case study esc

8/12/2019 Case Study Esc

1/6

Analysis - Social Cohesion

COMMON UNDERSTANDING:

Social Cohesion Efficiency Equity

Objectives identified by the

stakeholders are consistent

with the objectives of the

program. These objectives are

instrumental to achieving the

terminal objective which is

access to education

Stakeholders mostly

mentioned the instrumental

objectives of the program

rather than the terminal

objective. Varied perspectivesare evident

clarify goals in order to

strengthen unity and shared

goals among stakeholders

Representation of various

stakeholders is evident but

their participation needs to be

taken advantaged of more

fullyParticipation from DepEd

Division and District offices

Coordination between public

schools and private schools


2/6

Analysis: Socia

SECTOR REPRESENTATION AND INVOLVEMENT

STAKEHOLDER PARTNERSHIP

-invest in education

-users impacts on the socio-economic profile of the ESC grantees

ol s and public schools

Analysis - Efficiency

EXPENDITURE

ALLOCATION

t with the identified strategy

DISSBURSEMENT

with the DepEd/FAPE timetable, it is perceived as late by teachers and end-users

nt on ESC funding so they find it difficult to sustain

operations on the 1st

semester

USE OF FUNDS:

FUND SUFFICIENCY:


3/6

the grantees but ESC grant considered as critical in the continued existence of some schools. It

also allows parents to channel their meagre income to other basic needs of the family

TRANSPARENCY:

national, regional and school level

Analysis - Equity

r each student

- there is lack of awareness among stakeholders on the bases for

allocation of funds across the regions. Varying perspective evident among program

implementers

tion of schools with particular focus on thecapacity of schools to provide quality education

-coded public school said to be not consistently

implemented

-school that seem to cater only to students with a particular vocation

i.e. seminary

ears to be varying criteria as to what constitute the poor. This results to different

selection process across schools

-invest

in education

d as scholarship

-sharing

Program benefits students coming

from low-income families:

ot

gainfully employed:


4/6

-skilled worker (23%), farming (14%)

-skilled worker (7%)

- 4%)

school recipients were majority of the students have parents who are gainfullyemployed:

workers (20%)

ence of student grantees who live in well-built houses

35%)

r-wheeled vehicles (low of

3%, high of 32%)

School is generally accessible to students

significant number of students in Compostela Valley consider accessibility as one of their

reasons for enrolling in school

Key Issues Addressed

Key education issues being addressed by the ESC program:


5/6

Decongestion of the public school

Some questions for consideration:

given ESC grants are near redcoded

public schools and that the excess students of these public schools are taken in as

ESC grantees in the nearby private school?

on the

number of students in a given public school and the policy of transferring excess students to theprivate schools?

gestion on the school achievement of

those who remained in the public school?

-aged children who did not

enroll either in the public school or private school?

Support for Private Schools

E responds to quality considerations thru:

evaluate the effectiveness of the ESC

program

increasing control over the use of funds?

student achievement?

Subsidy for Private Education

Some questions for consideration:


6/6

mechanisms among stakeholders.

who may not have the financial

capacity to shoulder part of the cost of studying in the private school communicated to

stakeholders?

case study esc

Documents