case presentation s n d

Upload: yuvraj-bhadauria

Post on 10-Apr-2018

221 views

Category:

Documents


0 download

TRANSCRIPT

  • 8/8/2019 Case Presentation S n D

    1/16

  • 8/8/2019 Case Presentation S n D

    2/16

    TITLE PAGE NO

    INTRODUCTION 1-1

    OBJECTIVE 2-2

    ARTICLE 3-3

    ACTION TAKEN 4-4

    RESULT OF SURVEY 5-5

    REASONS FOR ATTITUDE FOUND 6-7

    REMEDIAL ACTIONS 8-9

    RESULTS TO IMPROVE PERSONNEL MOTIVATION 10-

  • 8/8/2019 Case Presentation S n D

    3/16

    The Grady Tire Company- Tyre manufacturer for

    automobiles.

    Executive Offices- New York City

    Manufacturing plants- Cleveland, New York, LA

    Sales force- 295 persons

    Sales force division- Four Geographical Areas.

    10/31/2010 Group no-3, M-1 Sales and Distribution 1

  • 8/8/2019 Case Presentation S n D

    4/16

    OBJECTIVE OF CASE STUDY:To improve personnel attitude to increase productive sales effort.

    BASIS OF OBJECTIVE SETTING:Sales policies sometimes undergo considerable alteration by the

    time they filtered down to the customer James Bruce, VP Sales.

    REASON ASSUMED BY JAMES BRUCE FOR THE

    PROBLEM: Failure in Communication

    Resistance by the sales force to Management Direction

    10/31/2010 Group no-3, M-1 Sales and Distribution 2

  • 8/8/2019 Case Presentation S n D

    5/16

    Salespersons without enthusiasm, not creative thinkers.

    They radiate dissatisfaction.

    Accept customers point of view- product quality, price.

    Do not inspire customer confidence. Complain to management low salary and commission .

    Blame poor sales record ineffective advertising, poor

    leadership.

    Negative attitude affect fellow sales people.

    Ultimately leave company.

    10/31/2010 Group no-3, M-1 Sales and Distribution 3

  • 8/8/2019 Case Presentation S n D

    6/16

    Meeting with J.Rogers, VP Marketing.

    Thought of J.Bruce , Every sales executive recognizes theexistence of situations that prevent sales persons from doing their

    best work, but many do not care enough to try to find out what

    these conditions are

    Suggestion by J.Bruce- Attitude Survey among the sales force-

    by an external Research company.

    10/31/2010 Group no-3, M-1 Sales and Distribution 4

  • 8/8/2019 Case Presentation S n D

    7/16

    CRITERIA OF OBSERVATION ATTITUDE FOUND

    Towards Sales helps, Sales training,Communication, territory and customers

    Higher than National Average.

    Fear of competition Higher than National Average.

    Towards middle and top management Less favourable than National Average

    Suggestions by sales persons Greater than average negative reaction

    Satisfaction with Salary provided Lower than National Average

    Towards Job Stability and Opportunity forPersonal Progress

    Favourable than National Average

    Awareness of their problems by Top andMiddle Management

    Lower than National Average

    Towards Rewards, Recognition and creditallotment

    Lower than National Average

    Cooperation by other Departments Less favourable

    Satisfaction towards their CompanysProducts

    Lower than National Average

    10/31/2010 Group no-3, M-1 Sales and Distribution 5

  • 8/8/2019 Case Presentation S n D

    8/16

    Company is providing all initial facilities to create effective sales team.

    Company considering few standard criteria's(sales training, sales help,

    territory allotment) -driving force of effective results.

    Policies, Strategies, ideas generated by top management, notcommunicated to sales people-fear of competition.

    Lack of new ideas by middle management-Demotivate Sales force

    Credit for work is not alloted by Middle Management-Demotivate Salesteam-Low sense of Belongingness.

    Communication gap exist between sales team and management regarding

    problems.

    10/31/2010 Group no-3, M-1 Sales and Distribution 6

  • 8/8/2019 Case Presentation S n D

    9/16

    Communication gap-Insecurity and dissatisfaction.

    Lack of recognition of suggestions by sales team demotivating .

    Low increment in salary and incentives.

    Real producer of result not recognized - demotivating .

    Un co-operative other departments- decrease sense of

    belongingness and feeling of isolation.

    Measures not taken for product development- low confidence in

    product capability and fear of competition.

    10/31/2010 Group no-3, M-1 Sales and Distribution 7

  • 8/8/2019 Case Presentation S n D

    10/16

    Consider criteria's for Sales team motivation- reward, recognition

    for their work-motivate to work efficiently.

    Policies, strategies and new ideas generated, communicated to sales

    team- increase confidence in Top management ,reduce fear ofcompetition increase sense of belongingness.

    Middle management should generate new ideas- to handle

    competition.

    Credit for work should be given .

    Regular communication between Top Management and Sales Team

    10/31/2010 Group no-3, M-1 Sales and Distribution 8

  • 8/8/2019 Case Presentation S n D

    11/16

    Suggestions provided by sales team should be given recognition.

    New suggestions should be invited.

    Increment in Salary periodically.

    Percentage of Incentives should be increased. Real producer of the result should be given recognition.

    Appraisal based on performance .

    Communication between different departments should be increased.

    Regular feedback taken from sales team.

    Product development with change in technology and trend.

    10/31/2010 Group no-3, M-1 Sales and Distribution 9

  • 8/8/2019 Case Presentation S n D

    12/16

    10/31/2010 Group no-3, M-1 Sales and Distribution 10

    Are the rewards

    worth the effort?

    Does betterperformancelead to greaterrewards

    Does moreeffort lead tobetterperformance?

    Less effort

    Greater Effect

  • 8/8/2019 Case Presentation S n D

    13/16

    LEADING TO SATISFACTION(MOTIVATION FACTOR)

    LEADING TO DISSATISFACTION(HYGIENE FACTOR)

    Achievement Company Policy

    Recognition Supervision

    Work itself Relationship with bossResponsibility Work condition

    Advancement Salary

    Growth Relationship with Peers

    Security

    10/31/2010 Group no-3, M-1 Sales and Distribution 11

  • 8/8/2019 Case Presentation S n D

    14/16

    EQUITY THEORY

    Output of A (pay , recognition) = Output of B (pay, recognition)Output of B (effort , loyalty) Output of B (effort, loyalty)

    EXPECTANCY THEORY

    Motivation = function of(Expectancy x Instrumentality x Valence)

    GOALSETTING THEORY

    Anticipated result(goal) Intention(will); which implies Effort (will-act); and Strategy to reach goal (object oriented content).

  • 8/8/2019 Case Presentation S n D

    15/16

  • 8/8/2019 Case Presentation S n D

    16/16

    10/31/2010 Group no-3, M-1 Sales and Distribution 16