can we really compare and aggregate pro data between people and setting?

6
Moderator: Professor Nancy J. Devlin Director of Research, OHE ISPOR European Congress, Vienna, 2016 Can we really compare and aggregate PRO data between people and setting? Implications for clinical trials and HTA

Upload: office-of-health-economics

Post on 20-Jan-2017

148 views

Category:

Presentations & Public Speaking


0 download

TRANSCRIPT

Page 1: Can we really compare and aggregate PRO data  between people and setting?

Moderator:Professor Nancy J. DevlinDirector of Research, OHE

ISPOR European Congress, Vienna, 2016

Can we really compare and aggregate PRO data between people and setting?Implications for clinical trials and HTA

Page 2: Can we really compare and aggregate PRO data  between people and setting?

ISPOR European Congress, Vienna, 2016

Can we safely assume comparability of PRO data?• Use of PRO instruments to measure health within and between

populations, and the aggregation of those data (e.g. in RCTs) relies on their strict comparability.

Two aspects to this:

(i) Properties of the instruments themselves: conceptual (what attributes of health matter) and linguistic/semantic issues (how to describe health).

(ii) How people respond to the instruments in self-reporting health. Self-perception of health and health problems may depend

on:•Their perception of what is ‘normal’ and expectations

regarding health• Conditioned by social context, education, literacy, income, availability of health care facilities, public health education etc.

Page 3: Can we really compare and aggregate PRO data  between people and setting?

ISPOR European Congress, Vienna, 2016

Does ‘no problems’ mean different things to different people?

Might ‘the best health you can imagine’ (and the worst) differ between different sorts of people?

Page 4: Can we really compare and aggregate PRO data  between people and setting?

ISPOR European Congress, Vienna, 2016

Life

exp

ecta

ncy

Sel

f-rep

orte

d m

orbi

dity

Sen (2002) Self reported morbidity has severe limitations and can be extremely misleading BMJ“The internal (self-reported) view of health deserves attention, but relying on it in assessing health care or in evaluating medical strategy can be extremely misleading”

Page 5: Can we really compare and aggregate PRO data  between people and setting?

ISPOR European Congress, Vienna, 2016

Nancy Devlin (Moderator): Introduction

Mike Herdman: Conceptual and linguistic issues in cross-cultural comparability of PROs

Paula Lorgelly: Addressing differences in use of PRO response categories: anchoring vignettes

Andrea Manca: Methods for addressing heterogeneity in PRO data

Page 6: Can we really compare and aggregate PRO data  between people and setting?

NANCY DEVLINThe Office of Health Economics

Registered address Southside, 7th Floor, 105 Victoria Street, London SW1E 6QT

Website: www.ohe.org  Email: [email protected]

THANK YOU FOR YOUR ATTENTION