case for basic social math

13
Independent Independent Communication Communication Possible? Possible? The Case for Basic Social Math The Case for Basic Social Math © 2012 © 2012 by by Jared Lee Hanson Jared Lee Hanson Academy of Management Annual Meeting in Boston, Academy of Management Annual Meeting in Boston, Massachusetts, USA Massachusetts, USA

Upload: jared-lee-hanson

Post on 07-Dec-2014

478 views

Category:

Technology


0 download

DESCRIPTION

See the video at http://www.facebook.com/video/video.php?v=464768986874320

TRANSCRIPT

Page 1: Case for Basic Social Math

Is Context-Is Context-Independent Independent

Communication Communication Possible?Possible?

The Case for Basic Social MathThe Case for Basic Social Math

© 2012© 2012 byby Jared Lee Hanson Jared Lee HansonAcademy of Management Annual Meeting in Boston, Academy of Management Annual Meeting in Boston,

Massachusetts, USAMassachusetts, USA

Page 2: Case for Basic Social Math

Frankfurt School & the Question of Frankfurt School & the Question of TruthTruth

“Horkheimer argued that the social sciences are different from the natural sciences, “inasmuch as generalizations cannot be easily made from so-called experiences, “because the understanding of a ‘social’ experience itself is always fashioned by ideas that are in the researchers themselves.” (1976)*

Page 3: Case for Basic Social Math

Why Can’t We Generalize?Why Can’t We Generalize?

Page 4: Case for Basic Social Math

Philosophical DividePhilosophical Divide

“Scientific inquiry places a lot of emphasis on method, on exactly how the evidence in support of a knowledge claim was collected. ... if a rigorous method is used, then the evidence collected to support a proposed solution will be thought to be ‘true’ regardless of who collected it or whom it is presented to.” (Metcalfe, 2008)

“Pragmatism distinguishes inquiry from research by saying knowledge is community based rather than universal.... pragmatism sees inquiry as reflecting on physical events through a variety of concepts (lenses, theories, perspectives, stances, viewpoints or ideologies).” (Metcalfe, 2008) Includes: Qual/Quan Methods, Normative/Descriptive Modeling

Page 5: Case for Basic Social Math

Problem with Social ConstructionProblem with Social Construction

Page 6: Case for Basic Social Math

Criticism from Austrian EconomicsCriticism from Austrian Economics

“Mises argued that numerically accurate ‘probabilities’ could never be assigned to singular cases because the unique confluence of events in each moment of time in real markets makes the assignment of ‘objective’ probabilities unrealistic, as these events are intrinsically unique and not capable of numerical probabilistic modeling.”(1981)*“The Austrian praxeological method is based on the heavy use of logical deduction from what they argue to be undeniable, self-evident axioms or irrefutable facts about human existence.” (Hoppe, 2007)*

Page 7: Case for Basic Social Math

Problem in Current MethodsProblem in Current Methods

How can we reach any irrefutable facts about human existence?

Page 8: Case for Basic Social Math

Habermas on Communicating TruthHabermas on Communicating Truth

“In this version of the consensus theory of truth Habermas maintains that truth is what would be agreed upon in an ideal speech situation.” (1981)*“An ‘ideal speech situation’ (in Payrow Shabani, 2003)*, requires participants to have the same capacities of discourse, social equality and their words are not confused by ideology or other errors. (in Calhoun, 2002)*”

Page 9: Case for Basic Social Math

Lessons from Language ClassLessons from Language Class

Page 10: Case for Basic Social Math

““Ideal Speech Situation”?Ideal Speech Situation”?

“Decision making is a fundamental particle of management” (Noonan, 2007).

Page 11: Case for Basic Social Math

Illustrations of perspective in drawing (Gavin, 2010).

How can we achieve legitimacy in our social representations?

The Need for Linguistic RigorThe Need for Linguistic Rigor

Cimabue, 1280 Giotto, 1310 Da Vinci, 1503-6

Page 12: Case for Basic Social Math

Bridging the Philosophical DivideBridging the Philosophical DivideBasic Social MathBasic Social MathTesting Paradigms Against Empirical EvidenceAnchoring Meaning to Empirical Processes in order to Frame and Navigate Complex Problems

“While theory must inform praxis, praxis must also have a chance to inform theory.” Frankfurt School*

Page 13: Case for Basic Social Math

Add me! Add me! facebook.com/JaredLeeHansonfacebook.com/JaredLeeHanson

Calhoun, Craig J (2002). Contemporary Sociological Theory, Wiley-Blackwell, 2002, ISBN 0-631-21350-3, p.355Gavin (2010). “Establishing Perspective in Your Drawings.” Tutorials Plus. 10 May 2010.

http://psd.tutsplus.com/tutorials/tools-tips/establishing-perspective-in-your-drawings-basix/Habermas, Jurgen (1981). The Theory of Communicative Action *summarized in

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Jurgen_Habermas, 16 July 2012 Hoppe, Hans-Hermann (2007). Economic Science and the Austrian Method (Auburn, Ala.: Mises Institute, [1995]

2007), p. 63. *summarized in http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Austrian_economics, accessed on 16 July 2012.Horkheimer, Max (1976). “Traditional and Critical Theory”. In: Connerton, P (Eds), Critical Sociology: Selected

Readings, Penguin, Harmondsworth, p. 213, *summarized in http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Frankfurt_school, accessed on 16 July 2012.

Metcalfe, Mike (2008). “Pragmatic Inquiry”. Journal of the Operational Research Society (2008) 59, 1091–1099. doi:10.1057/palgrave.jors.2602443

Mises, Ludwig von (1981). http://mises.org/books/ufofes/ *summarized in http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Austrian_economics, accessed on 16 July 2012.

Noonan, Patrick S (2007). “Designing, Selling a Hybrid Course.” ORMS Today, v34 (4) 2007: 10.Payrow Shabani, Omid A (2003). Democracy, Power and Legitimacy: The Critical Theory of Jurgen Habermas.

University of Toronto Press. p. 49. ISBN 0-8020-8761-2. http://books.google.com/books?ie=UTF- 8&vid=ISBN0802087612&id=tKDU3l3cq60C&pg=P A49&lpg=P A49&dq=ideal+speech+situation.