case-asap district iii 2012

16
Getting the Most Out of Your Students Dillon Kimmel & Hunter Evans University of South Carolina

Upload: dekimmel

Post on 21-Dec-2014

552 views

Category:

Education


1 download

DESCRIPTION

 

TRANSCRIPT

Page 1: CASE-ASAP District III 2012

Getting the Most Out of Your Students

Dillon Kimmel & Hunter EvansUniversity of South Carolina

Page 2: CASE-ASAP District III 2012

Ag

en

da

• Personal case studies

• We will explore Deci & Ryan’s (1985) self-determination theory as it relates to factors that motivate our students.

• Share ideas from our own organizations

• Analyze the case study based on what we’ve learned

Page 3: CASE-ASAP District III 2012

Case

Stu

dy Reflect on a current struggle with

your organization regarding motivating students:

• What was the student(s) background?

• What was their role?• What affect did it have on your

organization?

Page 4: CASE-ASAP District III 2012

Th

e T

heory Self-determination Theory identifies

three needs that, if met, satisfy an individual’s intrinsic motivations, leading to increased commitment & engagement:

1

Relatedness

Autonomy

2 Competence

3Deci, E.L. & Ryan, R. M. (1985). Intrinsic motivation and self-determination in human behavior. New York: Plenum.

Page 5: CASE-ASAP District III 2012

Th

e T

heory Autonomy

• Something to call ‘theirs’

• Encouraged self-initiation

• Limited supervision

Page 6: CASE-ASAP District III 2012

So what can we do to meet the need for student autonomy?

• Allow students to take ownership of things

• A more ‘hands-off’ approach when possible

• New ideas are encouraged and expected

Page 7: CASE-ASAP District III 2012

Th

e T

heory Autonomy

• Something to call ‘theirs’

• Encouraged self-initiation

• Limited supervision

Competence • Feel they can do the job

• Receive positive feedback

Page 8: CASE-ASAP District III 2012

So what can we do to meet the need for student competence?

• Consistent encouragement and appreciation

• Be in-tune with what’s happening in our student’s lives

• Be reasonable with expectations

Page 9: CASE-ASAP District III 2012

Th

e T

heory Autonomy

Competence

Relatedness

• Feeling close to the university

• Positive relationships• Aligns with career goals

• Feel they can do the job

• Receive positive feedback

• Something to call ‘theirs’

• Encouraged self-initiation

• Limited supervision

Page 10: CASE-ASAP District III 2012

So what can we do to meet the need for student relatedness?

• Make work meaningful (not just free labor at events!)

• Ensure we’re recruiting students who are a good fit

• Make time for bonding among group members

Page 11: CASE-ASAP District III 2012
Page 12: CASE-ASAP District III 2012

“…students involved in advisory board gain valuable skills in marketing, advertising, and public relations.”

Page 13: CASE-ASAP District III 2012

“…students involved in advisory board gain valuable skills in marketing, advertising, and public relations.”

Page 14: CASE-ASAP District III 2012

“…students involved in advisory board gain valuable skills in marketing, advertising, and public relations.”

Page 15: CASE-ASAP District III 2012

We want to hear from you!

What strategies do you use to motivate your students?

Page 16: CASE-ASAP District III 2012

• Can you determine which need (competence, autonomy, relatedness) may not be being met?

• If so, what are some strategies you could use to motivate the students(s) involved?

Back to your case study…