calculators not! why not?

14
Calculators Not! Why Not? Jan Martin Assessment Director, SD DOE SDCTM Feb.8, 2014

Upload: soyala

Post on 20-Feb-2016

41 views

Category:

Documents


0 download

DESCRIPTION

Calculators Not! Why Not?. Jan Martin Assessment Director, SD DOE. SDCTM Feb.8, 2014. Grade 3- 5 Math Content. Number and Operations – Base 10 Grade 3 : Using place value and properties of operations to add and subtract whole numbers Grade 4: Multiplying and dividing whole numbers - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

TRANSCRIPT

Page 1: Calculators Not! Why Not?

Calculators Not! Why Not?Jan Martin

Assessment Director, SD DOE

SDCTMFeb.8, 2014

Page 2: Calculators Not! Why Not?

Grade 3- 5 Math Content

Number and Operations – Base 10

• Grade 3: Using place value and properties of operations to add and subtract whole numbers

• Grade 4: Multiplying and dividing whole numbers

• Grade 5: Solving problems with decimals using the four operations

Page 3: Calculators Not! Why Not?

Grade 3-5 Math Content

Operations and Algebraic Thinking

• Grade 3: Understanding meaning of multiplication and division

• Grade 4: Applying understanding

• Grade 5: Writing and interpreting numerical expressions

Page 4: Calculators Not! Why Not?

Grade 3 – 5 Math Content

Number and Operations – Fractions

• Grade 3: Understanding of fractions as numbers

• Grade 4: Understand fraction equivalence

and operations with fractions

• Grade 5: Solving problems involving the four operations

Page 5: Calculators Not! Why Not?

Grade 3-5 Math Content

Measurement and Data

• Grade 3: Measuring time, liquid volumes, and masses of objects and solving simple one-step word problems

• Grade 4: Solving problems involving measurement, representing and interpreting data, and understanding angles

• Grade 5: Understanding volume and solving problems that involve estimating and measuring volume

Page 6: Calculators Not! Why Not?

Grade 3 – 5 Math Content

Geometry

• Grade 3: Understanding that shapes in different categories may share attributes and recognizing quadrilaterals

• Grade 4: Classifying shapes based on properties

• Grade 5: Graphing points on the coordinate plane and understanding that attributes belonging to a category of two-dimensional shapes also belong to all subcategories of that category

Page 7: Calculators Not! Why Not?

Claim 2 – Problem Solving

• Selected Response, Constructed Response, Extended Response, and Technology-Enhanced items that focus on problem solving

• Items and tasks require students to construct their own pathway to the solution

• Relevant verbs include: – understand, solve, apply, describe, illustrate,

interpret, and analyze

Page 8: Calculators Not! Why Not?

Claim 3 - Communicating Reasoning

• Constructed Response, Extended Response, and Technology-Enhanced items and tasks that focus on mathematical reasoning

• Relevant verbs include:– understand, explain, justify, prove, derive,

assess, illustrate, and analyze

Page 9: Calculators Not! Why Not?

Claim 4 – Modeling and Data Analysis

• Performance Tasks and collections of Extended Response items

• Real world problems

• Draw upon knowledge and skills articulated in the progression of standards up to the grade being assessed

• Relevant verbs include: – model, construct, compare, investigate, build, interpret, estimate,

analyze, summarize, represent, solve, evaluate, extend, and apply

Page 10: Calculators Not! Why Not?

ITEM WRITING GUIDELINES

Page 11: Calculators Not! Why Not?

Selected Response Items

• From the General Guidelines for Developing SR Items • Items should be appropriate for students in terms of

grade-level difficulty, cognitive complexity, and reading level.1

• Items are expected to include mathematical concepts detailed in the CCSSM of lower grades.

• At grades 3–5, all items should be written so they can be answered without using a calculator

• Items should provide clear and complete instructions to students.

• Each item should be written to clearly elicit the desired evidence of a student’s KSA.

Page 12: Calculators Not! Why Not?

CONSTRUCTED RESPONSE ITEMS

• From the General Guidelines for Developing CR and ER Items/Tasks

• Items/tasks should be appropriate for students in terms of grade-level difficulty, cognitive complexity, and reading level.

• Items/tasks are expected to include mathematical concepts detailed in the CCSS of lower grades.

• At grades 3–5, all items should be written so they can be answered without using a calculator.

• Items/tasks should provide clear and complete instructions to students.

Page 13: Calculators Not! Why Not?

Computational Complexity of Mathematics Items and Tasks

• In general, items/tasks developed to assess student understanding of core concepts and procedures in mathematics will draw upon grade-level standards to ensure student mastery of this content.

• Grade-level standards are implicitly included in the assessment targets of Claim 1 for grades 3–5. The assessment targets for Claim 1 correspond directly to the cluster headings contained in the CCSSM, and the technical demand of these Claim 1 items can be consistent with the grade level being assessed. However, when writing more complex tasks (such as those associated with Claims 3 and 4), the computational demand should be lowered and should typically be met by content that was first taught in earlier grades.

Page 14: Calculators Not! Why Not?

Questions?