car-t cells for dummies - janssen medical cloud · car-t cells –the future • bispecific cars...
TRANSCRIPT
CAR-T cells for DUMMIES
Dr Reuben Benjamin
King’s College Hospital
This medical education meeting was organised and funded by Janssen-Cilag Ltd
EM-17942| September 2019
This meeting was organised and funded by Janssen
The content covered in this slide deck was up to date and accurate at the time of presentation
The slide content has been reviewed by Janssen to ensure compliance with the ABPI Code of Practice for the
Pharmaceutical Industry
The faculty may express personal opinions that are not necessarily shared by Janssen
Adverse events should be reported. Reporting forms and information can be found at
www.mhra.gov.uk/yellowcard or search for MHRA Yellow Card in the Google Play or Apple App Store. Adverse
events should also be reported to Janssen-Cilag Limited on 01494 567447 or at [email protected]
Any adverse events presented in this slide deck (related to Janssen products) have been reported to
drug safety
Prescribing Information is available at this meeting
Janssen-Cilag Ltd, 50–100 Holmers Farm Way, High Wycombe, Buckinghamshire HP12 4EG
Disclosures
• Research funding from Servier and Pfizer
• Ad boards for Cellectis, Gilead, Novartis, Pfizer and Servier
• Honoraria from Amgen, Celgene, Takeda and Janssen
CAR-T talk – learning objectives
• What are CAR-T cells?
• How effective is CAR-T therapy in haematological malignancies?
• What are the side effects of CAR-T cells?
• How to access CAR-T therapy in the UK?
• CAR-T – the future!
CAR-T cell: chimeric antigen receptor T cell
Structure of a CAR-T cell
Antigen-binding domain
Transmembrane domain
Co-stimulatory domain
Activation domain
Genetically modified T cells expressing an artificial receptor that binds cell surface antigen in an HLA-independent manner
Yu S, et al. J Hematol Oncol. 2017;10:78. HLA: histocompatibility leukocyte antigen
Autologous CAR-T production
Levine BL. Cancer Gene Therapy volume. 2015; 22:79–84.
T-cell collection from healthy donor
T-cell adoptive transfer to multiple lymphodepleted patients
Allogeneic CAR-T
CAR-Tlentivirus
T-cell transduction
Endogenous TCR and C52 knock-out by TALENs
Allogeneic ‘off the shelf’ CAR-T cells
TALENs: transcription activator-like effector nucleases; TCR: T cell receptor
Liu J, et al. J Hematol Oncol. 2017;10:35; Ren J, et al. Oncotarget. 2017;8:17002–11.
Early phase 1 CD19 CAR-T trials in B-ALL
• Lee et al1, NIH CR = 67%n = 21 children
• Maude et al2, U.Penn CR = 90%n = 30 (25 children, 5 adults)
• Park et al3, MSKCC CR = 91% n = 33 adults
1. Lee, et al. Lancet. 2014; 2. Maude, et al. New Engl J Med. 2014; 3. Park, et al. ASCO 2014.
B-ALL: B-cell acute lymphocytic leukaemia;CR: complete remission;
MSKCC: Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center; NIH: National Institutes of Health; U.Penn: University of Pennsylvania
ELIANA trial – Tisagenlecleucel for B-ALL <25 years
ORR on ITT = 61/92 (66%)
ORR (CR/CRi) = 61/75 (81%)
RFS 6 months = 80%
RFS 12 months = 59%
Maude, et al. N Engl J Med. 2018; 378:439-48.CRi: complete remission with incomplete haematologic recovery;
ORR: overall response rate; RFS: relapse-free survival
CD19 CAR-T trials in DLBCL
• ZUMA-1 trial1
– Axicabtagene ciloleucel (Yescarta)
– 24-month PFS 39%, 24-month OS 51%
• JULIET trial2
– Tisagenlecleucel (Kymriah)
– 18-month CR 40%, 18-month 43%
• TRANSCEND trial3
– Lisocabtagene maraleucel (JCAR17)
– Six-month CR 39%
1. Neelappu, et al. ASH 2018; 2. Schuster, et al. New Engl J Med. 2018; 3. Abramhson, et al. EHA 2017.
DLBCL: diffuse large B-cell lymphoma;OS: overall survival; PFS: progression-free survival
• Tisagenlecleucel (Kymriah, Novartis)
– FDA, EMA approved for R/R B-ALL <25yrs $475,000
– FDA, EMA approved for R/R DLBCL/TFL $373,000
• Axicabtagene ciloleucel (Yescarta, Gilead)
– FDA, EMA approved for R/R DLBCL, PMBCL $373,000
CAR-T cell product approvals
EMA: European Medicines Agency;FDA: Food and Drug Administration;
PMBCL: primary mediastinal large B-cell lymphoma;R/R: relapsed/refractory;
TFL: transformed follicular lymphomaPharmaphorum. Novartis matches Gilead on price in new CAR-T use.Available at: https://pharmaphorum.com/news/novartis-matches-gilead-kymriah/.
CRB-401 Phase 1 trial – for myeloma
≥50% BCMA expression
<50% BCMA expression (n=10)
≥50% BCMA expression (n=12)
Dose range: 150–450 × 106 CAR+ cells
Dose Escalation (N=21) Dose Expansion (N=22)
150 ×106
450 ×106
800 ×106
50 ×106
Raje N, et al. ASCO 2018. Abstract 8007. BCMA: B-cell maturation antigen
Demographics
ParameterEscalation
(N=21)
Expansion
(N=22)
Median (min, max) age, yrs 58 (37, 74) 65 (44, 75)
Median (min, max) time since diagnosis, yrs 4 (1, 16) 6 (1, 36)
ECOG PS n (%)
0
1
10 (48)
11 (52)
6 (27)
16 (72)
High-risk cytogenetics, n (%)
del(17p), t(4;14), t(14;16) 8 (38) 9 (41)
Median prior regimens 7 8
Prior autologous SCT, n (%) 21 (100) 19 (86)
Raje N, et al. ASCO 2018. Abstract 8007. ECOG PS: Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group performance status; SCT: stem cell transplant
Progression-free survival
PFS at inactive (50 × 106) and
active (150–800 × 106) dose levelsPFS in MRD-negative patients
• mPFS of 11.8 months at active doses (≥150 × 106 CAR+ T cells) in 18 subjects in dose escalation phase
• mPFS of 17.7 months in 16 responding subjects who are MRD-negative
mPFS = 11.8 mo
mPFS = 2.7 mo
mPFS = 17.7 mo
Raje N, et al. ASCO 2018. Abstract 8007.
Side effects of CAR-T cells
• Cytokine release syndrome
• Neurotoxicity (CRES / ICANS)
• B-cell aplasia
• Macrophage activation syndrome
Reuben Benjamin, personal communication.CRES: CAR-T cell-related encephalopathy syndrome;
ICANS: immune effector cell-associated neurotoxicity syndrome
Cytokine release syndrome
- Constitutional symptoms - fever, malaise- Cardiovascular - tachycardia, hypotension- Respiratory - tachypnoea, hypoxia- Renal - acute kidney injury- Coagulation - DIC- Hepatic - transaminitis- Neurologic - headache, confusion, aphasia, seizures
➢ Graded 1–5 using Lee et al1 scale➢ Treated with supportive care, tocilizumab (anti-IL-6R), steroids, anakinra
(anti-IL-1R), anti-IL-6
Lee, et al. Blood. 2014; 124(2):188–195. DIC: disseminated intravascular coagulation
ASBMT Consensus grading for CRS
Lee, et al. BBMT; DOI: 10.1016/j.bbmt.2018.12.758.ASBMT: American Society for Blood and Marrow Transplantation;
CRS: cytokine release syndrome
ASBMT Consensus grading for ICANS
Lee, et al. BBMT; DOI: 10.1016/j.bbmt.2018.12.758.
Toxicity profile of selected CAR-T products
Product CRS (Grade ≥3) CRES (Grade ≥3) Clinical Trial
Axicabtageneciloleucel (Yescarta)
13% 28% ZUMA-11
Tisagenlecleucel(Kymriah)
23% 12% JULIET2
Lisocabtagenemaraleucel
1% 13% TRANSCEND3
bb2121 2% <1% CRB-4014
1. Yescarta SPC [updated June 2019]. Available at: www.medicines.org.uk/emc/product/9439; 2. Schuster, et al. NEJM. 2018; 3. Abramson. ASCO 2018; 4. Raje N, et al. ASCO 2018. Abstract 8007.
CAR-T pathway in EnglandLocal Hospital MDT
CAR-T Centre MDT
NHSE National Panel
ApheresisCAR-T Centre
Bridging treatmentLocal Hospital
CAR-T treatmentCAR-T Centre
Routine follow-upLocal Hospital
Long-term safety follow-upCAR-T Centre
AdultNewcastleMRIChristieBristolBirminghamUCLHKing’s
PaediatricGOSHManchesterNewcastle
Additional centres with trialsSecond wave of centres
Reuben Benjamin, personal communication.
GOSH: Great Ormond Street Hospital;MDT: multidisciplinary team;
MRI: Manchester Royal Infirmary;NHSE: NHS England;
UCLH: University College London Hospital
Challenges with CAR-T treatment
• Toxicity of treatment– Multi-speciality involvement, unexpected adverse events
• Kinetics of disease– Need for bridging therapy
• Lack of access to CAR-T– CAR-T centre capacity, manufacturing slots, funding, training
• Unrealistic patient expectations– Publicity/Car-T hype
• Post-treatment relapse
Reuben Benjamin, personal communication.
Mechanisms of CAR-T failure
• Lack of persistence
• CAR-T exhaustion
• Antigen escape
• Immunosuppressive tumour microenvironment
• Immunity against CAR components
Reuben Benjamin, personal communication.
• 18-year-old female
• Pre-B-ALL – normal cytogenetics
• Diagnosed 10/2014
• Normal cytogenetics
• Treatment– UKALL 2011 regimen C / maintenance– Relapse in 05/2016– FLAG-Ida ➔no response– Inotuzumab x2 (07/08/2016) ➔progressive disease– Clofarabine/cyclophosphamide/etoposide (09/2016) ➔persistent disease
(100% blasts)
Case study 1
FLAG-Ida: fludarabine, idarubicin, granulocyte-colony stimulating factor, high-dose cytarabine
Vincristine/dexamethasoneCirculating blasts
LymphodepletionFludarabine/cyclophosphamide/alemtuzumab
Day 06 x 106 CARs
Day+ 5 6 7 8 9 10
NoradrenalineTocilizumab Tocilizumab CPAP Dialysis
Dexamethasone Amiodarone
Cardiac arrest
Temperature
CPAP: continuous positive airway pressure; MAP: mean arterial pressure
PulseMAPResp rate
Case Study 2
• 38-year-old with DLBCL
• R-CHOP x6 ➔ early relapse
• R-DHAP ➔ progressive disease
• Referred for CAR-T therapy
• Steroids to hold disease, then one week off pre-apheresis
• R-IVE post-apheresis ➔ progressive disease
• Admitted for lymphodepletion but with fevers, sweats
R-CHOP: rituximab-cyclophosphamide, doxorubicin, vincristine, prednisone;R-DHAP: rituximab-dexamethasone, cytarabine, cisplatin;
R-IVE: rituximab-ifosfamide, epirubicin, etoposide
Clinical course
D-8 D-6 D-4 D-2 D0 D+5 D+10 D+18
Fludarabine/cyclophosphamide
CRS CRESTocilizumab 3 doses, dexamethasone, anakinra
Dexamethasone, anakinra
Cell infusion ICU Discharge
CAR-T cells – the future
• Bispecific CARs
• Regulatable CARs
• Use of fully human CARs
• CARs that evade the tumour microenvironment
• Combination treatment with checkpoint inhibitors
• ‘Off the shelf’ CARs
• CARs in other cells (NK, gammadelta, NKT)
• CARs for solid tumours
Reuben Benjamin, personal communication.
Summary
• Huge promise for CAR-T therapy in DLBCL, B-ALL and myeloma
• Significant challenges in delivering treatment safely
• New indications and next generation CARs to come
• How can we afford CAR-T therapy?!
Reuben Benjamin, personal communication.