calatea isaac asimov's "three laws of robotics" a robot may not injure a human being...

14

Upload: dwight-lester

Post on 05-Jan-2016

212 views

Category:

Documents


0 download

TRANSCRIPT

Page 1: Calatea Isaac Asimov's "Three Laws of Robotics"  A robot may not injure a human being or, through inaction, allow a human being
Page 2: Calatea Isaac Asimov's "Three Laws of Robotics"  A robot may not injure a human being or, through inaction, allow a human being
Page 3: Calatea Isaac Asimov's "Three Laws of Robotics"  A robot may not injure a human being or, through inaction, allow a human being
Page 4: Calatea Isaac Asimov's "Three Laws of Robotics"  A robot may not injure a human being or, through inaction, allow a human being
Page 5: Calatea Isaac Asimov's "Three Laws of Robotics"  A robot may not injure a human being or, through inaction, allow a human being
Page 6: Calatea Isaac Asimov's "Three Laws of Robotics"  A robot may not injure a human being or, through inaction, allow a human being
Page 7: Calatea Isaac Asimov's "Three Laws of Robotics"  A robot may not injure a human being or, through inaction, allow a human being
Page 8: Calatea Isaac Asimov's "Three Laws of Robotics"  A robot may not injure a human being or, through inaction, allow a human being
Page 9: Calatea Isaac Asimov's "Three Laws of Robotics"  A robot may not injure a human being or, through inaction, allow a human being
Page 10: Calatea Isaac Asimov's "Three Laws of Robotics"  A robot may not injure a human being or, through inaction, allow a human being
Page 11: Calatea Isaac Asimov's "Three Laws of Robotics"  A robot may not injure a human being or, through inaction, allow a human being

Calatea

Page 12: Calatea Isaac Asimov's "Three Laws of Robotics"  A robot may not injure a human being or, through inaction, allow a human being
Page 13: Calatea Isaac Asimov's "Three Laws of Robotics"  A robot may not injure a human being or, through inaction, allow a human being

Isaac Asimov's Isaac Asimov's "Three Laws of Robotics" "Three Laws of Robotics"

A robot may not injure a human being oA robot may not injure a human being or, through inaction, allow a human beinr, through inaction, allow a human being to come to harm. g to come to harm.

A robot must obey orders given it by huA robot must obey orders given it by human beings except where such orders man beings except where such orders would conflict with the First Law. would conflict with the First Law.

A robot must protect its own existence A robot must protect its own existence as long as such protection does not coas long as such protection does not conflict with the First or Second Law. nflict with the First or Second Law.

Page 14: Calatea Isaac Asimov's "Three Laws of Robotics"  A robot may not injure a human being or, through inaction, allow a human being

1.1. Do you think Andrew Martin should be defined a Do you think Andrew Martin should be defined as a human being? Why and why not? If you were ths a human being? Why and why not? If you were the judge, would you validate Martin and Portia’s mae judge, would you validate Martin and Portia’s marriage? rriage?

2.2. In the movie, what makes human beings the sam In the movie, what makes human beings the same with robots, when human being have to rely on ae with robots, when human being have to rely on artificial organs, and robots on human organs?rtificial organs, and robots on human organs?

3.3. Why do human beings want to keep forever you Why do human beings want to keep forever young or immortal—to live on machines or NDR pills, ng or immortal—to live on machines or NDR pills, but are afraid of immortal robots?but are afraid of immortal robots?

4.4. Do you think human being eventually surpass G Do you think human being eventually surpass God in the creation, maintenance, and closure of life?od in the creation, maintenance, and closure of life? Do you think the ending moralist or/and religious? Do you think the ending moralist or/and religious? Like it?Like it?

5.5. Do you think Andrew Martin is still a duplicate of Do you think Andrew Martin is still a duplicate of human beings by all means, and controlled by thehuman beings by all means, and controlled by them mentally and physically from the beginning? Dom mentally and physically from the beginning? Does he has an authentic individuality?es he has an authentic individuality?