busn603_11th_ppt_ch_06
TRANSCRIPT
-
7/30/2019 BUSN603_11th_PPT_Ch_06
1/118
Chapter 6
To accompanyQuanti tat ive Analys is for Management, Eleventh Edit ion,by Render, Stair, and HannaPower Point slides created by Brian Peterson andXiaodong Wu
Inven tory Con trol Models
-
7/30/2019 BUSN603_11th_PPT_Ch_06
2/118
Copyright 2012 Pearson Education, Inc. publishing as Prentice Hall 6-2
Learn ing Object ives
1. Understand the importance of inventorycontrol and ABC analysis.
2. Use the economic order quantity (EOQ) todetermine how much to order.
3. Compute the reorder point (ROP) indetermining when to order more inventory.
4. Handle inventory problems that allowquantity discounts or non-instantaneousreceipt.
After completing this chapter, students will be able to:
-
7/30/2019 BUSN603_11th_PPT_Ch_06
3/118
Copyright 2012 Pearson Education, Inc. publishing as Prentice Hall 6-3
Learn ing Object ives
5. Understand the use of safety stock.
6. Describe the use of material requirements
planning in solving dependent-demandinventory problems.
7. Discuss just-in-time inventory concepts toreduce inventory levels and costs.
8. Discuss enterprise resource planningsystems.
After completing this chapter, students will be able to:
-
7/30/2019 BUSN603_11th_PPT_Ch_06
4/118
Copyright 2012 Pearson Education, Inc. publishing as Prentice Hall 6-4
Chapter Ou tl ine
6.1 Introduction
6.2 Importance of Inventory Control
6.3 Inventory Decisions
6.4 Economic Order Quantity: DeterminingHow Much to Order
6.5 Reorder Point: Determining When to Order
6.6 EOQ Without the Instantaneous ReceiptAssumption
6.7 Quantity Discount Models
6.8 Use of Safety Stock
-
7/30/2019 BUSN603_11th_PPT_Ch_06
5/118
Copyright 2012 Pearson Education, Inc. publishing as Prentice Hall 6-5
Chapter Ou tl ine
6.9 Single-Period Inventory Models
6.10 ABC Analysis
6.11 Dependent Demand: The Case for MaterialRequirements Planning
6.12 Just-in-Time Inventory Control
6.13 Enterprise Resource Planning
-
7/30/2019 BUSN603_11th_PPT_Ch_06
6/118
Copyright 2012 Pearson Education, Inc. publishing as Prentice Hall 6-6
In t roduct ion
Inventory is an expensive and importantasset to many companies.
Inventory is any stored resource used tosatisfy a current or future need.
Common examples are raw materials, work-in-process, and finished goods.
Most companies try to balance high and lowinventory levels with cost minimization as a
goal. Lower inventory levels can reduce costs.
Low inventory levels may result in stockouts anddissatisfied customers.
-
7/30/2019 BUSN603_11th_PPT_Ch_06
7/118Copyright 2012 Pearson Education, Inc. publishing as Prentice Hall 6-7
In t roduct ion
All organizations have some type of inventorycontrol system.
Inventory planning helps determine whatgoods and/or services need to be produced.
Inventory planning helps determine whetherthe organization produces the goods orservices or whether they are purchased fromanother organization.
Inventory planning also involves demandforecasting.
-
7/30/2019 BUSN603_11th_PPT_Ch_06
8/118Copyright 2012 Pearson Education, Inc. publishing as Prentice Hall 6-8
Controlling
InventoryLevels
In t roduct ion
Forecasting
Parts/ProductDemand
Planning on WhatInventory to Stock
and How to AcquireIt
Feedback Measurementsto Revise Plans and
Forecasts
Figure 6.1
Inventory planning and control
-
7/30/2019 BUSN603_11th_PPT_Ch_06
9/118Copyright 2012 Pearson Education, Inc. publishing as Prentice Hall 6-9
Impo rtance of Invento ry Con trol
Five uses of inventory: The decoupling function
Storing resources
Irregular supply and demand Quantity discounts
Avoiding stockouts and shortages
Decouple manufacturing processes.
Inventory is used as a buffer between stagesin a manufacturing process.
This reduces delays and improves efficiency.
-
7/30/2019 BUSN603_11th_PPT_Ch_06
10/118Copyright 2012 Pearson Education, Inc. publishing as Prentice Hall 6-10
Impo rtance of Invento ry Con trol
Storing resources. Seasonal products may be stored to satisfy
off-season demand.
Materials can be stored as raw materials, work-in-process, or finished goods.
Labor can be stored as a component ofpartially completed subassemblies.
Compensate for irregular supply anddemand. Demand and supply may not be constant over
time.
Inventory can be used to buffer the variability.
-
7/30/2019 BUSN603_11th_PPT_Ch_06
11/118Copyright 2012 Pearson Education, Inc. publishing as Prentice Hall 6-11
Impo rtance of Invento ry Con trol
Take advantage of quantity discounts. Lower prices may be available for larger
orders.
Extra costs associated with holding moreinventory must be balanced against lowerpurchase price.
Avoid stockouts and shortages. Stockouts may result in lost sales.
Dissatisfied customers may choose to buyfrom another supplier.
-
7/30/2019 BUSN603_11th_PPT_Ch_06
12/118
Copyright 2012 Pearson Education, Inc. publishing as Prentice Hall 6-12
Invento ry Decis ions
There are two fundamental decisions incontrolling inventory: How much to order.
When to order. The major objective is to minimize total
inventory costs.
Common inventory costs are:
Cost of the items (purchase or material cost). Cost of ordering.
Cost of carrying, or holding, inventory.
Cost of stockouts.
-
7/30/2019 BUSN603_11th_PPT_Ch_06
13/118
Copyright 2012 Pearson Education, Inc. publishing as Prentice Hall 6-13
Inven tory Cos t Facto rs
ORDERING COST FACTORS CARRYING COST FACTORS
Developing and sending purchase orders Cost of capital
Processing and inspecting incominginventory
Taxes
Bill paying Insurance
Inventory inquiries Spoilage
Utilities, phone bills, and so on, for thepurchasing department
Theft
Salaries and wages for the purchasingdepartment employees
Obsolescence
Supplies, such as forms and paper, for thepurchasing department Salaries and wages for warehouseemployees
Utilities and building costs for thewarehouse
Supplies, such as forms and paper, for thewarehouse
Table 6.1
-
7/30/2019 BUSN603_11th_PPT_Ch_06
14/118
Copyright 2012 Pearson Education, Inc. publishing as Prentice Hall 6-14
Inven tory Cos t Facto rs
Ordering costs are generally independent oforder quantity. Many involve personnel time.
The amount of work is the same no matter thesize of the order.
Carrying costs generally varies with theamount of inventory, or the order size. The labor, space, and other costs increase as the
order size increases.
The actual cost of items purchased can varyif there are quantity discounts available.
-
7/30/2019 BUSN603_11th_PPT_Ch_06
15/118
Copyright 2012 Pearson Education, Inc. publishing as Prentice Hall 6-15
Econom ic Order Quant i ty
The econom ic order quant i ty(EOQ) modelis one of the oldest and most commonlyknown inventory control techniques.
It is easy to use but has a number ofimportant assumptions.
Objective is to minimize total cost ofinventory.
-
7/30/2019 BUSN603_11th_PPT_Ch_06
16/118
Copyright 2012 Pearson Education, Inc. publishing as Prentice Hall 6-16
Econom ic Order Quant i ty
Assumptions:1. Demand is known and constant.
2. Lead time is known and constant.
3. Receipt of inventory is instantaneous.
4. Purchase cost per unit is constantthroughout the year.
5. The only variable costs are the cost ofplacing an order, ordering cos t, and the cost
of holding or storing inventory over time,hold ingorcarry ing cost, and these areconstant throughout the year.
6. Orders are placed so that stockouts orshortages are avoided completely.
-
7/30/2019 BUSN603_11th_PPT_Ch_06
17/118
Copyright 2012 Pearson Education, Inc. publishing as Prentice Hall 6-17
Invento ry Usage Over Time
Time
InventoryLevel
MinimumInventory
0
Order Quantity = Q=Maximum Inventory Level
Figure 6.2
-
7/30/2019 BUSN603_11th_PPT_Ch_06
18/118
Copyright 2012 Pearson Education, Inc. publishing as Prentice Hall 6-18
Invento ry Costs in the EOQ Situat ion
Computing Average Inventory
2levelinventoryAverage
QINVENTORY LEVEL
DAY BEGINNING ENDING AVERAGE
April 1 (order received) 10 8 9
April 2 8 6 7
April 3 6 4 5
April 4 4 2 3April 5 2 0 1
Maximum level April 1 = 10 unitsTotal of daily averages = 9 + 7 + 5 + 3 + 1 = 25Number of days = 5Average inventory level = 25/5 = 5 units Table 6.2
-
7/30/2019 BUSN603_11th_PPT_Ch_06
19/118
Copyright 2012 Pearson Education, Inc. publishing as Prentice Hall 6-19
Inventory Costs in theEOQSituat ion
Mathematical equations can be developed using:
Q= number of pieces to orderEOQ = Q* = optimal number of pieces to order
D= annual demand in units for the inventory item
Co= ordering cost of each orderCh= holding or carrying cost per unit per year
Annual ordering cost Number of
orders placed
per year
Orderingcost per
order
oC
Q
D
-
7/30/2019 BUSN603_11th_PPT_Ch_06
20/118
Copyright 2012 Pearson Education, Inc. publishing as Prentice Hall 6-20
Inventory Costs in theEOQSituat ion
Mathematical equations can be developed using:
Q= number of pieces to orderEOQ = Q* = optimal number of pieces to order
D= annual demand in units for the inventory item
Co= ordering cost of each orderCh= holding or carrying cost per unit per year
Annual holding cost Average
inventory
Carryingcost per unit
per year
hC
Q
2
-
7/30/2019 BUSN603_11th_PPT_Ch_06
21/118
Copyright 2012 Pearson Education, Inc. publishing as Prentice Hall 6-21
Inventory Costs in theEOQSituat ion
MinimumTotalCost
Optimal
OrderQuantity
Curve of Total Costof Carrying
and Ordering
Carrying Cost Curve
Ordering Cost Curve
Cost
Order QuantityFigure 6.3
Total Cost as a Function of Order Quantity
-
7/30/2019 BUSN603_11th_PPT_Ch_06
22/118
Copyright 2012 Pearson Education, Inc. publishing as Prentice Hall 6-22
Finding theEOQ
According to the graph, when the EOQ assumptionsare met, total cost is minimized when annualordering cost equals annual holding cost.
ho CQ
CQ
D
2Solving forQ
hoCQDC
22 22
QC
DC
h
o *
EOQ QQ
C
DC
h
o 2
-
7/30/2019 BUSN603_11th_PPT_Ch_06
23/118
Copyright 2012 Pearson Education, Inc. publishing as Prentice Hall 6-23
Econom ic Order Quant i ty (EOQ) Model
hC
Q
2costholdingAnnual
oC
Q
DcostorderingAnnual
h
o
C
DCQ
2*EOQ
Summary of equations:
-
7/30/2019 BUSN603_11th_PPT_Ch_06
24/118
Copyright 2012 Pearson Education, Inc. publishing as Prentice Hall 6-24
Sumco Pump Company
Sumco Pump Company sells pump housings toother companies.
The firm would like to reduce inventory costs byfinding optimal order quantity.
Annual demand = 1,000 units Ordering cost = $10 per order
Average carrying cost per unit per year = $0.50
units20000040500
10000122 ,.
))(,(*
h
o
CDCQ
-
7/30/2019 BUSN603_11th_PPT_Ch_06
25/118
Copyright 2012 Pearson Education, Inc. publishing as Prentice Hall 6-25
Sumco Pump Company
Total annual cost = Order cost + Holding cost
hoC
QC
Q
DTC
2
).()(,
502
20010
200
0001 1005050 $$$
-
7/30/2019 BUSN603_11th_PPT_Ch_06
26/118
Copyright 2012 Pearson Education, Inc. publishing as Prentice Hall 6-26
Sumco Pump Company
Program 6.1A
Input Data and Excel QM formulas for theSumco Pump Company Example
-
7/30/2019 BUSN603_11th_PPT_Ch_06
27/118
Copyright 2012 Pearson Education, Inc. publishing as Prentice Hall 6-27
Sumco Pump Company
Program 6.1B
Excel QMSolution forthe SumcoPump
CompanyExample
-
7/30/2019 BUSN603_11th_PPT_Ch_06
28/118
Copyright 2012 Pearson Education, Inc. publishing as Prentice Hall 6-28
Purchase Cost o f Invento ry Items
Total inventory cost can be written to include thecost of purchased items.
Given the EOQ assumptions, the annual purchasecost is constant at DCno matter the order
policy, where Cis the purchase cost per unit.
Dis the annual demand in units.
At times it may be useful to know the average
dollar level of inventory:
2leveldollarAverage
)(CQ
-
7/30/2019 BUSN603_11th_PPT_Ch_06
29/118
Copyright 2012 Pearson Education, Inc. publishing as Prentice Hall 6-29
Purchase Cost o f Invento ry Items
Inventory carrying cost is often expressed as anannual percentage of the unit cost or price of theinventory.
This requires a new variable.
Annual inventory holding charge asa percentage of unit price or costI
The cost of storing inventory for one year is then
ICCh thus,
IC
DCQ o
2*
-
7/30/2019 BUSN603_11th_PPT_Ch_06
30/118
Copyright 2012 Pearson Education, Inc. publishing as Prentice Hall 6-30
Sensi t iv i ty Analys is w i th theEOQModel
The EOQ model assumes all values are know andfixed over time.
Generally, however, some values are estimated ormay change.
Determining the effects of these changes iscalled sensit iv i ty analysis .
Because of the square root in the formula,changes in the inputs result in relatively small
changes in the order quantity.
h
o
C
DC2EOQ
-
7/30/2019 BUSN603_11th_PPT_Ch_06
31/118
Copyright 2012 Pearson Education, Inc. publishing as Prentice Hall 6-31
Sensi t iv i ty Analys is w i th theEOQModel
In the Sumco Pump example:
units200500
1000012 .
))(,(EOQ
If the ordering cost were increased four times from$10 to $40, the order quantity would only double
units400500
4000012 .
))(,(
EOQ
In general, the EOQ changes by the square rootof the change to any of the inputs.
-
7/30/2019 BUSN603_11th_PPT_Ch_06
32/118
Copyright 2012 Pearson Education, Inc. publishing as Prentice Hall 6-32
Reorder Poin t :Determ ining When To Order
Once the order quantity is determined, thenext decision is when to order.
The time between placing an order and itsreceipt is called the
lead t ime(L ) or
del ivery t im e.
When to order is generally expressed as areorder po int(ROP).
Demandper day
Lead time for anew order in daysROP
dL
-
7/30/2019 BUSN603_11th_PPT_Ch_06
33/118
Copyright 2012 Pearson Education, Inc. publishing as Prentice Hall 6-33
Procomps Computer Chips
Demand for the computer chip is 8,000 per year.
Daily demand is 40 units.
Delivery takes three working days.
ROPdL 40 units per day 3 days 120 units
An order based on the EOQ calculation is placedwhen the inventory reaches 120 units.
The order arrives 3 days later just as theinventory is depleted.
-
7/30/2019 BUSN603_11th_PPT_Ch_06
34/118
Copyright 2012 Pearson Education, Inc. publishing as Prentice Hall 6-34
Reorder Poin t Graphs
Figure 6.4
-
7/30/2019 BUSN603_11th_PPT_Ch_06
35/118
Copyright 2012 Pearson Education, Inc. publishing as Prentice Hall 6-35
EOQ Without The Ins tantaneousReceip t Assumpt ion
When inventory accumulates over time, theinstantaneous receiptassumption does not apply.
Daily demand rate must be taken into account.
The revised model is often called the product ionrun model.
Figure 6.5
-
7/30/2019 BUSN603_11th_PPT_Ch_06
36/118
Copyright 2012 Pearson Education, Inc. publishing as Prentice Hall 6-36
Annual Carry ing Cos t forProduct ion Run Model
In production runs, setup costreplaces orderingcost.
The model uses the following variables:
Q number of pieces per order, orproduction run
Cs setup costCh holding or carrying cost per unit per
yearp daily production rated daily demand ratet length of production run in days
-
7/30/2019 BUSN603_11th_PPT_Ch_06
37/118
Copyright 2012 Pearson Education, Inc. publishing as Prentice Hall 6-37
Annual Carry ing Cos t forProduct ion Run Model
Maximum inventory level (Total produced during the production run)
(Total used during the production run)
(Daily production rate)(Number of days production) (Daily demand)(Number of days production)
(pt) (dt)
since Total produced Qpt
we know p
Qt
Maximuminventory
level
p
dQ
p
Qd
p
Qpdtpt 1
-
7/30/2019 BUSN603_11th_PPT_Ch_06
38/118
Copyright 2012 Pearson Education, Inc. publishing as Prentice Hall 6-38
Annual Carry ing Cos t forProduct ion Run Model
Since the average inventory is one-half the maximum:
p
dQ1
2
inventoryAverage
and
hCp
dQ
12costholdingAnnual
-
7/30/2019 BUSN603_11th_PPT_Ch_06
39/118
Copyright 2012 Pearson Education, Inc. publishing as Prentice Hall 6-39
Annual Setup Cost forProduct ion Run Model
sCQ
D
costsetupAnnual
Setup cost replaces ordering cost when a product isproduced over time.
replaces
o
CQ
DcostorderingAnnual
-
7/30/2019 BUSN603_11th_PPT_Ch_06
40/118
Copyright 2012 Pearson Education, Inc. publishing as Prentice Hall 6-40
Determ ining the Opt imalProduct ion Quant i ty
By setting setup costs equal to holding costs, wecan solve for the optimal order quantity
Annual holding cost Annual setup cost
shC
Q
DC
p
dQ
12
Solving for Q, we get
p
dC
DCQ
h
s
1
2*
-
7/30/2019 BUSN603_11th_PPT_Ch_06
41/118
Copyright 2012 Pearson Education, Inc. publishing as Prentice Hall 6-41
Produc t ion Run Model
Summary of equations
p
dC
DCQ
h
s
1
2quantityproductionOptimal *
sC
Q
DcostsetupAnnual
hC
p
dQ
12
costholdingAnnual
-
7/30/2019 BUSN603_11th_PPT_Ch_06
42/118
Copyright 2012 Pearson Education, Inc. publishing as Prentice Hall 6-42
Brown Manu factur ing
Brown Manufacturing produces commercialrefrigeration units in batches.
Annual demand D 10,000 units
Setup cost Cs $100Carrying cost Ch $0.50 per unit per year
Daily production rate p 80 units dailyDaily demand rate d 60 units daily
1. How many units should Brown produce in each batch?2. How long should the production part of the cycle last?
-
7/30/2019 BUSN603_11th_PPT_Ch_06
43/118
Copyright 2012 Pearson Education, Inc. publishing as Prentice Hall 6-43
Brown Manu factur ing Example
p
dC
DCQ
h
s
1
2*1. 2.
80
60150
100000102
.
,*Q
000000164
1500000002 ,,
.
,,
units4,000
days50
80
0004 ,p
QcycleProduction
-
7/30/2019 BUSN603_11th_PPT_Ch_06
44/118
Copyright 2012 Pearson Education, Inc. publishing as Prentice Hall 6-44
Brown Manu factur ing
Program 6.2A
Excel QM Formulas and Input Data for the BrownManufacturing Problem
-
7/30/2019 BUSN603_11th_PPT_Ch_06
45/118
Copyright 2012 Pearson Education, Inc. publishing as Prentice Hall 6-45
Brown Manu factur ing
Program 6.2B
The Solution Results for the Brown ManufacturingProblem Using Excel QM
-
7/30/2019 BUSN603_11th_PPT_Ch_06
46/118
Copyright 2012 Pearson Education, Inc. publishing as Prentice Hall 6-46
Quant i ty Discount Models
Quantity discounts are commonly available. The basic EOQ model is adjusted by adding in the
purchase or materials cost.
Total cost
Material cost + Ordering cost + Holding cost
hoC
QC
Q
DDC
2costTotal
where
D annual demand in unitsCo ordering cost of each orderC cost per unitCh holding or carrying cost per unit per year
-
7/30/2019 BUSN603_11th_PPT_Ch_06
47/118
Copyright 2012 Pearson Education, Inc. publishing as Prentice Hall 6-47
Quant i ty Discount Models
Quantity discounts are commonly available. The basic EOQ model is adjusted by adding in the
purchase or materials cost.
Total cost
Material cost + Ordering cost + Holding cost
hoC
QC
Q
DDC
2costTotal
where
D annual demand in unitsCo ordering cost of each orderC cost per unitCh holding or carrying cost per unit per year
Holding cost ChI C
I holding cost as a percentage of the unit cost (C)
Because unit cost is now variable,
-
7/30/2019 BUSN603_11th_PPT_Ch_06
48/118
Copyright 2012 Pearson Education, Inc. publishing as Prentice Hall 6-48
Quant i ty Discount Models
A typical quantity discount schedule can look likethe table below.
However, buying at the lowest unit cost is notalways the best choice.
DISCOUNTNUMBER
DISCOUNTQUANTITY DISCOUNT (%)
DISCOUNTCOST ($)
1 0 to 999 0 5.00
2 1,000 to 1,999 4 4.80
3 2,000 and over 5 4.75
Table 6.3
-
7/30/2019 BUSN603_11th_PPT_Ch_06
49/118
Copyright 2012 Pearson Education, Inc. publishing as Prentice Hall 6-49
Quant i ty Discount Models
Total cost curve for the quantity discount model
Figure 6.6
TC Curve forDiscount 1
TC Curve for Discount 3TotalCost
$
Order Quantity
0 1,000 2,000
TC Curve for Discount 2
EOQ for Discount 2
-
7/30/2019 BUSN603_11th_PPT_Ch_06
50/118
Copyright 2012 Pearson Education, Inc. publishing as Prentice Hall 6-50
Brass Department Store
Brass Department Store stocks toy race cars. Their supplier has given them the quantity
discount schedule shown in Table 6.3. Annual demand is 5,000 cars, ordering cost is $49, and
holding cost is 20% of the cost of the car
The first step is to compute EOQ values for eachdiscount.
orderpercars70000520
49000521
).)(.(
))(,)((EOQ
orderpercars71480420
49000522
).)(.(
))(,)((EOQ
orderpercars71875420
49000523
).)(.(
))(,)((EOQ
-
7/30/2019 BUSN603_11th_PPT_Ch_06
51/118
Copyright 2012 Pearson Education, Inc. publishing as Prentice Hall 6-51
Brass Department Store Example
The second step is adjust quantities below theallowable discount range.
The EOQ for discount 1 is allowable.
The EOQs for discounts 2 and 3 are outside the
allowable range and have to be adjusted to thesmallest quantity possible to purchase andreceive the discount:
Q1 700Q2 1,000Q3 2,000
-
7/30/2019 BUSN603_11th_PPT_Ch_06
52/118
Copyright 2012 Pearson Education, Inc. publishing as Prentice Hall 6-52
Brass Department Store
The third step is to compute the total cost for eachquantity.
DISCOUNTNUMBER
UNITPRICE
(C)
ORDERQUANTITY
(Q)
ANNUALMATERIALCOST ($)
= DC
ANNUALORDERINGCOST ($)= (D/Q)Co
ANNUALCARRYINGCOST ($)= (Q/2)Ch TOTAL ($)
1 $5.00 700 25,000 350.00 350.00 25,700.00
2 4.80 1,000 24,000 245.00 480.00 24,725.00
3 4.75 2,000 23,750 122.50 950.00 24,822.50
The final step is to choose the alternative with thelowest total cost.
Table 6.4
-
7/30/2019 BUSN603_11th_PPT_Ch_06
53/118
Copyright 2012 Pearson Education, Inc. publishing as Prentice Hall 6-53
Brass Department Store
Program 6.3A
Excel QMs Formulas and the Input Data for the BrassDepartment Store Quantity Discount Problem
-
7/30/2019 BUSN603_11th_PPT_Ch_06
54/118
Copyright 2012 Pearson Education, Inc. publishing as Prentice Hall 6-54
Brass Department Store
Program 6.3B
Excel QMs Solution to the Brass DepartmentStore Problem
-
7/30/2019 BUSN603_11th_PPT_Ch_06
55/118
Copyright 2012 Pearson Education, Inc. publishing as Prentice Hall 6-55
Use of Safety Stock
If demand or the lead time are uncertain,the exact ROP will not be known withcertainty.
To prevent s tockouts, it is necessary tocarry extra inventory called safety stock.
Safety stock can prevent stockouts whendemand is unusually high.
Safety stock can be implemented byadjusting the ROP.
-
7/30/2019 BUSN603_11th_PPT_Ch_06
56/118
Copyright 2012 Pearson Education, Inc. publishing as Prentice Hall 6-56
Use of Safety Stock
The basic ROP equation is
ROPdLd daily demand (or average daily demand)L order lead time or the number of
working days it takes to deliver an order(or average lead time)
A safety stock variable is added to the equationto accommodate uncertain demand during leadtime
ROP dL + SSwhere
SS safety stock
-
7/30/2019 BUSN603_11th_PPT_Ch_06
57/118
Copyright 2012 Pearson Education, Inc. publishing as Prentice Hall 6-57
Use of Safety Stock
Figure 6.7
-
7/30/2019 BUSN603_11th_PPT_Ch_06
58/118
Copyright 2012 Pearson Education, Inc. publishing as Prentice Hall 6-58
ROP wi th Known Stockout Costs
With a fixed EOQ and an ROP for placing orders,stockouts can only occur during lead time.
Our objective is to find the safety stock quantitythat will minimize the total of stockout cost and
holding cost. We need to know the stockout cost per unit and
the probability distribution of demand during leadtime.
Estimating stockout costs can be difficult asthere may be direct and indirect costs.
-
7/30/2019 BUSN603_11th_PPT_Ch_06
59/118
Copyright 2012 Pearson Education, Inc. publishing as Prentice Hall 6-59
Safety Stock w i th UnknownStockou t Costs
There are many situations when stockout costsare unknown.
An alternative approach to determining safetystock levels is to use a servic e level.
A service level is the percent of time you will notbe out of stock of a particular item.
Service level 1 Probability of a stockoutor
Probability of a stockout 1 Service level
-
7/30/2019 BUSN603_11th_PPT_Ch_06
60/118
Copyright 2012 Pearson Education, Inc. publishing as Prentice Hall 6-60
Hinsdale Company
Inventory demand during lead time is normallydistributed.
Mean demand during lead time is 350 units with astandard deviation of 10.
The company wants stockouts to occur only 5%of the time.
350 X ?
SS
5% Area ofNormal Curve
Figure 6.8
Mean demand 350dLT Standard deviation 10
X
Mean demand + Safety stockSS Safety stock XZ
XZ
-
7/30/2019 BUSN603_11th_PPT_Ch_06
61/118
Copyright 2012 Pearson Education, Inc. publishing as Prentice Hall 6-61
Hinsdale Company Example
350 X ?
SS
5% Area ofNormal Curve
From Appendix A we find Z 1.65 SSX
Solving for safety stock:
SS 1.65(10) 16.5 units, or 17 units
X = ROP = 350+16.5 = 366.5 units
Figure 6.9
-
7/30/2019 BUSN603_11th_PPT_Ch_06
62/118
Copyright 2012 Pearson Education, Inc. publishing as Prentice Hall 6-62
Hinsdale Company
Different safety stock levels will be generated fordifferent service levels.
However, the relationship is not linear. You should be aware of what a service level is costing in
terms of carrying the safety stock in inventory.
The relationship between Zand safety stock canbe developed as follows:
2. We also know that SSX1. We know that
XZ
3. Thus SS
Z
4. So we haveSSZ
Z(10)
-
7/30/2019 BUSN603_11th_PPT_Ch_06
63/118
Copyright 2012 Pearson Education, Inc. publishing as Prentice Hall 6-63
Hinsdale Company
Safety Stock at different service levelsSERVICE LEVEL(%)
ZVALUE FROMNORMAL CURVE TABLE
SAFETY STOCK(UNITS)
90 1.28 12.8
91 1.34 13.4
92 1.41 14.1
93 1.48 14.8
94 1.55 15.5
95 1.65 16.5
96 1.75 17.5
97 1.88 18.8
98 2.05 20.5
99 2.33 23.3
99.99 3.72 37.2Table 6.5
-
7/30/2019 BUSN603_11th_PPT_Ch_06
64/118
Copyright 2012 Pearson Education, Inc. publishing as Prentice Hall 6-64
Hinsdale Company
Figure 6.9
Service level versus annual carrying costs
This graph wasdeveloped for aspecific case, but
the general shape ofthe curve is thesame for all service-level problems.
Calcu lat ing Lead Time Demand
-
7/30/2019 BUSN603_11th_PPT_Ch_06
65/118
Copyright 2012 Pearson Education, Inc. publishing as Prentice Hall 6-65
Calcu lat ing Lead Time Demandand Standard Dev iat ion
There are three situations toconsider:Demand is variable but lead time is
constant.Demand is constant but lead time is
variable.
Both demand and lead time are variable.
Calcu lat ing Lead Time Demand
-
7/30/2019 BUSN603_11th_PPT_Ch_06
66/118
Copyright 2012 Pearson Education, Inc. publishing as Prentice Hall 6-66
Calcu lat ing Lead Time Demandand Standard Dev iat ion
Demand is variable but lead time isconstant:
Where:
Calcu lat ing Lead Time Demand
-
7/30/2019 BUSN603_11th_PPT_Ch_06
67/118
Copyright 2012 Pearson Education, Inc. publishing as Prentice Hall 6-67
Calcu lat ing Lead Time Demandand Standard Dev iat ion
Demand is constant but lead time isvariable:
Where:
Calcu lat ing Lead Time Demand
-
7/30/2019 BUSN603_11th_PPT_Ch_06
68/118
Copyright 2012 Pearson Education, Inc. publishing as Prentice Hall 6-68
Calcu lat ing Lead Time Demandand Standard Dev iat ion
Both demand and lead time arevariable.
Notice that this is the most general case and that
the other two cases can be derived from thisformula.
-
7/30/2019 BUSN603_11th_PPT_Ch_06
69/118
Copyright 2012 Pearson Education, Inc. publishing as Prentice Hall 6-69
Hinsdale Company
Suppose for product SKU F5402, daily demand isnormally distributed, with a mean of 15 units and astandard deviation of 3. Lead time is exactly 4 days.To maintain a 97% service level, what is the ROP,
and how much safety stock should be carried?
ROP = 15(4)+1.88(3*2)= 60 + 11.28=71.28
So the average demand during lead time is 60units, and safety stock is 11.28 units.
-
7/30/2019 BUSN603_11th_PPT_Ch_06
70/118
Copyright 2012 Pearson Education, Inc. publishing as Prentice Hall 6-70
Hinsdale Company
Suppose for product SKU B7319, daily demand isconstant at 25 units per day, but lead time isnormally distributed, with a mean of 6 days and astandard deviation of 3. To maintain a 98% service
level, what is the ROP?
ROP = 25(6)+2.05(25*3)= 150+153.75
=303.75
So the average demand during lead time is 150units, and safety stock is 153.75 units.
-
7/30/2019 BUSN603_11th_PPT_Ch_06
71/118
Copyright 2012 Pearson Education, Inc. publishing as Prentice Hall 6-71
Hinsdale Company
Suppose for product SKU F9004, daily demand isnormally distributed, with a mean of 20 units and astandard deviation of 4. Lead time is normallydistributed, with a mean of 5 days and a standard
deviation of 2 days. To maintain a 94% servicelevel, what is the ROP?
ROP = 100+1.55(40.99)= 163.53
Calculat ing Annual Hold ing
-
7/30/2019 BUSN603_11th_PPT_Ch_06
72/118
Copyright 2012 Pearson Education, Inc. publishing as Prentice Hall 6-72
Calculat ing Annual HoldingCost w i th Safety Stock
Under standard assumptions of EOQ,average inventory is just Q/2.
So annual holding cost is: (Q/2)*Ch.
This is not the case with safety stockbecause safety stock is not meant tobe drawn down.
Calculat ing Annual Hold ing
-
7/30/2019 BUSN603_11th_PPT_Ch_06
73/118
Copyright 2012 Pearson Education, Inc. publishing as Prentice Hall 6-73
Calculat ing Annual HoldingCost w i th Safety Stock
Total annual holding cost = holdingcost of regular inventory + holdingcost of safety stock
Where:
THC = total annual holding costQ = order quantityCh = holding cost per unit per yearSS = safety stock
Excel QM Form ulas and Input Data for
-
7/30/2019 BUSN603_11th_PPT_Ch_06
74/118
Copyright 2012 Pearson Education, Inc. publishing as Prentice Hall 6-74
Excel QM Form ulas and Input Data forthe Hinsdale Safety Stock Prob lems
Program 6.4A
Excel QM Solu t ion to the
-
7/30/2019 BUSN603_11th_PPT_Ch_06
75/118
Copyright 2012 Pearson Education, Inc. publishing as Prentice Hall 6-75
Excel QM Solu t ion to theHinsdale Safety Stock Prob lem
Program 6.4B
-
7/30/2019 BUSN603_11th_PPT_Ch_06
76/118
Copyright 2012 Pearson Education, Inc. publishing as Prentice Hall 6-76
Single-Period Invento ry Models
Some products have no future value beyond thecurrent period.
These situations are called news vendorproblems orsingle-per iod inventory m odels.
Analysis uses marginal profit (MP) and marginalloss (ML) and is called marginal analysis.
With a manageable number of states of natureand alternatives, discrete distributions can beused.
When there are a large number of alternatives orstates of nature, the normal distribution may beused.
Marginal Analysis w ith
-
7/30/2019 BUSN603_11th_PPT_Ch_06
77/118
Copyright 2012 Pearson Education, Inc. publishing as Prentice Hall 6-77
Marginal Analysis w ithDiscrete Distr ibu t ions
We stock an additional unit only if the expectedmarginal profit for that unit exceeds the expectedmarginal loss.
P probability that demand will be greaterthan or equal to a given supply (or theprobability of selling at least oneadditional unit).
1P probability that demand will be less thansupply (or the probability that oneadditional unit will not sell).
Marginal Analysis w ith
-
7/30/2019 BUSN603_11th_PPT_Ch_06
78/118
Copyright 2012 Pearson Education, Inc. publishing as Prentice Hall 6-78
Marginal Analysis w ithDiscrete Distr ibu t ions
The expected marginal profit is P(MP) .
The expected marginal loss is (1P)(ML).
The optimal decision rule is to stock theadditional unit if:
P(MP) (1 P)ML
With some basic manipulation:
P(MP) MLP(ML)P(MP) + P(ML) ML
P(MP + ML) ML
orMPML
ML
P
Steps of Marginal Analysis w ith
-
7/30/2019 BUSN603_11th_PPT_Ch_06
79/118
Copyright 2012 Pearson Education, Inc. publishing as Prentice Hall 6-79
Steps of Marginal Analysis w ith
Discrete Distr ibu t ions
1. Determine the value of for theproblem.
2. Construct a probability table and add a
cumulative probability column.3. Keep ordering inventory as long as the
probability (P) of selling at least one additional
unit is greater than
MPML
ML
MPML
ML
-
7/30/2019 BUSN603_11th_PPT_Ch_06
80/118
Copyright 2012 Pearson Education, Inc. publishing as Prentice Hall 6-80
Cafdu Donu t
The caf buys donuts each day for $4 per cartonof 2 dozen donuts.
Any cartons not sold are thrown away at the endof the day.
If a carton is sold, the total revenue is $6. The marginal profit per carton is.
MP Marginal profit $6 $4 $2
The marginal loss is $4 per carton since cartonscan not be returned or salvaged.
Caf du Donuts Probability
-
7/30/2019 BUSN603_11th_PPT_Ch_06
81/118
Copyright 2012 Pearson Education, Inc. publishing as Prentice Hall 6-81
Caf du Donut s ProbabilityDistr ibut ion
DAILY SALES(CARTONS OF DOUGHNUTS)
PROBABILITY (P) THAT DEMANDWILL BE AT THIS LEVEL
4 0.05
5 0.15
6 0.15
7 0.20
8 0.25
9 0.10
10 0.10
Total 1.00Table 6.6
-
7/30/2019 BUSN603_11th_PPT_Ch_06
82/118
Copyright 2012 Pearson Education, Inc. publishing as Prentice Hall 6-82
MPMLMLStep 1. Determine the value of for the
decision rule.
Cafdu Donu t Examp le
6706
4
24
4.
$$
$
MPML
ML P670.P
Step 2. Add a new column to the table to reflect theprobability that doughnut sales will be at
each level or greater.
Marg inal Analys is fo r Cafdu
-
7/30/2019 BUSN603_11th_PPT_Ch_06
83/118
Copyright 2012 Pearson Education, Inc. publishing as Prentice Hall 6-83
Marg inal Analys is fo r CafduDonut
DAILY SALES(CARTONS OFDOUGHNUTS)
PROBABILITY (P) THATDEMAND WILL BE ATTHIS LEVEL
PROBABILITY (P) THATDEMAND WILL BE AT THISLEVEL OR GREATER
4 0.05 1.00 0.665 0.15 0.95 0.66
6 0.15 0.80 0.66
7 0.20 0.65
8 0.25 0.45
9 0.10 0.20
10 0.10 0.10
Total 1.00
Table 6.7
C f d D E l
-
7/30/2019 BUSN603_11th_PPT_Ch_06
84/118
Copyright 2012 Pearson Education, Inc. publishing as Prentice Hall 6-84
Cafdu Donu t Examp le
Step 3. Keep ordering additional cartons as longas the probability of selling at least oneadditional carton is greater than P, whichis the indifference probability.
Pat 6 cartons 0.80 > 0.67
Marginal Analys is w i th the
-
7/30/2019 BUSN603_11th_PPT_Ch_06
85/118
Copyright 2012 Pearson Education, Inc. publishing as Prentice Hall 6-85
Marginal Analys is w i th theNormal Distr ibut ion
We first need to find four values:
1. The average or mean sales for the product, 2. The standard deviation of sales,
3. The marginal profit for the product, MP.4. The marginal loss for the product, ML.
We let X* optimal stocking level.
Steps o f Marginal Analysis w ith the
-
7/30/2019 BUSN603_11th_PPT_Ch_06
86/118
Copyright 2012 Pearson Education, Inc. publishing as Prentice Hall 6-86
Steps o f Marginal Analysis w ith the
Normal Distr ibut ion
1. Determine the value of for theproblem.
2. Locate Pon the normal distribution (Appendix
A) and find the associated Z-value.
MPML
ML
to solve for the resulting stocking policy:
ZX *
*X
Z
3. Find X* using the relationship:
Joes Stocking Decision for the
-
7/30/2019 BUSN603_11th_PPT_Ch_06
87/118
Copyright 2012 Pearson Education, Inc. publishing as Prentice Hall 6-87
Joe s Stocking Decision for theChicago Tr ibune
Demand for the Chicago Tr ibuneat JoesNewsstand averages 60 papers a day with astandard deviation of 10.
The marginal loss is 20 cents and the marginal
profit is 30 cents.Step 1. Joe should stock the Tribuneas long asthe probability of selling the last unit is at leastML/(ML + MP):
40050
20
cents30cents20
cents20.
MPML
ML Let P= 0.40.
Joes Stocking Decision for the
-
7/30/2019 BUSN603_11th_PPT_Ch_06
88/118
Copyright 2012 Pearson Education, Inc. publishing as Prentice Hall 6-88
Joe s Stocking Decision for theChicago Tr ibune
Step 2. Using the normal distribution in Figure6.10, we find the appropriate Zvalue
Z= 0.25 standard deviations from the mean
50 X Demand
Area under the Curve is 0.40
Figure 6.10 X*
Optimal Stocking Policy (62 Newspapers)
Area under the Curve is 1 0.40 = 0.60
(Z= 0.25) Mean Daily Sales
Joes Stocking Decision for the
-
7/30/2019 BUSN603_11th_PPT_Ch_06
89/118
Copyright 2012 Pearson Education, Inc. publishing as Prentice Hall 6-89
Joe s Stocking Decision for theChicago Tr ibune
Step 3. In this problem, 60 and 10, so
10
60250
*. X
or
X* 60 + 0.25(10) 62.5, or 62 newspapers
Joe should order 62 newspapers since theprobability of selling 63 newspapers is slightlyless than 0.40
Joes Stocking Decision for the
-
7/30/2019 BUSN603_11th_PPT_Ch_06
90/118
Copyright 2012 Pearson Education, Inc. publishing as Prentice Hall 6-90
gChicago Tr ibune
The procedure is the same when P> 0.50. Joe also stocks the Chicago Sun-Times.
Marginal loss is 40 cents and marginal profit is10 cents.
Daily sales average 100 copies with a standarddeviation of 10 papers.
80050
40
cents10cents40
cents40.
MPML
ML
Z= 0.84 standard deviations from the mean
From Appendix A:
Joes Stocking Decision for the
-
7/30/2019 BUSN603_11th_PPT_Ch_06
91/118
Copyright 2012 Pearson Education, Inc. publishing as Prentice Hall 6-91
gChicago Tr ibune
With 100 and 10
10
100840
*. Xor
X* 100 0.84(10) 91.6, or 91 newspapers
100 X Demand
Area under the
Curve is 0.40
Figure 6.11X*
Optimal Stocking Policy (91 Newspapers)
(Z= 0.84)
ABC A l i
-
7/30/2019 BUSN603_11th_PPT_Ch_06
92/118
Copyright 2012 Pearson Education, Inc. publishing as Prentice Hall 6-92
ABC Analys is
The purpose of ABC analysis is to divide theinventory into three groups based on the overallinventory value of the items.
Group A items account for the major portion ofinventory costs. Typically about 70% of the dollar value but only 10% of
the quantity of items.
Forecasting and inventory management must be donecarefully.
Group B items are more moderately priced. May represent 20% of the cost and 20% of the quantity.
Group C items are very low cost but high volume. It is not cost effective to spend a lot of time managing
these items.
S f ABC A l i
-
7/30/2019 BUSN603_11th_PPT_Ch_06
93/118
Copyright 2012 Pearson Education, Inc. publishing as Prentice Hall 6-93
Summary of ABC Analys is
INVENTORYGROUP
DOLLARUSAGE (%)
INVENTORYITEMS (%)
ARE QUANTITATIVE CONTROLTECHNIQUES USED?
A 70 10 Yes
B 20 20 In some cases
C 10 70 No
Table 6.8
Dependent Demand : The Case for
-
7/30/2019 BUSN603_11th_PPT_Ch_06
94/118
Copyright 2012 Pearson Education, Inc. publishing as Prentice Hall 6-94
pMater ial Requiremen ts Plann ing
All the inventory models discussed so farhave assumed demand for one item isindependent of the demand for any otheritem.
However, in many situations itemsdemand is dependent on demand for oneor more other items.
In these situations,Material Requ iremen tsPlann ing (MRP)can be employed
effectively.
Dependent Demand : The Case for
-
7/30/2019 BUSN603_11th_PPT_Ch_06
95/118
Copyright 2012 Pearson Education, Inc. publishing as Prentice Hall 6-95
pMater ial Requiremen ts Plann ing
Some of the benefits of MRP are:1. Increased customer service levels.
2. Reduced inventory costs.
3. Better inventory planning and scheduling.
4. Higher total sales.
5. Faster response to market changes and shifts.
6. Reduced inventory levels without reducedcustomer service.
Most MRP systems are computerized, butthe basic analysis is straightforward.
Material Struc tu re Tree
-
7/30/2019 BUSN603_11th_PPT_Ch_06
96/118
Copyright 2012 Pearson Education, Inc. publishing as Prentice Hall 6-96
Material Struc tu re Tree
The first step is to develop a bi l l of mater ials(BOM).
The BOM identifies components, descriptions,and the number required for production of oneunit of the final product.
From the BOM we can develop a materialstructure tree.
We use the following data: Demand for product A is 50 units.
Each A requires 2 units of B and 3 units of C. Each B requires 2 units of D and 3 units of E.
Each C requires 1 unit of E and 2 units of F.
Material Struc tu re Tree
-
7/30/2019 BUSN603_11th_PPT_Ch_06
97/118
Copyright 2012 Pearson Education, Inc. publishing as Prentice Hall 6-97
Material Struc tu re Tree
Material structure tree for Item A
ALevel
0
1
2
B(2) C(3)
D(2) E(3) F(2)E(1)
Figure 6.12
Material Struc tu re Tree
-
7/30/2019 BUSN603_11th_PPT_Ch_06
98/118
Copyright 2012 Pearson Education, Inc. publishing as Prentice Hall 6-98
Material Struc tu re Tree
It is clear from the three that the demand for B, C,D, E, and F is completely dependent on thedemand for A.
The material structure tree has three levels: 0, 1,
and 2. Items above a level are called parents.
Items below any level are called components .
The number in parenthesis beside each item
shows how many are required to make the itemabove it.
Material Struc tu re Tree
-
7/30/2019 BUSN603_11th_PPT_Ch_06
99/118
Copyright 2012 Pearson Education, Inc. publishing as Prentice Hall 6-99
Material Struc tu re Tree
We can use the material structure tree and the demandfor Item A to compute demands for the other items.
Part B: 2 number of As 2 50 100.
Part C: 3 number of As 3 50 150.Part D: 2 number of Bs 2 100 200.Part E: 3 number of Bs + 1 number of Cs
3 100 + 1 150 450.Part F: 2 number of Cs 2 150 300.
Gross and Net Mater ial
-
7/30/2019 BUSN603_11th_PPT_Ch_06
100/118
Copyright 2012 Pearson Education, Inc. publishing as Prentice Hall 6-100
Requ iremen ts Plan
Once the materials structure tree is done, weconstruct a gross material requirements plan.
This is a time schedule that shows: when an item must be ordered when there is no
inventory on hand, or
when the production of an item must be started in orderto satisfy the demand for the finished product at aparticular date.
We need lead times for each of the items.
Item A 1 week Item D 1 weekItem B 2 weeks Item E 2 weeksItem C 1 week Item F 3 weeks
Gross Material Requ irements Plan
-
7/30/2019 BUSN603_11th_PPT_Ch_06
101/118
Copyright 2012 Pearson Education, Inc. publishing as Prentice Hall 6-101
for 50 Units o f AWeek
1 2 3 4 5 6
ARequired Date 50
Lead Time = 1 WeekOrder Release 50
BRequired Date 100
Lead Time = 2 WeeksOrder Release 100
CRequired Date 150
Lead Time = 1 WeekOrder Release 150
DRequired Date 200
Lead Time = 1 WeekOrder Release 200
ERequired Date 300 150
Lead Time = 2 WeeksOrder Release 300 150
FRequired Date 300
Lead Time = 3 WeeksOrder Release 300
Figure 6.13
Net Material Requ irements Plan
-
7/30/2019 BUSN603_11th_PPT_Ch_06
102/118
Copyright 2012 Pearson Education, Inc. publishing as Prentice Hall 6-102
Net Material Requ irements Plan
A net material requirements plan can be constructedfrom the gross materials requirements plan and thefollowing on-hand inventory information:
ITEM ON-HAND INVENTORY
A 10
B 15
C 20
D 10
E 10
F 5
Table 6.9
Net Material Requ irements Plan
-
7/30/2019 BUSN603_11th_PPT_Ch_06
103/118
Copyright 2012 Pearson Education, Inc. publishing as Prentice Hall 6-103
Net Material Requ irements Plan
Using this data we can construct a planthat includes: Gross requirements.
On-hand inventory.
Net requirements.
Planned-order receipts.
Planned-order releases.
The net requirements plan is constructedlike the gross requirements plan.
Net Material Requ irements Plan
-
7/30/2019 BUSN603_11th_PPT_Ch_06
104/118
Copyright 2012 Pearson Education, Inc. publishing as Prentice Hall 6-104
for 50 Units o f A
Week LeadTimeItem 1 2 3 4 5 6
A Gross 50 1
On-Hand 10 10
Net 40
Order Receipt 40
Order Release 40
B Gross 80A 2
On-Hand 15 15
Net 65
Order Receipt 65
Order Release 65
Figure 6.14(a)
Net Material Requ irements Plan
-
7/30/2019 BUSN603_11th_PPT_Ch_06
105/118
Copyright 2012 Pearson Education, Inc. publishing as Prentice Hall 6-105
for 50 Units o f A
Week LeadTimeItem 1 2 3 4 5 6
C Gross 120A 1
On-Hand 20 10
Net 100
Order Receipt 100
Order Release 100
D Gross 130B 1
On-Hand 10 10
Net 120
Order Receipt 120
Order Release 120
Figure 6.14(b)
Net Material Requ irements Plan
-
7/30/2019 BUSN603_11th_PPT_Ch_06
106/118
Copyright 2012 Pearson Education, Inc. publishing as Prentice Hall 6-106
for 50 Units o f A
Week LeadTimeItem 1 2 3 4 5 6
E Gross 195B 100C 2
On-Hand 10 10 0
Net 185 100
Order Receipt 185 100
Order Release 185 100
F Gross 200C 3
On-Hand 5 5
Net 195
Order Receipt 195
Order Release 195
Figure 6.14(c)
Two o r More End Produc ts
-
7/30/2019 BUSN603_11th_PPT_Ch_06
107/118
Copyright 2012 Pearson Education, Inc. publishing as Prentice Hall 6-107
Two o r More End Produc ts
Most manufacturing companies have more thanone end item.
In this example, the second product is AA and ithas the following material structure tree:
AA
D(3) F(2)
If we require 10 units of AA, the gross
requirements for parts D and F can be computed:
Part D: 3 number of AAs 3 10 30Part F: 2 number of AAs 2 10 20
Two o r More End Produc ts
-
7/30/2019 BUSN603_11th_PPT_Ch_06
108/118
Copyright 2012 Pearson Education, Inc. publishing as Prentice Hall 6-108
Two o r More End Produc ts
The lead time for AA is one week. The gross requirement for AA is 10 units in week 6
and there are no units on hand.
This new product can be added to the MRP
process. The addition of AA will only change the MRP
schedules for the parts contained in AA.
MRP can also schedule spare parts andcomponents.
These have to be included as gross requirements.
Net Material Requ irements
-
7/30/2019 BUSN603_11th_PPT_Ch_06
109/118
Copyright 2012 Pearson Education, Inc. publishing as Prentice Hall 6-109
Plan , Includ ing AA
Figure 6.15
Just-in -Time (J IT) Invento ry
-
7/30/2019 BUSN603_11th_PPT_Ch_06
110/118
Copyright 2012 Pearson Education, Inc. publishing as Prentice Hall 6-110
Contro l
To achieve greater efficiency in theproduction process, organizations havetried to have less in-process inventory onhand.
This is known as JIT invento ry.
The inventory arrives just in time to beused during the manufacturing process.
One technique of implementing JIT is amanual procedure called kanban.
Just-in-Time Invento ry Con trol
-
7/30/2019 BUSN603_11th_PPT_Ch_06
111/118
Copyright 2012 Pearson Education, Inc. publishing as Prentice Hall 6-111
Just in Time Invento ry Con trol
Kanban in Japanese means card.
With a dual-card kanban system, there is aconveyance kanban, or C-kanban, and a
production kanban, or P-kanban. Kanban systems are quite simple, but they
require considerable discipline.
As there is little inventory to cover
variability, the schedule must be followedexactly.
4 Steps o f Kanban
-
7/30/2019 BUSN603_11th_PPT_Ch_06
112/118
Copyright 2012 Pearson Education, Inc. publishing as Prentice Hall 6-112
4 Steps o f Kanban
1. A user takes a container of parts or inventoryalong with its C-kanban to his or her work area.
When there are no more parts or the container isempty, the user returns the container along with
the C-kanban to the producer area.2. At the producer area, there is a full container of
parts along with a P-kanban.
The user detaches the P-kanban from the fullcontainer and takes the container and the C-
kanban back to his or her area for immediateuse.
4 Steps o f Kanban
-
7/30/2019 BUSN603_11th_PPT_Ch_06
113/118
Copyright 2012 Pearson Education, Inc. publishing as Prentice Hall 6-113
4 Steps o f Kanban
3. The detached P-kanban goes back to theproducer area along with the empty container
The P-kanban is a signal that new parts are to bemanufactured or that new parts are to be placed
in the container and is attached to the containerwhen it is filled .
4. This process repeats itself during the typicalworkday.
The Kanban Sys tem
-
7/30/2019 BUSN603_11th_PPT_Ch_06
114/118
Copyright 2012 Pearson Education, Inc. publishing as Prentice Hall 6-114
The Kanban Sys tem
ProducerArea
StorageArea
UserArea
P-kanbanand
Container
C-kanbanand
Container
4
3 2
1
Figure 6.16
Enterp r ise Resource Planning
-
7/30/2019 BUSN603_11th_PPT_Ch_06
115/118
Copyright 2012 Pearson Education, Inc. publishing as Prentice Hall 6-115
MRP has evolved to include not only the materialsrequired in production, but also the labor hours,material cost, and other resources related toproduction.
In this approach the term MRP II is often used andthe word resourcereplaces the word requirements.
As this concept evolved and sophisticated softwarewas developed, these systems became known asenterpr ise resou rce plann ing(ERP) systems.
Enterp r ise Resource Planning
Enterp r ise Resource Planning
-
7/30/2019 BUSN603_11th_PPT_Ch_06
116/118
Copyright 2012 Pearson Education, Inc. publishing as Prentice Hall 6-116
The objective of an ERP System is to reduce costsby integrating all of the operations of a firm.
Starts with the supplier of materials needed andflows through the organization to includeinvoicing the customer of the final product.
Data are entered only once into a database whereit can be quickly and easily accessed by anyone inthe organization.
Benefits include:
Reduced transaction costs. Increased speed and accuracy of information.
Enterp r ise Resource Planning
Enterp r ise Resource Planning
-
7/30/2019 BUSN603_11th_PPT_Ch_06
117/118
Copyright 2012 Pearson Education, Inc. publishing as Prentice Hall 6-117
Drawbacks to ERP: The software is expensive to buy and costly to
customize. Small systems can cost hundreds of thousands of
dollars.
Large systems can cost hundreds of millions.
The implementation of an ERP system mayrequire a company to change its normaloperations.
Employees are often resistant to change. Training employees on the use of the new
software can be expensive.
Enterp r ise Resource Planning
Copyr ight
-
7/30/2019 BUSN603_11th_PPT_Ch_06
118/118
Copyr ight
All rights reserved. No part of this publication may bereproduced, stored in a retrieval system, or transmitted, inany form or by any means, electronic, mechanical,photocopying, recording, or otherwise, without the prior
itt i i f th bli h P i t d i th U it d