california department of housing and community development collaboration workshop
DESCRIPTION
California Department of Housing and Community Development Collaboration Workshop. Emergency Solutions Grants Program February 2012. ESG Staff. Tom Bettencourt, Branch Chief Sabrina Sassman, Section Chief Dan Apodaca, ESG Program Manager Catherine Kungu, ESG Program Representative - PowerPoint PPT PresentationTRANSCRIPT
California Department of Housing and Community
Development Collaboration Workshop
Emergency Solutions Grants Program
February 2012
ESG Staff
Tom Bettencourt, Branch Chief
Sabrina Sassman, Section Chief
Dan Apodaca, ESG Program Manager
Catherine Kungu, ESG Program Representative
Amanda Lockwood, ESG Program Representative
Connie Mallavia, ESG Program Representative
Helene Hiromoto, ESG Program Representative
Objectives
A) To meet with Continuums of Care contact persons and Stakeholders serving the homeless and “at risk” of homelessness populations.
B) To review, solicit dialog and receive ideas on major budget components of the new ESG Program.
C) To develop a coordinated effort between HCD (Recipient) and the Continuums of Care, service providers, community leaders and eligible subrecipients on ESG funding.
Although these workshops will be specific to ESG 2011 Round II funding, the general areas of discussion and input will carry forward into FY 2012 and in subsequent funding years.
Topics
I. Allocation of Funds
II. Performance Standards for Components Funded Under ESG
III. HMIS Activities
IV. Other Areas to Discuss
I. A. Allocation of FundsESG 2011 Round II
Regional Allocation of Funding:• New Project—up to 5% • Northern CA –33% • Southern CA –24% • Rural Allocation—19% • General Allocation—13% • General Adm. for HCD—6%
I. B. Allocation of FundsESG 2011 Round II
Continued...
Proposed Components:• Street Outreach• Emergency Shelter• Homelessness Prevention• Rapid Re-housing• HMIS• Administration
* See Eligible Expense Guide for all eligible activities under each Component above.
I. C. Expenditure Limit on Emergency Shelter & Street
Outreach Activities
The total amount of the 2011 Fiscal year grant that can be expended on Emergency and Street Outreach cannot exceed the greater of:• 60% of the current fiscal year grant:
$6,469,328OR
• Amount of FY 2010 funds spent on “Homeless Assistance” (HA) activities:
$6,357,061
Since 60% of current fiscal year is greater, the expenditure limit is $6,469,328.
I. C. Expenditure Limit on Emergency Shelter & Street Outreach Activities
Continued...
$6,469,328 (60% of Total Allocation)- $6,115,251 (Round I Funds spent on
HA)$354,077 (Remaining funds for ES & SO)
Therefore, the maximum amount available for Emergency Shelter and Street Outreach activities for Round II of the 2011 Allocation is:
9.1%
Discussion of Funding Priorities: Emphasis on HP and RR vs. ES• Funding Priorities:
Rapid Re-Housing (RR)Homelessness Prevention (HP)Emergency Shelter (ES)Street Outreach (SO)HMISAdministration (AD)
• Funding Limitations: Refer to Interim Rule dated December 5, 2011.
I. D. Allocation of FundsESG 2011 Round II
Continued...
I. E. Allocation of FundsESG 2011 Round II
Continued...
Funding by Component for Round II allocation:
* Street Outreach and Emergency Shelter limited to a total of $354,077 due to Round I allocations already made in Homeless Assistance Activities ($6,558,347).
** Based on 6% to HCD and 1.5% to Subrecipients; Round I Administration allocation was $342,270, therefore Round II is $466,396 to both HCD and Subrecipients.
Funding ActivityHomelessness
Prevention[3]
Rapid Re-housing[4]
Total Amount Budgeted
Rental Assistance [Refer to 3.2 in Eligible
Expense Guide][Refer to 4.2 in Eligible
Expense Guide]
Housing Relocation and Stabilization Services[Refer to 3.1 in Eligible
Expense Guide][Refer to 4.1 in Eligible
Expense Guide]
Subtotal
Emergency Shelter *[Refer to 2 in Eligible
Expense Guide] *
Street Outreach *[Refer to 1 in Eligible
Expense Guide] *
HMIS[Refer to 5 in Eligible
Expense Guide]
**Administration to Subrecipients Administration to HCD
(2.5%) $ 95,488(9.5%) $370,908
[Refer to 6 in Eligible Expense Guide]
Round II ESG Amount Budgeted (100%) $3,881,597
I. F. Allocation of FundsESG 2011 Round II
Continued...
Funding by Component for FY 2012
* Emergency Shelter and Street Outreach activities are limited to a maximum of 60% of the total HUD allocation.
Funding Activity Homelessness Prevention [3]
Rapid Re-housing[4]
Total Amount Budgeted
Rental Assistance[Refer to 3.2 in Eligible Expense
Guide][Refer to 4.2 in Eligible
Expense Guide]
Housing Relocation and Stabilization Services
[Refer to 3.1 in Eligible Expense Guide]
[Refer to 4.1 in Eligible Expense Guide]
Subtotal
Emergency Shelter * [Refer to 2 in Eligible Expense Guide] *
Street Outreach * [Refer to 1 in Eligible Expense Guide] *
HMIS [Refer to 5 in Eligible Expense Guide]
Administration7.5%
(6% - HCD; 1.5% - Subrecipients)[Refer to 6 in Eligible Expense Guide]
FY 2012 ESG Amount Budgeted
100% ($12 million)
II. Performance Standards for Components Funded Under ESG
Written standards for provision of ESG Components: HCD vs. Subrecipients.• HCD plans to have subrecipients provide standards -
Refer to Docket No. FR-5594-N-01, (page xii insert).
HCD performance standards for evaluating ESG activities - Rating Factors (maximum of 1400 points):• Applicant Capability - up to 300 points• Need for Funds - up to 200 points *• Impact and Effectiveness - up to 765 points• Cost Efficiency - up to 100 points• State Objectives - up to 35 points
* To be rated by the Continuum of Care in their Certification of Local Need form.
II. Performance Standards for Components Funded Under ESG
Continued...
Rating Criteria FESG ESG
Applicant Capability
300 pts. 300 pts.
Need for Funds 100 pts. 200 pts.
Impact and Effectiveness
250 pts. 205 pts. (Street Outreach and Emergency Shelter)280 pts. (Homeless Prevention)280 pts. (Rapid Re-housing)
765 pts.Cost Efficiency 100 pts. 100 pts.
State Objectives 35 pts. 35 pts.
Total 785 pts. 1,400 pts.
Old FESG/ESG Round I vs. ESG Round II:
III. HMIS Activities Funding, policies, and procedures for
the operation and administration of HMIS activities:• All subrecipients must participate in an
HMIS through a Continuum of Care in their service area. The Department proposes an 11% cap in HMIS activities, as in HPRP.
I. V. Other Areas to Discuss Match – to be required by the
subrecipients and shown on the application.
Indirect Costs – not eligible. Centralized or Coordinated Assessment
System(s) – If the Continuum of Care employs a centralized or coordinated assessment system, this must be described in the ESG Application.
Other Areas to DiscussContinued...
Maintenance of Effort (Supplanting) – applies to Units of General Purpose Local Government only.
HCD Monitoring and Reporting• Risk Assessment follow-up by site monitoring visits
and/or desk audits.
• Reports: Quarterly Performance Reports and Annual Performance Reports to be determined by HUD and HCD.
HCD involvement in regional discussions with CoC’s• Discussion on collaborations between CoCs and HCD.