c/- catchment management solutions suite 4/85 gordon street mackay qld 4740 29 … n59... · 2016....
TRANSCRIPT
Our reference: SDA-0516-030273 10 June 2016 Ipswich City Council C/- Catchment Management Solutions Suite 4/85 Gordon Street MACKAY QLD 4740 [email protected] Attention: Matt Moore Dear Matt Notice of decision 29 Berry Street, Yamanto – Berry’s Weir (Given under section 285 of the Sustainable Planning Act 2009) The Department of Infrastructure, Local Government and Planning advises that the development application described below has been approved subject to conditions. Applicant details Applicant name: Ipswich City Council,
C/- Catchment Management Solutions Site details Lot on plan: Lot 224 on CC1946 Local government area: Ipswich City Council Application details Proposed development: Development Permit for Operational Work – Waterway
Barrier Works (Construction of fishway/scour protection within the stream channel of the Bremer River).
A decision notice for this application is attached. Copies of the following documents are also attached: • relevant appeal provisions in the Sustainable Planning Act 2009 • any plans and specifications approved in relation to the decision notice.
Page 1
SEQ West Region Level 4,117 Brisbane Street PO Box 129 IPSWICH QLD 4305
SDA-0516-030273
For further information, please contact Darrian Borick, Principal Planning Officer, SARA SEQ West Ipswich on 3432 2411, or email [email protected] who will be pleased to assist. Yours sincerely
Darren Cooper A/Manager – Planning enc: Decision notice
Attachment 1—Assessment manager conditions Attachment 2—SPA appeal provisions Attachment 3—Approved plans and specifications
Department of Infrastructure, Local Government and Planning
Page. 2
SDA-0516-030273
Decision notice (Given under section 334 of the Sustainable Planning Act 2009) Applicant details Applicant name: Ipswich City Council, C/- Catchment Management Solutions Applicant contact details: Suite 4/85 Gordon Street
MACKAY QLD 4740 [email protected]
Application details Level of assessment: Code assessment Properly made date: 12 May 2016 Site details Street address: 29 Berry Street, Yamanto Lot on plan: Lot 224 on CC1946 Name of owner: Ipswich City Council Decision Date of decision: 10 June 2016 Decision details: Approved subject to conditions Referral agencies There were no referral agencies for this application. Conditions This approval is subject to: • the assessment manager conditions in Attachment 1 • there are no concurrence agency conditions for this approval. The department has, for particular conditions of this approval, nominated an entity to be the assessing authority for that condition under section 255D(3) of the Sustainable Planning Act 2009. Aspects of development and development approval granted
Nature of Development
Approval Type
Brief Proposal of Description
Level of Assessment
Operational Work Development permit
Waterway Barrier Works – Construction of a partial width rock ramp fishway/scour protection within the stream channel of the Bremer River
Code Assessment
Department of Infrastructure, Local Government and Planning
Page. 3
SDA-0516-030273
Further development permits or compliance permits Please be advised that the following development permits or compliance permits are required to be obtained before the development can be carried out: 1. Not applicable Self-assessable codes Please be advised that the following codes may need to be complied with for self-assessable development related to the approved development: 1. Not applicable Compliance assessment Compliance assessment is required under chapter 6, part 10 of the Sustainable Planning Act 2009 for the following documents or works in relation to the development: 1. Not applicable Properly made submissions Not applicable—No part of the application required impact assessment. Rights of appeal The rights of applicants to appeal to the Planning and Environment Court against decisions about a development application are set out in chapter 7, part 1, division 8 of the Sustainable Planning Act 2009. For particular applications, there may also be a right to appeal to the Building and Development Dispute Resolution Committee (see chapter 7, part 2 of the Act). Copies of the relevant appeal provisions are attached. Relevant period for the approval This development approval will lapse if development is not started within the relevant periods stated in section 341 of the Act. Approved plans and specifications Copies of the following approved plans and specifications are attached: Drawing/Report Title Prepared by Date Reference
no. Version/Issue
Aspect of development: Operational Works Berry’s Weir Fishway Concept Design Location Plan, Notes, Schedule of Drawings
Catchment Solutions
12/03/2016 FAE-1001-S8 – Sheet 1 of 3
A
Berry’s Weir Fishway Concept Design Site Plan, Typical Sections and Notes
Catchment Solutions
13/03/2016 FAE-1001-S8 – Sheet 2 of 3
A
Berry’s Weir Fishway Concept Design Site Plan, Typical Sections and Material Specifications
Catchment Solutions
13/03/2016 FAE-1001-S8 – Sheet 2 of 3
A
Department of Infrastructure, Local Government and Planning
Page. 4
SDA-0516-030273
Our reference: SDA-0516-030273 Attachment 1—Assessment manager conditions No. Conditions of development approval Condition timing
Operational Works
Schedule 6, Table 3, Item 11—Pursuant to section 255D of the Sustainable Planning Act 2009, the chief executive administering the Act nominates the Director-General of Department of Fisheries to be the assessing authority for the development to which this development approval relates for the administration and enforcement of any matter relating to the following condition(s):
Constructing or raising waterway barrier works
1. The development must be carried out generally in accordance with the following plans: • Berry’s Weir Fishway Concept Design Location Plan, Notes,
Schedule of Drawings, prepared by Catchment Management Solutions, 12 March 2016, reference FAE-1001-S8 – Sheet 1 of 3, version A.
• Berry’s Weir Fishway Concept Design Site Plan, Typical Sections and Notes, prepared by Catchment Management Solutions, 13 March 2016, reference FAE-1001-S8 – Sheet 2 of 3, version A.
• Berry’s Weir Fishway Concept Design Site Plan, Typical Sections and Material Specifications, prepared by Catchment Management Solutions, 13 March 2016, reference FAE-1001-S8 – Sheet 2 of 3, version A.
For the duration of the works
2. Development authorised under this approval is limited as follows: the operational works to raise or construct a waterway barrier works that is a permanent rock ramp fishway within the Bremer River and shown in : • Berry’s Weir Fishway Concept Design Location Plan, Notes,
Schedule of Drawings, prepared by Catchment Management Solutions, 12 March 2016, reference FAE-1001-S8 – Sheet 1 of 3, version A.
• Berry’s Weir Fishway Concept Design Site Plan, Typical Sections and Notes, prepared by Catchment Management Solutions, 13 March 2016, reference FAE-1001-S8 – Sheet 2 of 3, version A.
• Berry’s Weir Fishway Concept Design Site Plan, Typical Sections and Material Specifications, prepared by Catchment Management Solutions, 13 March 2016, reference FAE-1001-S8 – Sheet 2 of 3, version A.
At all times
3. Provide written notice to [email protected], when the development authorised under this approval has started, and when it has been completed. These notices must state this permit number, the location and the condition number under which the notice is being given. The notice advising of the completion date must also include a report documenting the completed development works, including but not limited to: • photographs taken before, during and after the development
works at specific photo-monitoring sites.
At least five (5) business days but no greater than twenty (20) business days prior to the commencement of fisheries development works. And then, as to the notice advising of the
Department of Infrastructure, Local Government and Planning
Page. 5
SDA-0516-030273
No. Conditions of development approval Condition timing • an evaluation of the actual impacts of the development on
fish passage.
completion date, within 15 business days of the completion of the fisheries development works.
4. Spoil is not disposed of within waterways and is managed to prevent acid soil development.
At all times
5. Until the works have been completed, permit access to the place where the works are located by Department of Agriculture and Fisheries officers if requested.
For the duration of the works the subject of this approval.
6. Up and downstream fish passage must be provided across the waterway barrier.
At all times
7. The fish passage provided must cater for the whole fish community taking into account species, size classes, life stages and swimming abilities as well as the seasonal and flow related biomass of the fish community.
At all times
8. The waterway barrier and any associated infrastructure including, but not limited to intakes, walls, access structures, spillways and dissipation devices are to be designed, constructed and maintained to avoid fish injury, mortality and/or entrapment.
At all times
9. (a) A person or entity that is suitably qualified and experienced in fish passage biology and fish passage design and construction, must supervise the construction of the approved works.
(b) The person or entity who supervised the approved works must prepare and submit to [email protected], a report detailing how supervision was provided, and the extent to which the ‘as constructed’ fish way/s complies with the approved fish way/s design, and the level to which the ‘as constructed’ fish way/s is/are expected to provide the fish passage claimed in the development application.
The email attaching the report must state this permit number, the location and name of work and the condition number under which the report is being given.
(a) For the duration of the works the subject of this approval (b) Upon completion of the works the subject of this approval
10. (a) A monitoring program must be developed and implemented by a person or entity that is suitably qualified and experienced in fish passage biology, fish passage design and construction, to demonstrate the performance of the fish way/s.
(b) The monitoring program must: • involve the provision of monitoring reports to
[email protected] at intervals of every 6 months for a total 12 months from the completion of works;
• include an alert and action component, which will enable changes to be made to any deficiencies in the fish way/s promptly and no later than prior to the commencement of the following wet season.
The emails attaching the monitoring reports must state this permit
(a) Prior to the completion of the works (b) At all times
Department of Infrastructure, Local Government and Planning
Page. 6
SDA-0516-030273
No. Conditions of development approval Condition timing number, the location and name of work and the condition number under which the report is being given
11. The effective operation of the fish passage aspects of the structure must be maintained for the life of the barrier. This maintenance must include regular, documented inspections of the structures (fish way, baffles, roughening etc) especially after flood events, and prompt clearing of debris or rectifying any other failures, malfunctions, breakdowns or other impediments to fish movement.
At all times
12. In-stream works are to be completed as quickly as possible and are avoided during times of elevated flows and spawning/migration times of native fish species reasonably expected to require fish passage at the location of the development.
At all times
13. The construction, or raising, of the waterway barrier is to be performed in such a manner as to avoid or minimise direct or indirect disturbance to the bed and banks adjacent to the approved footprint of the works as shown on Berry’s Weir Fishway Concept Design Location Plans, Notes, Schedule of Drawings, prepared by Catchment Management Solutions, 12 March 2016, Reference FAE-1001-S8, Sheet 1 of 3, Revision A.
At all times
Department of Infrastructure, Local Government and Planning
Page. 7
SDA-0516-030273
Our reference: SDA-0516-030273 Attachment 2—SPA Appeal Provisions Sustainable Planning Act 2009—Representation and appeal provisions The following relevant appeal provisions are provided in accordance with s336(a) of the Sustainable Planning Act 2009. Chapter 6 Integrated development assessment system (IDAS) Part 8 Dealing with decision notices and approvals Division 1 Changing decision notices and approvals during applicant’s appeal period 360 Application of div 1
This division applies only during the applicant’s appeal period. 361 Applicant may make representations about decision
(1) The applicant may make written representations to the assessment manager about— (a) a matter stated in the decision notice, other than a refusal or a matter about which a
concurrence agency told the assessment manager under section 287(1) or (5); or (b) the standard conditions applying to a deemed approval.
(2) However, the applicant can not make representations under subsection (1)(a) about a condition attached to an approval under the direction of the Minister.
362 Assessment manager to consider representations
The assessment manager must consider any representations made to the assessment manager under section 361.
363 Decision about representations
(1) If the assessment manager agrees with any of the representations about a decision notice or a deemed approval, the assessment manager must give a new decision notice (the negotiated decision notice) to— (a) the applicant; and (b) each principal submitter; and (c) each referral agency; and (d) if the assessment manager is not the local government and the development is in a local
government area—the local government. (2) Before the assessment manager agrees to a change under this section, the assessment
manager must consider the matters the assessment manager was required to consider in assessing the application, to the extent the matters are relevant.
(3) Only 1 negotiated decision notice may be given. (4) The negotiated decision notice—
(a) must be given within 5 business days after the day the assessment manager agrees with the representations; and
(b) must comply with section 335; and (c) must state the nature of the changes; and (d) replaces—
(i) the decision notice previously given; or (ii) if a decision notice was not previously given and the negotiated decision notice
relates to a deemed approval—the standard conditions applying to the deemed approval.
Department of Infrastructure, Local Government and Planning
Page. 8
SDA-0516-030273
(5) If the assessment manager does not agree with any of the representations, the assessment manager must, within 5 business days after the day the assessment manager decides not to agree with any of the representations, give written notice to the applicant stating the decision about the representations.
364 Giving new notice about charges for infrastructure
(1) This section applies if the development approved by the negotiated decision notice is different from the development approved in the decision notice or deemed approval in a way that affects the amount of an infrastructure charge, regulated infrastructure charge or adopted infrastructure charge.
(2) The local government may give the applicant a new infrastructure charges notice under section 633, regulated infrastructure charges notice under section 643 or adopted infrastructure charges notice under section 648F to replace the original notice.
366 Applicant may suspend applicant’s appeal period
(1) If the applicant needs more time to make the representations, the applicant may, by written notice given to the assessment manager, suspend the applicant’s appeal period.
(2) The applicant may act under subsection (1) only once. (3) If the representations are not made within 20 business days after the day written notice was
given to the assessment manager, the balance of the applicant’s appeal period restarts. (4) If the representations are made within 20 business days after the day written notice was
given to the assessment manager— (a) if the applicant gives the assessment manager a notice withdrawing the notice under
subsection (1)—the balance of the applicant’s appeal period restarts the day after the assessment manager receives the notice of withdrawal; or
(b) if the assessment manager gives the applicant a notice under section 363(5)—the balance of the applicant’s appeal period restarts the day after the applicant receives the notice; or
(c) if the assessment manager gives the applicant a negotiated decision notice—the applicant’s appeal.
Chapter 7 Appeals, offences and enforcement Part 1 Planning and Environment Court Division 8 Appeals to court relating to development applications and approvals 461 Appeals by applicants
(1) An applicant for a development application may appeal to the court against any of the following— (a) the refusal, or the refusal in part, of the development application; (b) any condition of a development approval, another matter stated in a development
approval and the identification or inclusion of a code under section 242; (c) the decision to give a preliminary approval when a development permit was applied for; (d) the length of a period mentioned in section 341; (e) a deemed refusal of the development application.
(2) An appeal under subsection (1)(a), (b), (c) or (d) must be started within 20 business days (the applicant’s appeal period) after— (a) if a decision notice or negotiated decision notice is given—the day the decision notice or
negotiated decision notice is given to the applicant; or (b) otherwise—the day a decision notice was required to be given to the applicant.
(3) An appeal under subsection (1)(e) may be started at any time after the last day a decision on the matter should have been made.
462 Appeals by submitters—general
(1) A submitter for a development application may appeal to the court only against—
Department of Infrastructure, Local Government and Planning
Page. 9
SDA-0516-030273
(a) the part of the approval relating to the assessment manager’s decision about any part of the application requiring impact assessment under section 314; or
(b) the part of the approval relating to the assessment manager’s decision under section 327.
(2) To the extent an appeal may be made under subsection (1), the appeal may be against 1 or more of the following— (a) the giving of a development approval; (b) any provision of the approval including—
(i) a condition of, or lack of condition for, the approval; or (ii) the length of a period mentioned in section 341 for the approval.
(3) However, a submitter may not appeal if the submitter— (a) withdraws the submission before the application is decided; or (b) has given the assessment manager a notice under section 339(1)(b)(ii).
(4) The appeal must be started within 20 business days (the submitter’s appeal period) after the decision notice or negotiated decision notice is given to the submitter.
463 Additional and extended appeal rights for submitters for particular development applications
(1) This section applies to a development application to which chapter 9, part 7 applies. (2) A submitter of a properly made submission for the application may appeal to the court about
a referral agency’s response made by a concurrence agency for the application. (3) However, the submitter may only appeal against a referral agency’s response to the extent it
relates to— (a) development for an aquacultural ERA; or (b) development that is—
(i) a material change of use of premises for aquaculture; or (ii) operational work that is the removal, damage or destruction of a marine plant.
(4) Despite section 462(1), the submitter may appeal against the following matters for the application even if the matters relate to code assessment—
i. a decision about a matter mentioned in section 462(2) if it is a decision of the chief executive;
ii. a referral agency’s response mentioned in subsection (2). 464 Appeals by advice agency submitters
(1) Subsection (2) applies if an advice agency, in its response for an application, told the assessment manager to treat the response as a properly made submission.
(2) The advice agency may, within the limits of its jurisdiction, appeal to the court about— (a) any part of the approval relating to the assessment manager’s decision about any part of
the application requiring impact assessment under section 314; or (b) any part of the approval relating to the assessment manager’s decision under section
327. (3) The appeal must be started within 20 business days after the day the decision notice or
negotiated decision notice is given to the advice agency as a submitter. (4) However, if the advice agency has given the assessment manager a notice under section
339(1)(b)(ii), the advice agency may not appeal the decision. 465 Appeals about decisions relating to extensions for approvals
(1) For a development approval given for a development application, a person to whom a notice is given under section 389, other than a notice for a decision under section 386(2), may appeal to the court against the decision in the notice.
(2) The appeal must be started within 20 business days after the day the notice of the decision is given to the person.
(3) Also, a person who has made a request under section 383 may appeal to the court against a deemed refusal of the request.
(4) An appeal under subsection (3) may be started at any time after the last day the decision on the matter should have been made.
Department of Infrastructure, Local Government and Planning
Page. 10
SDA-0516-030273
466 Appeals about decisions relating to permissible changes (1) For a development approval given for a development application, the following persons may
appeal to the court against a decision on a request to make a permissible change to the approval— (a) if the responsible entity for making the change is the assessment manager for the
application— (i) the person who made the request; or (ii) an entity that gave a notice under section 373 or a pre-request response notice
about the request; (b) if the responsible entity for making the change is a concurrence agency for the
application—the person who made the request. (2) The appeal must be started within 20 business days after the day the person is given notice
of the decision on the request under section 376. (3) Also, a person who has made a request under section 369 may appeal to the court against a
deemed refusal of the request. (4) An appeal under subsection (3) may be started at any time after the last day the decision on
the matter should have been made. 467 Appeals about changing or cancelling conditions imposed by assessment manager or concurrence agency
(1) A person to whom a notice under section 378(9)(b) giving a decision to change or cancel a condition of a development approval has been given may appeal to the court against the decision in the notice.
(2) The appeal must be started within 20 business days after the day the notice of the decision is given to the person.
Division 11 Making and appeal to Court 481 How appeals to the court are started
(1) An appeal is started by lodging written notice of appeal with the registrar of the court. (2) The notice of appeal must state the grounds of the appeal. (3) The person starting the appeal must also comply with the rules of the court applying to the
appeal. (4) However, the court may hear and decide an appeal even if the person has not complied with
subsection (3). 482 Notice of appeal to other parties—development applications and approvals
(1) An appellant under division 8 must give written notice of the appeal to— (a) if the appellant is an applicant—
(i) the chief executive; and (ii) the assessment manager; and (iii) any concurrence agency; and (iv) any principal submitter whose submission has not been withdrawn; and (v) any advice agency treated as a submitter whose submission has not been
withdrawn; or (b) if the appellant is a submitter or an advice agency whose response to the development
application is treated as a submission for an appeal— (i) the chief executive; and (ii) the assessment manager; and (iii) any referral agency; and (iv) the applicant; or
(c) if the appellant is a person to whom a notice mentioned in section 465(1) has been given— (i) the chief executive; and (b) the assessment manager for the development application to which the notice relates;
and
Department of Infrastructure, Local Government and Planning
Page. 11
SDA-0516-030273
(c) any entity that was a concurrence agency for the development application to which the notice relates; and
(d) the person who made the request under section 383 to which the notice relates, if the person is not the appellant; or
(d) if the appellant is a person mentioned in section 466(1)— (i) the chief executive; and (ii) the responsible entity for making the change to which the appeal relates; and (iii) the person who made the request to which the appeal relates under section 369, if
the person is not the appellant; and (iv) if the responsible entity is the assessment manager—any entity that was a
concurrence agency for the development application to which the notice of the decision on the request relates; or
(e) if the appellant is a person to whom a notice mentioned in section 467 has been given—the entity that gave the notice.
(2) The notice must be given within— (a) if the appellant is a submitter or advice agency whose response to the development
application is treated as a submission for an appeal—2 business days after the appeal is started; or
(b) otherwise—10 business days after the appeal is started. (3) The notice must state—
(a) the grounds of the appeal; and (b) if the person given the notice is not the respondent or a co-respondent under section
485—that the person may, within 10 business days after the notice is given, elect to become a co-respondent to the appeal by filing in the court a notice of election in the approved form.
485 Respondent and co-respondents for appeals under div 8
(1) Subsections (2) to (8) apply for appeals under sections 461 to 464. (2) The assessment manager is the respondent for the appeal. (3) If the appeal is started by a submitter, the applicant is a co-respondent for the appeal. (4) Any submitter may elect to become a co-respondent for the appeal. (5) If the appeal is about a concurrence agency’s response, the concurrence agency is a co-
respondent for the appeal. (6) If the appeal is only about a concurrence agency’s response, the assessment manager may
apply to the court to withdraw from the appeal. (7) The respondent and any co-respondents for an appeal are entitled to be heard in the
appeal as a party to the appeal. (8) A person to whom a notice of appeal is required to be given under section 482 and who is
not the respondent or a co-respondent for the appeal may elect to be a co-respondent. (9) For an appeal under section 465—
i. the assessment manager is the respondent; and ii. if the appeal is started by a concurrence agency that gave the assessment manager a
notice under section 385—the person asking for the extension the subject of the appeal is a co-respondent; and
iii. any other person given notice of the appeal may elect to become a co-respondent. (10) For an appeal under section 466—
(a) the responsible entity for making the change to which the appeal relates is the respondent; and
(b) if the responsible entity is the assessment manager— (i) if the appeal is started by a person who gave a notice under section 373 or a pre-
request response notice—the person who made the request for the change is a co-respondent; and
(ii) any other person given notice of the appeal may elect to become a co-respondent. (11) For an appeal under section 467, the respondent is the entity given notice of the appeal.
Department of Infrastructure, Local Government and Planning
Page. 12
SDA-0516-030273
488 How an entity may elect to be a co-respondent An entity that is entitled to elect to be a co-respondent to an appeal may do so, within 10 business days after notice of the appeal is given to the entity, by following the rules of court for the election.
490 Lodging appeal stops particular actions
(1) If an appeal, other than an appeal under section 465, 466 or 467, is started under division 8, the development must not be started until the appeal is decided or withdrawn.
(2) If an appeal is about a condition imposed on a compliance permit, the development must not be started until the appeal is decided or withdrawn.
(3) Despite subsections (1) and (2), if the court is satisfied the outcome of the appeal would not be affected if the development or part of the development is started before the appeal is decided, the court may allow the development or part of the development to start before the appeal is decided.
Department of Infrastructure, Local Government and Planning
Page. 13
SDA-0516-030273
Our reference: SDA-0516-030273 Attachment 3—Approved Plans and Specifications
Department of Infrastructure, Local Government and Planning
Page. 14
0 100m50
A1 OF 3
07 4968 4200
07 4968 4228
Mackay QLD 4740
Suite 4, 85 Gordon Street
PO Box 815
ACN 158 982 186
ABN 89 158 982 186
TF
W
Catchment Solutions Pty. Ltd.
www.catchmentsolutions.com
NOTES:
1. SITE LOCATION: BREMER RIVER, YAMANTO.
2. SITE ACCESS VIA BERRY STREET, THROUGH LOT 224/CC1946.
3. ALL DESIGN OFFSETS AND CHAINAGES PROVIDED ARE IN METRES UNLESS
NOTED OTHERWISE.
4. ALL COORDINATES PROVIDED ARE IN METRES TO DATUM GDA 94 AND
PROJECTION SYSTEM MGA ZONE 56J.
5. ALL LEVELS PROVIDED ARE IN METRES TO AUSTRALIAN HEIGHT DATUM.
6. ALL WORKMANSHIP AND MATERIALS SHALL COMPLY WITH THESE DRAWINGS
AND RELEVANT AUSTRALIAN AND LOCAL GOVERNMENT STANDARDS.
7. THE CONTRACTOR SHALL VERIFY ALL DIMENSIONS ON SITE BEFORE
COMMENCING ANY WORKS.
8. IT IS THE CONTRACTOR'S RESPONSIBILITY TO CONFIRM THE LOCATION AND
DEPTH OF ALL OBSTRUCTIONS AND UNDERGROUND SERVICES IN THE VICINITY
OF THE PROPOSED WORKS PRIOR TO THE COMMENCEMENT OF ANY WORKS.
9. ALL STRUCTURES SHALL BE MAINTAINED IN A SAFE AND STABLE CONDITION
DURING CONSTRUCTION.
10. IT IS THE CONTRACTOR'S RESPONSIBILITY TO ENSURE NO PART OF ANY
STRUCTURE IS OVERSTRESSED DURING CONSTRUCTION PROCEDURE.
11. ALL REASONABLE EFFORTS SHALL BE MADE TO PRESERVE AND PROTECT
EXISTING NATIVE VEGETATION.
12. PUBLIC ACCESS THROUGH SITE NEEDS TO BE RESTRICTED OR CONTROLLED
FOR DURATION OF WORKS.
Survey Control
ID EASTING NORTHING RL DESCRIPTION
1001 474727.86 6942324.73 7.85
NAIL IN TOP WALL
2002 474722.38 6942333.30 10.15
NAIL IN PEG
IPSWICH CITY COUNCIL
BERRYS WEIR
FISHWAY CONCEPT DESIGN
FISHWAY LOCATION
LOCATION PLAN
PROJECT LOCATION
474727.92 E, 6942329.76 S
ROCK STOCKPILE
LOCATION
SITE ACCESS VIA
BERRY STREET
LOCALITY PLAN
224
CC1946
1002
1001
FAE-1001-S8 A
IPSWICH
FAE1001
TP
BG
MAJOR 1.0m, MINOR 0.25m
MGA Zone 56
AHD DERIVED
IPSWICH CITY COUNCIL
BERRYS WEIR FISHWAY CONCEPT DESIGN
IPSWICH CITY COUNCIL
LOCATION PLAN, NOTES, SCHEDULE OF DRAWINGS
VARIOUS (A3)
SCHEDULE OF DRAWINGS
REVISION DRAWING TITLE
A
A
A
FAE-1001-S8
LOCATION PLAN, NOTES AND SCHEDULE OF
DRAWINGS
DRAWING NUMBER
SITE PLAN, TYPICAL SECTIOINS AND NOTES
TYPICAL SECTIONS AND MATERIAL
SPECIFICATIONS
FAE-1001-S9
FAE-1001-S10
12/03/2016
TP
MM
BREMER RIVER
STANLEY
14/03/2016
06/03/2016
08/03/2016
12/03/2016
PM30887
PM30887RL: 18.632
CONCEPT DESIGN NOT FOR CONSTRUCTION
PLANS AND DOCUMENTS referred to in the DEVELOPMENT APPROVAL
Date: 10 June 2016.................
Approval no: SDA-0416-029340.................
0 5m1 2
A2 OF 3
07 4968 4200
07 4968 4228
Mackay QLD 4740
Suite 4, 85 Gordon Street
PO Box 815
ACN 158 982 186
ABN 89 158 982 186
TF
W
Catchment Solutions Pty. Ltd.
www.catchmentsolutions.com
IPSWICH CITY COUNCIL
BERRYS WEIR
FISHWAY CONCEPT DESIGN
FAE-1001-S8 A
IPSWICH
FAE1001
TP
BG
MAJOR 1.0m, MINOR 0.25m
MGA Zone 56
AHD DERIVED
IPSWICH CITY COUNCIL
BERRYS WEIR FISHWAY CONCEPT DESIGN
IPSWICH CITY COUNCIL
VARIOUS (A3)
TP
BREMER RIVER
STANLEY
PM30887
PM30887RL: 18.632
A
FAE-1001-S9
RIDGE
DETAIL
1:20 (A3)
NOTES:
EXCAVATIONS
1. EXCAVATIONS SHALL BE IN ACCORDANCE WITH IPSWICH CITY
COUNCIL GUIDELINES.
2. EXCAVATIONS SHALL BE SURVEY CONTROLLED TO MAINTAIN
SPECIFIED SLOPES.
3. EXCAVATIONS SHALL BE UNDERTAKEN IN A MANNER THAT MINIMISES
DISTURBANCE TO MATERIAL OUTSIDE THE LIMITS OF WORKS.
4. EXCAVATED MATERIAL SHALL BE USED OR DISPOSED OF IN A MANNER
APPROVED BY SUPERINTENDENT.
5. EXCAVATED SURFACES SHALL BE CLEARED OF MATERIAL AND
INSPECTED BY SUPERINTENDENT PRIOR TO PLACEMENT OF ROCK.
ROCK MATERIAL
1. ALL ROCK USED SHALL BE HARD IGNEOUS TYPE, ANGULAR IN SHAPE
AND FREE OF POLLUTANTS AND ORGANIC MATTER TO A STANDARD
SUITABLE FOR THE CONSTRUCTION OF ROCK CHUTES.
1.1. EQUIVALENT SPHERICAL DIAMETER.
1.1.1. TOE/WALL ROCK 1500 - 1800 mm
1.1.2. RIDGE ROCK 1000 - 1200 mm
1.1.3. ARMOUR ROCK GRADED MIX REFER TO
SPECIFICATION TABLE - SHEET 3
1.1.4. FILL ROCK 100 - 500 mm
2. IMPORTED ROCK TO BE STOCKPILED IN DESIGNATED AREA UNTIL
READY FOR USE, SEE SHEET 1 FOR STOCKPILE LOCATION.
3. RIDGE AND WALL ROCK TO BE PLACED WITH A ROCK GRAB
ATTACHMENT AND SURVEY CONTROLLED TO MAINTAIN SPECIFIED
SLOPE AND RIDGE SLOT SPACING.
4. WALL SLOPE SET AT 1V:27H, SLIGHT ADJUSTMENT MAY BE REQUIRED
DUE TO VARIATION IN WALL ROCK SIZE, ALL ADJUSTMENTS MUST BE
APPROVED BY SUPERINTENDENT.
5. TYPICAL RIDGE SPACING AT 2000 mm CENTRES.
6. TYPICAL WALL SPACING AT 2300 mm CENTRES.
7. ADJUSTMENT TO RIDGE AND WALL SPACING SHALL BE APPROVED BY
SUPERINTENDENT PRIOR TO PLACEMENT.
8. MAXIMUM HEIGHT OF RIDGE AND WALL ROCK PROTRUDING ABOVE
WEIR CREST SHALL BE 250 mm.
9. RIDGE ROCK TO BE PLACED IN POSITION THAT MAINTAINS A SLOT
WIDTH OF 100 mm, MEASURED AT CONTROL HEIGHT OF RIDGE.
10. RIDGE AND WALL ROCK TO BE EMBEDDED INTO EXISTING BED OR FILL
ROCK MINIMUM OF 500 mm OR 50% OF VERTICAL AXIS.
11. TOE ROCK SHALL BE EMBEDDED INTO EXISTING BED OR FILL ROCK
MINIMUM OF 1000 mm OR 80% OF VERTICAL AXIS.
12. ARMOUR/FILL ROCK SHALL BE CAREFULLY PLACED WITH A BUCKET
FROM A HEIGHT NO GREATER THAN 1000 mm ABOVE THE MATERIAL
ONTO WHICH IT IS TO BE PLACED.
13. ARMOUR/FILL ROCK SHALL BE COMPACTED BY TRACK ROLLING OR
BUCKET TAMPING ONLY AND LEFT WITH A ROUGHENED SURFACE.
14. PLACEMENT OF ROCK SHALL PRODUCE A BLANKET OF INTERLOCKING
ROCK THAT HAS NO SIGNIFICANT VOIDS AND DOES NOT MOVE UNDER
FOOT.
CONCRETE MATERIAL
15. CONCRETE USED SHALL FIBRE REINFORCED, 10 mm AGGREGATE SIZE,
HIGH SLUMP.
16. RIDGE AND WALL ROCK TO BE SECURED USING PUMPED CONCRETE
THAT ENCASES ROCKS, INTENSE VIBRATION REQUIRED TO DRIVE
CONCRETE INTO ROCK CREVASSES. PUMPED CONCRETE SHALL
MAINTAIN A MINIMUM COVERAGE OF 100 mm.
17. POOLS SHALL BE SEALED USING SHOTECRETE AND LEFT ROUGHENED
BELOW POOL CONTROL LEVEL. SHOTCRETE SHALL MAINTAIN A
MINIMUM COVERAGE OF 50 mm.
18. REINFORCING STEEL SHALL BE DEFORM AND TO THE FOLLOWING
SPECIFICATIONS:
18.1. NIB WALL STARTER BAR 150 mm (N12) @ 400 mm CENTRES
18.2. NIB WALL STRAIGHT BAR (N12), MINIMUM OVERLAP 400 mm @
JOINS
19. ALL REINFORCING SHALL HAVE MINIMUM COVERAGE OF 50 mm TO
EDGE OF CONCRETE.
MAJOR CONTOUR
MINOR CONTOUR
TOP BANK
LOW BANK
FLOW PATH
LEGEND
POOL ELEVATION
DOWNSTREAM CONTROL
TOE ROCK
WALL ROCK
RIDGE ROCK
FILL ROCK
0.075
VARIES REFERTO NOTES
SLOPE 1V:27H
WHERE REQUIRED TO EXCAVATE INTO EXISTING
BED USE EXCAVATED MATERIAL WHERE FILL IS REQUIRED
A
FAE-1001-S9
NIB WALL DIVERTS LOW
FLOW INTO FISHWAY
EXISTING BED
B
FAE-1001-S10
B
FAE-1001-S10
C
FAE-1001-S10
C
FAE-1001-S10
SITE PLAN
1:100 (A3)
A:A FLOW PATH
1:150 (A3)
WEIR CREST
NIB WALL DIVERTS LOW
FLOW INTO FISHWAY
STN 1001
STN 1002
18.350
16.300
OLD
FISHWAY
0.300
MIN 0.050MIN 0.100
SHOTCRETE
PUMPED
CONCRETE
RL 7.240
RL 7.090
RL 6.940
RL 6.790
RL 6.640
RL 6.490
RL 6.340
RL 6.190
RL 6.040
RL 5.890
RL 5.740
RL 5.590
RL 5.440
RL 5.290
RL 5.140
RL 4.990
RL 4.840
DS CONTROL 4.870
EXISTING BED2.000ARMOUR ROCK
ARMOUR ROCK
ARMOUR ROCK
WALL ROCK
SITE PLAN, TYPICAL SECTIONS AND NOTESCONCEPT DESIGN NOT FOR CONSTRUCTION
13/03/2016
MM
14/03/2016
06/03/2016
08/03/2016
13/03/2016
POOL CONTROL
LEVEL
VARIES0.2 - 0.3
WALL ROCK
RIDGE ROCK
PLANS AND DOCUMENTS referred to in the DEVELOPMENT APPROVAL
Date: 10 June 2016.................
Approval no: SDA-0416-029340.................
A2 OF 3
07 4968 4200
07 4968 4228
Mackay QLD 4740
Suite 4, 85 Gordon Street
PO Box 815
ACN 158 982 186
ABN 89 158 982 186
TF
W
Catchment Solutions Pty. Ltd.
www.catchmentsolutions.com
FAE-1001-S8 A
IPSWICH
FAE1001
TP
BG
MAJOR 1.0m, MINOR 0.25m
MGA Zone 56
AHD DERIVED
IPSWICH CITY COUNCIL
BERRYS WEIR FISHWAY CONCEPT DESIGN
IPSWICH CITY COUNCIL
VARIOUS (A3)
TP
BREMER RIVER
STANLEY
14/03/2016 PM30887
PM30887RL: 18.632
LEGEND
POOL ELEVATION
DOWNSTREAM CONTROL
EXISTING BED
IPSWICH CITY COUNCIL
BERRYS WEIR
FISHWAY CONCEPT DESIGN
EXCAVATION AND ROCK QUANTITY
TABLE
UNITS QUANTITY
TOTAL LENGTH OF WORKS m 18
TOTAL AREA OF WORKS m
2
250
ESTIMATED MATERIAL CUT (gross)
m
3
/ ton 100 / 180
ESTIMATED MATERIAL FILL (gross)
m
3
/ ton 32 / 58
TOE/WALL ROCK ton 120
RIDGE ROCK ton 90
FILL ROCK ton 50
ARMOUR ROCK ton 90
ARMOUR ROCK SPECIFICATION TABLE
EQUIVALENT SPHERICAL
DIAMETER
PERCENT BY WEIGHT
400 - 600 mm (1.3 - 2.0 D50)
30%
300 mm (D50)
50%
100 -250 mm (0.3 - 0.8 D50)
20%
MIN 0.500
FISHWAY MATERIAL SPECIFICATION
TABLES
B:B TYPICAL RIDGES 1:100 (A3)
B:B TYPICAL POOLS 1:100 (A3)
NIB WALL DETAIL 1:20 (A3)
N12 BAR - 50 mm MIN
COVERAGE
N12 BAR CHEMSET
INTO CONCRETE
WEIR
0.150
0.100
0.100
RL 7.015
RL 6.640
RL 6.150
RL 5.740
RL 5.365
RL 5.140
2.130 2.300 2.300 2.300 2.300 2.300
2.130 2.300 2.300 2.300 4.600
RL 5.215
RL 5.815
RL 5.965
RL 6.715
RL 6.865
ARMOUR ROCK TO
BE USED OUTSIDE
FISHWAY WALLS
ARMOUR ROCK TO
BE USED OUTSIDE
FISHWAY WALLS
SEE NIB WALL DETAIL
MIN 0.500
0.100
0.300
MIN 0.150WALL ROCKS KEYED WELL
INTO EXISTING BED OR FILL
ROCK
16.700
16.700
RIDGE ROCKS KEYED WELL
INTO EXISTING BED OR FILL
ROCK
TYPICAL SECTIONS AND MATERIAL SPECIFICATIONSCONCEPT DESIGN NOT FOR CONSTRUCTION
13/03/2016
MM
14/03/2016
06/03/2016
08/03/2016
13/03/2016
CONCRETE MATERIAL QUANTITIES
MATERIAL UNIT QUANTITIY
STARTER BAR bar 40
STRAIGHT BAR
length
3
CONCRETE m
3
37.5
MAX 0.30RL 7.240
MATERIAL SPECIFICATIONS SUBJECT TO CHANGE
PLANS AND DOCUMENTS referred to in the DEVELOPMENT APPROVAL
Date: 10 June 2016.................
Approval no: SDA-0416-029340.................