captain richard rushton usn (retd) - industry partnering for smart defence
Upload: royal-united-services-institute-for-defence-and-security-studies
Post on 11-Nov-2014
406 views
DESCRIPTION
This is a presentation delivered by Captain Richard Rushton USN (Retd), at the RUSI Missile Defence Conference 2014TRANSCRIPT
1
Industry Partnering for Smart Defence
RUSI Missile Defence Conference London, UK
19 March 2014
CAPT Richard Rushton, USN (Ret.)
Director, Maritime Integrated Air and Missile Defense Systems
Lockheed Martin Mission Systems and Training (LM MST)
Copyright 2014 Lockheed Martin Corporation
2
Evolving Situation in Europe The Threat is Growing
Iranian Systems
Shahab-1 (Scud-B) – 300 Km
Shahab-2 (Scud-C) – 700 Km
Shahab-3 (No-Dong) – 1,200 Km
Shahab-3 Variant – 2,000 Km
Musudan* – 4,000 Km
Shahab-6** (Taepo-dong-2) – 6,000 Km
1985
1992
2001
2004
2005
Beyond 2013
*DPRK System – Public Reports of
Possible Kit Transfer (Bild Zeitung)
**Currently in Development
Patriot/PAC-3 TPY-2 Radar Aegis BMD EPAA/Aegis
Ashore
MEADS SAMP/T NATO CI
AGENCY
UEWR C2BMC
SBIRS
NATO
ALTBMD
3
Smart Defence Policy and Objectives
– Builds on the strengths of the Alliance to deliver essential capabilities while reducing unit costs
– Draws on existing mechanisms to coordinate defence efforts, aligning national and Alliance capabilities
– Provides a platform for Allies to build on individual strengths through coordination with the Alliance and each other
Ballistic Missile Defence
is the quintessential Net-Centric challenge
4
BMD Building Blocks
Robust layered defence capabilities
1. Command & Control
– Evolved NATO BMDS
2. BMD Sensors
– Sensors capable of Early Warning, Search, Track, Discrimination and Engagement Support
– Connected in robust Sensor Grid
3. Weapon Control
– Weapon Systems to perform ballistic missile intercepts
– Incorporate advanced Net-centric engagement concepts
4. Effectors
– Upper and lower tier BMD interceptors
– Launch denial strike weapons
5
Robust Systems Engineering Challenge Interfaces, interfaces, interfaces
Tactical Sensors, Shooters, People, Technology
National
Joint Military (JOC)
Air (AOC)
Sector/Region (CRC, SOC)
Strategic
Operational
Tactical and Technological
Cyber Sea Land Space
Interoperability is critical
across Strategic, Operational, Tactical, and Technological levels
6
NATO BMD Operational Capability (BMDOC)
• NATO Interim Capability (2012)
– BMD Situational Awareness
– Command and Control of NATO Defence Systems
– Regional Communications Connectivity
• NATO Full Operational Capability (2017)
– Enhanced Planning
– Robust Battle Management
• National Contributions
– Tactical C2 interfaces to BMDS
– Weapons Control
Industry collaboration essential to success
7
• Early Detection, Long Range Surveillance & Track, Discrimination to support BMD defence
– MEADS Sensors
– AN/TPY-2 BMD Radar
– SPY-1 Radar
– SMART-L Radar
– Gap Filling Tracking Radar
– Shared Early Warning (SEWs)
NATO BMD Sensor Grid
Building on existing expertise for enhanced capability
8
IAMD Technology
International IAMD Testbed
Capability Integration
Business Model
International Partners Universities Companies
Critical questions
Evolving mission capabilities
Partnership
for Success
ConOps exploration / C4ISR application
Interoperability
Assessment
Ops analysis
ID
Technology
Needs
Relevance, Affordability
Improved understanding
Cost Tech Maturity
