cataloging earthquakes shear-wave splitting · • 2133 earthquakes were located in sumner county,...

1
Monitoring seismicity near an active CO 2 EOR injection Keith A. Nolte 1 , Georgios P. Tsoflias 1 , Tandis S. Bidgoli 2 and W. Lynn Watney 2 1 Department of Geology, The University of Kansas, Lawrence, KS 2 Kansas Geological Survey, The University of Kansas, Lawrence, KS Events cataloged from April 2015 to April 2017 2133 earthquakes were located in Sumner County, KS Magnitudes range from M w 0.4 to M w 3.5 P-wave velocity calculated from well logs of KGS 2-32 S-wave velocity is calculated from a Vp/Vs ratio Moment Magnitude calculated from energy spectrum of event and distance to event Magnitude of Completeness 1.5 M w for Sumner County Figure 1. Comparison of small local event (left) of M w 1.0 and large local event (right) of M w 1.8 with vertical channel displayed on the top row and the two horizontal channels below. P and S arrivals are shown in red. Both events are from March of 2016. Cataloging Earthquakes Magnitude of Completeness: Magnitude of Completeness (M c ) is the earthquake magnitude for which an array can confidently pick all events of that magnitude and larger in a certain area [Vorobieva, 2012] M c for the Wellington array is ~1.5 M w for Sumner County Increase b-value of 1.5 indicative of pore fluid pressure increase as cause of seismicity Figure 2. Velocity model was used in calculating locations of events near the Wellington Array. The model was derived from well logs of the KGS 2-32 well, calculated to the bottom of the well. Deeper velocities were constrained through 1-D velocity inversion Figure 3. The graph is showing the Magnitude of completeness calculated from the Gutenberg- Richter law. The blue line with black circles represents events recorded from the seismometer array, and the orange line represents predicted events using the Gutenberg-Richter law, with a b-value of 1.5. The two curves diverge at a magnitude Mc = 1.1. References 1) Ellsworth, W.L., 2013, Injection induced earthquakes, Science, v. 341, 1225942. 2) Garnero, E., 2017, School of Earth and Space science, Arizona State university, personal website: http://garnero.asu.edu/ 3) Michael, A. J. ,1984, Determination of stress from slip data: faults and folds: Journal of Geophysical Research, v. 89, p. 11,517–11,526. 4) Ottemoller, L., Voss, P., and Havskov, J., 2014, Seisan earthquake analysis software for Windows, Solaris, Linux, and macosx. 5) Silver, P.G., and Chan, W.W., 1991, Shear wave splitting and subcontinental mantle deformation, Journal of Geophysical Research, v. 96, p. 16429-16454 6) Stork, A.L., Verdon, J.P., and Kendall, J. M., 2014, The robustness of seismic moment and magnitudes estimated using spectral analysis, Geophysical Prospecting, v. 62, p. 862-878. 7) Vorobieva, I., Narteau, C., Shebalin, P., Beauducel, F., Nercessian, A., Clouard, V., and bouin, M. P., 2012, Multiscale mapping of completeness magnitude of earthquake catalogs, Bulletin of the Seismological Society of America, v. 103, no. 4, p. 2188-2202. 8) Zinke, J.C. and Zoback, M.D., 2000, Structure-related and stress-induced shear-wave velocity anisotropy: observations from microearthquakes near the Calaveras fault in central California, Bulletin of the Seismological Society of America, v. 90, p. 1305- 1312. Objective The objective of the earthquake monitoring program at Wellington Oilfield is to ensure safe CO 2 injection in the Mississippian and Arbuckle with regards to induced seismicity. The research also provides information on the stress field of the shallow basement and the location of faults. This data can be used to advance the understanding of induced seismicity in the region as well as inform the regulation of fluid injection in the midcontinent. Acknowledgements This research has been supported by grants from the Kansas Geological Survey and the Kansas Interdisciplinary Carbonates Consortium (KICC) as well as DOE contract (DE-FE0006821). Equipment has also been on loan through IRIS and PASSCAL. Results CO 2 injection at Wellington field well KGS #2-32 did not cause observable seismicity Seismicity likely caused from increased pore fluid pressure in basement and Arbuckle Over the last two years earthquakes have been advancing northward, from northern Oklahoma to southern Kansas Shear- wave anisotropy analysis presented here is the first direct evidence provided by seismological observations relating increase in pore fluid pressure to earthquakes in KS and OK Pressure monitoring in well KGS 1-28 confirms the pressure increase in KS and OK Shear-wave splitting methods can be used to mitigate seismic hazard associated with injection induced seismicity Figure 7. Map of the study area in south-central Kansas and northern Oklahoma. Black triangles are seismometer station locations, colored circles are earthquake epicenters where color identifies the time period of the earthquake and the source of the data. Red circles: 2010-2012 Earthscope Transportable Array (TA); Green circles: 2013-2015 Nanometrics Research Network (NX) and the USGS network (GS); Blue circles: 2015-2016 Wellington, Kansas CO 2 sequestration monitoring network (ZA). Arbuckle pressure measured in well KGS 1-28. Figure 8. (A1) Polar histogram of ϕ from TA events 201-2012 (red). The most common ϕ value is near the maximum horizontal stress of ~75° along with flipped values at ~330°. Zero degree values are most often null solutions. (A2) Polar histogram of ϕ from NZ & GS events 2013-2015 (green) showing common solutions in line with maximum horizontal stress as well as solutions 90° off of maximum horizontal stress. (A3) Polar histogram of ϕ from ZA events 2015-2016 (blue) show the most common solution to be 90° off of the maximum horizontal stress, a direct indicator of critical pore fluid pressure. Arrows indicate the orientation of maximum horizontal stress at 75°. (B) Average dt/km of earthquakes from 2010 through 2016, showing a steady increase in magnitude over time as well as an increase in variance. Black stars correspond to average monthly pressure observations in well KGS 1- 28, at Wellington Oil field. The initial pressure measurement in August 2011 was obtained when the well was drilled. Inset B1 is an expanded view of monthly average downhole pressures from April to November 2016. Figure 6. Example of how a shear-wave separates into a fast and slow component in an anisotropic medium. From Garnero, 2017. Shear-Wave Splitting Figure 4. Map of Sumner County, KS, showing the earthquake catalog and station locations. Figure 5. Map of Sumner County, KS, showing the earthquake progression through time,with red being the oldest (2015) and blue being the newest (2017).

Upload: others

Post on 28-Jul-2020

3 views

Category:

Documents


0 download

TRANSCRIPT

Page 1: Cataloging Earthquakes Shear-Wave Splitting · • 2133 earthquakes were located in Sumner County, KS • Magnitudes range from M. w. 0.4 to M. w. 3.5 • P-wave velocity calculated

Monitoring seismicity near an active CO2 EOR injectionKeith A. Nolte1, Georgios P. Tsoflias1, Tandis S. Bidgoli2 and W. Lynn Watney2

1Department of Geology, The University of Kansas, Lawrence, KS2Kansas Geological Survey, The University of Kansas, Lawrence, KS

• Events cataloged from April 2015 to April 2017• 2133 earthquakes were located in Sumner County, KS• Magnitudes range from Mw 0.4 to Mw 3.5 • P-wave velocity calculated from well logs of KGS 2-32• S-wave velocity is calculated from a Vp/Vs ratio• Moment Magnitude calculated from energy spectrum of event

and distance to event• Magnitude of Completeness

• 1.5 Mw for Sumner County

Figure 1. Comparison of small local event (left) of Mw 1.0 and large local event (right) of Mw 1.8with vertical channel displayed on the top row and the two horizontal channels below. P and Sarrivals are shown in red. Both events are from March of 2016.

Cataloging Earthquakes

Magnitude of Completeness:• Magnitude of Completeness (Mc) is the earthquake magnitude

for which an array can confidently pick all events of that magnitude and larger in a certain area [Vorobieva, 2012]

• Mc for the Wellington array is ~1.5 Mw for Sumner County• Increase b-value of 1.5 indicative of pore fluid pressure increase

as cause of seismicity

Figure 2. Velocity model was used in calculatinglocations of events near the Wellington Array. Themodel was derived from well logs of the KGS 2-32 well,calculated to the bottom of the well. Deeper velocitieswere constrained through 1-D velocity inversion

Figure 3. The graph is showing theMagnitude of completenesscalculated from the Gutenberg-Richter law. The blue line withblack circles represents eventsrecorded from the seismometerarray, and the orange linerepresents predicted events usingthe Gutenberg-Richter law, with ab-value of 1.5. The two curvesdiverge at a magnitude Mc = 1.1.

References1) Ellsworth, W.L., 2013, Injection induced earthquakes, Science, v. 341, 1225942.2) Garnero, E., 2017, School of Earth and Space science, Arizona State university, personal website: http://garnero.asu.edu/3) Michael, A. J. ,1984, Determination of stress from slip data: faults and folds: Journal of Geophysical Research, v. 89, p. 11,517–11,526.4) Ottemoller, L., Voss, P., and Havskov, J., 2014, Seisan earthquake analysis software for Windows, Solaris, Linux, and macosx.5) Silver, P.G., and Chan, W.W., 1991, Shear wave splitting and subcontinental mantle deformation, Journal of Geophysical Research, v. 96, p. 16429-16454 6) Stork, A.L., Verdon, J.P., and Kendall, J. M., 2014, The robustness of seismic moment and magnitudes estimated using spectral analysis, Geophysical Prospecting, v. 62, p. 862-878.7) Vorobieva, I., Narteau, C., Shebalin, P., Beauducel, F., Nercessian, A., Clouard, V., and bouin, M. P., 2012, Multiscale mapping of completeness magnitude of earthquake catalogs, Bulletin of the Seismological Society of America, v. 103, no. 4, p. 2188-2202.8) Zinke, J.C. and Zoback, M.D., 2000, Structure-related and stress-induced shear-wave velocity anisotropy: observations from microearthquakes near the Calaveras fault in central California, Bulletin of the Seismological Society of America, v. 90, p. 1305-1312.

ObjectiveThe objective of the earthquake monitoring program at Wellington Oilfield is to ensuresafe CO2 injection in the Mississippian and Arbuckle with regards to induced seismicity.The research also provides information on the stress field of the shallow basement andthe location of faults. This data can be used to advance the understanding of inducedseismicity in the region as well as inform the regulation of fluid injection in themidcontinent.

AcknowledgementsThis research has been supported by grants from the Kansas Geological Survey and the Kansas Interdisciplinary Carbonates Consortium (KICC) as well as DOE contract (DE-FE0006821). Equipment has also been on loan through IRIS and PASSCAL.

Results• CO2 injection at Wellington field well KGS #2-32 did not cause observable seismicity• Seismicity likely caused from increased pore fluid pressure in basement and Arbuckle• Over the last two years earthquakes have been advancing northward, from northern Oklahoma to

southern Kansas• Shear- wave anisotropy analysis presented here is the first direct evidence provided by seismological

observations relating increase in pore fluid pressure to earthquakes in KS and OK• Pressure monitoring in well KGS 1-28 confirms the pressure increase in KS and OK• Shear-wave splitting methods can be used to mitigate seismic hazard associated with injection

induced seismicity

Figure 7. Map of the study area insouth-central Kansas and northernOklahoma. Black triangles areseismometer station locations, coloredcircles are earthquake epicenterswhere color identifies the time periodof the earthquake and the source ofthe data. Red circles: 2010-2012Earthscope Transportable Array (TA);Green circles: 2013-2015 NanometricsResearch Network (NX) and the USGSnetwork (GS); Blue circles: 2015-2016Wellington, Kansas CO2 sequestrationmonitoring network (ZA). Arbucklepressure measured in well KGS 1-28.

Figure 8. (A1) Polar histogram of ϕfrom TA events 201-2012 (red). Themost common ϕ value is near themaximum horizontal stress of ~75°along with flipped values at ~330°.Zero degree values are most often nullsolutions. (A2) Polar histogram of ϕfrom NZ & GS events 2013-2015(green) showing common solutions inline with maximum horizontal stress aswell as solutions 90° off of maximumhorizontal stress. (A3) Polar histogramof ϕ from ZA events 2015-2016 (blue)show the most common solution to be90° off of the maximum horizontalstress, a direct indicator of criticalpore fluid pressure. Arrows indicatethe orientation of maximum horizontalstress at 75°. (B) Average dt/km ofearthquakes from 2010 through 2016,showing a steady increase inmagnitude over time as well as anincrease in variance. Black starscorrespond to average monthlypressure observations in well KGS 1-28, at Wellington Oil field. The initialpressure measurement in August 2011was obtained when the well wasdrilled. Inset B1 is an expanded view ofmonthly average downhole pressuresfrom April to November 2016.

Figure 6. Example of how a shear-wave separatesinto a fast and slow component in an anisotropicmedium. From Garnero, 2017.

Shear-Wave Splitting

Figure 4. Mapof SumnerCounty, KS,showing theearthquakecatalog andstationlocations.

Figure 5. Mapof SumnerCounty, KS,showing theearthquakeprogressionthroughtime,with redbeing theoldest (2015)and bluebeing thenewest(2017).