cap (philip.van zijl v1)

18
Curriculum Alignment Project INFORMATION LITERACY SURVEY

Upload: philip-van-zijl

Post on 25-May-2015

384 views

Category:

Education


1 download

TRANSCRIPT

Page 1: Cap (Philip.Van Zijl V1)

Curriculum Alignment Project

INFORMATION LITERACY SURVEY

Page 2: Cap (Philip.Van Zijl V1)

Information literacy surveyTeam members..

Dr Helen Anderson, National Curriculum Alignment Projects Manager, Manukau Institute of TechnologyDale Bennett: CAP Manager Otago/ Otago PolytechnicMaurie Jackways, Principal, Mount Aspiring CollegePhilip van Zijl, Library Manager, Bill Robertson LibraryEmma Bennett: Organisation Research Officer, Otago PolytechnicVicki Darling: Senior Librarian, Bill Robertson LibraryGlynis Shields: Centre Manager National Library Dunedin.

Page 3: Cap (Philip.Van Zijl V1)

“Information Literacy” definition for this project…

• Information Literacy is the ability to identify, use, acknowledge and evaluate information for problem solving and decision making.

Page 4: Cap (Philip.Van Zijl V1)

CAP

Information Literacy Project

Timeframe• July 2005, January

2006

• Photo: students in Otago University Info Centre..

Page 5: Cap (Philip.Van Zijl V1)

CAP Information Literacy Project

Aims

• To raise awareness in Otago Secondary Schools and Otago Polytechnic of the standards of Information literacy skills needed by students to complete their studies across all levels and in all areas of study.

• To assist in aligning the Information Literacy skills of students leaving secondary schools in the catchment area with what are required for successful tertiary study.

Page 6: Cap (Philip.Van Zijl V1)

CAP Information Literacy Project

Expected outcomes• To report to

stakeholders… • To produce ‘a

resource’ to help future students make a more successful transition…

Page 7: Cap (Philip.Van Zijl V1)

And the Survey itself….

Information Literacy Survey: • Purpose of survey:

– To examine the perceived Information Literacy “confidence” and actual “competence” of first year - first year out of school - Otago Polytechnic students

– 3 interconnected surveys: • Years 12/13 teachers: “expected competence”• 1st year Polytechnic lecturers: “expected competence”• Students themselves: “confidence” & “actual competence”

Page 8: Cap (Philip.Van Zijl V1)

“Information literacy” Survey Unique aspects..

• 48 secondary schools• 142 1st year students

Survey questions origins

• Confidence questions• Competence questions:

Dianne Quirion/ Dianne Mittermeyer 2003 competence survey

Page 9: Cap (Philip.Van Zijl V1)

Responses

• 487 responses

- 304 from teachers

Page 10: Cap (Philip.Van Zijl V1)

Information Literacy skills assessed.

Info Lit skills Explanation

Deciding

Understanding

Identify key terms and concepts for an assigned topic

Finding

Searching

Use key terms and concepts to search for relevant information

Using Selecting

Evaluating Info

Select and use information appropriately to answer assigned questions

Acknowledging Approp use

Acknowledge sources used

correctly Presenting

Evaluating

Complete assignments to the overall communicated standard

Not surveyed

Page 11: Cap (Philip.Van Zijl V1)

% Expectations of ‘Independent”student Info lit confidence/ competence.

Deciding Understanding

Teachers

Year 12

Students

Teachers

Year 13

Students

Polytechnic

1st year

Students

Students’ own

Confidence

Students’ own

Competence

Deciding

Understanding 45.7 59.3 58.8 87.9 43Finding/

Searching

Using

Selecting

Evaluating

Acknow/ Approp. Use

Presenting

Evaluating

Not surveyed

Not surveyed

Not surveyed Not surveyed

Not surveyed

Page 12: Cap (Philip.Van Zijl V1)

Expectations of “Independent” student Info lit confidence/ competence.

Finding/ Searching

Teachers

Year 12

Students

Teachers

Year 13

Students

Polytechnic

1st year

Students

Students’ own

Confidence

Students’ own

Competence

Deciding

Understanding 45.7 59.3 58.8 87.9 43Finding/

Searching 45.2 65.6 39 78.5 29.8Using

Selecting

Evaluating

Acknow/Approp. Use

Presenting

Evaluating

Not surveyed Not surveyed Not surveyed Not surveyed Not surveyed

Page 13: Cap (Philip.Van Zijl V1)

Expectations of “Independent”student Info lit confidence/ competence

Using/ Selecting/ EvaluatingTeachers

Year 12

Students

Teachers

Year 13

Students

Polytech-nic

1st year

Students

Students’ own

Confidence

Students’ own

Competence

Deciding

Understanding 45.7 59.3 58.8 87.9 43

Finding/

Searching 45.2 65.6 39 78.5 29.8

Using

Selecting

Evaluating

40.7 62.6 41.5 81.5 33.6

Acknow/ Approp. Use

Presenting

Evaluating

Not surveyed

Not surveyed

Not surveyed

Not surveyed

Not surveyed

Page 14: Cap (Philip.Van Zijl V1)

Expectations of “Independent” student Info lit confidence/ competenceAcknowledging/ Appropriate use.

Teachers

Year 12

Students

Teachers

Year 13

Students

Polytechnic

1st year

Students

Students’ own

Confidence

Students’ own

Competence

Deciding/

Understanding 45.7 59.3 58.8 87.9 43

Finding/

Searching 45.2 65.6 39 78.5 29.8

Using

Selecting

Evaluating

40.7 62.6 41.5 81.5 33.6

Acknow/ Approp. Use 28.8 53.4 34.1 82.5 37.4

Presenting

EvaluatingNot

surveyed NS NS NS NS

Page 15: Cap (Philip.Van Zijl V1)

Some possible conclusions..?

• Teachers are more confident of students independent Information literacy competence skills in their first year of Polytechnic study than their Lecturers

• Students are far more ‘confident ’ than ‘competent’ in their own information literacy skills in their first year of study at Otago Polytechnic

• Students confidence in their information literacy skills are higher than their teachers expectations of their competence – which are still inflated…

• Difficulties in teaching Information literacy skills may be related to the students inflated confidence in their existing skills.

• Difficulties in encouraging teachers to consider Information Literacy could relate to their confidence that students will be OK in this area…

Page 16: Cap (Philip.Van Zijl V1)

Where next?

• Publication of survey in education and library contexts e.g. SET

• Publicity e.g. Principals groups

• A resource?

• Local “good practice” initiatives….

• Repeat survey in Australia?

Page 17: Cap (Philip.Van Zijl V1)

Secondary DCE studentsStudents’ Confidence vs. Ability with Information Literacy Skills

ThemeQuestions Variable

% Correct Answers

Confidenceof Students*

Deciding /Understanding

Q2 Significant words 41.0%97.0%

Q3 Significant words 73.7%

Finding / Searching

Q5 Periodicals 98.0%

91.0%

Q6 Encyclopaedias 41.7%

Q7 Search engines 95.0%

Q8 Databases 66.7%

Q9 Library catalogues 36.8%

Q10 Search indexes 68.7%

Q11 Scholarly journals 50.0%

Q12 Controlled vocabulary 21.4%

Q13 Boolean operator ‘AND’ 54.5%

Q14 Boolean operator ‘OR’ 57.7%

Q21 Library catalogues 39.4%

Using / Selecting / Evaluating Information

Q16 Scholarly journals 94.8%90.0%

Q20 Evaluating information (Internet) 34.3%

Acknowledging / Appropriate Use

Q18 Ethical use of information 87.6%99.0%

Q19 Reading citations 25.3%

Page 18: Cap (Philip.Van Zijl V1)

If you would like a copy of the complete survey or more information:

Email Glynis Shields at

[email protected]

or

[email protected]