case study: mobile performance support for maintenance procedures

40
Session 607 - Case Study: Mobile Performance Support for Maintenance Procedures Christopher Adams Handshaw, Inc. 3.24.2011

Upload: cdadams411

Post on 02-Jul-2015

854 views

Category:

Education


0 download

DESCRIPTION

My presentation for Learning Solutions 2011.

TRANSCRIPT

Page 1: Case Study: Mobile Performance Support for Maintenance Procedures

Session 607 - Case Study:

Mobile Performance Support for Maintenance Procedures

Christopher AdamsHandshaw, Inc.

3.24.2011

Page 2: Case Study: Mobile Performance Support for Maintenance Procedures

Project Description

• Enable maintenance technicians to access and complete Maintenance Procedure Cards (MPCs) on a hand-held device.

87’ Coastal Patrol Boat (WPB)

2

Page 3: Case Study: Mobile Performance Support for Maintenance Procedures

3

Page 4: Case Study: Mobile Performance Support for Maintenance Procedures

Project Participants

4

Page 5: Case Study: Mobile Performance Support for Maintenance Procedures

Project Phases

PrototypeDevice

SelectionContent Capture

App Development

Pilot

5

Page 6: Case Study: Mobile Performance Support for Maintenance Procedures

Prototype

• Created content structure and one page of content (text and video) in an existing learning content management solution.

• Accessed content through wirelessly connected mobile phone.

• Used simple demo to gather requirements.

PrototypeDevice

SelectionContent Capture

App Development

Pilot

6

Page 7: Case Study: Mobile Performance Support for Maintenance Procedures

Lessons Learned

• Our mobile solution was not as mobile as we thought it would be.

PrototypeDevice

SelectionContent Capture

App Development

Pilot

7

Page 8: Case Study: Mobile Performance Support for Maintenance Procedures

Device Selection

• Used original prototype plus a laptop and router to play the role of the internet.

• Had actual maintenance technicians in repair docks handle a number of potential devices.

• Informal evaluation included responses to menu navigation, readability, text entry, and form-factor.

PrototypeDevice

SelectionContent Capture

App Development

Pilot

8

Page 9: Case Study: Mobile Performance Support for Maintenance Procedures

PrototypeDevice

SelectionContent Capture

App Development

Pilot

9

Page 10: Case Study: Mobile Performance Support for Maintenance Procedures

PrototypeDevice

SelectionContent Capture

App Development

Pilot

T h i s s l i d e

l e f t

i n t e n t i o n a l l

y b l a n k s o

t h a t C h r i s

d o e s n ’t g e t

t w i t c h y a n d

r u i n t h e

s u r p r i s e !

Guess Which Two Devices Won?

Page 11: Case Study: Mobile Performance Support for Maintenance Procedures

PrototypeDevice

SelectionContent Capture

App Development

Pilot

Trimble Yuma HP Mini 100e

Rugged outdoor tablet computer.

Durable netbookdesigned for education.

11

Page 12: Case Study: Mobile Performance Support for Maintenance Procedures

PrototypeDevice

SelectionContent Capture

App Development

Pilot

Trimble Yuma HP Mini 100e

Rugged outdoor tablet computer.

Durable netbookdesigned for education.

12

Page 13: Case Study: Mobile Performance Support for Maintenance Procedures

PrototypeDevice

SelectionContent Capture

App Development

Pilot

Lessons Learned

• Our hand-held solution will require large hands.

• Both of our mobile platforms turned out to be full-on Windows 7 devices.

13

Page 14: Case Study: Mobile Performance Support for Maintenance Procedures

PrototypeDevice

SelectionContent Capture

App Development

Pilot

The Late Addition

Viewsonic G Android Tablet

14

Page 15: Case Study: Mobile Performance Support for Maintenance Procedures

PrototypeDevice

SelectionContent Capture

App Development

Pilot

Content Capture

• Content existed in Word documents, PDF documents, and paper MPCs.

• Team of writers worked to “chunk” and import data using LCMS front-end.

• Produced 567 procedures for pilot in roughly two months (estimated at about 1/6 of total procedures).

• Custom “cleaner” built to correct and standardize formatting from original documents.

• Images and video were captured and edited for a subset of produced procedures.

15

Page 16: Case Study: Mobile Performance Support for Maintenance Procedures

PrototypeDevice

SelectionContent Capture

App Development

Pilot

Content Structure

Asset

Sub-System

Procedure

Item Grouping

Item

16

Page 17: Case Study: Mobile Performance Support for Maintenance Procedures

PrototypeDevice

SelectionContent Capture

App Development

Pilot

LCMS Interface

17

Page 18: Case Study: Mobile Performance Support for Maintenance Procedures

PrototypeDevice

SelectionContent Capture

App Development

Pilot

Why a Content Management System?

Definition:

A content management system (CMS) is the collection of procedures used to manage work flow in a collaborative environment. These procedures can be manual or computer-based.

- adapted from Wikipedia

18

Page 19: Case Study: Mobile Performance Support for Maintenance Procedures

PrototypeDevice

SelectionContent Capture

App Development

Pilot

Why a Content Management System?

Attributes:

• Allow for a large number of people to contribute to and share stored data

• Control access to data, based on user roles. User roles define what information each user can view or edit

• Aid in easy storage and retrieval of data

• Reduce repetitive duplicate input

• Improve communication between users

19

Page 20: Case Study: Mobile Performance Support for Maintenance Procedures

PrototypeDevice

SelectionContent Capture

App Development

Pilot

Content Standardization and Integration

Asset VendorSpecifications

Content Components

Text

Media

Deliverables

Performance Support

Training

Documentation

20

Page 21: Case Study: Mobile Performance Support for Maintenance Procedures

PrototypeDevice

SelectionContent Capture

App Development

Pilot

Why a Content Management System?

Attributes:

• Organizes content by objective

• Presents content as activities

• Integrates with Learning Management Systems

l e a r n i n g

21

Page 22: Case Study: Mobile Performance Support for Maintenance Procedures

PrototypeDevice

SelectionContent Capture

App Development

Pilot

Solution Architecture

• LCMS• XML Stager

Desktop Synch App

Android Mobile App

WindowsMobile App

Periodic Secure Internet

Connection

Once-per-shift Wired

Connection

22

Page 23: Case Study: Mobile Performance Support for Maintenance Procedures

PrototypeDevice

SelectionContent Capture

App Development

Pilot

Desktop App - Synch with Stager

23

Page 24: Case Study: Mobile Performance Support for Maintenance Procedures

PrototypeDevice

SelectionContent Capture

App Development

Pilot

Desktop App - Synch with Device

24

Page 25: Case Study: Mobile Performance Support for Maintenance Procedures

PrototypeDevice

SelectionContent Capture

App Development

Pilot

Windows Mobile App – Sign In

25

Page 26: Case Study: Mobile Performance Support for Maintenance Procedures

PrototypeDevice

SelectionContent Capture

App Development

Pilot

Windows Mobile App – Procedure Selection

26

Page 27: Case Study: Mobile Performance Support for Maintenance Procedures

PrototypeDevice

SelectionContent Capture

App Development

Pilot

Windows Mobile App – Content Example

27

Page 28: Case Study: Mobile Performance Support for Maintenance Procedures

PrototypeDevice

SelectionContent Capture

App Development

Pilot

Windows Mobile App – Content Example

28

Page 29: Case Study: Mobile Performance Support for Maintenance Procedures

PrototypeDevice

SelectionContent Capture

App Development

Pilot

Windows Mobile App – Data Capture

29

Page 30: Case Study: Mobile Performance Support for Maintenance Procedures

PrototypeDevice

SelectionContent Capture

App Development

Pilot

Android App Differences

30

Page 31: Case Study: Mobile Performance Support for Maintenance Procedures

PrototypeDevice

SelectionContent Capture

App Development

Pilot

Desktop App – User Actions

31

Page 32: Case Study: Mobile Performance Support for Maintenance Procedures

PrototypeDevice

SelectionContent Capture

App Development

Pilot

Lessons Learned

• Mobile video formats needed a lot of tweaking.

• Parsing XML on a mobile device is much slower than expected.

• Native media apps are best.

• Having a SCORM framework on a disconnected device is handy.

32

Page 33: Case Study: Mobile Performance Support for Maintenance Procedures

PrototypeDevice

SelectionContent Capture

App Development

Pilot

Pilot

• Running on three assets since fall of last year.

• Well received so far by technicians.

• Proposal to extend pilot pending.

33

Page 34: Case Study: Mobile Performance Support for Maintenance Procedures

PrototypeDevice

SelectionContent Capture

App Development

Pilot

Potential Future Directions

• Additional apps for additional platforms.

• Integration to inventory and work management systems.

• Integration with LMS(s).

• S1000D import/export.

34

Page 35: Case Study: Mobile Performance Support for Maintenance Procedures

Thank You!

For more info:

www.handshaw.com

blog.learnbombs.com

Christopher AdamsHandshaw, Inc.

3.24.2011

Page 36: Case Study: Mobile Performance Support for Maintenance Procedures

36

Page 37: Case Study: Mobile Performance Support for Maintenance Procedures

If You Must Know – Rough Scope of Work

Prototype

• 1 Resources

• 2 Days

Device Selection

• 4 Resources

• 1 Month

Content Capture

• 6 Resources

• 2 Months

App Development

• 2 Resources

• 2 Months

Pilot

• 1 Resource

• 1 Month

37

Page 38: Case Study: Mobile Performance Support for Maintenance Procedures

38

Page 39: Case Study: Mobile Performance Support for Maintenance Procedures

39

Page 40: Case Study: Mobile Performance Support for Maintenance Procedures

40