can nonlinear dynamics contribute to chatter suppression? gábor stépán
DESCRIPTION
Can nonlinear dynamics contribute to chatter suppression? Gábor Stépán. Department of Applied Mechanics Budapest University of Technology and Economics. Contents. Motivation – high-speed milling - PowerPoint PPT PresentationTRANSCRIPT
Can nonlinear dynamics Can nonlinear dynamics contribute to chatter contribute to chatter
suppression?suppression?
Gábor StépánGábor Stépán
Department of Applied MechanicsBudapest University of Technology
and Economics
Contents- Motivation – high-speed milling
- Physical background Periodically constrained inverted pendulum,
and the swing Delayed PD control of the inverted pendulum Unstable periodic motion in stick-slip
- Periodic delayed oscillators: delayed Mathieu equ.
- Nonlinear vibrations of cutting processes
- State dependent regenerative effect
Motivation: Chatter
~ (high frequency) machine tool vibration
“… Chatter is the most obscure and delicate of all problems facing the machinist – probably no rules or formulae can be devised which will accurately guide the machinist in taking maximum cuts and speeds possible without producing chatter.”
(Taylor, 1907).
(Moon, Johnson, 1996)
Efficiency of cutting
Specific amount of material cut within a certain time
where
w – chip width
h – chip thickness
Ω ~ cutting speed
2D
whV .
Modelling – regenerative effect
Mechanical model
τ – time period of revolution
Mathematical model
)(1
2 2 hFm
xxx xnn .. .
)()()( 0 txtxhth )()()( 0 txtxhthh
Milling
Mechanical model:
- number of cutting edgesin contact varies periodically with periodequal to the delay
)()(
)())(
()(2)( 112 txm
tktx
m
tktxtx nn
)()( 11 tktk
Contents- Motivation – high-speed milling
- Physical background Periodically constrained inverted pendulum,
and the swing Delayed PD control of the inverted pendulum Unstable periodic motion in stick-slip
- Periodic delayed oscillators: delayed Mathieu equ.
- Nonlinear vibrations of cutting processes
- State dependent regenerative effect
Stabilizing inverted pendula
Stephenson (1908): periodically forced pendulum
Mathematical background:
Mathieu equation (1868)
x = 0 can be stable inLjapunov sense for < 0
.
0))cos(()( 22 tlrmlgmlm SSSS
0)()cos()( txttx
Contents- Motivation – high-speed milling
- Physical background Periodically constrained inverted pendulum,
and the swing Delayed PD control of the inverted pendulum Unstable periodic motion in stick-slip
- Periodic delayed oscillators: delayed Mathieu equ.
- Nonlinear vibrations of cutting processes
- State dependent regenerative effect
Contents- Motivation – high-speed milling
- Physical background Periodically constrained inverted pendulum,
and the swing Delayed PD control of the inverted pendulum Unstable periodic motion in stick-slip
- Periodic delayed oscillators: delayed Mathieu equ.
- Nonlinear vibrations of cutting processes
- State dependent regenerative effect
Balancing with reflex delay
instabilityg
lcr 3
]s[1.0
]m[3.0
l
]Hz[5.24
10
f
)()()( tDtPtQ
Contents- Motivation – high-speed milling
- Physical background Periodically constrained inverted pendulum,
and the swing Delayed PD control of the inverted pendulum Unstable periodic motion in stick-slip
- Periodic delayed oscillators: delayed Mathieu equ.
- Nonlinear vibrations of cutting processes
- Outlook: Act & wait control, periodic flow control
Stick&slip – unstable periodic motion
Experiments with brakepad-like arrangements(R Horváth, Budapest / Auburn)
Contents- Motivation – high-speed milling
- Physical background Periodically constrained inverted pendulum,
and the swing Delayed PD control of the inverted pendulum Unstable periodic motion in stick-slip
- Periodic delayed oscillators: delayed Mathieu equ
- Nonlinear vibrations of cutting processes
- State dependent regenerative effect
The delayed Mathieu equation
Analytically constructed stability chart for testing numerical methods and algorithms
Time delay and time periodicity are equal:
Damped oscillator
Mathieu equation (1868)
Delayed oscillator (1941 – shimmy)
)2()()cos()()( txbtxttxtx
2T
0b0
0b
The damped oscillator
stable
Maxwell(1865)
Routh (1877)
Hurwitz (1895)
Lienard & Chipard (1917)
0)()()( txtxtx
Stability chart – Mathieu equation
Floquet (1883)
Hill (1886)
Rayleigh(1887)
van der Pol &
Strutt (1928)
Sinha (1992)
Strutt – Ince (1956) diagram swing(2000BC)
Stephenson’s inverted pendulum (1908)
0)()cos()( txttx
The damped Mathieu equation0)()cos()()( txttxtx
The delayed oscillator
Hsu & Bhatt (1966)
Stepan, Retarded Dynamical Systems (1989)
)2()()( txbtxtx
Delayed oscillator with damping
)2()()()( txbtxtxtx
The delayed Mathieu – stability charts
b=0
ε=1 ε=0
)2()()cos()( txbtxttx
Stability chart of delayed Mathieu
Insperger, Stepan (2002)
)2()()cos()( txbtxttx
Contents- Motivation – high-speed milling
- Physical background Periodically constrained inverted pendulum,
and the swing Delayed PD control of the inverted pendulum Unstable periodic motion in stick-slip
- Periodic delayed oscillators: delayed Mathieu equ
- Nonlinear vibrations of cutting processes
- State dependent regenerative effect
Modelling – regenerative effect
Mechanical model
τ – time period of revolution
Mathematical model)(
12 2 hF
mxxx xnn
)()()( 0 txtxhth
)()()( 0 txtxhthh
Cutting force
¾ rule for nonlinear
cutting force
Cutting coefficient
4/31),( whchwFx
4/10101 4
3),(),(
0
whc
h
hwFhwk
h
x
...)()( 33
2210, hkhkhkFF xx
0
12 8
1hk
k
20
13 96
5hk
k
Linear analysis – stability
Dimensionless time
Dimensionless chip width
Dimensionless cutting speed
TobiasTlusty, Altintas, BudakGradisek, Kalveram, Insperger
tt n~
)~(~)~()~1()~(2)~( ntxwtxwtxtx
kk
mk
wn
12
1~
nn
n
2
22~
2
)()()()(2)( 112 txmk
txmk
txtx nn.. .
Stability and bifurcations of turning
Subcritical Hopf bifurcation: unstable vibrations around stable cutting
211
atn1
21
jn
j
)1(2~ crw 21 ncr
The unstable periodic motion
Shi, Tobias
(1984) –
impactexperiment
Case study – thread cutting
m= 346 [kg]
k=97 [N/μm]
fn=84.1 [Hz]
ξ=0.025
gge=3.175[mm]
Stability of thread cutting – theory&exp.
Ω=344 f/p
Quasi-periodic
vibrations:
f1=84.5 [Hz]
f2=90.8 [Hz]
Machined surface
D=176 [mm], τ =0.175 [s]
]Hz[0.883.15
221
ff
]Hz[5.3)5.122(
3.152
21
ff
Self-interrupted cutting
High-speed milling
Parametrically interrupted cutting
Low number of edges
Low immersion
Highly interrupted
Highly interrupted cutting
Two dynamics:
- free-flight
- cutting with regenerative effect– like an impact
00,;3,2
111
100
Fm
vxbv
x
v
x
khkh
kj
hjhk
j
j
j
j A
),[ jj ttt
),[ jj ttt
Stability chart of H-S milling
Sense of the
period
doubling
(or flip)
bifurcation?
Linear model (Davies, Burns, Pratt, 2000)Simulation (Balachandran, 2000)
Subcritical flip bifurcation
Bifurcation diagram – chaos
The fly-over effect
00,;3,2
111
100
Fm
vxbv
x
v
x
khkh
kj
hjhk
j
j
j
j A
Both period-2s unstable at b)
Milling
Mechanical model:
- number of cutting edgesin contact varies periodically with periodequal to the delay
)()(
)())(
()(2)( 112 txm
tktx
mtk
txtx nn.. .
Phase space reconstruction
A – secondary B – stable cutting C – period-2 osc. Hopf (tooth pass exc.) (no fly-over!!!)
noisy trajectory from measurement noise-free reconstructed trajectory cutting contact(Gradisek,Kalveram)
The stable period-2 motion
Lobes & lenses with =0.02
(Szalai, Stepan, 2006)
with =0.0038
(Insperger,
Mann, Bayly,
Stepan, 2002)
Phase space reconstruction at A
Stable milling Unstable milling with (Gradisek et al.) stable period-2(?) or quasi-periodic(?) oscillation
Bifurcation diagram
(Szalai, Stepan, 2005)
Stability of up- and down-milling
Stabilization by time-periodic parameters!Insperger, Mann, S, Bayly (2002)
Contents- Motivation – high-speed milling
- Physical background Periodically constrained inverted pendulum,
and the swing Delayed PD control of the inverted pendulum Unstable periodic motion in stick-slip
- Periodic delayed oscillators: delayed Mathieu equ.
- Nonlinear vibrations of cutting processes
- State dependent regenerative effect
State dependent regenerative effect
3.0x
yr K
Kk
State dependent regenerative effect
State dependent time delay (x):
Without state dependence:
With state dependence, the chip thickness is
, fz – feed rate,
]0,[),()(
)()()(2
rsstxsx
xtxtxRR
t
t
2
))(()()(d)()()(
tt
t
xt
xtytyxvssyvtht
/zfv
R
f
Rv z
2
2 DoF mathematical model
Linearisation at stationary cutting (Insperger, 2006)
Realistic range of parameters:
Characteristic function
q
ttyyy
qttxxx
xtytyxvwKtyktyctym
xtytyxvwKtxktxctxm
))(()()()()()(
))(()()()()()(
)()()()()()()()(
)()()()()()()()(
1
1
ttRv
ttvwKtktctm
ttRv
ttvwKtktctm
qyyy
qxxx
01.0001.0 Rv
0e111212 11
22
nq
r
Kk
Stability chart – comparison
Conclusion
- Periodic modulation of cutting coefficient may result improvements in the stability, e.g., for high-speed milling, but
- It may also cause loss of stability via period-2 oscillations, leading to lenses (& lobes), too.
- Subcriticality results reduction in safe chatter-free parameter domain for turning, milling,…
- There is no nonlinear theory for state-dependent regenerative effect.
Thank you for your attention!