CARE Steering Committee and Dissemination Board

R. Aleksan(aleksan@dapnia.cea.fr)

CARE Steering Committee CERN, September 13, 2006

1. Introduction et objectives2. CARE funding and general administrative matters 3. FP7, ESGARD matters and CARE2

+

Main objectives of the meeting

1. Review financial situation• Status of EU funding• Total costs• Budget for next 18 months

2. Review progress in NA/JRA

3. Discuss the future• Preparation of CARE06 in Frascati • FP7• CARE2

Total costs for the 24 first months (2004+2005)

Total (5 years) expected costs: 35 141 200 € Total costs for past 24 months: 14 011 451 € (~40%)

Total costs

0

1 000 000

2 000 000

3 000 000

4 000 000

5 000 000

6 000 000

7 000 000

8 000 000

9 000 000

10 000 000

CEA

(FC

)

UCL

N (A

C)

CNR

S (F

CF)

GSI

(FC

)

IAP

-FU

(AC)

DES

Y (A

C)

FZJ

(FC

)

TUM

(AC

)

FZR

(AC

)

INFN

(AC

)

TEU

(FC

)

TUL

(AC

)

IPJ

(AC

)

WUT

-ISE

(AC

)

WUT

(AC

)

CSI

C (F

C)

CER

N (A

C)

UNI

-GE

(AC

)

PSI

(FC

)

CCL

RC

(FC)

ICL

(AC

)

UM

A (A

C)

Institutes

Euro

s

Total expected costActual Costcost period 1cost period 2

Total costs for the 24 first months (2004+2005)

Total expenditures

0%

10%

20%

30%

40%

50%

60%

70%

80%

90%

100%

CEA

(FC)

UCLN

(AC)

CNRS

(FCF

)

GSI (F

C)

IAP-

FU (A

C)

DESY

(AC)

FZJ (

FC)

TUM

(AC)

FZR

(AC)

INFN

(AC)

TEU

(FC)

TUL (

AC)

IPJ (

AC)

WUT-I

SE (A

C)

WUT (

AC)

CSIC

(FC)

CERN

(AC)

UNI-G

E (A

C)

PSI (F

C)

CCLR

C (FC

)

ICL (

AC)

UMA

(AC)

Gran

d tota

l

Intitutes

Perce

ntag

e

Difference from total cost

Actual Cost

Total expected costs for next 18 months: 12 839 414 €

Total costs requested to the EC: 5 644 485 € (we should receive ~2 500 000 €)

Budget for the next 18 months

Budget for the next 18 months (1/1/2006-30/6/2007)

0500 000

1 000 0001 500 0002 000 0002 500 0003 000 0003 500 0004 000 000

CE

A(F

C)

UC

LN(A

C)

CN

RS

(FC

F)

GS

I(FC

)

IAP

-FU

(AC

)

DE

SY

(AC

)

FZJ(

FC)

TUM

(AC

)

FZR

(AC

)

INFN

(AC

)

TEU

(FC

)

TUL(

AC

)

IPJ(

AC

)

WU

T-

WU

T(A

C)

CS

IC(F

C)

CE

RN

(AC

)

UN

I-GE

(AC

)

PS

I(FC

)

CC

LRC

(FC

)

ICL(

AC

)

UM

A(A

C)

Institutes

Eur

os

Expected costs includingindirect cost (Euros)

Requested funding (Euros)

EU funding for CARE

0

500 000

1 000 000

1 500 000

2 000 000

2 500 000

3 000 000

CE

A (

FC

)

UC

LN

(A

C)

CN

RS

(F

CF

)

GS

I (F

C)

IAP

-FU

(A

C)

DE

SY

(A

C)

FZ

J (F

C)

TU

M (

AC

)

FZ

R (

AC

)

INF

N (

AC

)

TE

U (

FC

)

TU

L (

AC

)

IPJ

(AC

)

WU

T-I

SE

(A

C)

WU

T (

AC

)

CS

IC (

FC

)

CE

RN

(A

C)

UN

I-G

E (

AC

)

PS

I (F

C)

CC

LR

C (

FC

)

ICL

(A

C)

UM

A (

AC

)

Participant

Eu

ro

Total EU CARE fundingTotal payment made so farfirst EC payment received in 2004second payment (made in 2005)third payment (made in 2006)

We received 2 605 444.45 €

Summary of the financial situation

Percentage received so far from EC

0%20%40%60%80%

100%

CE

A (

FC

)

UC

LN

(A

C)

CN

RS

(F

CF

)

GS

I (F

C)

IAP

-FU

(A

C)

DE

SY

(A

C)

FZ

J (

FC

)

TU

M (

AC

)

FZ

R (

AC

)

INF

N (

AC

)

TE

U (

FC

)

TU

L (

AC

)

IPJ

(A

C)

WU

T-I

SE

(A

C)

WU

T (

AC

)

CS

IC (

FC

)

CE

RN

(A

C)

UN

I-G

E (

AC

)

PS

I (F

C)

CC

LR

C (

FC

)

ICL

(A

C)

UM

A (

AC

)

Gra

nd

To

tal

Participant

remaining to be paid

Total payment made so far

Mid Term Review

Administrative issues

Audits of individual CARE participant made by the EC

Quarterly report

So far only HHH and HIPPI have provided the 2nd Quarterly Report

This is an important element of our reporting procedure

Send it very soon

We have to go through the mid term review (D. Pasini sent me a letter on this)

It will likely happen during CARE06 as a simple status report presentation ofthe progress accompanied with the yearly report (under negotiation)

I received a mail from the EC reminding that partners have to be CAREFULin declaring their costs, many documents are often missing and/ornon-expenditures eligible have been found by EC auditors

9RESEARCH INFRASTRUCTURES

Timetable for FP7 adoption

6 April 2005 FP7 proposal

21 September 2005 Specific Prog. proposals

June 2006 ? Adoption

November 2006 ? First calls for proposals

January 2007 ? Launch Conference

likely to be delayed by 6 months or so

Probably early 2007, with the first call being on new infrastructures and DS

Delayed accordingly

1- Support to existing research infrastructuresThe objective is to optimise the use and development of existing research infrastructures, in all fields ofscience and technology. Support will be provided for the following activities:• Integrating Activities: to ensure that European researchers may have access to the best research infrastructures to conduct their research by supporting the integrated provision of infrastructure related services to the research community at a European level. Integrating activities should also aim at structuring better, on a European scale, the way research infrastructures operate, and at fostering their joint development in terms of capacity and performance. Emphasis should be given to the efficient and coordinated implementation of trans-national access and service activities. This action will follow both a bottom-up and a targeted approach:

• bottom-up to respond to the needs of the scientific community in all fields of science and technology, without any preference for one field over another;• targeted to respond to the strategic research needs of the thematic priority areas and thereby strengthen the consistency of actions within FP7.

• ICT based e-infrastructures: to foster the further development and evolution of high-capacity and high-performance communication (GÉANT) and grid empowered infrastructures, including the reinforcement of world class distributed supercomputing facilities, data storage and advanced visualisation facilities. Emphasis will be given to the deployment of a scientific data infrastructure resulting from the coordination, at pan-European level, of data storage, archiving, access, management and curation activities. The activity will also aim at fostering the adoption by user communities where appropriate, enhancing their global relevance and increasing the level of trust and confidence.

Different type of FP7 calls

2- Support to new research infrastructuresThe aim is to help to create in all fields of science and technology new research infrastructures of pan-European interestneeded by the European scientific community in order to remain at the forefront of the advancement of research, and be able to help industry to strengthen its base of knowledge and its technological know-how. Support will be provided for the following activities:

Design Studies: to support, in all fields of science and technology, feasibility studies for new research infrastructures, including e-Infrastructures, which are of a clear European dimension and interest. Construction of new infrastructures: to provide a catalytic and leveraging support for the construction of critical new facilities based on the European Strategy Forum on Research Infrastructures (ESFRI)[1] roadmap for new research infrastructures of pan-European interest. This activity will follow a two stage-approach:

Stage 1 - support to the preparatory phase: This first phase will involve, in particular, the finalisation of the detailed construction plans, of the legal organisation, of the management and multi-annual financial planning. Stage 2 - support to the implementation phase: This phase involves the actual construction, building on the technical, legal, administrative and financial agreement achieved during the preparatory phase between all stakeholders. Community financial support for the implementation phase will be very limited and may be indirect, e.g. through the Risk Sharing Finance Facility (RSFF)[2], or direct, but only in few cases, where there is a critical need for such a support.

Community support will concentrate on the preparatory phase. The first call for proposals, in 2007, for the preparatory phase (Stage 1) will be restricted to the list of projects included in the ESFRI Roadmap published in 2006. Only projectswhich have sufficiently progressed in the preparatory phase will proceed to the Stage 2. Decisions for a Communityfinancial support for the implementation phase of these projects (Stage 2) will be taken through the periodic revisionof this work programme, where the projects, the form of support and beneficiaries will be identified.

Call N° ActivityIndicative budget

(M€)

Call 1(early 2007)

ICT based e-infrastructures …

Design studies …

Construction – preparatory phase …

Support Measures …

Contribution in 2007 to the Risk Sharing Facility 40

Call 2(later in 2007)

Integrating Activities …

ICT based e-Infrastructures …

Support Measures …

Call 3(late 2009)

Integrating Activities …

ICT based e-Infrastructures …

Design studies …

Construction – preparatory phase …

Support Measures …

Call 4(late 2011)

Integrating Activities …

ICT based e-Infrastructures …

Support Measures …

Direct grants for the construction phase …

Contribution between 2009 and 2013 to the Risk Sharing Finance Facility

160

Total About 1780

Tentative schedule of FP7 calls

LHC and p (ion) accelerators

Subject Contr

act Type

Specific

TitleNb

instituteDuration

Cost (Meuro)

continuation

Contact

LHC DSThe Upgrade in Luminosity of the CERN-LHC in Europe

>10 4 7.2F. Ruggiero, W.

scandale (CERN)

LHC magnet I3 JRAHigh Field Magnets for LHC upgrades

10 7 13.85 A. Devred (CEA) TBD

LHC magnet I3 JRA HT superconducting materials 4 (+6) 5 1.3 A. Ballarino (CERN)

LHC Magnet I3 JRA High field magnet construction 7 3 ? CARE/NED A. Devred (CEA)

LHC Magnet I3 TA CryoMagNet 7 7 1 CARE/NED A. Devred (CEA)

P aceel. DSFast Cycling Syncrotron Design Study

>10 4 7.2 CaRE/HHHF. Ruggiero, W.

Scandale (CERN)

P accel. I3 JRACollimators and Materials for High Power Accelerators

6 5 10 R. Assmann (CERN)

P accel. I3 JRADevelopment of an electron cooler for the Extra Low ENergy Antiproton ring

>10 2 2.5 T. Eriksson (CERN)

P accel. I3 JRAFast Cycling Superconducting Magnets for Synchrotrons

8 4 8.75 TBD

P accel. I3 JRASuperconducting linac-based Proton Driver

8 4 10.2 CARE/HIPPIR. Garoby, M. Vretenar

(CERN)

p-ion accel. I3 JRA High Current Ion Linac 10 7 15 CARE/HIPPI U. Ratzinger (IAP-FU)

p-ion accel. I3 JRALight Ion Sources and Associated Plasma Studies

4 5 ? ? R. Gobin (CEA)

intense ion beam CNI High Current Ion Storage Ring ? 12 20 ? U. Ratzinger (IAP-FU)

Update on the LoI received

Subject

Contract

Type Specific TitleNb

instituteDuration

Cost (Meuro)

continuation Contact

CLIC I3 JRA Drive Beam issues 9 3 5 D. Schulte (CERN)

CLIC I3 JRAGeneration And Diagnostics Gear for tiny EmiTtance 6 4 5.9 H. Braun (CERN)

CLIC I3 JRAL-band, High Power and High Efficiency Multi Beam RF Amplifier

>10 6 7I. Syratchev

(CERN)

CLIC I3 JRA Luminosity Ensuring Design 10 5 5.4 D. Schulte (CERN)

CLIC I3 JRA High-gradient RF structures 6 5 5W. Wuensch

(CERN)

CLIC I3 JRAKa-band Stand-Alone Power Source >10 4 7 E. Jensen (CERN)

CLIC I3 JRACLIC Two-Beam Test-Stand and CLIC Post Collision studies

2 5 1,5 ?V. Ziemann (U. Uppsala)

Lineac Collider activities

Subject

Contract

Type Specific TitleNb

instituteDuration

Cost (Meuro)

continuation Contact

SCRF (ILC) ? JRA Positron Polarized Sources 11 4 10 ? A. Variola (LAL)

SCRF I3JRA-WP

Deposition of thin superconducting layers for accelerator technology

3 5 2CARE/SRF

M. Sadowski (IPJ)

SCRF I3JRA-WP

Deposition of superconducting films of pure lead (Pb) by means of the UHV cathodic arc

3 5 0,5CARE/SRF

J. Langner (IPJ)

SCRF I3JRA-WP

Development of various materials (e.g. Mg, Pb) films on Cu substrates

2 4 ?CARE/SRF

F. Tazzioli (LNF)

SCRF I3 JRA SCRF technologiesSRF coll.

? ?CARE/SRF

D. Proch (DESY)

SCRF I3 JRAInfluence of Slope on Superconductive RF Cavity Cooling

2 2 0,9 ? B. Rousset (CEA)

SCRF I3 WP

Infrastructure testing the new technologies concerning the high power-high repetition rate lasers

1 2 1,8 ? A. Variola (LAL)

SCRF CNIEuropean Super-Conducting RF Facility

TTC + ? 30 ? A. Wagner (DESY)

ILC I3 JRAUse the HERA Electron Ring as ILC Damping Ring

4 3 10EUROTe

VF. Willeke (DESY)

Lineac Collider activities (cont’d)

Other activities

Subject Contr

act Type

Specific

TitleNb

instituteDuration

Cost (Meuro)

continuation

Contact

Neutrino DS Next Generation of Neutrino Oscillation Facilities

42 3 20 CARE/BENE R. Edgecock (RAL)

Neutrino DS+I3 JRA FFAG >10 5 16 F. Meot

Phi Factory DS DAPHNE upgrade : DANAE ? ? ? ?

Laser-Plasma ? JRA LAser Plasma TECHnology 19 4 20CARE/PHIN,

EuroLeapV. Malka (CNRS)

Activity Estimated Cost (Meuro)

LHC, p accel. & magnets 47.6(JRA)+14.4(DS)

CLIC 36.8(JRA)

SCRF - ILC 15.2+?(JRA)+10(DS)+30(CNI)

Neutrino facility 16(JRA)+20(DS)

Phi Factory ?

Laser-Plasma 20(JRA)

ion Accel. 15(JRA)+20(CNI)

245 M€ + ?

33 letters received

ESGARD recommendations

Design Studies

Submit several proposals but with priorities:1. LHC luminosity upgrade2. Neutrino factory3. Rapid Cycling synchrotron4. Beta BeamHERA as damping ring study ?

Integrating Activities

Submit proposals in the first callAvoid a single IA as total funding will be too smallGroup a set of JRA in 3 categories• High Intensity High Energy Proton Beams• Supraconducting RF acceleration systems • Novel particle acceleration systemsFinal number of IA will be recommended later with priority

http://www.lnf.infn.it/conference/care06/index.htm

CARE06

Programme : 2.5 days How many parallel sessions do you need ?How many plenary highlight talk sessions ?What about half day for reporting on JRA structuring ?