can we improve our diagnostic acumen?: a clinical ......framing effect/ diagnostic momentum...

74
Ryan Kraemer, MD, FACP June 1, 2018 Can We Improve Our Diagnostic Acumen?: A Clinical Reasoning Toolkit

Upload: others

Post on 23-Jul-2020

2 views

Category:

Documents


0 download

TRANSCRIPT

Page 1: Can We Improve Our Diagnostic Acumen?: A Clinical ......Framing Effect/ Diagnostic Momentum •Framing Effect: Susceptibility to be influenced by how a problem is described 42 yo with

Ryan Kraemer, MD, FACP June 1, 2018

Can We Improve Our Diagnostic Acumen?: A Clinical Reasoning Toolkit

Page 2: Can We Improve Our Diagnostic Acumen?: A Clinical ......Framing Effect/ Diagnostic Momentum •Framing Effect: Susceptibility to be influenced by how a problem is described 42 yo with
Page 3: Can We Improve Our Diagnostic Acumen?: A Clinical ......Framing Effect/ Diagnostic Momentum •Framing Effect: Susceptibility to be influenced by how a problem is described 42 yo with

HPI

PMH

PSH

Meds

All

SH

FH

PE

Labs

Imaging

Pneumonia

80%

Hampton JR, Harrison MJG, Mitchell JRA. Relative contributions of history-taking, physical examination and laboratory

investigation to diagnosis and management of medical outpatients. BMJ. 1975;2(5969):486–489.

Page 4: Can We Improve Our Diagnostic Acumen?: A Clinical ......Framing Effect/ Diagnostic Momentum •Framing Effect: Susceptibility to be influenced by how a problem is described 42 yo with

85% correct

40K-80K deaths

annually

Malpractice

claims

4% knowledge

deficit Trowbridge et al. Teaching Clinical Reasoning. ACP Teaching Medicine Series. 2015, p. 3, 5.

The incidence of diagnostic error in medicine. BMJ Qual Saf. 2013;22 Suppl 2:ii21-ii27.

Graber ML. Diagnostic error in internal medicine. Arch Intern Med. 2005;165(13):1493-9

Pneumonia

Page 5: Can We Improve Our Diagnostic Acumen?: A Clinical ......Framing Effect/ Diagnostic Momentum •Framing Effect: Susceptibility to be influenced by how a problem is described 42 yo with

The Diagnostic Process

Psychology, expertise, educational literature

Page 6: Can We Improve Our Diagnostic Acumen?: A Clinical ......Framing Effect/ Diagnostic Momentum •Framing Effect: Susceptibility to be influenced by how a problem is described 42 yo with

Hmmm…

Page 7: Can We Improve Our Diagnostic Acumen?: A Clinical ......Framing Effect/ Diagnostic Momentum •Framing Effect: Susceptibility to be influenced by how a problem is described 42 yo with
Page 8: Can We Improve Our Diagnostic Acumen?: A Clinical ......Framing Effect/ Diagnostic Momentum •Framing Effect: Susceptibility to be influenced by how a problem is described 42 yo with

Roadmap

• How we (humans) think

• How we (doctors) make diagnoses

• Cognitive biases that can lead to wrong diagnoses

• Cognitive strategies to improve diagnosis

• Development of expertise

Page 9: Can We Improve Our Diagnostic Acumen?: A Clinical ......Framing Effect/ Diagnostic Momentum •Framing Effect: Susceptibility to be influenced by how a problem is described 42 yo with

Roadmap

• How we (humans) think

• How we (doctors) make diagnoses

• Cognitive biases that can lead to wrong diagnoses

• Cognitive strategies to improve diagnosis

• Development of expertise

Page 10: Can We Improve Our Diagnostic Acumen?: A Clinical ......Framing Effect/ Diagnostic Momentum •Framing Effect: Susceptibility to be influenced by how a problem is described 42 yo with

• Impressions

• Intuitions

• Quick Responses

Page 11: Can We Improve Our Diagnostic Acumen?: A Clinical ......Framing Effect/ Diagnostic Momentum •Framing Effect: Susceptibility to be influenced by how a problem is described 42 yo with

I’m Rational and logical

Page 12: Can We Improve Our Diagnostic Acumen?: A Clinical ......Framing Effect/ Diagnostic Momentum •Framing Effect: Susceptibility to be influenced by how a problem is described 42 yo with
Page 13: Can We Improve Our Diagnostic Acumen?: A Clinical ......Framing Effect/ Diagnostic Momentum •Framing Effect: Susceptibility to be influenced by how a problem is described 42 yo with

2 systems of thinking

1. Intuitive • Automatic mode • Fast

2. Analytical • Effortful mode • Slow

Page 14: Can We Improve Our Diagnostic Acumen?: A Clinical ......Framing Effect/ Diagnostic Momentum •Framing Effect: Susceptibility to be influenced by how a problem is described 42 yo with

Intuitive Thinking (system 1)

Kahneman, Daniel. Thinking, Fast and Slow. New York: Farrar, Straus and Giroux, 2011, pg 19.

Page 15: Can We Improve Our Diagnostic Acumen?: A Clinical ......Framing Effect/ Diagnostic Momentum •Framing Effect: Susceptibility to be influenced by how a problem is described 42 yo with

Intuitive Thinking (system 1)

•Always on

•Generates answers • Automatically • Quickly • Effortlessly • No sense of voluntary control

Kahneman, Daniel. Thinking, Fast and Slow. New York: Farrar, Straus and Giroux, 2011, pg 20.

Page 16: Can We Improve Our Diagnostic Acumen?: A Clinical ......Framing Effect/ Diagnostic Momentum •Framing Effect: Susceptibility to be influenced by how a problem is described 42 yo with

Intuitive Thinking (system 1)

2 + 2 = The capital of France is ________

Kahneman, Daniel. Thinking, Fast and Slow. New York: Farrar, Straus and Giroux, 2011, pg 22.

Page 17: Can We Improve Our Diagnostic Acumen?: A Clinical ......Framing Effect/ Diagnostic Momentum •Framing Effect: Susceptibility to be influenced by how a problem is described 42 yo with

Analytical Thinking (system 2)

17 x 24 = Deliberate, effortful, orderly

Choice, concentration System 1

Kahneman, Daniel. Thinking, Fast and Slow. New York: Farrar, Straus and Giroux, 2011, pg 20-21.

Page 18: Can We Improve Our Diagnostic Acumen?: A Clinical ......Framing Effect/ Diagnostic Momentum •Framing Effect: Susceptibility to be influenced by how a problem is described 42 yo with

Thinking in Action

System 1

Impressions, intuitions, intentions, feelings

System 2

Endorses system 1 suggestions (check & balance)

Engaged when system 1 has no answer

Kahneman, Daniel. Thinking, Fast and Slow. New York: Farrar, Straus and Giroux, 2011, pg 20-21.

Page 19: Can We Improve Our Diagnostic Acumen?: A Clinical ......Framing Effect/ Diagnostic Momentum •Framing Effect: Susceptibility to be influenced by how a problem is described 42 yo with

SO_P

Kahneman, Daniel. Thinking, Fast and Slow. New York: Farrar, Straus and Giroux, 2011, pg 52.

Effortless = confidence

Page 20: Can We Improve Our Diagnostic Acumen?: A Clinical ......Framing Effect/ Diagnostic Momentum •Framing Effect: Susceptibility to be influenced by how a problem is described 42 yo with

SO_P

Kahneman, Daniel. Thinking, Fast and Slow. New York: Farrar, Straus and Giroux, 2011, pg 52.

Effortless = confidence

Page 21: Can We Improve Our Diagnostic Acumen?: A Clinical ......Framing Effect/ Diagnostic Momentum •Framing Effect: Susceptibility to be influenced by how a problem is described 42 yo with

Anchoring

What is the percentage of African nations in the UN?

WOF 10 = 25%

WOF 65 = 45%

65

10

Kahneman, Daniel. Thinking, Fast and Slow. New York: Farrar, Straus and Giroux, 2011, pg 119.

Page 22: Can We Improve Our Diagnostic Acumen?: A Clinical ......Framing Effect/ Diagnostic Momentum •Framing Effect: Susceptibility to be influenced by how a problem is described 42 yo with

Bat and Ball problem

A bat and a ball cost $1.10

The bat costs one dollar more than the ball

How much does the ball cost?

10¢

Kahneman, Daniel. Thinking, Fast and Slow. New York: Farrar, Straus and Giroux, 2011, pg 42.

Page 23: Can We Improve Our Diagnostic Acumen?: A Clinical ......Framing Effect/ Diagnostic Momentum •Framing Effect: Susceptibility to be influenced by how a problem is described 42 yo with
Page 24: Can We Improve Our Diagnostic Acumen?: A Clinical ......Framing Effect/ Diagnostic Momentum •Framing Effect: Susceptibility to be influenced by how a problem is described 42 yo with
Page 25: Can We Improve Our Diagnostic Acumen?: A Clinical ......Framing Effect/ Diagnostic Momentum •Framing Effect: Susceptibility to be influenced by how a problem is described 42 yo with

A 13 C 12 B 14

Kahneman, Daniel. Thinking, Fast and Slow. New York: Farrar, Straus and Giroux, 2011, pg 79.

Page 26: Can We Improve Our Diagnostic Acumen?: A Clinical ......Framing Effect/ Diagnostic Momentum •Framing Effect: Susceptibility to be influenced by how a problem is described 42 yo with

• Alan

intelligent industrious impulsive critical stubborn envious

• Ben

Kahneman, Daniel. Thinking, Fast and Slow. New York: Farrar, Straus and Giroux, 2011, pg 82.

Page 27: Can We Improve Our Diagnostic Acumen?: A Clinical ......Framing Effect/ Diagnostic Momentum •Framing Effect: Susceptibility to be influenced by how a problem is described 42 yo with

• Alan

intelligent industrious impulsive critical stubborn envious

• Ben

envious stubborn critical impulsive industrious intelligent

Kahneman, Daniel. Thinking, Fast and Slow. New York: Farrar, Straus and Giroux, 2011, pg 82.

Page 28: Can We Improve Our Diagnostic Acumen?: A Clinical ......Framing Effect/ Diagnostic Momentum •Framing Effect: Susceptibility to be influenced by how a problem is described 42 yo with

Halo Effect

• Alan

intelligent industrious impulsive critical stubborn envious

• Ben

envious stubborn critical impulsive industrious intelligent

Order matters

Kahneman, Daniel. Thinking, Fast and Slow. New York: Farrar, Straus and Giroux, 2011, pg 82.

Page 29: Can We Improve Our Diagnostic Acumen?: A Clinical ......Framing Effect/ Diagnostic Momentum •Framing Effect: Susceptibility to be influenced by how a problem is described 42 yo with

Base Rate Neglect

Neighbors say:

“Steve is very shy and withdrawn, invariably helpful but with little interest in people or in the world of reality. A meek and tidy soul, he has a need for order and structure, and a passion for detail.”

Is Steve more likely to be a librarian or a farmer?

Male Farmers 20 : 1 Male librarians

Kahneman, Daniel. Thinking, Fast and Slow. New York: Farrar, Straus and Giroux, 2011, pg pg7.

Page 30: Can We Improve Our Diagnostic Acumen?: A Clinical ......Framing Effect/ Diagnostic Momentum •Framing Effect: Susceptibility to be influenced by how a problem is described 42 yo with

Confirmation Bias

• Is Sam friendly?

• Is Sam mean?

Kahneman, Daniel. Thinking, Fast and Slow. New York: Farrar, Straus and Giroux, 2011, pg 81.

Page 31: Can We Improve Our Diagnostic Acumen?: A Clinical ......Framing Effect/ Diagnostic Momentum •Framing Effect: Susceptibility to be influenced by how a problem is described 42 yo with

System 1

• System 1 usually has an answer with cognitive ease by use of shortcuts…

• We need to know when those answers may lead us to the wrong answer

• A poor statistician

• Can be manipulated

Page 32: Can We Improve Our Diagnostic Acumen?: A Clinical ......Framing Effect/ Diagnostic Momentum •Framing Effect: Susceptibility to be influenced by how a problem is described 42 yo with

Dual process theory

System 2

Deliberate

Slow

Requires cognitive effort

Uses knowledge and logic

System 1

Automatic

Fast

Uses first impressions

Little cognitive effort

Prone to specific errors

Uses experience/pattern recognition

Kahneman, Daniel. Thinking, Fast and Slow. New York: Farrar, Straus and Giroux, 2011, pg 105 & adapted

from slide from Amanda Clark.

Page 33: Can We Improve Our Diagnostic Acumen?: A Clinical ......Framing Effect/ Diagnostic Momentum •Framing Effect: Susceptibility to be influenced by how a problem is described 42 yo with

Roadmap

• How we (humans) think

• How we (doctors) make diagnoses

• Cognitive biases that can lead to wrong diagnoses

• Cognitive strategies to improve diagnosis

• Development of expertise

Page 34: Can We Improve Our Diagnostic Acumen?: A Clinical ......Framing Effect/ Diagnostic Momentum •Framing Effect: Susceptibility to be influenced by how a problem is described 42 yo with

Patient #1

• 52 yo African-American Man • CC: Knee pain

• Pain began in right knee 1 day ago • Awoke him from sleep with severe pain • Same thing happened 9 months ago and 2 years ago • Prior episodes resolved in a few days

• Asymptomatic between episodes • Overweight, drinks 6 beers daily, loves seafood

Page 35: Can We Improve Our Diagnostic Acumen?: A Clinical ......Framing Effect/ Diagnostic Momentum •Framing Effect: Susceptibility to be influenced by how a problem is described 42 yo with

Pattern Recognition

My knee hurts

Knee pain

Page 36: Can We Improve Our Diagnostic Acumen?: A Clinical ......Framing Effect/ Diagnostic Momentum •Framing Effect: Susceptibility to be influenced by how a problem is described 42 yo with

Pattern Recognition

My knee hurts

Knee pain

Page 37: Can We Improve Our Diagnostic Acumen?: A Clinical ......Framing Effect/ Diagnostic Momentum •Framing Effect: Susceptibility to be influenced by how a problem is described 42 yo with

Pattern Recognition

My knee hurts

Osteoarthritis Gout

Patellofemoral

syndrome

Meniscal Injury

Knee pain

Page 38: Can We Improve Our Diagnostic Acumen?: A Clinical ......Framing Effect/ Diagnostic Momentum •Framing Effect: Susceptibility to be influenced by how a problem is described 42 yo with

Illness Scripts

Disease

Who gets it?

How does it present?

Typical history

Typical physical exam findings

Typical lab and imaging findings

How does it respond to treatment?

Trowbridge et al. Teaching Clinical Reasoning. ACP Teaching Medicine Series. 2015, p. 83.

Page 39: Can We Improve Our Diagnostic Acumen?: A Clinical ......Framing Effect/ Diagnostic Momentum •Framing Effect: Susceptibility to be influenced by how a problem is described 42 yo with

Problem Representation

• One sentence summary defining the case in abstract terms

• Semantic qualifiers: abstract, often binary terms that help clarify the meaning of a symptom

Acute Chronic

Intermittent Constant

Mono Poly

42 year old Middle aged

Page 40: Can We Improve Our Diagnostic Acumen?: A Clinical ......Framing Effect/ Diagnostic Momentum •Framing Effect: Susceptibility to be influenced by how a problem is described 42 yo with

Problem Representation

The acute onset of a recurrent, painful,

monoarticular process in middle-aged man

with excessive daily alcohol intake.

Problem Representation:

Bowen JL. Educational strategies to promote diagnostic reasoning. N Engl J Med. 2006;355:2217-25.

Matthew Watto. The Curbsiders podcast: #90 Clinical Reasoning: Become an expert diagnostician w/Gurpreet Dhaliwal, MD.

Page 41: Can We Improve Our Diagnostic Acumen?: A Clinical ......Framing Effect/ Diagnostic Momentum •Framing Effect: Susceptibility to be influenced by how a problem is described 42 yo with

Pattern Recognition = Illness Script Matching

My knee hurts

Problem representation Osteoarthritis Gout

Patellofemoral

syndrome

Meniscal Injury

Page 42: Can We Improve Our Diagnostic Acumen?: A Clinical ......Framing Effect/ Diagnostic Momentum •Framing Effect: Susceptibility to be influenced by how a problem is described 42 yo with

Patient #2

A 52 yo WM with PMH HIV CD4 count 4 presents with fever, pancytopenia, headache, odynophagia, & diarrhea

Differential:

Slide courtesy of Amanda Clark, MD

17 x 24 =

Page 43: Can We Improve Our Diagnostic Acumen?: A Clinical ......Framing Effect/ Diagnostic Momentum •Framing Effect: Susceptibility to be influenced by how a problem is described 42 yo with

System 2/ Analytical Reasoning

• Generate problem list

• Form a differential diagnosis for each problem

• Hypothetico-deductive reasoning

• Bayesian reasoning

Trowbridge et al. Teaching Clinical Reasoning. ACP Teaching Medicine Series. 2015, p. 37, 83.

Page 44: Can We Improve Our Diagnostic Acumen?: A Clinical ......Framing Effect/ Diagnostic Momentum •Framing Effect: Susceptibility to be influenced by how a problem is described 42 yo with

Roadmap

• How we (humans) think

• How we (doctors) make diagnoses

• Cognitive biases that can lead to wrong diagnoses

• Cognitive strategies to improve diagnosis

• Development of expertise

Page 45: Can We Improve Our Diagnostic Acumen?: A Clinical ......Framing Effect/ Diagnostic Momentum •Framing Effect: Susceptibility to be influenced by how a problem is described 42 yo with

System 1

• Heuristics: mental shortcuts that allow a rapid response to information

• When heuristics fail us = cognitive biases

Cognitive biases

Cognitive pills for cognitive ills

Trowbridge et al. Teaching Clinical Reasoning. ACP Teaching Medicine Series. 2015, p. 54.

Croskerry P, Singhal G, Mamede S Cognitive debiasing 2: impediments to and strategies for change BMJ Qual

Saf 2013;22:ii65-ii72

Page 46: Can We Improve Our Diagnostic Acumen?: A Clinical ......Framing Effect/ Diagnostic Momentum •Framing Effect: Susceptibility to be influenced by how a problem is described 42 yo with

Heuristics & Cognitive biases

Norman G, et al. The Causes of Errors in Clinical Reasoning: Cognitive Biases, Knowledge Deficitis, and Dial

Process Thinking. Acad Med 2017;92:23-30.

>100 in general literature

>38 in medical literature

Page 47: Can We Improve Our Diagnostic Acumen?: A Clinical ......Framing Effect/ Diagnostic Momentum •Framing Effect: Susceptibility to be influenced by how a problem is described 42 yo with

Premature closure

• Making a diagnosis before it has been fully verified

• Usually due to another cognitive bias

• 63 yo with DM II who stopped metformin 6 mo ago, presents with confusion, polyuria, polydipsia, blurry vision, BS of 698

If it turned out that the diagnosis wasn’t ____, what else could it be?

Trowbridge et al. Teaching Clinical Reasoning. ACP Teaching Medicine Series. 2015, pp. 56-59.

SO_P

Page 48: Can We Improve Our Diagnostic Acumen?: A Clinical ......Framing Effect/ Diagnostic Momentum •Framing Effect: Susceptibility to be influenced by how a problem is described 42 yo with

Anchoring

• Narrow focus on one aspect of the patient’s presentation or one test to base the entire clinical impression (“fall in love” with a diagnosis).

• Causes us to ignore contradictory information

• 63 yo’s “confusion” = episodes, word-finding difficulty, intermittent

Not better with BS of 165

What doesn’t fit here?

Trowbridge et al. Teaching Clinical Reasoning. ACP Teaching Medicine Series. 2015, pp. 57.

Page 49: Can We Improve Our Diagnostic Acumen?: A Clinical ......Framing Effect/ Diagnostic Momentum •Framing Effect: Susceptibility to be influenced by how a problem is described 42 yo with

Confirmation Bias

• Searching for evidence that supports the initial impression

• 36 yo with cough … you’re thinking GERD • Is it worse after meals: “yes” • Do you sometimes have heartburn: “yes”

• Not asking: about allergic rhinitis, asthma, smoking, etc

What else might this be? … additional questions?

Page 50: Can We Improve Our Diagnostic Acumen?: A Clinical ......Framing Effect/ Diagnostic Momentum •Framing Effect: Susceptibility to be influenced by how a problem is described 42 yo with

Availability Bias

• The tendency to think that things that come to mind immediately are more likely or more common

• Recently seen or read about

• Frequently seen

• Dramatic cases

• Diagnoses that have been missed in the past

• Those cases associated with a memorable outcome (good or bad)

Slide courtesy Amanda Clark

Tversky A, Kahneman D. Availability: a heuristic for judging frequency and probability.

Cognitive Psychology 1973. p. 207-32

Am I thinking of this diagnosis because I just read about it or saw a case of it?

Page 51: Can We Improve Our Diagnostic Acumen?: A Clinical ......Framing Effect/ Diagnostic Momentum •Framing Effect: Susceptibility to be influenced by how a problem is described 42 yo with

Affective Bias

• The emotional influences (both positive and negative feelings) that can induce cognitive errors

Problem representation

Page 52: Can We Improve Our Diagnostic Acumen?: A Clinical ......Framing Effect/ Diagnostic Momentum •Framing Effect: Susceptibility to be influenced by how a problem is described 42 yo with

Framing Effect/ Diagnostic Momentum

• Framing Effect: Susceptibility to be influenced by how a problem is described

42 yo with hx of drug abuse found down

42 yo with prev hx of drug abuse (clean x2 years) felt palpitations, then LOC. FH of sudden death.

• Diagnostic Momentum: The tendency for diagnostic labels to stick and not be questioned

Take your own history from the beginning

Page 53: Can We Improve Our Diagnostic Acumen?: A Clinical ......Framing Effect/ Diagnostic Momentum •Framing Effect: Susceptibility to be influenced by how a problem is described 42 yo with

Roadmap

• How we (humans) think

• How we (doctors) make diagnoses

• Cognitive biases that can lead to wrong diagnoses

• Cognitive strategies to improve diagnosis

• Development of expertise

Page 54: Can We Improve Our Diagnostic Acumen?: A Clinical ......Framing Effect/ Diagnostic Momentum •Framing Effect: Susceptibility to be influenced by how a problem is described 42 yo with

Dual Process Reasoning

• System 1: Fast, efficient, but prone to error

• System 2: More accurate, but too slow and inefficient for making routine decisions

Kahneman, Daniel. Thinking, Fast and Slow. New York: Farrar, Straus and Giroux, 2011.

95%

5%

Trowbridge et al. Teaching Clinical Reasoning. ACP Teaching Medicine Series. 2015, pp. 54..

You need both the rabbit and the turtle!

Page 55: Can We Improve Our Diagnostic Acumen?: A Clinical ......Framing Effect/ Diagnostic Momentum •Framing Effect: Susceptibility to be influenced by how a problem is described 42 yo with

Dual Process Reasoning

• System 1: Fast, efficient, but prone to error

• System 2: More accurate, but too slow and inefficient for making routine decisions

Slow down when we should

Kahneman, Daniel. Thinking, Fast and Slow. New York: Farrar, Straus and Giroux, 2011.

95%

5%

System 1

System 2

Trowbridge et al. Teaching Clinical Reasoning. ACP Teaching Medicine Series. 2015, pp. 54..

Page 56: Can We Improve Our Diagnostic Acumen?: A Clinical ......Framing Effect/ Diagnostic Momentum •Framing Effect: Susceptibility to be influenced by how a problem is described 42 yo with

When should we slow down?

• High stakes symptoms

• Patient doesn’t respond to treatment

• Patient symptom continues or condition worsens

• Complex patient

• You don’t like the patient (or you really like them)

• When we are: • Tired & hungry • Distracted

Trowbridge et al. Teaching Clinical Reasoning. ACP Teaching Medicine Series. 2015, p. 63.

Kahneman, Daniel. Thinking, Fast and Slow. New York: Farrar, Straus and Giroux, 2011, p 43.

Page 57: Can We Improve Our Diagnostic Acumen?: A Clinical ......Framing Effect/ Diagnostic Momentum •Framing Effect: Susceptibility to be influenced by how a problem is described 42 yo with

Cognitive Forcing Strategies

• What else could this be?

• What doesn’t fit with my diagnosis?

• Could the patient have multiple problems?

• Is there any reason I need to slow down?

• How does this patient make me feel?

• What is the worst thing this could be?

• Am I missing something?

• Am I being framed or victim of diagnostic momentum?

DIAGNOSTIC

Trowbridge et al. Teaching Clinical Reasoning. ACP Teaching Medicine Series. 2015, p. 68, 94.

Page 58: Can We Improve Our Diagnostic Acumen?: A Clinical ......Framing Effect/ Diagnostic Momentum •Framing Effect: Susceptibility to be influenced by how a problem is described 42 yo with

Complex cases/High cognitive load

• Make a problem list

• Write a problem representation

• Check your differential

Page 59: Can We Improve Our Diagnostic Acumen?: A Clinical ......Framing Effect/ Diagnostic Momentum •Framing Effect: Susceptibility to be influenced by how a problem is described 42 yo with

Other Diagnostic Pearls

• When a diagnosis doesn’t fit, retake the history

• Be Skeptical – do not believe the “label” the patient carries

• Be systematic, especially with complex or high stakes cases

Courtesy of Gustavo Heudebert, MD

Page 60: Can We Improve Our Diagnostic Acumen?: A Clinical ......Framing Effect/ Diagnostic Momentum •Framing Effect: Susceptibility to be influenced by how a problem is described 42 yo with

Roadmap

• How we (humans) think

• How we (doctors) make diagnoses

• Cognitive biases that can lead to wrong diagnoses

• Cognitive strategies to improve diagnosis

• Development of expertise

Page 61: Can We Improve Our Diagnostic Acumen?: A Clinical ......Framing Effect/ Diagnostic Momentum •Framing Effect: Susceptibility to be influenced by how a problem is described 42 yo with

Attaining Expertise

Ericsson K, Krampe R, Tesch-Tomer C. The Role of Deliberate Practice in the Acquisition of Expert

Performance. Psychological Review. 1993. Vol. 100. No 3, 363-406

Ericsson K. Acquisition and Maintenance of Medical Expertise: A Perspective From the Expert-

Performance Approach with Deliberate Practice. Acad med. 2015;90:1471-1486.

Practice > Ability

Page 62: Can We Improve Our Diagnostic Acumen?: A Clinical ......Framing Effect/ Diagnostic Momentum •Framing Effect: Susceptibility to be influenced by how a problem is described 42 yo with

Attaining Expertise

• Deliberate Practice: • A task is completed • Immediate feedback given • The task is repeated

• The difficulty of the task is increased

• Guided by a teacher, effortful

Ericsson K, Krampe R, Tesch-Tomer C. The Role of Deliberate Practice in the Acquisition of Expert

Performance. Psychological Review. 1993. Vol. 100. No 3, 363-406

Ericsson K. Acquisition and Maintenance of Medical Expertise: A Perspective From the Expert-

Performance Approach with Deliberate Practice. Acad med. 2015;90:1471-1486.

Page 63: Can We Improve Our Diagnostic Acumen?: A Clinical ......Framing Effect/ Diagnostic Momentum •Framing Effect: Susceptibility to be influenced by how a problem is described 42 yo with

Metacognition

• Thinking about our own thinking

• Get feedback on your diagnoses

Page 64: Can We Improve Our Diagnostic Acumen?: A Clinical ......Framing Effect/ Diagnostic Momentum •Framing Effect: Susceptibility to be influenced by how a problem is described 42 yo with

Form schemas for signs/symptoms

• Schema: mental structure to organize information

• Dizziness

Trowbridge et al. Teaching Clinical Reasoning. ACP Teaching Medicine Series. 2015, p. 24.

Page 65: Can We Improve Our Diagnostic Acumen?: A Clinical ......Framing Effect/ Diagnostic Momentum •Framing Effect: Susceptibility to be influenced by how a problem is described 42 yo with

Form schemas for signs/symptoms

• Schema: mental structure to organize information

• Dizziness

Trowbridge et al. Teaching Clinical Reasoning. ACP Teaching Medicine Series. 2015, p. 24.

Page 66: Can We Improve Our Diagnostic Acumen?: A Clinical ......Framing Effect/ Diagnostic Momentum •Framing Effect: Susceptibility to be influenced by how a problem is described 42 yo with

Refine Illness Scripts

Nieman L. Clinical manifestations of adrenal insufficiency in adults. Uptodate. Accessed 5/21/18.

Adrenal Insufficiency

Page 67: Can We Improve Our Diagnostic Acumen?: A Clinical ......Framing Effect/ Diagnostic Momentum •Framing Effect: Susceptibility to be influenced by how a problem is described 42 yo with

Learn New Illness Scripts

• ACP Conferences

• MKSAP

Page 68: Can We Improve Our Diagnostic Acumen?: A Clinical ......Framing Effect/ Diagnostic Momentum •Framing Effect: Susceptibility to be influenced by how a problem is described 42 yo with

Calibrate your system 1

• A 55yo comes in with several months of intermittent hand tingling … How do I confirm or refute carpal tunnel syndrome?

Finding + LR -LR

Tinel sign 1.4 NS

Phalen sign 1.3 0.7

+ Hand Diagram

2.4 0.5

Page 69: Can We Improve Our Diagnostic Acumen?: A Clinical ......Framing Effect/ Diagnostic Momentum •Framing Effect: Susceptibility to be influenced by how a problem is described 42 yo with

Calibrate your system 1

Page 70: Can We Improve Our Diagnostic Acumen?: A Clinical ......Framing Effect/ Diagnostic Momentum •Framing Effect: Susceptibility to be influenced by how a problem is described 42 yo with

Diagnostic Experts

• Illness scripts with greater granularity

• More attention to “red flags”

• Understand when to switch to system 2

From: Robert Centor, MD

Deliberate Practice

Page 71: Can We Improve Our Diagnostic Acumen?: A Clinical ......Framing Effect/ Diagnostic Momentum •Framing Effect: Susceptibility to be influenced by how a problem is described 42 yo with

Summary

• To make diagnoses utilize: • System 1, intuitive, pattern recognition • System 2, analytical, slow & effortful

• We can improve our diagnoses by: • Learning when/how to slow down • Deliberate practice feedback on cases • Developing schemas, illness scripts, PE skills

Page 72: Can We Improve Our Diagnostic Acumen?: A Clinical ......Framing Effect/ Diagnostic Momentum •Framing Effect: Susceptibility to be influenced by how a problem is described 42 yo with

Resources for clinical reasoning

• Getting it Right: Cases to Improve Diagnosis (3 CME/MOC)

• Clinical Reasoning Toolkit

• https://www.improvediagnosis.org/page/ClinicalReasoning

Page 73: Can We Improve Our Diagnostic Acumen?: A Clinical ......Framing Effect/ Diagnostic Momentum •Framing Effect: Susceptibility to be influenced by how a problem is described 42 yo with

Books on Thinking

Page 74: Can We Improve Our Diagnostic Acumen?: A Clinical ......Framing Effect/ Diagnostic Momentum •Framing Effect: Susceptibility to be influenced by how a problem is described 42 yo with

Evidence for Slowing Down

• 34 internal medicine residents completed 12 cases (6 complex and 6 simple)

• Immediate answer vs forced analytical thinking answer

• Simple cases: no difference

• Complex cases: diagnostic accuracy improved 50%

Mamede S. Conscious thought beats deliberation without attention in diagnostic decision-making: at least

when you are an expert. Psychol Res. 2010 Nov;74(6):586-92