carrefour d'échanges 2010 (fsedu) : m. hashash - student-teacher interaction in the elementary...

67
Student-Teacher Interaction in the Elementary Public Schools in Lebanon: A Symbolic Interactionist Perspective By: Mona Hashash January 22, 2010 under the direction of Dr. Kamal Abouchedid and the co-direction of Dr. Suzanne Abourjeily 1

Upload: universite-saint-joseph-de-beyrouth

Post on 12-May-2015

799 views

Category:

Documents


0 download

TRANSCRIPT

Page 1: Carrefour d'échanges 2010 (FSEDU) : M. Hashash - Student-Teacher Interaction in the Elementary Public Schools in Lebanon: A Symbolic Interactionist Perspective

Student-Teacher Interaction in the Elementary Public Schools in Lebanon: A Symbolic Interactionist

Perspective

By: Mona Hashash

January 22, 2010

under the direction ofDr. Kamal Abouchedid

and the co-direction ofDr. Suzanne Abourjeily 1

Page 2: Carrefour d'échanges 2010 (FSEDU) : M. Hashash - Student-Teacher Interaction in the Elementary Public Schools in Lebanon: A Symbolic Interactionist Perspective

objectives

• Exploring the patterns of student-teacher interaction in elementary public schools along three dimensions:

- teachers’ expectations for student academic and social achievement,

-teachers’ feedback to students in class,

- teachers’ use of students’ ideas

• Exploring whether classroom environment as perceived by the students has any relationship with their attitude toward school.

2

Page 3: Carrefour d'échanges 2010 (FSEDU) : M. Hashash - Student-Teacher Interaction in the Elementary Public Schools in Lebanon: A Symbolic Interactionist Perspective

Theoretical framework

• The number of references I used in this research for:

the review of literature: 62 resourcesthe research methods: 10 resourcesthe methodology: 6 resourcesthe philosophical orientations: 19

resources

3

Page 4: Carrefour d'échanges 2010 (FSEDU) : M. Hashash - Student-Teacher Interaction in the Elementary Public Schools in Lebanon: A Symbolic Interactionist Perspective

dimensions indices indicators safety physical communicated rules

response to their violation

Socio-emotional Rules about bullying conflict resolution belief in school

rules

relationship student-student relationships

school community and collaboration,

feelings about school.

Teaching-learning Quality of instruction expectations for

student achievement

feedback used help provided opportunities for

participation social, emotional,

ethical learning, professional

development for personnel leadership.

environment Cleanliness

order of facilities adequate space materials time

Source:(Cohen, Pickeral, & McCloskey, 2009; Cohen, 2007)

Dimensions of Classroom Environment

4

Page 5: Carrefour d'échanges 2010 (FSEDU) : M. Hashash - Student-Teacher Interaction in the Elementary Public Schools in Lebanon: A Symbolic Interactionist Perspective

expectations for students’ achievement

high average low

feedback to students verbal, non-verbal for social or academic

behavior showing approval (+) or

disapproval (-) using students’ ideas (students’ participation)

listening to students’ contributions

opportunities for discussions participation in class

decisions students’ feelings toward school students’ feelings inside

school students’ feelings outside

school students’ pride of own school

The variables used in this research are:

5

Page 6: Carrefour d'échanges 2010 (FSEDU) : M. Hashash - Student-Teacher Interaction in the Elementary Public Schools in Lebanon: A Symbolic Interactionist Perspective

Theoretical framework cont’d

The literature revealed that:• supportive student-teacher relationships have a

positive effect on student achievement and on their attitude toward their school.

• learning outcomes and student attitudes towards learning are closely linked to the classroom environment

 

6

Page 7: Carrefour d'échanges 2010 (FSEDU) : M. Hashash - Student-Teacher Interaction in the Elementary Public Schools in Lebanon: A Symbolic Interactionist Perspective

• Booth and Sheehan (2008):11-to-12 year-old students’ happiness in school is most influenced by their peers, followed by the relationship with teachers.

• Hallinan (2008): students who perceive that their teachers care about them, respect them and praise them are more apt to like school than are those who do not.

Theoretical framework cont’d

7

Page 8: Carrefour d'échanges 2010 (FSEDU) : M. Hashash - Student-Teacher Interaction in the Elementary Public Schools in Lebanon: A Symbolic Interactionist Perspective

• teachers can accord different levels of expectations to different students depending on the way they perceive the strength of their relationship with the students or depending on other factors, and students can easily detect these expectations through their teachers’ practices and feedback in class.

Theoretical framework cont’d

8

Page 9: Carrefour d'échanges 2010 (FSEDU) : M. Hashash - Student-Teacher Interaction in the Elementary Public Schools in Lebanon: A Symbolic Interactionist Perspective

• teachers with students’ lowered expectations tend to give them less wait-time to answer a question

• the content of the feedback is important in addition to the way and the time this feedback is delivered

Theoretical framework cont’d

9

Page 10: Carrefour d'échanges 2010 (FSEDU) : M. Hashash - Student-Teacher Interaction in the Elementary Public Schools in Lebanon: A Symbolic Interactionist Perspective

• to have an effective social and emotional classroom environment, students need opportunities to receive feedback and reinforcement

Theoretical framework cont’d

10

Page 11: Carrefour d'échanges 2010 (FSEDU) : M. Hashash - Student-Teacher Interaction in the Elementary Public Schools in Lebanon: A Symbolic Interactionist Perspective

• When students are satisfied with their school experiences they will have a strong sense of belonging to their schools.

• “about a third to a half of everything people report about their behavior is not true” (Bernard, 2002, p.85)

Theoretical framework cont’d

11

Page 12: Carrefour d'échanges 2010 (FSEDU) : M. Hashash - Student-Teacher Interaction in the Elementary Public Schools in Lebanon: A Symbolic Interactionist Perspective

In the elementary public schools in Lebanon:

• weak relations among students, teachers, administration, and parents (National Educational Strategy in Lebanon, 2006).

• no studies on the nature, causes and effects of the weak relations found.

12

Page 13: Carrefour d'échanges 2010 (FSEDU) : M. Hashash - Student-Teacher Interaction in the Elementary Public Schools in Lebanon: A Symbolic Interactionist Perspective

in Lebanon cont’d

• TIMSS 2003 report: Lebanon as the second from last among the 8 lowest countries on the list in the perceptions of teachers of how healthy the school climate is.

13

Page 14: Carrefour d'échanges 2010 (FSEDU) : M. Hashash - Student-Teacher Interaction in the Elementary Public Schools in Lebanon: A Symbolic Interactionist Perspective

• How do students’ perceptions of their teachers’ social and academic expectations of them relate to their attitude toward the school?

• How do students’ perceptions of their teachers’ verbal and nonverbal feedback relate to their attitude toward the school?

• How do students’ perceptions of their teachers’ use of their ideas in class relate to their attitude toward the school?

Research questions

14

Page 15: Carrefour d'échanges 2010 (FSEDU) : M. Hashash - Student-Teacher Interaction in the Elementary Public Schools in Lebanon: A Symbolic Interactionist Perspective

• How do teachers’ accounts of their own practices in class conform to the students’ perceptions of these practices and to the researcher’s observations?

• Are there any inter patterns of communication common to all or some of the public schools chosen in this study, and why?

 

Research questions cont’d

15

Page 16: Carrefour d'échanges 2010 (FSEDU) : M. Hashash - Student-Teacher Interaction in the Elementary Public Schools in Lebanon: A Symbolic Interactionist Perspective

Hypotheses

• The teachers’ expectations for student academic and social success influence the students’ attitude toward school.

• The nature of teachers’ feedback to students in class influences their attitude toward school.

16

Page 17: Carrefour d'échanges 2010 (FSEDU) : M. Hashash - Student-Teacher Interaction in the Elementary Public Schools in Lebanon: A Symbolic Interactionist Perspective

Hypotheses cont’d

• The extent to which teachers make use of their students’ ideas in class influences their students’ attitude toward school.

• There exists a difference between the way teachers view their own practices in class and the way students and outside observers perceive these practices.

17

Page 18: Carrefour d'échanges 2010 (FSEDU) : M. Hashash - Student-Teacher Interaction in the Elementary Public Schools in Lebanon: A Symbolic Interactionist Perspective

Hypotheses cont’d

• There is no significant difference in the patterns of student-teacher interaction along the dimensions chosen, and in the attitudes of students toward school among the schools selected in this study.

18

Page 19: Carrefour d'échanges 2010 (FSEDU) : M. Hashash - Student-Teacher Interaction in the Elementary Public Schools in Lebanon: A Symbolic Interactionist Perspective

Pre-pilot study

I- The Teachers (Statistical Yearbook, 2006-2007)

• recruitment (on tenure 69.5%, on contractual basis 27.9%)

• qualifications (21.7% Bacc II / equivalent. 39.1% BA. BS)

• age (32% 51 yrs. and above)

• distribution (44 schools with 2 to 25 students)

19

Page 20: Carrefour d'échanges 2010 (FSEDU) : M. Hashash - Student-Teacher Interaction in the Elementary Public Schools in Lebanon: A Symbolic Interactionist Perspective

Pre-pilot study/ teachers cont’d

teachers interviewed:

• 10 elementary public school teachers

• in schools in Beirut and Mount Lebanon

• 6 hold a university degree but not in education

• 5 have more than 5 years of teaching experience

• 7 have received educational training or attended workshops at least once

20

Page 21: Carrefour d'échanges 2010 (FSEDU) : M. Hashash - Student-Teacher Interaction in the Elementary Public Schools in Lebanon: A Symbolic Interactionist Perspective

Pre-pilot study/teachers cont’d

• What made you enter the teaching profession in public schools?

910

67

6

4

0

2

4

6

8

10

12

summersalary

benefits easy job monthlyincome

female job flexibleschedule

21

Page 22: Carrefour d'échanges 2010 (FSEDU) : M. Hashash - Student-Teacher Interaction in the Elementary Public Schools in Lebanon: A Symbolic Interactionist Perspective

Reason for teaching in public schools quotes

Benefits •“tenure provides some security”•“working in the public sector has always been financially rewarding on the long run“•“nothing is lost with the government”

Summer salary •“I get paid while staying at home”

Monthly income •“I always have cash in my hand’•“I consider my salary as pocket money”•“even when our salaries are delayed the amount becomes bigger”

Female job •“it’s the cleanest job for a female’•“the vacations conform to our kids’”

Easy job •“students get easily scared! A single voice and they are all quiet!”

Flexible schedule •‘I can go to work and come back whenever I want provided there is someone to cover up for me”.•“we fit our schedules to our own convenience” 22

Page 23: Carrefour d'échanges 2010 (FSEDU) : M. Hashash - Student-Teacher Interaction in the Elementary Public Schools in Lebanon: A Symbolic Interactionist Perspective

Pre-pilot study/teachers cont’d

• What are the frequently encountered problems in your schools?

8

4

7

3

5

9 98

4

1

10 10

0

2

4

6

8

10

12

23

Page 24: Carrefour d'échanges 2010 (FSEDU) : M. Hashash - Student-Teacher Interaction in the Elementary Public Schools in Lebanon: A Symbolic Interactionist Perspective

Problems most frequently encountered

quotes

Discipline problems •“we have classes which keep popping up like popcorn”•“very often things are beyond the capacity of an individual teacher”•“I spend most of the class time trying to calm them down”

Emotional distance •“some are strangely quiet, shy and withdrawn, just breathing air”.•“as if they are living inside a bubble”•“I don’t know how to deal with them or how to approach them”

Defying students •“they are not concerned with our presence”•“they don’t follow directions, as if we are not talking to them”•“all what you study in education is mere theories and can not be applied with these students”•“some simply look at me and continue misbehaving, others don’t even bother to look”

24

Page 25: Carrefour d'échanges 2010 (FSEDU) : M. Hashash - Student-Teacher Interaction in the Elementary Public Schools in Lebanon: A Symbolic Interactionist Perspective

Problems most frequently encountered

quotes

Uninterested students •“these students don’t take school seriously”•“they don’t understand why they should listen or do their homework”•“in every class you can find one or two students who really want to learn”

Foul language •“not only students use obscene words, but also teachers”•“sometimes I use demeaning words because this is how they understand”•“being polite doesn’t work with them”

25

Page 26: Carrefour d'échanges 2010 (FSEDU) : M. Hashash - Student-Teacher Interaction in the Elementary Public Schools in Lebanon: A Symbolic Interactionist Perspective

Pre-pilot study/teachers cont’d

• In your opinion what are the causes of these problems?

26

Page 27: Carrefour d'échanges 2010 (FSEDU) : M. Hashash - Student-Teacher Interaction in the Elementary Public Schools in Lebanon: A Symbolic Interactionist Perspective

Causes of problems quotes

home environment •“it’s the way they have been raised”•“their parents are careless themselves”•“their parents don’t care, why should we?”•“I am not here to raise them instead of their parents”

punitive measures in school •“floor supervisors always carry sticks in their hands threatening the students”•“I even use the stick sometimes”•“at the same time, do you know what really keeps them on their toes? Being beaten! Believe me, it has proven to be very effective”

automatic class promotion •“the most serious cases are found in grade 4 and up because students are not entitled to fail classes, so they get away with everything”

Student biological make-up •“I don’t know but most if not all of them need psychological help”

27

Page 28: Carrefour d'échanges 2010 (FSEDU) : M. Hashash - Student-Teacher Interaction in the Elementary Public Schools in Lebanon: A Symbolic Interactionist Perspective

Pre-pilot study/teachers cont’d

• How do you usually handle the problems you face?

•“I’m always screaming in class and some teachers burst into tears”

•“I leave the classroom because it makes no difference for them whether I’m in class or not”

•“I stop instruction, and wait till the bell rings. After all I’m not willing to lose my voice and temper for their sake”

•“I do my job and continue instruction. I focus on two or three students who really want to learn”

•“ I get outside help and I don’t care what happens to them. Very often I can’t control them and a terrible headache starts banging my head”

28

Page 29: Carrefour d'échanges 2010 (FSEDU) : M. Hashash - Student-Teacher Interaction in the Elementary Public Schools in Lebanon: A Symbolic Interactionist Perspective

Pre-pilot study/students

II- The Students (Statistical Yearbook, 2006-2007)

• poor

• sometimes non-Lebanese

• 35% aged more than their normal class age

29

Page 30: Carrefour d'échanges 2010 (FSEDU) : M. Hashash - Student-Teacher Interaction in the Elementary Public Schools in Lebanon: A Symbolic Interactionist Perspective

•“many teachers do not really explain anything, some keep talking about themselves leaving the assigned book untouched”

•“sometimes we feel that our teachers do not value us. It’s not a nice feeling”

•“sometimes I give a silly answer to a very easy question and sometimes I say nonsense just to have fun!”

•“the teacher talks and I daydream or I talk with others”

• “some students are really annoying and drive the teacher crazy”

•“shouting most of the time doesn’t work nor does hitting students with a stick, or referring them to the supervisor’s office”

Pre-pilot study/students cont’d

30

Page 31: Carrefour d'échanges 2010 (FSEDU) : M. Hashash - Student-Teacher Interaction in the Elementary Public Schools in Lebanon: A Symbolic Interactionist Perspective

•“sometimes teachers enter the class frowning and angry before the students do anything depending on what happened with them at home!”

•“we need teachers who do not yell and punish”

•“I love many teachers because they tell us at the end of the school year: “The mere fact that we shouted at you does not mean that we don’t love you”

•“some teachers play football with us during recess, and help us get out of trouble with the supervisor”

•“ we had a teacher who would shout the moment he enters the classroom: “silence, discipline, studying!” then he would start to talk about whatever comes to his mind provided it is not related to the curriculum”

Pre-pilot study/students cont’d

31

Page 32: Carrefour d'échanges 2010 (FSEDU) : M. Hashash - Student-Teacher Interaction in the Elementary Public Schools in Lebanon: A Symbolic Interactionist Perspective

Pre-pilot study/outsider view

•“ teachers are yelling across the corridors even louder than the students themselves”

•“ a common scene you would see is: unsupervised students left alone in classes, fighting, shouting, banging on the desks and, most importantly, risking to hurt each others”

•“ the teachers are either very permissive or harshly severe without credibility”

• ‘the students are constantly afraid of being beaten and wouldn’t hesitate to put a classmate into trouble and lie just to save themselves”

•“ the problem is that the students never understand why they are punished “

III- An Outsider View

32

Page 33: Carrefour d'échanges 2010 (FSEDU) : M. Hashash - Student-Teacher Interaction in the Elementary Public Schools in Lebanon: A Symbolic Interactionist Perspective

Pre-pilot study/outsider view cont’d

•“ one student said: everybody here expects us to misbehave, so we misbehave!”

 •“ these students are regarded as street kids who are not aware of their limits and who don’t take ‘no’ for an answer”

•“ I saw a teacher who left the classroom where she was supposed to substitute to smoke a cigarette leaving the students to fight fiercely behind her, and another who enters the classroom with a cigarette in her hand”

•“most public school teachers are not up to the challenge because of the recruitment of a high percentage of unqualified teachers by “wasta’ “

•“ teachers perform in classes by trial and error”

33

Page 34: Carrefour d'échanges 2010 (FSEDU) : M. Hashash - Student-Teacher Interaction in the Elementary Public Schools in Lebanon: A Symbolic Interactionist Perspective

Rational for research methodology

I-The multiple case study design (Yin,1993,1994,2003; de Vaus, 2007)

• investigate real life events in natural settings

• represent more compelling evidence

• the relevant behaviors cannot be manipulated

• answer ‘how’ and ‘why’ questions

34

Page 35: Carrefour d'échanges 2010 (FSEDU) : M. Hashash - Student-Teacher Interaction in the Elementary Public Schools in Lebanon: A Symbolic Interactionist Perspective

• are essential for inductive purposes: deductive vs. inductive logic

• theory building vs. theory testing

• possibility for replication: literal replication vs. theoretical replication (cross-case comparisons)

• exploratory, correlational and explanatory

The multiple case study design cont’d

35

Page 36: Carrefour d'échanges 2010 (FSEDU) : M. Hashash - Student-Teacher Interaction in the Elementary Public Schools in Lebanon: A Symbolic Interactionist Perspective

II- Symbolic interactionism: Grounded theorizing (Mead, Dewey, Blumer, Corbin & Strauss)

• meanings are central, not fixed

• meanings emerge through interaction

• meaning are derived through interpretation.

36

Page 37: Carrefour d'échanges 2010 (FSEDU) : M. Hashash - Student-Teacher Interaction in the Elementary Public Schools in Lebanon: A Symbolic Interactionist Perspective

Symbolic interactionism: Grounded theorizing cont’d

• Interpretation : researcher’s understanding of the events as related by participants

• generating grounded descriptions vs. testing pre-set theories

• people sharing common circumstances experience shared meanings.

37

Page 38: Carrefour d'échanges 2010 (FSEDU) : M. Hashash - Student-Teacher Interaction in the Elementary Public Schools in Lebanon: A Symbolic Interactionist Perspective

III- Philosophical orientations

• naturalistic, interpretative approaches: watching, listening, asking and collecting

relevant information.Understanding practices from within

38

Page 39: Carrefour d'échanges 2010 (FSEDU) : M. Hashash - Student-Teacher Interaction in the Elementary Public Schools in Lebanon: A Symbolic Interactionist Perspective

Philosophical orientations

• Constructivist approaches (Ausubel, Piaget, Bandura, Vygotsky)

meanings are interpreted and understood within social groups.

personal construction of meanings

39

Page 40: Carrefour d'échanges 2010 (FSEDU) : M. Hashash - Student-Teacher Interaction in the Elementary Public Schools in Lebanon: A Symbolic Interactionist Perspective

Philosophical orientations

• The social cognitive theory (Bandura)

Students do not passively receive knowledge

Students construct new ideas based upon current and past knowledge

40

Page 41: Carrefour d'échanges 2010 (FSEDU) : M. Hashash - Student-Teacher Interaction in the Elementary Public Schools in Lebanon: A Symbolic Interactionist Perspective

Selection of sites

• there are 190 public schools distributed on the different educational districts in Beirut and the suburbs (The School Directory for General Education, 2006-

2007)

41

Page 42: Carrefour d'échanges 2010 (FSEDU) : M. Hashash - Student-Teacher Interaction in the Elementary Public Schools in Lebanon: A Symbolic Interactionist Perspective

Subject selection

• All grade 6 students and teachers in 5 selected schools will be our respondents in this study.

42

Page 43: Carrefour d'échanges 2010 (FSEDU) : M. Hashash - Student-Teacher Interaction in the Elementary Public Schools in Lebanon: A Symbolic Interactionist Perspective

Research methods

• Mixture of qualitative and quantitative methods.

Qualitative: class observations and interviews (teachers)

Quantitative: questionnaires (students)

43

Page 44: Carrefour d'échanges 2010 (FSEDU) : M. Hashash - Student-Teacher Interaction in the Elementary Public Schools in Lebanon: A Symbolic Interactionist Perspective

Research methods cont’d

• Why qualitative methods?personal nature of researchgain understanding through language and

communicationshow why participants behave in certain

waysexplore inconsistencies and conflicts in

beliefs and behaviors.

44

Page 45: Carrefour d'échanges 2010 (FSEDU) : M. Hashash - Student-Teacher Interaction in the Elementary Public Schools in Lebanon: A Symbolic Interactionist Perspective

Research methods cont’d

• Why quantitative methods?facilitate cross-case comparisonsprovide more validity for the research

45

Page 46: Carrefour d'échanges 2010 (FSEDU) : M. Hashash - Student-Teacher Interaction in the Elementary Public Schools in Lebanon: A Symbolic Interactionist Perspective

Data collection

• semi- structured interviews with the teachers

the social and academic expectations for students

the feedback they provide them their use of students’ ideas.

• from half an hour to one hour.

• interview guide46

Page 47: Carrefour d'échanges 2010 (FSEDU) : M. Hashash - Student-Teacher Interaction in the Elementary Public Schools in Lebanon: A Symbolic Interactionist Perspective

Data collection cont’d

• Observation of teachers for two class periods during instruction

• to check for consistency between what is said and what is practiced (reported and observed).

47

Page 48: Carrefour d'échanges 2010 (FSEDU) : M. Hashash - Student-Teacher Interaction in the Elementary Public Schools in Lebanon: A Symbolic Interactionist Perspective

Data collection cont’d

• whether feedback is: verbal or non-verbal positive or negative for academic tasks or for social tasks

• a brief description of the feedback delivered.

• The extent of use of students’ ideas 

48

Page 49: Carrefour d'échanges 2010 (FSEDU) : M. Hashash - Student-Teacher Interaction in the Elementary Public Schools in Lebanon: A Symbolic Interactionist Perspective

Data collection cont’d

• semi-structured questionnaires to students

the way they perceive their teachers’ feedback the way they perceive their teachers’

expectations for them the extent to which their teachers use their

ideas their attitude toward school

 49

Page 50: Carrefour d'échanges 2010 (FSEDU) : M. Hashash - Student-Teacher Interaction in the Elementary Public Schools in Lebanon: A Symbolic Interactionist Perspective

Data collection cont’d

 • Combining methods in a single study is

becoming a more common practice because of the limitations of using only one approach to fully address all aspects of a research question (Zweck and Pentland, 2008, p. 116)

50

Page 51: Carrefour d'échanges 2010 (FSEDU) : M. Hashash - Student-Teacher Interaction in the Elementary Public Schools in Lebanon: A Symbolic Interactionist Perspective

Content analysis

• Data about expectations: High, medium, low

• Data about delivery of feedback: negative, positive

• Data about use of students’ ideas: frequent, sometimes, rarely

51

Page 52: Carrefour d'échanges 2010 (FSEDU) : M. Hashash - Student-Teacher Interaction in the Elementary Public Schools in Lebanon: A Symbolic Interactionist Perspective

Convergence of evidence in individual cases

Interviews with teachers

(semi-structured)

Facts about each school

Observations of teachers (direct & non-participant)

Questionnaires to students (open &

closed ended)

Students’ feelings toward

the school

52

Page 53: Carrefour d'échanges 2010 (FSEDU) : M. Hashash - Student-Teacher Interaction in the Elementary Public Schools in Lebanon: A Symbolic Interactionist Perspective

triangulation

“When you have really triangulated the data, the events or facts of the case study have been supported by more than a single source of evidence; when you have used multiple sources but not actually triangulated the data, you typically have analyzed each source of evidence separately and have compared the conclusions from the different analyses-but not triangulated the data” (Yin, 2003,p.99).

53

Page 54: Carrefour d'échanges 2010 (FSEDU) : M. Hashash - Student-Teacher Interaction in the Elementary Public Schools in Lebanon: A Symbolic Interactionist Perspective

replication

• “Each case’s conclusions are considered to be the information needing replication by other individual cases” (Yin, 2003, p.50)

• Literal vs. theoretical replication

54

Page 55: Carrefour d'échanges 2010 (FSEDU) : M. Hashash - Student-Teacher Interaction in the Elementary Public Schools in Lebanon: A Symbolic Interactionist Perspective

Analyzing field notes

1. Within-case analysis

2. Common format to facilitate cross-case analysis

3. Cross-site search for patterns

*remain open to as many theoretical directions as conceivable

55

Page 56: Carrefour d'échanges 2010 (FSEDU) : M. Hashash - Student-Teacher Interaction in the Elementary Public Schools in Lebanon: A Symbolic Interactionist Perspective

Case study method

Develop theory

Design data

collection protocol

Select cases

Develop policy

implications

Write cross-case report

Conduct remaining

case studies

Conduct 2nd case

study

Conduct 1st case study

Write individual

case report

Write individual

case reports

Modify theory

Write individual

case report

Draw cross-case

conclusions

Source: Yin, 2003, p.50

56

Page 57: Carrefour d'échanges 2010 (FSEDU) : M. Hashash - Student-Teacher Interaction in the Elementary Public Schools in Lebanon: A Symbolic Interactionist Perspective

Methodological issues

• research designs should be internally valid and externally valid, should produce reliable results and should be amenable to replication.

• However, case study designs are often seen to be “deficient in all these areas” (de Vaus, 2007, p.233)

 

57

Page 58: Carrefour d'échanges 2010 (FSEDU) : M. Hashash - Student-Teacher Interaction in the Elementary Public Schools in Lebanon: A Symbolic Interactionist Perspective

Methodological issues cont’d

1. Internal validity during data analysis: some other factors

may have influenced the students’ feelings toward school

solution: grounded theorizing “elsewhere syndrome”, “rival

explanations”.

58

Page 59: Carrefour d'échanges 2010 (FSEDU) : M. Hashash - Student-Teacher Interaction in the Elementary Public Schools in Lebanon: A Symbolic Interactionist Perspective

Methodological issues cont’d

2. External validityduring the design phase: the extent to

which results from a study can be generalized beyond the immediate case study.

solution: replication (literal vs. theoretical)hard to achieve in natural settings (Wiersma&

Jurs, 2009)

solution : enhancing reliability

59

Page 60: Carrefour d'échanges 2010 (FSEDU) : M. Hashash - Student-Teacher Interaction in the Elementary Public Schools in Lebanon: A Symbolic Interactionist Perspective

Methodological issues cont’d

3. Reliability

if it’s repeated by another researcher and still reaches similar results

solution: triangulationcase-study protocolcase study database

60

Page 61: Carrefour d'échanges 2010 (FSEDU) : M. Hashash - Student-Teacher Interaction in the Elementary Public Schools in Lebanon: A Symbolic Interactionist Perspective

Methodological issues cont’d

4. Construct validity

To determine whether the constructs of interest and hypotheses are suitable or need to be modified.

Condition achieved

61

Page 62: Carrefour d'échanges 2010 (FSEDU) : M. Hashash - Student-Teacher Interaction in the Elementary Public Schools in Lebanon: A Symbolic Interactionist Perspective

Methodological issues cont’d

Tests Case Study Tactic Phase of research in which tactic occurs

Construct validity use multiple sources of evidence*

establish chain of evidence have key informants review

draft case study report

data collection data collection composition

Internal validity do pattern- matching* do explanation-building* address rival explanations use logic models

data analysis data analysis data analysis data analysis

External validity use theory in single-case studies

use replication logic in multiple-case studies*

research design research design

Reliability use case study protocol* develop case study

database*

data collection data collection

62

Page 63: Carrefour d'échanges 2010 (FSEDU) : M. Hashash - Student-Teacher Interaction in the Elementary Public Schools in Lebanon: A Symbolic Interactionist Perspective

Reporting the data

• Final written report including:

brief chapters for individual casesone chapter for each cross-case issue for

comparison purposes

63

Page 64: Carrefour d'échanges 2010 (FSEDU) : M. Hashash - Student-Teacher Interaction in the Elementary Public Schools in Lebanon: A Symbolic Interactionist Perspective

Limitations of the study

• incapacity to cover all factors contributing to school environment

• threats to internal validity: incapacity to eliminate competing explanations

• difficulty measuring attitudes and feelingssolution: multiple related ,and open-ended

questions

64

Page 65: Carrefour d'échanges 2010 (FSEDU) : M. Hashash - Student-Teacher Interaction in the Elementary Public Schools in Lebanon: A Symbolic Interactionist Perspective

Contribution to knowledge

This research:• provides insight for educators and decision makers to

rethink their strategies for teacher recruitment, appraisal, and supervision in the elementary public schools,

• invites teachers to rethink their practices with their students in classes,

• offers recommendations for future development plans to improve the quality of classroom environment in these schools,

65

Page 66: Carrefour d'échanges 2010 (FSEDU) : M. Hashash - Student-Teacher Interaction in the Elementary Public Schools in Lebanon: A Symbolic Interactionist Perspective

• opens a new path in educational research in the public sector of education and invites researchers to further investigate other aspects which might contribute to the classroom environment in the elementary public schools in Lebanon. It also invites researchers to examine other aspects which might account for the students’ feelings toward their public schools.

66

Page 67: Carrefour d'échanges 2010 (FSEDU) : M. Hashash - Student-Teacher Interaction in the Elementary Public Schools in Lebanon: A Symbolic Interactionist Perspective

Thank you

67