26 Chapter Street

    London SW1P 4NP

    United Kingdom

    T. +44 (0)20 8849 2275

    F. +44 (0)20 8849 2468

    E. [email protected]

    www.cimaglobal.com

    Saved 0.6-0.9 t CO2

    per flight

    Hong Kong

    London

    MORIT ROUTE

    Old route New route