caltrans external advisory liaison committee october 2015
TRANSCRIPT
Caltrans External Advisory Liaison Committee October 2015
SHSP Overview
Guides safety activities for all roadway users
Addresses safety on all public roads
Strategic, data-driven process
Federal requirement
Plan Signed September 2015
5 Year Plan (2015-2019)
2
SHSP Overview
The Challenge Areas in the updated planinclude the following:
• Roadway Departure and Head-On Collisions• Intersections, Interchanges, and Other Roadway Access• Work Zones• Alcohol and Drug Impairment• Occupant Protection• Speeding and Aggressive Driving• Distracted Driving• Driver Licensing and Competency• Pedestrians• Bicycling• Young Drivers• Aging Road Users• Motorcycles• Commercial Vehicles• Emergency Medical Services
3
SHSP Partners
4
1995 1996 1997 1998 1999 2000 2001 2002 2003 2004 2005 2006 2007 2008 2009 2010 2011 2012*0
1,000
2,000
3,000
4,000
5,000
0
1,000
2,000
3,000
4,000
5,000
6,000
7,000
8,000
9,000
10,000
11,000
12,000
13,000
14,000
15,000
4,1
97
2,9
95
13,089
10,864
Fatalities Severe Injuries
Fa
talit
ies
(n
)
Se
ve
re In
juri
es
(n
)
17.0% reduction in severe injuries from 2006 to 2012
28.6% reduction in fatalities
from 2006 to 2012
Safety Progress Since 2006
5
Source: SWITRS, 1995-2012
6
Fatalities, Severe Injuries & VMT
-40%
-35%
-30%
-25%
-20%
-15%
-10%
-5%
0%
5%
10%
2003 2004 2005 2006 2007 2008 2009 2010 2011 2012
Perc
ent
Chan
ge*
Fatalities Severe Injuries VMT
Fatal and Severe Injury by Location
Source: SWITRS, 2003-2012
61.5%
38.5% Non-SHSSHS 59.1%
40.9% UrbanRural
Urban
Rural
0% 20% 40% 60% 80% 100%
Non-SHSSHS
State Highway System (SHS) vs. Non-SHS
Urban vs Rural
Percent of Victims
Impaire
d Driving
Leaving th
e Road / Head-O
n
Older Adults
Pedestrians
Safety Belts / C
hild Seats
Young Drivers
Commercial V
ehicles
Interse
ction / I
nterch
anges
Right of W
ay / Turn
ing
Speeding / Aggre
ssive Driv
ing
Bicycle
s
Moto
rcycle
s
Work Zone
0.0%
10.0%
20.0%
30.0%
40.0%
33.9%
25.3%22.7%21.9%
19.6%17.6%16.3%15.9%15.1%13.4%
6.8% 6.8%
1.6%
% o
f Tot
al F
atal
ities
and
Ser
ious
Inju
ries Total Fatalities (F) and Serious Injuries(SI): F+SI = 104,201
Fatalities and Serious Injuries by Crash Factor
Note: Multiple factors may be involved in a single crash. Percentages do not sum to 100 percent.
8
9
SHSP and Transportation Planning Linkages
Regional Vison and Goals
Alternate Improvement StrategiesOperations Capital
Evaluation and Prioritization of Strategies
Development of Transportation Plan (LRP)
Development of improvement Programs (S/TIP)
Project Development
Systems Operations (Implementation)
Monitor System Performance (Data)
Review and Incorporate SHSP
Data/Analysis,Goals, and
Emphasis Areas
Demonstrate Consistency with SHSP Strategies
Align Projects with SHSP Priorities and
Action Plans
Monitor and Track SHSP Implementation
Use Results for SHSPEvaluation and Update
SHSP Transportation Planning Process
Critica
l Facto
rs and In
puts
Cri
tica
l Fact
ors
and I
nputs
Air Q
uality
FEED
BA
CK
FEED
BA
CK
SHSP Measurable Objectives
Highway Safety Improvement
Program ReportTargets
Caltrans
Highway Safety Plan Targets
Office of Traffic Safety
Identical Targets
FatalitiesSerious injuries
Fatality rateSerious injury rate
MPOsSet own targets
Adopt state targets
MPOs and the SHSP
10
SHSP Strategies & Action Steps
Highway Safety Improvement
Program
Projects
Highway Safety Plan Targets
Programs & Activities
Local Safety Project -
Improve Line Delineation
Behavioral safety grants
Improve pavement markings,
markers, signs, and other devices
at high crash locations
The SHSP and HSIP Funding
11
12
CA Local HSIP Funding ProcessCaltrans Division of Local Assistance · Manages local agency share of HSIP
Cycle 7 Call for Projects · Due July 31, 2015· Call Size - approximately $150 million· Maximum HSIP funds per agency/application: $10 million
Other provisions· High Risk Rural Roads (HR3) is not a set aside· Non-infrastructure elements (education, enforcement, EMS)
are eligible
13
How Have Your Regional Transportation Plans Coordinated With the SHSP?
0%
5%
10%
15%
20%
25%
30%
35%
24%
15%
2%
19%
30%33%
Source: Cambridge Systematics, 2014
14
Has Your Agency Been Involved in SHSP Activities?
Source: Cambridge Systematics, 2014
19%
42%
39%Yes
No
I don’t know
Improve safety · Save lives· Reduce preventable injuries
Improve livability · Support active transportation goals · Improve public health· Coordinate with congestion management efforts
Gain local knowledge · Learn best practices · Access information and data · Discover funding opportunities
Local and Regional Benefits
15
16
SHSP Outreach
Outreach presentations· 50 organizations, agencies statewide
Six webinars · Driver behavior, infrastructure, active transportation,
focus populations, EMS, tribal · 500 participants · Nearly 50% were new to the process
Two safety summits · Los Angeles and Sacramento · 315 participants
17
Next Steps
Visit the SHSP Website at
http://www.dot.ca.gov/hq/traffops/shsp/
· Provide comments on the SHSP Update Process· Sign up to participate on Challenge Area teams
For more information, contact:Thomas Schriber, Chief, Office of Performance, Caltrans