case study ie322
TRANSCRIPT
![Page 1: Case Study IE322](https://reader036.vdocuments.us/reader036/viewer/2022062904/577cce3c1a28ab9e788da110/html5/thumbnails/1.jpg)
1
IE 322 CASE STUDY
Group #:__28_____
Name :___Andre Fernandes________ Class #:__28______
Name: ____Lukas Gurrera___________ Class #:__40______
Name:_____Justin Rees________________ Class#:_72_______
Please SUBMIT THIS FILE as GROUP_#.pdf to ANGEL DROP BOX
Part I: Correlation and Covariance Task 1:
Scatter Plot #1: Y(Market Share) vs. X1 (Absolute Unit Price) (5 Points)
Scatter Plot #2: Y(Market Share) vs. X2 (Relative Unit Price) (5 Points)
R² = 0.4502
0.15
0.2
0.25
0.3
36 42 48 54 60 66 72 78 84 90 96
SCATTER PLOT 1
SCATTER PLOT 1
Linear (SCATTER PLOT1)
R² = 0.6334
0.15
0.2
0.25
0.3
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8
SCATTER PLOT 2
SCATTER PLOT 2
Linear (SCATTER PLOT2)
![Page 2: Case Study IE322](https://reader036.vdocuments.us/reader036/viewer/2022062904/577cce3c1a28ab9e788da110/html5/thumbnails/2.jpg)
2
Task 2: (12 Points)
COV[X1, Y] = -.13699 COV[X2,Y]= .001002
CORR COEFF[X1, Y] = -.67098 CORR COEFF[X2, Y] = .795854
Show Sample Calculations Below for COV[X1, Y]; COV[X2,Y]; CORR COEFF[X1, Y];
CORR COEFF[X2, Y] (8 Points):
COV(X,Y) = E[XY] – E[X]E[Y]
E[XY] = ∑(Xi *Yi) / 120
E[X] = ∑ Xi / 120
E[Y] = ∑ Yi / 120
COV(X1,Y) = 11.08048 – 48.48889*0.231341
COV(X1,Y) = -0.13699
COV(X2,Y) = 0.115627 – 0.495481*0.231341
COV(X2,Y) = 0.115627
CORR(X,Y) = COV(X,Y) / (σx σy)
σx = √ (∑(Xi – Xaverage)2 / (n-1) )
σy = √ (∑(Yi – Yaverage)2 / (n-1) )
CORR(X1,Y) = -0.13699/10.88615 = -0.67098
CORR(X2,Y) = 0.115627/0.06714 = 0.795854
Built in Excel functions were used to readily calculate average and standard deviation of
variables. Functions used included:
E(x) ‘=average (array of x)’
V(x) ‘=STDEV.P(array of x)’
Built in Excel functions were used to validate covariance and correlation coefficient
COV(X,Y) ‘=COVAR(array of x, array of y)’
CORR(X,Y) ‘=CORREL(array of x, array of y)’
![Page 3: Case Study IE322](https://reader036.vdocuments.us/reader036/viewer/2022062904/577cce3c1a28ab9e788da110/html5/thumbnails/3.jpg)
3
Task 3: Answer the Following Questions (12 Points)
(1) Comment on the scatter plots from Task #1. Explain what you can tell about
the relationship between Y and X1 and Y and X2 based on the scatter plots. You
may want to use the linear trendline and resulting R2 value to help you with this.
(4 Points)
We can observe that the trend line of the X1 and Y plot yields a negative
slope, representing the negative correlation between both variables. In other words,
as X1 increase, Y will decrease. The trend line on the X2 and Y plot yielded a
positive slope, meaning that there is a positive relation between both variables and
as X2 increases, so does the Y value .The R2 value represents the strength of the
relationship between both variables since it is the square of the correlation
coefficient, indicating that the higher the R2 value, the stronger the correlation
coefficient. In other words, the higher the R2 value, a stronger change in Y is
observed with a change in X variables.
(2) Comment on the Correlation Coefficients calculated and what they tell you
about the relationship between Y and X1 and Y and X2. Is there a relationship? IF
yes, is it positive or negative? Is it slight or strong? (4 Points)
The correlation coefficient of X1 came out to be -.67098 and X2 equaled
.795854 meaning they both have a relationship. X1 has a strong negative
relationship because it is closer to -1 than 0, likewise X2 has a strong positive
relationship because its value is closer to 1 than 0.
(3) Do you feel as though the relationships you discussed in (1) and (2) can be used
to accurately predict the market share (i.e. the dependent variable). In other words,
do you think the changes in the independent variables (X1, X2) can accurately
predict the dependent variable (Y) ? (4 Points)
The relationship allows us to predict a trend line but cannot accurately
predict the market share because the values are based on the average of the trend
line.
![Page 4: Case Study IE322](https://reader036.vdocuments.us/reader036/viewer/2022062904/577cce3c1a28ab9e788da110/html5/thumbnails/4.jpg)
4
Part II: Regression Analysis
Task 1: (10 Points)
Paste the Minitab Output below for Y vs. X1, X2
Regression Analysis: y versus x1, x2 The regression equation is
y = 0.179 - 0.00105 x1 + 0.208 x2
Predictor Coef SE Coef T P
Constant 0.179129 0.000521 343.67 0.000
x1 -0.00104546 0.00000532 -196.48 0.000
x2 0.207687 0.000863 240.72 0.000
S = 0.000632182 R-Sq = 99.9% R-Sq(adj) = 99.9%
Analysis of Variance
Source DF SS MS F P
Regression 2 0.042162 0.021081 52748.26 0.000
Residual Error 117 0.000047 0.000000
Total 119 0.042209
Source DF Seq SS
x1 1 0.019003
x2 1 0.023159
Unusual Observations
Obs x1 y Fit SE Fit Residual St Resid
28 92.2 0.194436 0.193747 0.000245 0.000689 1.18 X
61 46.0 0.281676 0.280911 0.000203 0.000764 1.28 X
73 84.9 0.195084 0.195358 0.000203 -0.000273 -0.46 X
106 88.8 0.203899 0.203395 0.000235 0.000504 0.86 X
111 86.0 0.178107 0.177150 0.000212 0.000957 1.61 X
X denotes an observation whose X value gives it large leverage.
![Page 5: Case Study IE322](https://reader036.vdocuments.us/reader036/viewer/2022062904/577cce3c1a28ab9e788da110/html5/thumbnails/5.jpg)
5
Task 2: Provide Answers to the Following Questions Based on the Minitab Output Above:
(24 Points)
(1) Looking at the R2 value (R-sq) in the output for the regression analysis- please
write a one sentence interpretation of this value in the context of this problem.
(6 Points)
The R^2 value equaled 99.9% indicating that the model is very accurate in
determining the data variance.
(2) From the output above, would you say that the Absolute Price (X1) is a good
predictor of the Market Share (Y)? Why or Why Not? Please make sure you try to
answer this using the p value for the Absolute Price shown. (6 Points)
Yes X1 is a good predictor of the market share. The regression analysis
yielded a p value of 0.0 meaning that the model is very significant in determining
the market share for X1 variable. With p equaling 0.0 we can say with a greater
than 95% certainty that the model correctly predicts the market share.
(3) From the output above, would you say that the Relative Price (X2) is a good
predictor of the Market Share (Y)? Why or Why Not? Please make sure you try to
answer this using the p value for the Relative Price shown. (6 Points)
Yes X2 is a good predictor of the market share. The regression analysis
yielded a p value of 0.0 meaning that the model is very significant in determining
the market share for X2 variable. With p equaling 0.0 we can say with a greater
than 95% certainty that the model correctly predicts the market share.
(4) Do You feel as though the linear regression model (i.e. the regression equation)
does a good job of estimating (Y)? Explain. (6 Points)
Yes the linear regression model does a good job of closely estimating Y values. By
plugging different X values it is observed that the calculated Y value is very close to the actual
market share value.
![Page 6: Case Study IE322](https://reader036.vdocuments.us/reader036/viewer/2022062904/577cce3c1a28ab9e788da110/html5/thumbnails/6.jpg)
6
Part III: Matching Distributions
Task 1: Paste Your (3) Minitab Histograms Below (X1, X2, Y): (6 Points)
90807060504030
50
40
30
20
10
0
x1
Fre
qu
en
cy
Mean 48.49
StDev 10.93
N 120
Histogram of x1Normal
0.700.650.600.550.500.450.400.35
20
15
10
5
0
x2
Fre
qu
en
cy
Mean 0.4955
StDev 0.06742
N 120
Histogram of x2Normal
![Page 7: Case Study IE322](https://reader036.vdocuments.us/reader036/viewer/2022062904/577cce3c1a28ab9e788da110/html5/thumbnails/7.jpg)
7
0.280.260.240.220.200.18
30
25
20
15
10
5
0
y
Fre
qu
en
cy
Mean 0.2313
StDev 0.01883
N 120
Histogram of yNormal
![Page 8: Case Study IE322](https://reader036.vdocuments.us/reader036/viewer/2022062904/577cce3c1a28ab9e788da110/html5/thumbnails/8.jpg)
8
Task 2: Paste Your (9) Empirical CDF Plots Below (Normal, Exponential, Gamma): (9
Points)
NORMAL
1009080706050403020
100
80
60
40
20
0
x1
Pe
rce
nt
Mean 48.49
StDev 10.93
N 120
Empirical CDF of x1Normal
0.70.60.50.40.3
100
80
60
40
20
0
x2
Pe
rce
nt
Mean 0.4955
StDev 0.06742
N 120
Empirical CDF of x2Normal
![Page 9: Case Study IE322](https://reader036.vdocuments.us/reader036/viewer/2022062904/577cce3c1a28ab9e788da110/html5/thumbnails/9.jpg)
9
0.280.260.240.220.200.18
100
80
60
40
20
0
y
Pe
rce
nt
Mean 0.2313
StDev 0.01883
N 120
Empirical CDF of yNormal
EXPONENTIAL
250200150100500
100
80
60
40
20
0
x1
Pe
rce
nt
Mean 48.49
N 120
Empirical CDF of x1Exponential
![Page 10: Case Study IE322](https://reader036.vdocuments.us/reader036/viewer/2022062904/577cce3c1a28ab9e788da110/html5/thumbnails/10.jpg)
10
2.52.01.51.00.50.0
100
80
60
40
20
0
x2
Pe
rce
nt
Mean 0.4955
N 120
Empirical CDF of x2Exponential
1.21.00.80.60.40.20.0
100
80
60
40
20
0
y
Pe
rce
nt
Mean 0.2313
N 120
Empirical CDF of yExponential
![Page 11: Case Study IE322](https://reader036.vdocuments.us/reader036/viewer/2022062904/577cce3c1a28ab9e788da110/html5/thumbnails/11.jpg)
11
GAMMA
1009080706050403020
100
80
60
40
20
0
x1
Pe
rce
nt
Shape 24.23
Scale 2.001
N 120
Empirical CDF of x1Gamma
0.70.60.50.40.3
100
80
60
40
20
0
x2
Pe
rce
nt
Shape 55.46
Scale 0.008934
N 120
Empirical CDF of x2Gamma
![Page 12: Case Study IE322](https://reader036.vdocuments.us/reader036/viewer/2022062904/577cce3c1a28ab9e788da110/html5/thumbnails/12.jpg)
12
0.280.260.240.220.200.18
100
80
60
40
20
0
y
Pe
rce
nt
Shape 149.6
Scale 0.001546
N 120
Empirical CDF of yGamma
![Page 13: Case Study IE322](https://reader036.vdocuments.us/reader036/viewer/2022062904/577cce3c1a28ab9e788da110/html5/thumbnails/13.jpg)
13
Task 3: Provide Answers to the Following Questions: (9 Points)
(1) From your work in Task 1 & Task 2 above, Which of the distributions do you feel as through the Relative Market Share (Y) follows? (3 Points) Normal
(2) From your work in Task 1 & Task 2 above, which of the distributions do you
feel as though the Absolute Unit Price (X1) follows? (3 Points)
Gamma
(3) From your work in Task 1 & Task 2 above, which of the distributions do you
feel as though the Relative Unit Price (X2) follows? (3 Points)
Gamma
*All results were obtained by first looking at how close of a fit to the Empirical CDF lines were
and narrowing it down by observing the normal distribution trends.
GRADE: ________/ 100