cairo-globalization and gender eng

Upload: discovery

Post on 04-Jun-2018

217 views

Category:

Documents


0 download

TRANSCRIPT

  • 8/13/2019 Cairo-Globalization and Gender ENG

    1/18

    Globalization and

    Gender:Employment Effects

    Lourdes Benera

    Women and the Economy WorkshopCairo, Egypt

    4-5 December 2005

  • 8/13/2019 Cairo-Globalization and Gender ENG

    2/18

  • 8/13/2019 Cairo-Globalization and Gender ENG

    3/18

    First, a word on the notion of gender

    A concept introduced in the 1980s to emphasize:

    The social construction of differences between men andwomen: what is considered male and female changes across

    countries and regions, and it is influenced by cultural, social

    and other factors (and it can change through time).

    The relational aspects of power relations and gender

    differences: the concept automatically implies something

    about both men and women, i.e., gender is not about womenonly.

    Joan Scott: gender is everywhere --or the centrality ofgender to understand the economy and development.

  • 8/13/2019 Cairo-Globalization and Gender ENG

    4/18

    I. The 1970s

    ---The new internationalization of production: multinational

    investment and the transfer of production from high income to

    low wage countries affected labor intensive industries in areassuch as South East Asia and in countries such as Ireland and

    Mexico (maquiladora industries)

    ---> first generation countries

    ---The search for low cost, globally competitive production

    resulted in a very significant increase in the employment of

    women who became the preferred workers:

    ---> contrast with Boserups notion of

    marginalization of women during the 1950s

    and 1960s (ISI period).---Beginning the shift to X-promotion models of development.

  • 8/13/2019 Cairo-Globalization and Gender ENG

    5/18

    1970s (ction.)

    ---The initial literature focusing on womens employment in

    multinational firms followed a women as victims approach,

    emphasizing its negative aspects: low wages, short term

    contracts, precarious working conditions, authoritarian andpatriarchal forms of dealing with women workers, etc.

    ---EPZs spread across countries as a form of attracting multi-national investment, reinforcing the notion that women

    were exploited under unregulated labor market conditions.

    The share of women in EPZ employment was very high

    circa 1980:

    75% (Malaysia)

    74% (Philippines)

    77% (Rep. of Korea)88% (Sri Lanka)

  • 8/13/2019 Cairo-Globalization and Gender ENG

    6/18

    II. The 1980s: the process of accelerated globalization

    ---The growth of global markets was accompanied by the

    adoption of structural adjustment policies in the global

    South including:

    Financial deregulation & the new opening to foreigninvestment.

    Trade liberalization through global and regional trade

    liberalization schemes. The shift to export-led development models in all regions.

    The deepening and growth of domestic markets through

    deregulation, privatization and deep restructuring.

    Labor market informalization and the maquilaization

    of production:

    --->the shift of investment to second-tier countries

    (Central America, Indonesia, North Africa,Turkey, later in India and China, etc.)

  • 8/13/2019 Cairo-Globalization and Gender ENG

    7/18

    Womens employment in the informal economy: fluidity

    and job overlaps (El Alto).

    The global office and the transfers of clerical work to low

    wage countries (Barbados).

    The complexity of employment effects on women

    New studies illustrated that the initial analysis of womensemployment in production for global markets was simplistic:

    Linda Lims argument (1982): X-oriented employment

    raised wages for women workers, with higher rates than

    in the case of local capital.

    The varieties of female employment: the service sector

    The effects of technological change and the processes ofde-feminization of the labor force.

  • 8/13/2019 Cairo-Globalization and Gender ENG

    8/18

    Money exchange foto

  • 8/13/2019 Cairo-Globalization and Gender ENG

    9/18

  • 8/13/2019 Cairo-Globalization and Gender ENG

    10/18

    a) In EPZs:

    EPZs employment, selected countries (2000-03)

    Country No. EPZs Total % Women

    Kenya 6 27,148 60

    Mauritius whole 83,609 56

    islandKorea, Rep. 2 39,000 70 (77% in 1980)

    Sri Lanka 16* 111,033 72.72 (88% in 1980)

    Malaysia 14+ 200,000 54 (75% in 1980)

    Philipinnes 34 821,000 74 (same %)

    Guatemala 20 69,200 70

    Nicaragua 1 40,000 90

    ____*includes ind. parks Source: ILO

  • 8/13/2019 Cairo-Globalization and Gender ENG

    11/18

    b) In maquiladora industries:

    --Mexico: 65-69% women (1970s); just over 50% (1990s)

    --Honduras: 76% (1993); 58.3% (2003)

    Reasons behind defeminization processes:

    The new technologies tend to employ men

    Women are less able to upgrade their skills due to theirdomestic responsibilities

    Unconventional work schedules tend to be less acceptable

    for women The availability of male labor ready to work for womens

    wages

    Policies and private industry efforts to hire men Investment in K intensive industries

  • 8/13/2019 Cairo-Globalization and Gender ENG

    12/18

    To sum up: Can we generalize about the effects of

    globalization on women?

    --Generalizations must be approached with great caution since

    studies illustrate different outcomes. Examples:

    a. The S.E. Asian experience: high levels of female

    employment resulted in higher wages for women, even

    though lower than mens. Seguinos findings: the Asianeconomies that grew most rapidly had the widest wage

    gaps. Hence, there are gains for women but with

    significant wage gender gaps.

    b. The US-Mexico border experience: maquiladora wages

    have not improved overtime as employment expanded

    (Fussell 2000). Differences with the S.E. Asian case:unlimited labor supply and high levels of unemployt.

  • 8/13/2019 Cairo-Globalization and Gender ENG

    13/18

    Beriks study (2000) of the effects if X-let growth on gender

    wage inequality in Taiwan provides another exampleof limited gains for women: economic restructuring and

    technological change since the 1980s shifted employment

    from wage to salaried workers, with loss of jobs for women,higher wages for men and lower for women.

    c. The experience of X-led industrialization in Turkey: a case

    of mixed results. Ozlers study (2001), based on a large

    plant-level data set on manufacuring, shows that trade

    liberalization led to the feminization of the labor force:

    Jobs created significantly higher for women than for men

    But the volatility of womens jobs also significantly

    higher.

  • 8/13/2019 Cairo-Globalization and Gender ENG

    14/18

    d. The experience of Bangladesh: could international labor

    standards be beneficial for workers? Kabeer (3003) hasargued that they could drive investment away, particularly

    in the case of women workers.

    III. The 1990s (and 2000s)

    ---The new impact of India in China in global production

    ---From globalization of production to that of care work and

    the increasing feminization of international migration:women often find jobs more easily than men.

    ---Herrera and Parrenas studies (Ecuador and the Philippines):

    the multiple dimensions of women leaving their children

    and families behind.

  • 8/13/2019 Cairo-Globalization and Gender ENG

    15/18

    Reasons behind the feminization of migration:

    1. The care crisis in the North has generated demand for

    womens labor in the service sector (domestic work, care

    of children and the elderly)

    2. Womens increasing labor force participation in the South

    has generated an untapped labor supply unable to find

    jobs due to high levels of unemployment and under-employment.

    3. Changes in the social construction of gender roles,

    particularly in paid work, have increased womens

    autonomy and decision making power.

    4. Economic crisis, poverty and job scarcity facilitate thesocial acceptance of women as migrants.

  • 8/13/2019 Cairo-Globalization and Gender ENG

    16/18

    5. Remittances have become an important source of family

    survival and an incentive for those who stay behind to

    take up the work left behind by women.

    6. Women also migrate for more personal reasons such as

    the felt need to leave violent or oppressiverelationships.

    Concluding remarks

    1. Gender is a central category of analysis to understand the

    economy and to provide a basis for policy making.

    2. Is there really a gender paradox in MENA? The

    complexity of economic and cultural factors as a way of

    understanding womens economic participation andpolitical empowerment (MENA Development Report).

  • 8/13/2019 Cairo-Globalization and Gender ENG

    17/18

    Suggested readings

    --Benera, Lourdes, Gender, Development and Globalization;

    Economics as if All People Mattered, Routledge 2003.

    --Berik, Gunseli, Mature Export-Led Growth and Gender WageInequality,Feminist Economics 6(3) November 2000: 1-26.

    --Fussel, M.E., Making labor flexible: the recomposition of

    maquiladora female labor force, ibid: 59-80.--Kabeer, Naila, The Power to Chose: Bangladesh Women and

    Labor Market Decisions in London and Dhaka, Verso 2000.

    --Ozler, Sule, Export led industrialization and gender differences

    in job creation and destruction, Department of Economics,

    University of California, Los Angeles, 2001.

    --Seguino, Stephanie, Accounting for gender in Asian

    economic growth: adding gender to the equation,FeministEconomics, 6(3), November 2000: 27-58.

  • 8/13/2019 Cairo-Globalization and Gender ENG

    18/18

    THANK YOU!!