PRESENTATION

May 2009

CAMPUS DEVELOPMENT PLAN

March 2007

Introduction

Development Plan Scope and Criteria

• ECS was commissioned in June 2008 to prepare a Campus Development Plan to guide campus development to 2013 and beyond.

• The Campus Development Plan models future academic activities, explores how these requirements could be implemented on campus and calculates order-of-magnitude space requirements to describe a general direction for Humber to further develop and improve campus facilities.

March 2007

Purpose of the Development Plan

A roadmap to guide directions for the development and/ or improvement of the campus by identifying a number of principles on “how to get there”

A reference to validate that capital projects and campus development initiatives contribute to the realization of the College’s strategic goals, academic plans and operational objectives

A resource to describe space needs both internally and externally & is flexible enough to permit changes while specific enough to maintain established priorities

March 2007

Process

• Interviews and meetings with senior academic and administrative staff, student leadership members, faculty representatives, and support staff.

• Assessment of existing campus inventory and calculated instructional space needs based on:

– Future requirements for non-instructional office & support spaces

– Standardized room & seat utilization & hourly targets

– Future requirements for student learner and support spaces

• Regular presentations of Findings and Observations to the Steering Committee for validation and feedback

• Presentation of draft Planning Options via Town Hall forums

March 2007

Context

Humber 2008-2013 Strategic Plan establishes the following priorities for the College:

Manage Enrolment Growth

Commitment to Teaching and Learning Excellence

Commitment to High Quality Services to Support Student Success and Improved Business Practices

Commitment to Human Resource Planning and Professional Development

ECS believes that the priorities shown in bold green have particular implications for the Development Plan

These three priorities are partly contingent on physical changes at the North and Lakeshore campuses

March 2007

Context Enrolment Projections

Fall Target FTE Winter Target FTE Net Difference (+/- %) School / Academic Unit 2008 2012 2008 2012 Fall 2012 Winter 2012 North Campus Business 3,232 3,487 3,300 3,501 +7.9% +6.1% Applied Technology 2,330 2,604 2,291 2,531 +11.8% +10.5% CCE 36 36 70 70 0.0% 0.0% Health Sciences 2,168 2,202 1,968 2,011 +1.6% +2.2% Hospitality/Recreation/Tourism 1,151 1,503 1,112 1,422 +30.6% +27.9% Liberal Arts & Science 408 408 494 494 0.0% 0.0% Media Studies & IT 1,487 1,734 1,357 1,550 +16.6% +14.2% Sub totals 10,812 11,974 10,592 11,579 +10.7% +9.3% Lakeshore Campus Business 1,572 2,343 1,503 2,175 +49.0% +44.7% Creative & Performing Arts 741 741 845 845 0.0% 0.0% Liberal Arts & Science 126 166 191 227 +31.7% +18.8% Media Studies & IT 893 1,330 919 1,298 +48.9% +41.2% Social & Community Services 1,280 1,885 1,286 1,833 +47.3% +42.5% Sub totals 4,612 6,465 4,744 6,378 +40.2% +34.4% Orangeville Campus Business 86 121 74 108 +40.7% +45.9% Social & Community Services 73 73 68 68 0.0% 0.0% Sub totals 159 194 142 176 +22.0% +23.9% Grand Totals 15,583 18,633 15,478 18,133 +19.6% +17.2%

The presented table shows enrolment growth targets distributed by campus and school to a 2012 planning horizon

Significant growth (40%) is planned at the Lakeshore Campus while more measured growth (10%) is planned at the North Campus

These figures have since been revised higher

March 2007

Context Space IndicatorsEnrolment growth has outpaced physical growth at Humber in the past 10 years

Current additions and renovations at the North and Lakeshore campuses will not be enough to reverse the decrease in area to student ratio

Indicators point to a space deficit in the next five years

16,288 16,321 16,321

17,007

18,40018,629

18,96919,460

20,09820,627

1,100,000

1,150,000

1,200,000

1,250,000

1,300,000

1,350,000

1,400,000

1,450,000

1,500,000

1998-99 1999-00 2000-01 2001-02 2002-03 2003-04 2004-05 2005-06 2006-07 2007-08

Academic Year

Tota

l Gro

ss S

quar

e Fe

et -

All

Cam

puse

s Ex

clud

ing

Gue

lp-H

umbe

ran

d R

esid

ence

s

15,000

16,000

17,000

18,000

19,000

20,000

21,000

22,000

Stud

ent F

TE P

opul

atio

n

72.5 72.3

70.5

68.1 67.766.9 67.0 67.0

64.9

67.9

1,100,000

1,150,000

1,200,000

1,250,000

1,300,000

1,350,000

1,400,000

1,450,000

1,500,000

1998-99 1999-00 2000-01 2001-02 2002-03 2003-04 2004-05 2005-06 2006-07 2007-08

Academic Year

Tota

l Gro

ss S

quar

e Fe

et -

All

Cam

puse

s Ex

clud

ing

Gue

lp-H

umbe

ran

d R

esid

ence

s

60.0

65.0

70.0

75.0

Gro

ss S

quar

e Fe

et p

er F

TE S

tude

nt

1998-99 to 2007-08 Changes in Inventory and Student Population

1998-99 to 2007-08 Changes in Inventory and GSF per Student

March 2007

Planning Principles

• Student Space: Highly visible, easily accessible, and comfortably furnished space should be provided in each academic building for students to study independently, study in groups, and/or gather socially.

• Faculty Space: Appropriate office space should be provided for all faculty, both full time and part time, clustered by academic department and proximate to the labs, workshops and classrooms where the faculty teach most often.

• Future Growth: Humber is evolving from a suburban institution to an urban one. New buildings need to be taller and use of public transit must be encouraged.

March 2007

Key Site Challenges - Cohesiveness

NORTH CAMPUS

How to add new buildings while reinforcing internal cohesiveness and circulation along the internal north to south and east to west axis?

North Campus

B

A

March 2007

Key Site Challenges - Connectivity

LAKESHORECAMPUS

How to best improve the connections among the various distinct precincts?

B

AD

C

March 2007

Key Site Challenges – Surface Parking

DIRECTION

Create a more compact campus.

Encourage building development which provides closer connections with existing infrastructure.

Promote a sense of place.

Bring transit closer to core of campus.

Student Housing

Main formalentranceset backfromstreet

Mainstudentserviceentrance set backfrom street

Internalsecondarystreet

Parking

Parking

Parking

Parking

Parking

Parking

MainBuilding

Mainvehicular road

March 2007

Key Site Challenges – Campus Densities

DIRECTION

Encourage higher density additions -3 to 4 storeysminimum.

Facilitate a sense of community by integrating a range of functions that tie in with neighbouringfunctions

Promote a livelier campus

5 storeys & greater

4 storeys

3 storeys2 storeys

1 storey

5

7

9

5

4

No. of Storeys Above Ground

North Campus

Lakeshore East

Lakeshore West

60m4

3

2

22

2

2

2

1

1

1

2

2

2

3

1

60m

2

2

2

6

3

11

22

3 3 3

3

3 3 33

3

60m

March 2007

Key Site Challenges – Transportation

DIRECTION

Integrate transportationnetworks to reduce conflicts.

Minimize transportation and pedestrian conflicts

Promote easier campus access through proper location of lay-bys, bus stops, etc.

Proposed options for LRT stopsPresent bus stop locationsLandscaped courtyardsLoading & unloading service bays

Legend

A

B

C

Bus Stops

Pedestrianroute frombus stop

Bus Stops

Outdoorcourtyards

Serviceroute

Proposedtransit location“C”

Proposedtransit location“A”

Proposedtransitlocation“B”

Servicebays

March 2007

Key Site Challenges – Main Entrance

DIRECTION

Create a central entry point to the campus.

Provide easier access to front line services

Promote a sense of arrival that is exciting and welcoming

Ground Floor Plan

No directground level access

Awkward junction

Circuitouscongestedsecondarycirculation

Student Serviceslocated away frommain entrance

Outdoor amphitheatrehas poor connectivityto campus

Primary axiscorridor

Challenges exist dueto location of spaceat back of maincampus

Main formalentrance

Student services entrance

March 2007

Key Site Challenges – LandscapingDIRECTION

Enhance the quality of constructed landscapes

Develop creative landscape and streetscape solutions

Unify the North Campus through physical landscape interventions at the North end

Arboretum

Playing Fields

Ravine

NNorth OrientedCampus

March 2007

North Campus

LRT

A

B

Preferred locationfor new light railtransit station

Site for futuredevelopmentbridge linked tobuilding A

Gateway Contextual Building

Infill Building

C

Bus

CAMPUS DEVELOPMENT

Develop a strategy and sequencing framework for future capital projects for the North Campus

March 2007

Option N-A

OPTION N-A

Construct a new 4-storey 75,000 NASF Library and Student Services building at the main north entrance

Ground Floor PlanOPTION N-A

Arboretumgardens

Enclosed glazed passage overlooking gardens

University of Ontario Institute of Technology, Library*

Academic Learning Centre - U of T, Mississauga

Possiblebridge links

New informationcommons atground floor

Library onthird and fourthfloors with largereading room

New student servicesfacilities on ground floor and part second

43

2

1

Arboretumgardens

March 2007

Lakeshore Campus

CAMPUS DEVELOMENT

Develop a strategy and sequencing framework for future capital projects for the Lakeshore Campus

A

C

Lake Shore Blvd. W.

COLO

NEL S

AMUE

L SMI

TH PA

RK DR

IVE

Kipling Ave .

B23rd. St.

Mid-rise Infill Building

Gateway Entrance Building

Contextually Anchored Building

March 2007

Option L-AOPTION L-A

Construction of a 60,000 NASF- 4 to 8 storey- New Centre to accommodate existing program growth and new program initiatives at 3166 Lake Shore Blvd. W.

3170 Lake ShoreBlvd. W.

3166 Lake ShoreBlvd. W.

TTC StreetcarLoop

Site PlanOPTION L-A

Contextual Addition - Heaslip House, Ryerson University

Subject to zoning complianceof site for construction of a new, 4 to 8 storey Centre, 60,000 NASF, (96,000 GASF).

Consolidation of 3166 & 3170 Lake Shore Blvd. W. properties into a single site is an optionto be considered subject tocity application and approval

Existing 3 storey office building to remain and re-purposed for academic use

LAKE SHORE BLVD. W.

KIPLIN

G AVE

.

19TH S

T.

Possible expansion area if allowable under variance and re-zoning applications

Proposed 2 storey building extension over streetcar loop subject to TTC agreements

March 2007

Option L-BOPTION L-B

Construction of a 64,000 NASF New Centre to accommodate existing program growth and new program initiatives at Lakeshore Campus West

Ground Floor PlanOPTION L-B

UOIT, Durham

Claude Watson School for the Arts, Toronto, ON*

LAK ESHORE

LODGE

LAKE SHORE BOULEVARD WEST

New landscapedforecourt / studentsocial space

Existing pathto LakeshoreEast

New east entranceand entrance gallery linked to corridorto center of Lakeshore West

New 3-storeyHumberCentre

New shiftedkitchenlocation

Existingserviceyard

New studentcafeteria seating

Exiting kitchenspace to be renovated fornew academicor student support use

Expand libraryto accommodateadditional studentstudy space & aLearning Commons

23

1

12

March 2007

Option L-COPTION L-C

Construction of a 64,000 NASF New Centre to accommodate existing program growth and new program initiativesat Lakeshore Campus East

Site PlanOPTION L-C

Theatre podium and tower

University of Ontario Institute of Technology*

Open Green Space

64,000 NASFHumberCentre over 4floors

Area reservedfor future low rise developmentdependant onfuture landvariance

Possiblebelow gradeparking underpodium dependanton geo-technical conditions one story structure

with accessiblepodium roof

12

34

March 2007

Planning Principles

Student Space

• Space should be provided in each academic building for students to study independently, study in groups, and/or gather socially.

• Not all student space needs to be formal or enclosed.

• Space for students should be highly visible, easily accessible, comfortably furnished, and have wireless capabilities.

March 2007

Planning Principles

Faculty Space• Appropriate office space should be provided for all

faculty, both full time and contract, in accordance with Humber’s space management policy.

• Whenever practical, faculty offices should be clustered by department.

• Faculty office space needs to include small meeting rooms to enable faculty to meet privately with students.

• Departmental clusters should be located proximate to the labs, workshops, and classrooms where the faculty teach most often. This is particularly important for departments that rely extensively on specialized labs and workshops.

March 2007

Planning Principles

Future Growth

• Humber is evolving from a suburban institution to an urban one.

• New buildings need to be taller, to make better use of the limited land that is available.

• Site and building design must encourage use of public transit to reduce the amount of land required for parking and roadways for private transportation.

• For buildings which will house specialized functions, the design should incorporate expansion either internally, horizontally or vertically.

March 2007

Planning Principles

North Campus• The construction of a new 75,000 net assignable square

feet building (Option N-A) will provide space for an expanded library and consolidated and enhanced student services.

• Existing space that will be vacated by library and student services functions will enable Humber to alleviate shortages of space for students and faculty and to provide additional teaching spaces to accommodate enrolment growth.

• The existing library is best suited for conversion to administrative and faculty offices.

• Medium and longer term growth can be accommodated in future buildings at the two sites proposed in the campus development plan (Options N-B and N-C).

March 2007

Planning Principles

Lakeshore Campus• The space challenges at the Lakeshore campus will not be

solved by one new building; a three pronged approach is required.

• Option L-A, in conjunction with 3170 Lakeshore Drive, will provide additional space for classrooms, light labs, and offices.

• Option L-B will provide space for an expanded library, consolidated and enhanced student services, and additional academic delivery space.

• Option L-C will provide space for heavily serviced labs and workshops and other academic space.

• All buildings are required urgently. The exact sequencing will be determined based on funding availability and other factors.

March 2007May 2009

Thank you for your attention.We welcome your questions and comments.

North Campus - Options Lakeshore Campus - Options

DA

C

Lake Shore Blvd. W.

COLO

NEL S

AMUE

L SMI

TH PA

RK D

RIVE

Kipling Ave .

B23rd. St.

Mid-rise Infill Building

Gateway Entrance Building

Contextually Anchored Building

LRT

A

B

Preferred locationfor new light railtransit station

Site for futuredevelopmentbridge linked tobuilding A

Gateway Contextual Building

Infill Building

C

Bus