cassava and the environment: inputs, outputs and externalities
TRANSCRIPT
Cassava and the environment: inputs, outputs
and externalities
Presented by: Thierry Tran
Cassava Value Chains workshop, CIAT, Cali
24-26 / 08 / 2016
• CIAT• IITA, ILRI• CIRAD• NRI• Univalle (Colombia)• Kasetsart University, KMUTT (Thailand)• Clayuca
Partnership for RTB post-harvest project
Started 2013:Complementary funding RTB Post-harvest project
1
RTBs are processed at large and small scales
Thailand 200t starch/day
Nigeria 2t HQCF/day
Nigeria 0.3t gari/day
A. de la Giraudière
Colombia 2-3t starch/day
Vietnam 3- 11t starch/day
Paraguay 25-100t starch/day
Tanzania 2t HQCF /day 2
Thailand produces 2-3 million tons cassava
starch/year
25-30 million tons cassava roots / year (3rd producer)
10-12 millions tons roots processed into starch
Factories use:
Electricity: 900 - 1000 MJ/t starch
Thermal energy: 1600 - 2500 MJ/t starch
Since 2004, 90% of factories switched from
fuel oil to biogas for starch drying
3
5
Cassava starch production
Washing and
peeling
Cassava roots 600-800 t/day
Rasping
Photos: G. Da, T. Tran
6
Extraction - centrifugation
Drying
Dry starch
150-200 t/day
Photos: G. Da, T. Tran
Cassava starch production
7
By-products
Peels
Fibres (50% fibre / 50%
starch db)
Sun-drying
Compost
Fuel
Drying
Animal feed
Photos: T. Tran
Roots: 63% of costs279 USD/t starch
Energy: 20%89 USD/t starch
Total c osts:443 USD/t HQCF
Demand to improve processing (1)
39%
7%
44%
6% 4%
Peak 1FD Black oil 2013
Raw material
Power
Energy (drying)
Labour
Packaging
63%11%
9%
10%7%
Peak 1FD + Nobex HEPalm Kernel Shells 2013
Raw material
Power
Energy (drying)
Labour
PackagingRoots: 39% of costs282 USD/t starch
Energy: 5 1%368 USD/t starch
Total cost s:722 USD/t HQCF
Market price:
650 USD/t HQCF
NRI, 2012
Nigeria
Centrifuge456 kg/hour
Electricity: 36 kWh/t starch / 70
Water: 22 m3/t starch / 35
Colladora135 kg/hour
Electricity: 20 kWh/t starch / 55
Water: 34 m3/t starch / 48
Colombia
CIAT, Univalle, CIRAD, 2013
Demand to improve processing (2)
x 3
x 1.5
x 0.7
Flash dryer – Targets:4 t/day
Energy: < 2500 MJ/t starch
Surface: < 20 m 2
Sun drying2 t/day
Energy: 0 MJ
Surface: 300-400 m 2
Colombia
CIAT, Univalle, CIRAD, 2013-2015
Demand to improve processing (3)
Diagnostic: Drying uses most energy
CIRAD, CIAT, Univalle
1.2 5.8 8.015.48.3
29.2164.2
164.2
79.649.0
181.0
181.0
119.4 124.9
118.8
118.8
102.2
102.2
1 945.0
0%
20%
40%
60%
80%
100%
VLTElectricity +
thermalenergy;
2527.8MJ/t
VLTElectricity
only;582.8MJ/t
ST1;213.1MJ/t
ST2;211.1MJ/t
Drying - ThermalDrying - ElecSeparationExtractionRaspingRoot washingWater pump
Rasping, extraction use most electricity
Cassava starch processing
TH, VN, COL
Diagnostic: Roots are the main cost of production
81,24%
3,34%
7,48%
1,41%
4,13%0,45%
1,95%
Factory A
92.5%
1.5%
1.2%4.8%
PA1
73%
7%
6%
6%
8% Roots
Electricity
Natural gas
Labour
Other costs
63%11%
9%10%
7%
Rawmaterial
Power
66%1%
15%
3%
15% Roots
Electricity
Labour
Consumabes,
packaging, etc.
Office &
Marketing
Thailand Vietnam Colombia
Nigeria
CIRAD, CIAT, Univalle, NRI, 2013-2014
126 126
367 367
110114
267106
62
389
0
200
400
600
800
1000
1200
1400
1600
Biogas NO Biogas
CO
2e
q (
kg
/t s
tarc
h 1
2.5
% m
c)
Wastewater
treatment
Biogas production
Electricity - biogas
Electricity - grid
Fuel oil
Chemicals
Transportation
Diesel - farming
N2O emissions
Fertilizer-organic
Fertilizer-mineral
127 127
372 372
219107
107
7044
569
0
200
400
600
800
1000
1200
1400
1600
1800
Biogas NO Biogas
CO
2e
q (
kg
/t s
tarc
h 1
2.5
% m
c)
Wastewater
treatment
Biogas production
Electricity - biogas
Electricity - grid
Fuel oil
Chemicals and
packaging
Transportation
cassava roots
Diesel - agric
N2O emissions
Fertilizer-organic
Fertilizer-mineral71 71
247 247
121116
1423221
346
0
200
400
600
800
1000
1200
1400
1600
1800
Biogas NO Biogas
CO
2e
q (
kg
/t s
tarc
h 1
2.5
% m
c)
Wastewater
treatment
Biogas production
Electricity - biogas
Electricity - grid
Fuel oil
Chemicals and
packaging
Transportation
cassava roots
Diesel - agric
N2O emissions
Fertilizer-organic
Fertilizer-mineral
Biogas reduces GHG emissions
Factory 1 Factory 2
- Less fuel oil
- Less grid electricity
- Much less CH4 emissions
966
1410
910
1574
599
1028
Units: kg CO2eq/t starch
Savings:
430 - 660 kg CO2eq/t starch
26000 - 40000 t CO2eq/year/factory
Factory 3
14
Improvements: Flash drying
• Demand for small scale cassava starch/flour production
process in many countries : Nigeria, Tanzania, Colombia,
Peru …
• Traditional processes (solar) are limited in capacity
• Down-scaling flash drying process is one of the main barriers
• � Model to help understanding the influence of several
parameters, including:
• Design: pipe length, diameter…
• Control and regulation : air speed, temperature, starch feed rate…
15
Diversity of flash dryers
Capacity Energy use Energy type
t/day MJ/t
Thailand 200 1500 - 2000 Biogas
Vietnam 2 5000 Coal
Nigeria 1 - 2 3000 - 10000 Oil / Biomass
Paraguay 25 - 100 2000 - 3400 Wood
Colombia (AdS) 50 2600 Natural gas
Colombia (Cauca) 2 - Sun drying
Can we make dryers at small scale with same
energy efficiency as large scale?
CIRAD, CIAT, Univalle, Clayuca, KMUTT
5 10 15 20 25 30 35 403000
4000
5000
6000
7000
8000
9000
10000
11000
Pipe length [m]
Spe
cific
ene
rgy
cons
umpt
ion
[kJ.
kg−1
]
Ua0 = 10 m.s−1
Ua0 = 15 m.s−1
Ua0 = 20 m.s−1
Predictions of the model
Higher air flow rate (e.g. 10, 15, 20 m/s) requires a longer pipe for good energy efficiency. Min 20 m.
Sp
eci
fic
en
erg
yu
se
CIRAD
Large scale dryerslength: 30-40m
�EFFICIENT
Small scale dryerslength: 10-12m
�NOT EFFICIENT
� Use long pipes
even for small
dryers
� Adjust
capacity with
pipe diameter
Downscaling is not proportional
CIRAD, CIAT, Univalle, Clayuca, KMUTT, IITA
2-4 t starch/day
50 t starch/day
Prototype: Energy efficient, small-scaleflash dryer
CIRAD, CIAT, Univalle
Capacity:
100 kg/hr
Adjustable length:
15 – 35m
Adjustable air velocity
Consumer preferences
To match varieties, processing and expectations of users &
consumers
� Interviews, focus groups, sensory analysis to understand
expectations
� Making sure varieties and processing deliver products
that meet these expectations
On-going work on:
- Effect of rasping on texture, starch recovery
- Effects of process on the quality of garis (Benin, Cameroon)
- Cooking ability
- Fermentation ability
- Etc.
Matière première
Epluchage
Lavage
Râpage
Pressage / fermentation
Emottage par 2nd râpage
Cuisson poussée
Tamisage
Gari Ahaoye
Broyage
Tamisage
Gari Ahaoye
Matière première
Epluchage
Lavage
Râpage
Pressage / fermentation
Emottage / Tamisage
Cuisson / séchage en 2 temps
Gari Sohui
Tamisage
Gari Sohui
Matière première
Epluchage
Lavage
Râpage
Pressage / fermentation + Preséchage
solaire
Emottage / Tamisage
Cuisson
Séchage solaire
Gari Sohia
Tamisage
Gari Sohia
Matière première
Epluchage
Lavage
Râpage
Pressage / fermentation
Emottage / Tamisage
Cuisson et séchage en 2
temps
Gari Missé
Tamisage
Gari Missé
Processing and cassava value chains
Scenario 1: Current low-
efficiency processing
technologies (small-scale)
expand to meet demand.
Next 20-30 years:
- Cassava production increases
- Demand for processed products increases
Scenario 2: More efficient
technologies are available for
expansion
� Lower production costs,
lower environmental impacts.
Needed: Links with value chains approaches to improve adoption
Technologies for:
- Starch, flour
- Gari, fufu; ready-to-use products (fresh, waxed, frozen, etc.)
Nanthiya Hansupalak
Klanarong Sriroth
Arnaud Chapuis
Palotai Piromkraipak
Pakhamas Tamthirat
Sudarat Lee
Apisit Manitsorasak
Martin Moreno
Dominique Dufour
Andrès Escobar
Timothée Gally
Arthur de la Giraudière
Equipment manufacturers and cassava
starch factories
Contributors and donors
Adebayo Abass
Marcelo Precoppe
Keith Fahrney
Cu Thi Le Thuy
Andy Graffham
Diego Naziri
Uli Kleih
Warinthorn Songkasiri
Kanchana Saengchan
Patrick Sébastian