OCCURRENCE OF URANIUM IN GROUND WATER IN THE

VICINITY OF THE U.S. DEPARTMENT OF ENERGY

FEED MATERIALS PRODUCTION CENTER, FERNALD, OHIO

By Alan C. Sedam

U.S. GEOLOGICAL SURVEY

Open-File Report 85-099

Prepared in cooperation with the

U.S. DEPARTMENT OF ENERGY

Columbus , Ohio

1984

UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR

WILLIAM P. CLARK, Secretary

GEOLOGICAL SURVEY

Dallas L. Peck, Director

For additional information write to:

District Chief Water Resources Division U.S. Geological Survey 975 W. Third Avenue Columbus, Ohio 43212

Copies of this report can be purchased from:

Open-File Services Section Western Distribution Branch U.S. Geological Survey Box 25425, Federal Center Denver, Colorado 80225 (Telephone: (303) 234-5888)

CONTENTS

Abstract ...........................................Introduction .......................................

Well-sampling program and water-quality analyses Hydrogeologic setting of the Feed Materials

Production Center (FMPC)-Fernald study area ......Uranium concentrations in ground water and their

significance .....................................Conclusions ........................................References .........................................

Page

115

8

111314

ILLUSTRATIONS

Figure 1. Map showing Feed Materials Production Center (FMPC)-Fernald study area, Hamilton and Butler Counties, Ohio ........................ 2

2. Map showing location of FMPC offsite wellssampled by NLO, Inc., and dissolved uranium concentrations, December 1981 ................ 3

3. Map showing location of water-level observa­ tion and water-quality sample wells used in U.S. Geological Survey study, August 1982 .... 4

4. Map showing potentiometric surface atFMPC-Fernald area, August 1982 ............... 6

5. Map showing uranium concentrations in ground water collected in the FMPC-Fernald area, August 1982, and area where additional studies are needed ........................... 12

TABLES

Table 1. Inventory of water wells in the Fernald-FMPCarea, Hamilton and Butler Counties, Ohio ...... 16

2. Key to constituents determined in watersamples from wells shown on figure 3 .......... 7

3. Uranium concentrations in water from wells sampled by NLO, Inc. (December 1981) , and by the U.S. Geological Survey (August 1982) ... 9

4. Chemical quality of water from selectedwells ......................................... 22

in

CONVERSION FACTORS

For the convenience of readers who prefer to use metric (International System) units , conversion factors for terms used in this report are listed below:

Multiply inch- pound unit

foot (ft)mile (mi)acre (acre)

By

0.30481.6090.4047

To obtain metric unit

meter (m)kilometer (km)square hectometer (hm2 )

IV

OCCURRENCE OF URANIUM IN GROUND WATER IN THE VICINITY OF THE

U.S. DEPARTMENT OF ENERGY FEED MATERIALS PRODUCTION CENTER,

FERNALD, OHIO

By Alan C. Sedam

ABSTRACT

Process wastes are stored on site in rubber- and clay-lined pits and in large tanks at the U.S. Department of Energy Feed Materials Production Center (FMPC), where purified uranium and uranium compounds are produced. Water samples collected from off- site domestic and commercial wells in December 1981 by NLO, Inc., and in August 1982 by the U.S. Geological Survey contained con­ centrations of dissolved uranium that ranged from <0.4 to 430 micrograms per liter. The wells whose samples contained unusual concentrations of uranium (greater than 10 micrograms per liter) lie roughly along a line extending about 2000 feet south from the southern boundary of FMPC. The offsite area affected by these concentrations is probably less than 100 acres.

It is not possible to determine the exact point of origina­ tion of contaminants in the ground water on the basis of data presently available.

INTRODUCTION

The Feed Materials Production Center (FMPC), operated by NLO, Inc., for the U.S. Department of Energy, covers about 1.6 square miles of flat to gently rolling terrain in Hamilton and Butler Counties, Ohio. The southern edge of the tract is about 0.7 mile north of Fernald (fig. 1). The rubber- and clay- lined pits and concrete-encased storage tanks that comprise the process-wastes storage area are located about 0.3 mile west of the production area at FMPC (fig. 2) and are about 1.5 miles north of Fernald. As part of its monitoring program, NLO, Inc., the operator of FMPC, sampled a number of offsite wells in December 1981 (fig. 2). These and other wells also were sampled by the U.S. Geological Survey in August 1982 for uranium and other con­ stituents; the wells were assigned local numbers H-101 through H-134 (fig. 3). The dissolved uranium concentrations obtained by NLO, Inc., shown in figure 2, were converted from milligrams per liter (mg/L) to micrograms per liter (>ig/L) for consistency.

42V

S RESERVATK*) TMENT OF ES» BGV?

Base from U.S. Geological Survey Shandon. 1:24,000,1965

39*16'

1 KILOMETER

Figure 1. Feed Materials Production Center (FMPC)-Fernald study area, Hamilton and Butler Counties, Ohio.

ABEA

couaiKEiTjCFFIUEKT LtNC

Waajtaatoragaaraa

EXPLANATION

Wall location

Ownar K> uaad by NLO

Dlaaolvad uranium, In ug/L

Location wall numbar uaad by USGS Base front NLO, Inc.

Figure 2. Location of FMPC offsite wells sampled by NLO f Inc., and dissolved uranium concentrations, December 1981.

KTER co. r^ ;&/ It_|^ --X^Rryl

? ^ r >v^5$f ^11t^Tchilj ^^: VI^MfcflZl^^.,

B«M from U.S. Geological Surv»y Shandon. 1:24.000.1865

EXPLANATION 1 KILOMETER

FMPC-Fernald area

H 101 Well number (See table 1)

» Water level measured in this investigation

X Water level data site

Q Site sampled for water quality August 1982

D Code letter referring to constituents determined (See table 2)

Figure 3. Location of water-level observation and water-quality sample wells used in U.S. Geological Survey study, August, 1982,

Of particular concern are the concentrations of dissolved uranium at wells H-121, H-lll, and H-108, which are at least several times greater than background levels. As stated by Hem (1970, p. 212), "Uranium is present in amounts between 0.1 and 10 jig/L in most natural water. Amounts greater than this are unusual."

Drinking-water standards for uranium have not yet been established, but according to Lappenbusch (1980), an interim guideline of 10 pCiU/L (picoCuries of uranium per liter) has been suggested. A conversion factor of 1 jag/L = 0.68 pCi/L can be used when all three uranium isotopes are considered. (If only the radioactivity of uranium-238 is considered, the factor is 1 )ig/L = 0.33 pCi/L (Thatcher and others, 1977, p. 88).)

The elevated level of uranium appears to be confined to an area of about 100 acres that includes wells H-108, H-lll, and H-121. If this represents a plume of excessive uranium concentra­ tion in the ground water, its position is inconsistent with the ground-water flow patterns that may be inferred from the potentio- metric map (fig. 4). Water-quality problems at the community of Fernald (farther south) do not yet appear to be related to uranium contamination.

This study was undertaken at the request of the U.S. Department of Energy to determine the source of elevated con­ centrations of uranium in water from offsite wells near the FMPC property. The study is based on data from existing wells and is concerned with water-level conditions and the quality of the ground water at FMPC as well as in adjacent offsite areas extend­ ing southward to include the community of Fernald.

Well Sampling Program and Water Quality Analyses

Table 1 (at back of report) is an inventory of wells in the FMPC-Fernald area. Water samples were collected from selected wells between August 24 and August 31, 1982 by the U.S. Geological Survey. Choice of sampling sites was based on several considera­ tions. Wells selected included (1) the offsite wells sampled by NLO, Inc. (fig. 2); (2) wells along Paddys Run that could be affected by infiltration of contaminants from surface runoff;(3) wells at FMPC that are located near waste storage facilities;(4) wells at Fernald, an area where the ground water is allegedly of poor quality; and (5) wells near the east and west boundaries of FMPC that could be used to identify ground-water flow in any other direction.

Table 2 is a listing of four analytical schedules used in the sampling study. The letter codes (A, B, C, D) used in the table are also shown on figure 3 for the sites sampled in August 1982.

39° 18'

Base from U.S.Geological Survey Shandon, 1:24,000,1965

EXPLANATION

525- Water-level contour showing altitude of potentiometric surface, in feet, National Geodetic Vertical Datum of 1929. Dashed where inferred.

Water-level measurement site.

Area where bedrock is at or near the surface.

Contour encloses loweraltitude of potentiometric surface.

Figure 4. Potentiometric surface at FMPC-Fernald area,August 1 982 .

Table 2. Key to constituents determined in water samplesfrom wells shown on figure 3

Constituent

Symbol on figure 3

B

x xX X X X X X X

X X X

X X X

Radiochemical:Uranium, dissolved x xGamma scan x xGross alpha (dissolved, U-nat) x xGross beta (dissolved, Sr-90) x xGross beta (dissolved, Cs-137) x x

Common inorganic:Calcium, dissolved x xMagnesium, dissolved x xPotassium, dissolved x xSodium, dissolved x xSilica, dissolved x xChloride, dissolved x xFluoride, dissolved x xSulfate, dissolved x xNitrate, dissolved x xIron, dissolved x xManganese, dissolved x xBicarbonate, as HCC>3 x xHardness, as CaCC^ - x xNoncarbonate hardness x xSolids, dissolved x x

Metals:Barium, dissolved xBeryllium, dissolved xCadmium, dissolved x xCobalt, dissolved x xCopper, dissolved xChromium, dissolved xLead, dissolved x xLithium, dissolved xMolybdenum, dissolved xStrontium, dissolved x xVanadium, dissolved xZinc, dissolved x xArsenic, dissolved xMercury, dissolved xCyanide, total, as CN x

Organic;Nitrogen, organic, as N xNitrogen, ammonia, total, as N xNitrogen, ammonia + organic, total, as N xNitrogen, NC>2 + NC>3, total, as N xPhosphorus, total, as P xCarbon, total, organic x

At each well, untreated water was collected as close as possible to the wellhead. The well was pumped for several minutes to obtain water that was representative of aquifer conditions. Field determinations were made of water temperature, specific conductance, pH, and alkalinity. The hydrogen-sulfide content was determined by U.S. Geological Survey personnel in Columbus, Ohio. Radiometric analyses and dissolved uranium concentrations were determined in the U.S. Geological Survey regional laboratory at Denver, Colo. Other constituents (table 2) were analyzed at the Survey's regional laboratory at Doraville, Ga. Analytical results of dissolved-uranium concentrations determined by NLO, Inc., in December 1981 are presented in table 3. Analytical data from all of the samples collected in August 1982 are included in table 4 (at back of report).

HYDROGEOLOGIC SETTING OF THE FEED MATERIALS PRODUCTION CENTER(FMPC)-FERNALD AREA

The aquifer system is composed essentially of sand and gravel of glacial origin. In places, the aquifer is stratified with clay, or capped by clayey till.

Spieker (1968, pi. 2) shows the FMPC area as situated on a terrace (above the Miami River floodplain) and consisting of a clay-rich till underlain by about 150 feet of sand and gravel. A 10-foot bed of clay about 130 to 140 feet below land surface divides the sand and gravel section into an upper and a lower aquifer. The clay bed reportedly pinches out to the east near the eastern boundary of FMPC.

Studies by Eye (1961, p. 21) and Spieker (1968, p. A15) indicate that the clay beds act as partially confining layers. Only a few of the wells listed in table 1 are deep enough to have tapped the lower aquifer. At FMPC, these include the production wells (NLO/PW 1, 2, and 3) and test wells (NLO 1-D and 8-D). To the east, three wells drilled to bedrock by Southwestern Ohio Water Company apparently are not affected by the clay layer that divides the aquifer at FMPC.

An inventory of water wells and water-level measurements was completed in August 1982. Wells used in the inventory are listed in table 1, and their locations are shown in figure 3. Water- level data obtained in this investigation were used to prepare the potentiometric map (fig. 4), which shows the general direction of ground-water flow within the aquifer system. Not all wells in the area were available for measurement because of problems of access to the property or an inability to measure the depth to water without dismantling equipment in the wells.

Tabl

e 3. Uranium concentrations in wa

ter

from wells sampled by NLO, Inc.

(Dec

embe

r 19

81)

and

U.S.

Geological Survey (August

1982

)

[Wel

l lo

cati

ons

are

shown

in figures

2 an

d 3]

Concentrations

U.S.

Geol

ogic

al

Survey

loca

l well no.

H-10

1H-

103

H-10

6H-107

H-108

H-109

H-110

H-lll

H-116

H-117

H-118

H-119

H-121

NLO

well ID

BPH

DGBLK

WK HKBHMHP

DEDSKY

JSRE

MVRM

MC

NLO

(converted

to jug/L)

a

<3.0

6.0 6.0

<3.0

190

<3.0

<3.0

320 6.

0<3.0

<3.0

<3.0

54

U.S.

Geological

Survey

Ug/L)

< 2.

01.4 1.5

0.7

250

< 0.4

430 1.

5<0.4

<0.4

<0.5

46

aData

reported by NL

O as mi

llig

rams

pe

r liter

have

be

en co

nver

ted

to

micrograms pe

r liter

for

consistency

of presentation.

Sample from H-

109

not

used

be

caus

e of ex

cess

ive

bleach in

wa

ter

water

supply.

Several features should be mentioned with reference to figure 4. First, bedrock crops out along the banks of the Great Miami River near Fernald, and probably controls ground-water movement south of FMPC.

Second, the water table defined by the 520-foot contour that appears as a troughlike low at the southern edge of FMPC along Willey Road opens to the south as a narrowly constricted channel between two control points, wells H-122 and H-lll. In the area north of these wells, ground-water pumpage (mostly domestic and farm use) is low compared to the amount of ground water used at Fernald and FMPC. Where the north side of the 520-foot enclosure crosses Paddys Run (fig. 4) the altitude of the streambed is between 520 and 530 feet above sea level. Whether or not Paddys Run is a losing stream in this stretch or flows without connection with the water table was not determined. Paddys Run was virtual­ ly dry at the time of this investigation.

Third, the water level at the abandoned "cone house" well (labeled "CH," fig. 3) near the northeast corner of the FMPC just inside Butler County, is about 75 feet higher than in wells a half-mile to the east and to the west. The potentiometric surface along the eastern side of the FMPC is conjectural because of a lack of suitable well data; however, the well is evidently in a body of water that is perched or otherwise disconnected from the water-bearing zone mapped elsewhere in figure 4. An attempt to draw contours between this and other wells resulted in a hydraulic gradient that was unrealistically steep. The extent of the perched water body is unknown; thus, it is not shown in figure 4.

Finally, a ground-water divide may exist along the eastern boundary of the FMPC as suggested by Spieker (1968, pi. 2) between two bedrock areas (fig. 4). The contours as drawn in figure 4 suggest that a partial ground-water divide exists in the area.

The water table beneath the principal area of activity at FMPC is a relatively broad depression enclosed by the 525-foot contour (fig. 4). Static water levels of onsite wells were mea­ sured when the FMPC plant was shut down for vacation and the three main supply wells were idle. Water levels for the three wells were just below 524.0 feet, but in two observation wells to the north (NLO test well 10 and the old administration building well) the levels were 515.6 and 521.9 feet, respectively; this indicates that recovery in the aquifer was greater in the vicinity of the supply wells. During periods of plant operation the supply wells are pumped on a rotating basis, and the 520-foot enclosure north of the supply wells (fig. 4) would probably be enlarged to include all three wells.

10

The cone of depression at FMPC, even when major pumping is shut down, has become a persistent feature over the years. According to Spieker (1968, p. A19 and pi. 2), daily pumpage at FMPC in 1964 averaged more than 1.0 million gallons per day, but the cone of depression caused by pumping was too shallow to show on his map. Although the pumping rate has been less in recent years, development of the cone can be attributed to the fact that ground water pumped at FMPC is not returned to the aquifer but is discharged through sewers or lost by evaporation.

Recharge is essentially by precipitation. Rainfall in the area was deficient in July 1982. Had it been abundant, the cone of depression in figure 4 might have been smaller.

The water level at well H-132 (NLO test well 1-S, fig. 3), which is pumped continuously (at less than 100 gallons per minute) to intercept ground water between the waste pits and the main sup­ ply wells, was about 485 feet. Because water levels in nearby wells were much higher, the cone of depression at this well is too small to show in figure 4. Similarly, the cone of depression at well H-121 (fig. 3) is too small to show in figure 4.

URANIUM CONCENTRATIONS IN GROUND WATER AND THEIR SIGNIFICANCE

Table 3 compares concentrations of dissolved uranium deter­ mined by NLO, Inc., in December 1981 (fig. 2) to those determined by the U.S. Geological Survey for the same wells in August 1982. In general, the concentrations determined by the U.S. Geological Survey were lower than those determined by NLO, Inc., possibly because of differences in detection limits used in the analyses. However, the concentrations of dissolved uranium at wells H-108 and H-lll were greater; the concentration at well H-121 was nearly the same as that reported by NLO, Inc. These three wells were the highest in dissolved uranium content of the wells sampled in this study. All had concentrations at least several times higher than the dissolved uranium content found at wells H-132 and H-134 (fig. 5), both of which are situated near the FMPC waste-storage areas.

Two other onsite wells, H-130 and H-131 (fig. 5), are located farther from the waste-storage areas and were relatively low in dissolved uranium. Well H-131 taps the upper aquifer, whereas well H-130 is one of three supply wells that produces from the lower aquifer. The water-quality data for these wells and the potentiometric surface as mapped in figure 4 suggest that the high concentration of uranium at wells H-108, H-lll, and H-121 did not reach these wells through the aquifer directly from the FMPC production area because several wells such as H-103, H-104, H-116, and H-122 situated similarly along the ground-water flow pathway were scarcely affected. Even though a localized source of contamination is possible, it would be reasonable to consider the various possibilities for contaminant migration from FMPC. These

11

Base from U.S. Geological Survey Shandon, 1:24,000,1965

EXPLANATION

H-124 Well location and local number

0.6 Dissolved uranium in^pg/L

| I Area where additional study is needed

^11 FMPC waste-storage area

Figure 5.--Uranium concentrations in ground water collected in the FMPC-

Fernald area, August 1982, and area where additional study is needed (Analysis by U.S. Geological Survey),

would include movement down Paddys Run resulting from excessive discharges at some specific time, undetermined pathways of leakage from the storage pits, and contamination carried by storm runoff.

The amount of dissolved oxygen in the aquifer should be con­ sidered. According to Garrels and Christ (1964, p. 253-6), the more highly oxidized forms of uranium have greater solubility. This suggests that in areas of recharge where the oxygen content can be expected to be high, more uranium can be carried in solu­ tion than where the oxygen content is low. It is possible that uranium transported under conditions of oxygen enrichment could end up as excessive amounts in some localities, whereas a low uranium content could mean that potentially excessive amounts of uranium have already been precipitated out somewhere along the way from the source.

The amount of dissolved iron may be an indicator of oxygen concentration, that is, high iron concentrations would suggest reducing conditions or an oxygen deficiency. Conversely, low iron concentrations may indicate that conditions of oxygen en­ richment prevailed. In this study, 13 samples were analyzed for dissolved iron. Wells H-108, H-lll and H-121, which were low in iron, may have been relatively rich in oxygen. Conversely, wells H-106, H-110, H-118, H-119, and H-122 were quite high in dissolved iron but low in dissolved uranium. One well, H-107, was low in both iron and uranium.

Except for H-lll, H-121, and H-122, samples from the wells located along Paddys Run (fig. 5), contained less than 2 pg/L of dissolved uranium. However, the concentration of dissolved uranium in water from well H-128 near the southern end of Paddys Run was noticeably higher (3.2 pg/L). Because this well is shal­ low and located closer to the stream than other upstream wells (fig. 5), it is probably more susceptible to infiltration from surface-water contamination whenever the stream is bankfull.

Concentrations of dissolved uranium for most of the wells at Fernald were less than 2.0 jag/L; thus, dissolved uranium contami­ nation does not appear to be a problem for wells in that community,

CONCLUSIONS

The source of the uranium found in wells H-108, H-lll, and H-121 cannot be attributed directly to ground-water flow from the waste storage areas at FMPC; several other wells between FMPC and well H-108 would have been affected. More data concerning the flow characteristics of Paddys Run along the southwestern part of FMPC are needed to (1) determine if any part of the stream is losing water to the ground-water system, and (2) determine the distribution of uranium concentrations in Paddys Run at different flows. There is a possibility that surface-water runoff, such as storm overflow, could have carried high-level uranium wastes toward Paddys Run. The uranium wastes could have infiltrated the ground-water system along the reach near the affected wells.

13

Continued water-level measurements and water-quality sampling are needed to determine if the amount of uranium is increasing in the vicinity of wells H-108, H-lll, and H-121, or if other wells in the area (wells H-122 r H-116, H-107) are likely to be affected by increasing levels of uranium. Test wells may be needed to better define the direction of ground-water movement. Because the water table is relatively high in the vicinity of well H-lll (fig. 3), dissolved uranium at this locality could move in any of several directions toward wells that have not yet been affected.

The amount of dissolved iron in ground water suggests a rela­ tionship exists between the amount of available oxygen and the amount of dissolved uranium. Thus, if uranium wastes were carried by surface water r an opportunity exists for oxygen enrichment, which would permit greater transport of dissolved uranium to the ground-water system.

The area in which additional study is needed is outlined in figure 5. Water-level measurement and water-quality sampling could be continued at wells H-108, H-lll, H-121, and in other nearby wells to determine if the uranium content is changing. To help delineate the area of high uranium content, additional wells north and east of wells H-108, H-lll, and H-121 are needed. Other wells at FMPC, especially south of the storm outfall ditch, could be drilled to various depths; hydrogeologic samples could be taken during well construction.

Discharge measurements could be made along Paddys Run to determine if there are sections of the stream where water is being lost to the ground-water system. A soil sampling program conducted along Paddys Run and the storm sewer outfall ditch (fig. 1), would help identify places where infiltration may have taken place.

REFERENCES

Eye, J. D., 1961, Report on the ground-water pollution potential in the Feed Materials Production Center operated by the National Lead Company of Ohio: University of Cincinnati Department of Civil Engineering, 24 p.

Garrels, R. M., and Christ, C. L., 1964, Solutions, minerals, and equilibria: New York, Harper and Row, 450 p.

Hem, J. D., 1970, Study and interpretation of the chemicalcharacteristics of natural water: U.S. Geological Survey Water-Supply Paper 1473, 2d edition, 363 p.

14

Lappenbusch, W. L., 1980 , Current thinking about the present and future regulations for radioactivity in drinking water: Health Physics, v. 39, December 1980, p. 1005-6.

Spieker, A. M., 1968, Ground-water hydrology and geology of theLower Great Miami River valley, Ohio: U.S. Geological Survey Professional Paper 605-A, 37 p.

Thatcher, L. L., Janzer, V. J., and Edwards, K. W., 1977, Methods for determination of radioactive substances in water and fluvial sediments: Techniques of Water Resources Inves­ tigations of the United States Geological Survey, Book 5, chap. A5, 95 p.

15

Table 1. Inventory of

water wells in th

e Fernald-FMPC area.

Hamilton and Butler Counties. Ohio

Location

County

Sect

ion

Townsh

ip

number

Butler Co.

Morgan

T.

Ross T.

32

77

j *j

Hamilton

Co.

Cros

by T.

6

4

9__

Well

County

number,

if

assigned

BU-204

H-130

H-132

H-134

H-131

H-11

3 H-101

H-102

H-112

H_l O"7

H-120

H-114

H-4

H-133

number Other

number

M-30 j

.L R-70

R-59

R-69

Cone house

SW-0-3

NLO/PW-1

NLO/PW-2

NLO/PW-3

NLO/I-S

NLO/I-D

NLO/3

NLO/4

NLO/5

NLO/8-S

NLO/8-D

NLO/9

NLO/10

NLO/11

O.A.B

6-1

BPH*,6-2

6-3

6-4

5-1

5-2

5-02E

5-02W

5-B3

4-B1

4-B2

4-B4

9/LO-l

9-2

9-3

Owne

r or

resident

C&O

Railroad

William

McFa

rlan

d Ray

Heading

Bumm

er Bu

ilde

rs

Emerson

Eliot

NLO,

Inc.

Sout

hwes

tern

Oh

io Wa

ter

Co.

(SOW

C)

NLO, Inc.

do.

do.

do.

do.

do.

do.

do.

do.

do.

do.

do.

do.

do.

Geor

ge Fr

anke

nste

in

Best

Panel

Home

s do

. Eu

gene

Hott

Franklin Rack Excavating Co.

R. Burwinkle/SOWC

Byro

n Kn

ollm

an

do.

R. Burwinkel/SOWC

B. Gi

erin

ger

R. Burwinkle/SOWC

do.

do.

SOWC

Byron

Knollman

Ralp

h Keith

Ralph

Atherton

Well

di

amet

er

(inches)

6 6 4 36

6

12

12

12 4 4 8 8 8 4 4 4 6 6 6 6 6 6 6 6

10 2 2 6 6 6 6 2 6 2 4 6

Total

dept

h com­

plet

ed

(fee

t)

144 42

50

95

58

45

210

210

210

120

180

105 43

95

116

180

103

130

130

141 90

90

90

86

65

120 42

131

171 75

165

174

100 42

25

80

Tabl

e 1. Inventory of

wa

ter

well

s in the

Fernald-FMPC ar

ea.

Hami

lton

and

Butl

er Counties.

Ohio Continued

Loca

tion

Well

County

numb

er ,

County

Sect

ion

if

Township

number

assi

gned

Hamilton Co.

/"* v f\

o J-

« 7

ip

Q u

1 1

fi

H-109

H-106

H-107

1 7

_-

H-126

H-129

1 fi

- --

J.O

1 fi

_____

H-124

H-128

711

1 0*3

H-103

H-104

H-105

H-122

H-108

H-lll

H-121

H-115

H-118

H-117

H-125

H-119

H-116

12

13

numb

er

Othe

r number

r»T?*

o 1

L)hi

r o J.

BHMHP*,8-2

BLK*,8-4

WK*,8-5

17-1

17-2

17-3

17-4

16-1

16-2

1 O

1J.

O J.

18-2

18-3

18-4

18-6

7-1

DG*,

7-2

7-3

7-4

7-5

HK*,

7-6

DS*,7-7

MC*,7-8

7-8a

7-9

7-10

RE*, 7-11

JS*,

7-12

7-13

7-14

7-15

MVRM*,7-16

KY*,7-17

12-2

12-3

12-4

12-5

12-7

13-1

13-2

Owner or resident

Deni

er Electric Co.

Harr

y Klekamp

Byro

n Kn

ollm

anWilliam Knollman

Dennis He

yob

Lorin

Hann

R&T

Land

scap

ing

& La

wn Builders

T. Po

tten

ger

Cent

ury

Farms, Inc.

Prank

Tuck

erMatilda Kelsch

«!_ !

TM^-I

QU66J.COJ.pf XnC

M. D.

Po

tten

ger

Rumpke,

Inc.

do.

J. W. Ro

lfes

Jaco

b Fu

chs

Dan

Gier

enge

rMi

ke Lienesch

Fran

k Lienesch

Clayton

Burton

Knol

lman

Farms, Inc.

Delt

a St

eel

Corp

orat

ion

Mobi

l Chemical

do.

do.

Rutgers-Nease Ch

emic

al Co.

Ray

Evers

Welding

Jasp

er Stevens

Web Pa

llet

Co.

do.

do.

Miam

i Valley Ready

Mix

Kenneth Yoakum

Everett

Buskirk

do.

Euge

ne &

Haze

l Buskirk

George Fu

chs

Robe

rt Brankamp

Marshall Clark

Paul J.

Wi

wi

Well

diameter

(inc

hes)

6 8 6 6 6 5 5 1/

2186 6 6 6 5 6 6 6 6 6 6 6 5

5/8

6126 12 106 6 8 8 6 5 5 5 6 6 5 6

Tota

ldepth

com­

pleted

(fee

t)

100

110 85 90 33 99 24 60 70 50 145 40 60 17 O 1O J.

70 80 80 80 84 60 82 48 83 96 27 60 80 80 55 40i n o

J.U o

103

106

107

101

105 54

Tabl

e 1. Inventory of

water

wells

in the

Fernald-FMPC area.

Hamilton and

Butl

er Counties.

Ohio Continued

Location

County

Sect

ion

Township

number

Butl

er Co.

Morg

an T.

Ross

T.

31

32

33

Hamilton Co.

Cros

by T.

at

r Kr^

6

5

4

9

Well

r

County

number,

if

assigned

- BU-204

H-130

H-13

2

H-134

H-131

H_1 1 O

H-101

H-102

H-112

H i

")~i

H-120

H-114

H-4

H-133

lumber Ot

her

number

Min

o j.

R°7f)

R-59

R-69

Cone

house

SW-0

-3

NLO/PW-1

NLO/PW-2

NLO/PW-3

NLO/I-S

NLO/I-D

NLO/3

NLO/4

NLO/5

NLO/8-S

NLO/8-D

NLO/9

NLO/10

NLO/11

O.A.B

6-1

BPH*,6-2

6-3

6-4

5-1

5-2

5-02E

5-02W

5-B3

4-B1

4-B2

4-B4

9/LO-l

9-2

9-3

Date

measured

10-3

1-73

11-

-54

07-30-82

fl "

7 OQ OO

m Tf

i_QO

do.

do.

do.

do.

do.

do.

do.

do.

do.

do.

do.

do.

do.

no no

Q o

08-03-82

do.

na_o7 QO

08-2

0-64

08-02-82

do.

08-03-82

np._nO po

08-03-82

08-03-82

08-04-82

na_r

)o P.

908-04-82

Land

- surface

altitude

(fee

t)

585

574

615

625

565

613

C -1 Q Q1

579.

64

579.84

585.

55

585.

31

560.

86

556.

85

557.

09

576.

60

576.

62

557.23

580.

00

596.

??

589.

96

575

575

568

580

540

540

540

540

539

560

540

539

537

541.

57

532

536

560

Dept

h of water

below

land surface

(fee

t)

59 9

37 30 48

12

13.4

55.17

55.86

56.18

100.0+

60.95

35.61

30.98

30.82

51.85

52.52

30.85

64.40

60.78

68.07

54.78

52.20

44.73

20.16

17.17

14.08

13.88

14.80

& J.

. j y

14.58

22.72

21.88

1 £

Q C

13.7

7

Altitude

of

wate

r su

rfac

e (f

eet

above

sea

level)

533

537

C Q C

577

553

599.

6

523.

74523.78

523.66

485.+

524.36

525.25

525.

87

526.27

524.75

524.10

526.38

515.60

521.

89

522.80

523.

27

519.84

522.83

525.92

526.12

524.

20

518.61

524.

42

514.

519.

69

515.15

522.23

1

)H111

O <U -^41 flJ > "Hro q_| o <U3 i-i o > 4J <4-l D «J <U

HOW >H4J 4-1rH t-l <U Hi

rtj QJ QJ <D4J M-l Wflj S

i-i<U fl)4-1 U«J «J

O u -i-114_| ,_| 3 O>

0 <U W^J

J3 T3 ""4-> C

(V rH

Q

<U 0)1 0 T3 .p

'O (0 O yJJ

(3 t! -H ,?JiJ D 4-> -^

10 rH

flj

T3

i-lQ, 3

to (rt

Q <Ua

l_l

i-l0) §

DC

rH rH

<U

s

*"* <Vfl) _Q ^ 6

1 i ^*

^3 c

!*. U <UJj 41 Cc _a (w CT>3 e -H -H03 «uc «

co H 4-1toO0

c ^o <u H ja4J gO DOJ C

CO

& H^3(0

^i C4-1 5C 0

Ou

^> o^> n

a- r^<N rH

in fi

\o oin t*-

o ^roo in

in <NC5 r*\o in

C^J C^Joo oo

I ICO ^*0 0

I Ioo oo0 0

<N1

oorH

1 *00 CU p"l

* £

enro

VO t*- rH<N rH O

in in in

<N rHen o vo<N ro <sin vo ro

en o *rp*» oo (*)in in in

C^J VO C*JCO VO 00

1 1 1CN OO ^*

0 0 O1 1 1

oo oo ooo o o

1*I in

oo I-oo

4t * rH«*

co ro^r *r <N in

COTj-OTj-rOrHrHr-

OOrHOOOrHOinininminininin

r- t*-vo in r- in

rH <NCO <N

*r voo oin in

en oorH t*-

rHoor-CN^renooinco<N VO <N CN ^T <N i-l rH rH

in o

vo en p- o in r- ooao oo en vo co «o oo

i in<NrHO^rinenoorH^*rHCNCNrHCNrHCN

ininininminininin

*>> I-H co o in co <N

i ^roorHcoinenmcnooincNin^rHincNrH

in

CN 00cs o

rHrH

in in

oo cs

I coorH rH

in in

oo oo 10^r t*- cs en

vo \o vo enrH rH rH rHin in in in

CS CS TJ1in cs oo oen cs cs CN

rH M rH

in

oCNin

in*rr*»

ininrHCNininoinenoooocMenoininoenencor-oovoenenooroinc^j vo ro co ^* c^j co I-Hinininminininin

incNCNvo^rcococoinooooinvovor-ini i i i I i i Iin ^* r** ^» o <N r*

O O <N O rH O <N1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1

inooooin<Noco<N

rH <N

in in

<N <Noo co

I io oCO CO

I It*- r-

O O O O rH rH O O O O

<N CO ^* rH <N rH <N

III 1 1 1 1co ^r

I I

rH r* r* i^ vo ^» r** in co c^jininmininininininin

<Nenin<N<N<N<N<N<Nooinvooooooooooooo

I I I I I I I I I1 ^ ^* OO CO <N CO <\J CN <N1 OOrHOOOOOO

1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1ooTooooooooooooooooooooooo

CN VO r* 001 III

VO (0irH*co^rin***oo

was^^r-r^r-r^ loiococoooaocoiui i I « w U I

o enrH 0

rH rH

1 1DC 33

oo

O

§£4-> 10rH O H UeutoDC

VO t*-

0 0rH rH

1 133 03

r-rH

VO O\<N <NrH rH

1 103 33

1111111

l£> COrH rH

3-<NrH

1DC

OOCOCO^rinCNCOrHrHCNcNOOOCNOrHCNrHrHrHrHrHrHrHrHrH

1 _ 1 1 1 1 1 1 1

r--

cs cs cs csin in in in

cs csoo aoi i

CN OO CO

1 1oo r-o o

rH CMrH rH

1 1o

en rH * *1 1 W CO

in oo t*-rH rH rH

rH rH rH

1 1 1DC 03 33

CN CN CN CNin in in in

CN CN ^* CNoo oo r- oo

I I 1 IO O l£> OCO CO O CO

1 1 1 1r*» r*» CN r**O O rH O

rH

1t~-

*

*

n * in 33rH rH rH K

1 1 1 >

CO O1in in

enin

COCN

ino

t^rH

1r- CN

« 1JHCN

\0 in rH r-i-H rH

CN co co CN CN enin in in in in in

en o CN co oo enio r** co ^o oo rH

in in co in en oen c3 rH en c^ rHin vo i£> in vo vo

o o co oo in rHvo vo \o ^o in <>o

I i i i i ioo vo oo in CN voCN CN O O O CN

1 1 1 1 1 1o en *r I-H co ^rrH O O rH O O

co ^* in r~ rH CN1 1 1 1 1

CN CN OJ CN CO CO

in en vo<N rHrH rH

1 1DC OB

rHrH

103

CNrH

1

COrH

19

Tabl

e 1. Inventory of

water

wells

in the

Fernald-FMPC area.

Hamilton and

Butl

er Counties.

Ohio Continued

Loca

tion

County

Sect

ion

Township

number

Butl

er Co.

Morg

an T.

Ross

T.

1

1oo__ _ _

00

Hami

lton

Co.

Cros

by T.

6 __

____

5

Well

Coun

ty

number,

if

assigned

t>n

o f\ A

H-130

H-132

H-134

H-131

H_l 1 0

H-101

H-102

H-112

HI 97

H-120

H-114

H-4

H-133

number

Other

number

MO f

\

R_O 1

R_7f»

R-59

R-69

Cone ho

use

CM

fl

"}

NLO/PW-1

NLO/PW-2

NLO/PW-3

NLO/I-S

NLO/I-D

NLO/3

NLO/4

NLO/5

NLO/8-S

NLO/8-D

NLO/9

NLO/10

NLO/11

O.A.B

6-1

BPH*,6-2

6-3

6-4

5-1

5-2

5-02E

5-02W

5-B3

4-B1

4-B2

4-B4

9/LO-l

9-2

9-3

Use

of we

ll

Industrial

L/v

/ill

C; D L

. J. *

-

do.

do.

do.

Obse

rvat

ion

Observation

do.

do.

Test we

ll

do.

do.

do.

do.

do.

do.

do.

do.

do.

do.

Commercial

Domestic

do.

Irrigation

Observation

do.

do.

Domestic

Domestic & fa

rm

Obse

rvat

ion

Observation

Observation

Dome

stic

Do

mest

ic

Remarks

Driller's

log

95429

U L J

. J.

J. C L o J,U^

*t J *t J *t J

Driller's

log

1456

66

Dril

ler's

log

1725

59

Driller's

log

1156

33

Dug

well

Data

fr

om ODNR

Well id

le wh

en measured

do.

do.

Pump

ed continuously,

leve

l varies

Driller's

log

2588

89

Driller's log

258890

Land-surface datum

questionable

O.A.B. =

Old

Admin. Building we

llDriller's

log

3272

05

Driller's lo

g 366564

Inaccessible

Driller's lo

g 402900

Driller's

log

291494,

inac

cess

ible

**

Obse

rvat

ion

well

meas.

by SO

WC

do.

do.

Inaccessible

Obse

rvat

ion

well

meas.

by SO

WC

Stat

e obs.

well operated by US

GS

Inaccessible

Table 1. Inventory of water wells in

th

e Fernald-FMPC ar

ea.

Hamilton and Butler Counties. Ohio Continued

Location

Well number

County

number/

County

Section

if

Township

number

assigned

Hamilton Co

.Crosby T.

8

H-110

H-109

H-106

H-107

17 _______

H-126

H-129

16

1 B

H-124

H-128

7

H 1 "?"}

H-103

H-104

H-105

H-122

H-108

H-lll

H-12

1

H-115

H-118

H-117

H-125

H-119

H-116

12 _______

13 -

Othe

r nu

mber

DE*,

8-1

BHMHP*,8-2

BLK*,8-4

WK*,8-5

17-1

17-2

17-3

17-4

16-1

16-2

18-1

18-2

18-3

18-4

18-6

7-1

DG*,7-2

7-3

7-4

7-5

WK*,7-6

DS*,7-7

MC*,7-8

7-8a

7-9

7-10

RE*,

7-1

1JS*,7-12

7-13

7-14

7-15

MVRM*,7-16

KY*,7-17

12

7J. £*

£t

12-3

12-4

12-5

12-7

13-1

13-2

Use

of well

Commercial

Publ

ic su

pply

Domestic & fa

rmDomestic

do.

do.

Comm

erci

alDomestic

Farm

Domestic

do.

Unus

edDomestic

Comm

erci

alCommercial

Domestic

do.

do.

do.

do.

do.

Domestic &

farm

Commercial

Industrial

Unused,

test well

Industrial

Indu

stri

alCommercial

Domestic

Unus

edUn

used

Fire protection

Indu

stri

alDomestic

do.

do.

do.

do.

do.

do.

do.

Remarks

Driller's

Dril

ler's

Dril

ler's

Dril

ler's

Dug

well

Dril

ler's

Driller's

Dril

ler's

Driller's

Dril

ler's

Dril

ler's

Dril

ler's

Driller's

Driller's

Driller's

Dril

ler's

Dril

ler

' sDr

ille

r's

log

log

log

log

log

log

log

log

log

log

log

log

log

log

log

log

log

4345

26291459

327231,

145698,

172574

291498

291473

434519,

107451,

470774,

596060

225124,

327213,

115637

402882

358263,

198165

inaccessible

inaccessible

inaccessible

inac

cess

ible

unfit

to drink

inaccessible

inac

cess

ible

inaccessible

Inaccessible

Dril

ler's

Dril

ler's

Dril

ler

's

log

log

log

Inaccessible

nrill^r'Q

i « «

J-'LJ.-LJ.Ci-

JD

Dril

ler

'sDr

ille

r's

Dril

ler's

Driller's

Dril

ler

'sDr

ille

r's

.njy

log

log

log

log

log

log

366597

470793

4707

94

225131

227445

227441

366561

366572

157871

260757

*NLO sampling po

int

identificati

on

**In

accessible =

well

head

buried

or

covered

or some other

impe

dime

nt to

measuring

water

leve

l.

Table 4. Chemical quality of water from selected wells

LIST OF ABBREVIATIONS USED

AS arsenic (As)

BA barium (Ba)

BE beryllium (Be)

CA calcium (Ca)

CAC03 calcium carbonate (CaC03 )

CD cadmium (Cd)

CL chloride (Cl)

CO cobalt (Co)

C02 carbon dioxide (C02 )

COS carbonate (C03 )

CR chromium (Cr)

CS cesium (Cs)

CD copper (Cu)

DEC C degrees Celsius

FE iron (Fe)

FET-FLD fixed-endpoint titration, field determined

H2S hydrogen sulfide (H2 S)

HC03 bicarbonate (HC03 )

HG mercury (Hg)

LI lithium (Li)

MG magnesium (Mg)

MG/L milligrams per liter (mg/L)

MN manganese (Mn)

MO molybdenum (Mo)

NA sodium (Na)

N02 nitrite (N02 )

N03 nitrate (N03 )

PB lead (Pb)

PCI/L picocuries per liter (pCi/L)

P04 phosphate (P04 )

SI02 silica (Si02 )

S04 sulfate (S04 )

SR strontium (Sr)

SR/YT-90 strontium-yttrium-90

U-NAT uranium, natural

DG/L micrograms per liter (jig/L)

DMHOS micromhos per centimeter (pmho/cm)

ZN zinc (Zn)

22

Table 4.

Chemical quality of

Mater from

valla

ro CO

Loca

lwell

number

H-124

H-12

8H-129

H-126

H-125

H-11

7H-119

H-115

H-11

8H-

110

H-12

1H-lll

H-133

H-122

H-108

H-107

H-11

6H-

105

H-104

H-12

3

H-106

H-103

H-101

H-10

2H-112

H-127

H-131

H-120

H-130

H-13

4

H-132

H-114

H-113

STATION

NUMBER

391606084410800

391607084412500

391616084404300

3916ZBOB4405500

391633084411100

391633084411700

391636084410900

391636084412600

391637084412100

391648084405600

391654084413000

391659084412900

391702U84400900

391704084414100

391709084412500

3917t3084410800

391713084414000

391713084414400

391715084414800

391715084420300

391721084403600

391721084414600

391725084415600

391726084415100

391742084415900

391743084401800

391745084415100

391746084403200

391750084412800

391800084415200

391803084414200

391806084394900

391810084420900

DATE

OF

SAMPLE

82-08-27

82-08-30

82-08-31

82-OB-27

82-08-27

82-08-31

82-08-27

82-08-31

82-08-31

82-08-25

82-08-31

82-08-25

82-08-30

82-08-27

82-08-25

82-08-25

82-08-27

82-08-24

82-08-24

82-08-30

82-08-25

82-08-24

82-06-24

82-08-24

82-08-25

82-08-27

82-08-31

82-08-30

82-08-31

82-08-31

82-08-31

82-08-27

82-08-25

SPE­

CIFIC

CON­

DUCT­

ANCE

(UMHOS)

1050

1100

730

785

690

2050

695

2100

1100

770

695

720

1300

775

650

720

1050

790

755

585

880

650

775

610

720

765

610

960

580

660

750

770

840

PH

(STAND­

ARD

UNITS) 7.6

7.2

7.4

7.6

7.6

7.2

7.7

6.8

7.3

7.3

7.8

7.6

7.4

7.5

7.4

7.6

7.5

7.4

7.3

7.6

7.3

7.6

7.4

7.4

7.6

7.6

7.6

7.5

7.4

7.5

7.6

7.6

7.8

TEMPER­

ATURE

(DEC 0

15.5

19.0

13.5

13.5

16.0

17.0

13.5

18.5

13.5

12.5

12.5

14.5

14.0

12.0

12.5

11.5

12.5

12.5

12.5

13.0

13.0

12.5

13.0

15.0

15.0

16.5

10.0

17.0

14.5

12.0

13.0

14.0

14.0

HYDRO­

GEN

SULFIDE

TOTAL

<MG/L

AS H2S)

w .. _ .0 .. .0 .0 .0 .0 -- .0 .0 .0 .0 .0 .0 .0 .0 .0 .0 .. .0 -- __ ..

HARD­

NESS

(MG/L

AS

CAC03)

.. ----

..

353 --

469

390

361

334 --

399

310

344

..--

387

427

304

390 --

--

..

301 ----

_«.

--

«P«»

HAHD-

SIESS,

NONCAR-

BONATE

(MG/L

CAC03) ~ ..

..--

«»

58 .-

108

103 66

55--

87 56

24 -- 59 83

50119

-- ..

104

-- .. --

--

CALCIUM

DIS­

SOLVED

(MG/L

AS CA

)

-- --

-- ..

100--

97

110

100

94--

110 86

93

110--

12087

110-- ..

84 --

--

..

--

..

MAGNE-

SIUMt

DIS­

SOLVED

(MG/L

AS MG

) »«.

-- --

..

25--

55

28 2724--

30

2<3

27 --

27--

31 21 28--

-

..

22-- w«»

--

SODIUM.

DIS­

SOLVED

(MG/L

AS NA

) m --

--

5.7

17 6.3

15 14--

10 11 18--

..

6.8

12 12 13-- -- ..

11«P«» .. -- ..

POTAS­

SIUM*

DIS­

SOLVED

(MG/L

AS K)

« «

--

« <

-- .. 1.7 --

571.9

2.*

3.1 --

2.3

3.0

2.9 -- .7 --

4.1

2.6

1.7 -- -- ..

2.0 -

- _ .. --

Table 4. Chamical quality of na

fcar

from lactfd

Continued

ro

Loca

lwe

llnumber

H-12

4H-128

H-129

B-126

H-125

H-117

H-119

H-115

H-118

H-110

H-121

H-lll

H-133

H-122

H-108

H-107

H-116

H-105

H-104

H-123

H-106

H-103

H-101

H-102

H-112

H-127

H-131

H-120

H-130

H-134

H-132

H-114

H-113

STATION

NUMBER

391606084410800

391607084412500

391616084404300

391628084405500

391633084411100

391633084411700

391636084410900

391636084412600

391637084412100

3916*8084405600

391654084413000

391659084412900

391702084400900

391704084414100

391709084412500

391713084410800

391713084414000

391713084414400

3917t50844l4800

391715084420300

391721084403600

391721084414600

391725084415600

391726084415100

391742084415900

391743084401800

39174b084415100

391746084403200

391750084412800

391800084415200

391803084414200

391806084394900

391810084420900

DATE

OFSAMPLE

82-OB-27

82-06-30

82-08-31

82-OB-27

82-08-27

82-08-31

82-08-27

82-08-31

82-08-31

82-08-25

82-08-31

82-08-25

82-08-30

82-08-27

82-08-25

82-08-25

82-08-27

82-08-24

82-08-24

82-08-30

82-08-25

82-08-24

82-08-24

82-08-24

82-08-25

82-08-27

82-Ob-31

82-08-30

82-08-31

82-08-31

82-08-31

82-08-27

82-08-25

BICAR­

BONATE

FET-FLO

(MG/L

ASHC03) 590

500

380

360

370

920

360

900

440

350

360

340

570

380

310

390

390

350

400

360

420

310

330

290

380

340

240

380

350

330

320

390

510

ALKA­

LINITY

FIELD

(MG/L

AS

CAC03)

484

410

312

295

303

755

295

738

361

287

295

279

468

312

254

320

320

287

328

295

344

254

271

238

312

279

197

312

287

271

262

320

418

CARBON

DIOXIDE

DIS­

SOLVED

(MG/

LAS

C0

2)

24 50 24 14 15 92 11227 35 28

9.1

14 36 19 20 16 20 22 32 14 33 12 21 18 15 14 9.6

19 22 17 13 16 13

SULFATE

DIS­

SOLVED

(MG/L

AS S0

4) _ -- __

77..

85 110 75 60--

76 68 62~ --

83--

110 70 120 __

71 -- -- __

CHLO-

RIOEt

DIS­

SOLVED

(MG/

LAS CL

> ._ -- -- - 23

--100 23 28 42

34 18 17----

14

33 21 34--

-.22

-- -- --

-- --

FLUO-

RIDEt

DIS­

SOLVED

(MG/

LAS F>

_» -- ._ .2 --<.l .2 .2 .2 -- .2 .3 .2 -- -- .3 -- .2 .2 .2 --

- .2 -- -- -- -. -- .

SILICA.

DIS­

SOLVED

(MG/L

ASSI

02) _. -- -- -- 9.9 --

26 10 9.2

8.9 --

107.3

10-- --

14 -

109.4

11--

.- 7.9 --

--

SOL I OS

t RESIDUE

AT 180

DEG. C

DIS­

SOLVED

(MG/

L) -- -- -- -- -- --329 --

731

418 -_

412 -- --

.466

--. -- -- --

397

315

439 --

-- -- -- -- -

-- -- --

SOLIDSt

SUM OF

CONSTI-

TUENTSt

DIS­

SOLVED

(MG/

L> .- -- -- -- ..421 --

655

465

435

414 --

461

369

422 -- --

454

V«B

528

376

480 -- *"

--33

9 --

-- --

SITRO-

GENt

N02*N03

TOTAL

(MG/L

AS N)

._ --

-- -- -- -- --2.0 -- --

2.7 --

-- "" -- -- -

-- -- --

Table 4 .- Chemical quality of watar ff

f>a selected yella -Continued

en

Local

well

number

H-124

H-128

H-129

H-126

H-125

H-117

H-119

H-115

H-118

H-110

H-121

H-lll

H-133

H-122

H-108

H-107

H-116

H-105

H-104

H-123

H-106

H-103

H-101

H-102

H-112-

H-127

H-131

H-120

H-130

B-134

H-132

H-114

H-113

STATION

NUMBER

391606084410800

391607084412500

3916)6084404300

391628084405500

391633084411100

391633084411700

394636084410900

391636084412600

391637084412100

391648084405600

391654084413000

391659084412900

391702084400900

391704084414100

391709084412500

391713084410800

391713084414000

391713084414400

3917)5084414800

3917{5084420300

391721084403600

391711084414600

391725084415600

391726084415100

3917*2084415900

391743084401800

3917*5084415100

391746084403200

391750084412800

391800084415200

391803084414200

391806084394900

391810084420900

DATE

OFSAMPLE

82-08-27

82-08-30

82-08-31

82-08-27

82-08-27

82-08-31

82-O

tf-2

782-08-31

82-08-31

82-08-25

82-08-31

82-08-25

82-OB-30

82-08-27

82-08-25

82-08-25

82-08-27

82-08-24

82-08-24

82-08-30

82-OU-25

82-08-24

82-08-24

82-08-24

82-08-25

82-08-27

82-08-31

82-08-30

82-08-31

82-08-31

82-08-31

82-08-27

82-08-25

NITRO­

GEN*

AMMONIA

TOTAL

(MG/

LAS N)

. .. .. .. _ _. ._ .. »

.030 -_ ..

.050 _. ._ ..

.-- .. _

__ ._ ._ .. _

.. .. -- __ ..

NITRO­

GEN*

ORGANIC

TOTAL

(MG/

LAS N)

^

-. .. . ..

._ ». _. »

.17 _. .15 _. .- ._ .. __ _. _. _. _ __ _. _. _ __ --

NITRO­

GEN. AM-

MONIA

*ORGANIC

TOTAL

(MG/L

AS N)

..

-- -- -- -- .. .. __ _. _..

.20 .. .. .20 ...

-- -. .-

-- .

.. .. .. ...

.. __

-- __ -.

NITRO­

GEN*

TOTAL

(MG/

LAS N03) ..

mf-- -- .. ~ .. .- .. .. ..

9.7 -_ -.

13

._ -- .. ..

_. .. ._ _

._ ._ .. ._ ..

PHOS-

PHORUSf

TOTAL

(MG/L

AS P)

.. -« .. .. .. ..

.050 .. --

.010 ._ -- .. ~ .. .. .. ._ .. -- -- __ ..

ARSENIC

BARIUM,

DIS-

DIS­

SOLVED

SOLVED

(UG/L

(UG/L

AS AS

) AS

3A

)

..

«

..-.

..

--

._

.... .-

.- --

157

..2

53

I.. .-

1..

..

.. -- -. -- ..

--

2

..

..

-- .-..

BERYL­

LIUM*

CADMIUM

DIS-

DIS­

SOLVED

SOLVED

(UG/L

(UG/L

AS BE

) AS

CO

)

..

---- -. .. -- .. -- ..

.-

1<

1 <1 -.

1<!

2

-*>

1._ --

1-

-

..

._--

.-..

..I

--

..

----

CHRO-

MIJMf

DIS­

SOLVED

(UG/L

AS CR) ._ -- .. -- -- 20 -- 20 20 20 ._ -. >. -- .. 30 .. .. --

Table 4.

1 ualit

of water from lectad walla Continued

ro en

Loca

l well

number

H-12

4H-128

H-129

H-12

6H-

125

H-11

7H-

119

H-115

H-118

H-11

0

H-12

1H-

lll

H-133

H-122

H-108

H-107

H-11

6H-105

H-10

4H-123

H-10

6H-103

H-101

H-10

2H-112

H-127

H-13

1H-

120

H-130

H-134

H-132

H-11

4H-

113

STATION

NUMBER

39)606084410800

391607084412500

391616084404300

391628084405500

391633084411100

391633084411700

391636084410900

"391636084412600

391637084412100

391648084405600

391654084413000

J91659084412900

391702084400900

391704084414100

391709084412500

J91713084410800

391713084414000

391713084414400

391715084414800

391715084420300

391721084403600

391721084414600

391725084415600

391726084415100

391742084415900

391743084401800

391745084415100

391746084403200

J917500B4412800

391800084415200

391B03084414200

391806084394900

391810084420900

COBALT*

COPPER*

IRON*

LEAD*

LITHIUM

DATE

OIS-

DIS-

DIS-

DIS-

DIS-

OF

SOLVED

SOLVED

SOLVED

SOLVED

SOLVED

SAMPLE

(UG/L

(UG/L

(UG/L

(UG/L

(UG/L

AS CO

) AS CU)

AS FE

) AS PB)

AS LI

)

82-08-27

82-08-30

82-08-31

B2-OB-27

B2-Ob-27

B2-OB-31

B2-OB-27

B2-OB-31

82-08-31

82-08-25

B2-OB-31

82-08-25

62-OB-30

82-08-27

82-08-25

82-OB-25

B2-Ob-27

82-08-24

82-08-24

b2-0b-30

82-Ob-25

B2-OB-24

82-OB-24

82-08-24

82-Ob-25

82-06-27

B2-OB-31

82-Ob-30

82-08-31

82-08-31

82-Ob-31

B2-Ob-27

82-Ob-25

____

..

-.

.«.

1200

-.

..

--

1100

2800

<1

110

<3

<10

4--

..

--

<1

IbOO

<3

<10

<3

<l

3.. .. <1

13._

1100 41 27

-_ ._

_«.

»-

<1

82

-.__ _

...

»

....

»_

»_

.. ..__ .-

_-

..

__._.. 1

<10

12._

..

1<10

11

2.. -. 2 ._

__

.. .. .

2 _.

---- ~ «..

. «.

..

..

HANGA-

MOLYB-

STRON-

SESE*

MERCURY

DENUM*

TIUM*

DIS-

DIS-

DIS-

DIS­

SOLVED

SOLVED

SOLVED

SOLVED

(UG/L

(UG/L

(UG/L

(UG/L

AS MN

) AS HG)

AS MO)

AS SR)

----

-- _«

.250.-

290

230

390 13 _

190 <1 43

--.- 1

..

31078

250.. _

62__

.. < ..

_ --

--

_..-

--

-- .1 --

._ .2

<.l ~ .3 __ -- ~ .2 _. -- -- __ --

.. -_ .. ..

-.-. .. -.

350

10

230

__

.-

--

370

<10

220

180

...-

1100

..

_-

-- .- .- -- ..

..

250

..__--

._

--

..

VANA­

DIUM*

DIS­

SOLVED

(UG/L

AS V)

--

--

-- __

--

..

-.

<6.0 __

«.

<6.0 ..---- ~ __

-- -- __

--

.---~ _

--

Tabl> 4.---Chaaical quality of nafcar fro« ^lactad

Continued

ro

Local

well

numb

er

H-124

H-128

H-12

9H-

126

H-125

H-117

H-119*

H-115

H-118

H-110

H-121

H-lll

H-133

H-122

H-108

H-107

H-116

H-105

H-104

H-123

H-106

H-103

H-101

H-102

H-112

H-127

H-131

H-120

H-130

H-134

H-132

H-114

H-113

STATION

NUMBER

391606084410800

391607084412500

,391616084404300

391628084405500

391633084411100

39163308441 1700

391636084410900

391636084412600

391637084412100

391648084405600

391654084413000

391659084412900

391702084400900

391704084414100

391709084412500

391713084410800

391713084414000

391713084414400

391715084414800

391715084420300

391721084403600

391721084414600

391725084415600

391726084415100

391742084415900

391743084401800

391745084415100

391746084403200

391750084412BOO

391800084415200

391803084414200

391806084394900

391810084420900

DATE

OFSAMPLE

82-08-27

82-08-30

82-08-31

82-08-27

82-08-27

82-08-31

b2-08-27

b2-OB-31

82-08-31

82-08-25

82-08-31

82-08-25

82-08-30

82-08-27

82-08-25

82-08-25

82-08-27

82-08-24

82-08-24

82-08-30

82-08-25

82-08-24

82-08-24

82-08-24

82-08-25

82-08-27

82-08-31

82-08-30

82-08-31

82-08-31

82-08-31

82-08-27

82-08-25

GROSS

GROSS

ALPHA,

BETA,

ZINC,

DIS-

DIS-

DIS-

SOLVED

SOLVED

SOLVED

(UG/

L (PCI/L

(UG/

L AS

ASAS ZN

) U-NAT)

CS-137)

__

__

.. ..

-«

..

--

--.. .. ..

-

4 41

18

69

490

140

--4

<14

<7.4

130

280

85

34

<12

21

..9

<13

<6.8

--

..

--

--

..

--

..

..

--15

<10

<5.4

.. ..

-- -«

--

.. --

--

GROSS

BETA,

URANIUM

DIS-

NATURAL

SOLVED

DIS-

(PCI

/L

SOLVED

AS S

1*/

(UG/L

YT-90)

AS U)

.63.2 .9

1.2

<2.0 .4

<.5

<.5

--

< .4

<.4

17

46130

430 <.

5<7.0

2.2

81

250

20

.71.

5 .4<6.4

.6<.4

1.5

1.4

<2.0

--

<.4

1.4

<.4

<5.1

1.6

1.5

--

< .8

5.1

8.2

1.0

<.4

GAMMA

SCAN,

DIS­

SOLVED

(pCi/L

as0-235) __ __ __ __ , .

0.05

7.3 __

<.04

4.0

<.04 __ __

1.04 __ . _«*

<.04 __ __ __

CARBON*

ORGANIC

TOTAL

(MG/L

AS C)

.. -- --

-- -- _. .7 .6'

-- -- ~ _- -- -- .. -- --

.. --

CYANIDE

TOTAL

(MG/L

AS CM

) .. -- --

-- -- -- -- -.

<.01

<.01 -- --

--

-- .. -- -- -. "