busn603_11th_ppt_ch_06

Upload: cpd

Post on 14-Apr-2018

214 views

Category:

Documents


0 download

TRANSCRIPT

  • 7/30/2019 BUSN603_11th_PPT_Ch_06

    1/118

    Chapter 6

    To accompanyQuanti tat ive Analys is for Management, Eleventh Edit ion,by Render, Stair, and HannaPower Point slides created by Brian Peterson andXiaodong Wu

    Inven tory Con trol Models

  • 7/30/2019 BUSN603_11th_PPT_Ch_06

    2/118

    Copyright 2012 Pearson Education, Inc. publishing as Prentice Hall 6-2

    Learn ing Object ives

    1. Understand the importance of inventorycontrol and ABC analysis.

    2. Use the economic order quantity (EOQ) todetermine how much to order.

    3. Compute the reorder point (ROP) indetermining when to order more inventory.

    4. Handle inventory problems that allowquantity discounts or non-instantaneousreceipt.

    After completing this chapter, students will be able to:

  • 7/30/2019 BUSN603_11th_PPT_Ch_06

    3/118

    Copyright 2012 Pearson Education, Inc. publishing as Prentice Hall 6-3

    Learn ing Object ives

    5. Understand the use of safety stock.

    6. Describe the use of material requirements

    planning in solving dependent-demandinventory problems.

    7. Discuss just-in-time inventory concepts toreduce inventory levels and costs.

    8. Discuss enterprise resource planningsystems.

    After completing this chapter, students will be able to:

  • 7/30/2019 BUSN603_11th_PPT_Ch_06

    4/118

    Copyright 2012 Pearson Education, Inc. publishing as Prentice Hall 6-4

    Chapter Ou tl ine

    6.1 Introduction

    6.2 Importance of Inventory Control

    6.3 Inventory Decisions

    6.4 Economic Order Quantity: DeterminingHow Much to Order

    6.5 Reorder Point: Determining When to Order

    6.6 EOQ Without the Instantaneous ReceiptAssumption

    6.7 Quantity Discount Models

    6.8 Use of Safety Stock

  • 7/30/2019 BUSN603_11th_PPT_Ch_06

    5/118

    Copyright 2012 Pearson Education, Inc. publishing as Prentice Hall 6-5

    Chapter Ou tl ine

    6.9 Single-Period Inventory Models

    6.10 ABC Analysis

    6.11 Dependent Demand: The Case for MaterialRequirements Planning

    6.12 Just-in-Time Inventory Control

    6.13 Enterprise Resource Planning

  • 7/30/2019 BUSN603_11th_PPT_Ch_06

    6/118

    Copyright 2012 Pearson Education, Inc. publishing as Prentice Hall 6-6

    In t roduct ion

    Inventory is an expensive and importantasset to many companies.

    Inventory is any stored resource used tosatisfy a current or future need.

    Common examples are raw materials, work-in-process, and finished goods.

    Most companies try to balance high and lowinventory levels with cost minimization as a

    goal. Lower inventory levels can reduce costs.

    Low inventory levels may result in stockouts anddissatisfied customers.

  • 7/30/2019 BUSN603_11th_PPT_Ch_06

    7/118Copyright 2012 Pearson Education, Inc. publishing as Prentice Hall 6-7

    In t roduct ion

    All organizations have some type of inventorycontrol system.

    Inventory planning helps determine whatgoods and/or services need to be produced.

    Inventory planning helps determine whetherthe organization produces the goods orservices or whether they are purchased fromanother organization.

    Inventory planning also involves demandforecasting.

  • 7/30/2019 BUSN603_11th_PPT_Ch_06

    8/118Copyright 2012 Pearson Education, Inc. publishing as Prentice Hall 6-8

    Controlling

    InventoryLevels

    In t roduct ion

    Forecasting

    Parts/ProductDemand

    Planning on WhatInventory to Stock

    and How to AcquireIt

    Feedback Measurementsto Revise Plans and

    Forecasts

    Figure 6.1

    Inventory planning and control

  • 7/30/2019 BUSN603_11th_PPT_Ch_06

    9/118Copyright 2012 Pearson Education, Inc. publishing as Prentice Hall 6-9

    Impo rtance of Invento ry Con trol

    Five uses of inventory: The decoupling function

    Storing resources

    Irregular supply and demand Quantity discounts

    Avoiding stockouts and shortages

    Decouple manufacturing processes.

    Inventory is used as a buffer between stagesin a manufacturing process.

    This reduces delays and improves efficiency.

  • 7/30/2019 BUSN603_11th_PPT_Ch_06

    10/118Copyright 2012 Pearson Education, Inc. publishing as Prentice Hall 6-10

    Impo rtance of Invento ry Con trol

    Storing resources. Seasonal products may be stored to satisfy

    off-season demand.

    Materials can be stored as raw materials, work-in-process, or finished goods.

    Labor can be stored as a component ofpartially completed subassemblies.

    Compensate for irregular supply anddemand. Demand and supply may not be constant over

    time.

    Inventory can be used to buffer the variability.

  • 7/30/2019 BUSN603_11th_PPT_Ch_06

    11/118Copyright 2012 Pearson Education, Inc. publishing as Prentice Hall 6-11

    Impo rtance of Invento ry Con trol

    Take advantage of quantity discounts. Lower prices may be available for larger

    orders.

    Extra costs associated with holding moreinventory must be balanced against lowerpurchase price.

    Avoid stockouts and shortages. Stockouts may result in lost sales.

    Dissatisfied customers may choose to buyfrom another supplier.

  • 7/30/2019 BUSN603_11th_PPT_Ch_06

    12/118

    Copyright 2012 Pearson Education, Inc. publishing as Prentice Hall 6-12

    Invento ry Decis ions

    There are two fundamental decisions incontrolling inventory: How much to order.

    When to order. The major objective is to minimize total

    inventory costs.

    Common inventory costs are:

    Cost of the items (purchase or material cost). Cost of ordering.

    Cost of carrying, or holding, inventory.

    Cost of stockouts.

  • 7/30/2019 BUSN603_11th_PPT_Ch_06

    13/118

    Copyright 2012 Pearson Education, Inc. publishing as Prentice Hall 6-13

    Inven tory Cos t Facto rs

    ORDERING COST FACTORS CARRYING COST FACTORS

    Developing and sending purchase orders Cost of capital

    Processing and inspecting incominginventory

    Taxes

    Bill paying Insurance

    Inventory inquiries Spoilage

    Utilities, phone bills, and so on, for thepurchasing department

    Theft

    Salaries and wages for the purchasingdepartment employees

    Obsolescence

    Supplies, such as forms and paper, for thepurchasing department Salaries and wages for warehouseemployees

    Utilities and building costs for thewarehouse

    Supplies, such as forms and paper, for thewarehouse

    Table 6.1

  • 7/30/2019 BUSN603_11th_PPT_Ch_06

    14/118

    Copyright 2012 Pearson Education, Inc. publishing as Prentice Hall 6-14

    Inven tory Cos t Facto rs

    Ordering costs are generally independent oforder quantity. Many involve personnel time.

    The amount of work is the same no matter thesize of the order.

    Carrying costs generally varies with theamount of inventory, or the order size. The labor, space, and other costs increase as the

    order size increases.

    The actual cost of items purchased can varyif there are quantity discounts available.

  • 7/30/2019 BUSN603_11th_PPT_Ch_06

    15/118

    Copyright 2012 Pearson Education, Inc. publishing as Prentice Hall 6-15

    Econom ic Order Quant i ty

    The econom ic order quant i ty(EOQ) modelis one of the oldest and most commonlyknown inventory control techniques.

    It is easy to use but has a number ofimportant assumptions.

    Objective is to minimize total cost ofinventory.

  • 7/30/2019 BUSN603_11th_PPT_Ch_06

    16/118

    Copyright 2012 Pearson Education, Inc. publishing as Prentice Hall 6-16

    Econom ic Order Quant i ty

    Assumptions:1. Demand is known and constant.

    2. Lead time is known and constant.

    3. Receipt of inventory is instantaneous.

    4. Purchase cost per unit is constantthroughout the year.

    5. The only variable costs are the cost ofplacing an order, ordering cos t, and the cost

    of holding or storing inventory over time,hold ingorcarry ing cost, and these areconstant throughout the year.

    6. Orders are placed so that stockouts orshortages are avoided completely.

  • 7/30/2019 BUSN603_11th_PPT_Ch_06

    17/118

    Copyright 2012 Pearson Education, Inc. publishing as Prentice Hall 6-17

    Invento ry Usage Over Time

    Time

    InventoryLevel

    MinimumInventory

    0

    Order Quantity = Q=Maximum Inventory Level

    Figure 6.2

  • 7/30/2019 BUSN603_11th_PPT_Ch_06

    18/118

    Copyright 2012 Pearson Education, Inc. publishing as Prentice Hall 6-18

    Invento ry Costs in the EOQ Situat ion

    Computing Average Inventory

    2levelinventoryAverage

    QINVENTORY LEVEL

    DAY BEGINNING ENDING AVERAGE

    April 1 (order received) 10 8 9

    April 2 8 6 7

    April 3 6 4 5

    April 4 4 2 3April 5 2 0 1

    Maximum level April 1 = 10 unitsTotal of daily averages = 9 + 7 + 5 + 3 + 1 = 25Number of days = 5Average inventory level = 25/5 = 5 units Table 6.2

  • 7/30/2019 BUSN603_11th_PPT_Ch_06

    19/118

    Copyright 2012 Pearson Education, Inc. publishing as Prentice Hall 6-19

    Inventory Costs in theEOQSituat ion

    Mathematical equations can be developed using:

    Q= number of pieces to orderEOQ = Q* = optimal number of pieces to order

    D= annual demand in units for the inventory item

    Co= ordering cost of each orderCh= holding or carrying cost per unit per year

    Annual ordering cost Number of

    orders placed

    per year

    Orderingcost per

    order

    oC

    Q

    D

  • 7/30/2019 BUSN603_11th_PPT_Ch_06

    20/118

    Copyright 2012 Pearson Education, Inc. publishing as Prentice Hall 6-20

    Inventory Costs in theEOQSituat ion

    Mathematical equations can be developed using:

    Q= number of pieces to orderEOQ = Q* = optimal number of pieces to order

    D= annual demand in units for the inventory item

    Co= ordering cost of each orderCh= holding or carrying cost per unit per year

    Annual holding cost Average

    inventory

    Carryingcost per unit

    per year

    hC

    Q

    2

  • 7/30/2019 BUSN603_11th_PPT_Ch_06

    21/118

    Copyright 2012 Pearson Education, Inc. publishing as Prentice Hall 6-21

    Inventory Costs in theEOQSituat ion

    MinimumTotalCost

    Optimal

    OrderQuantity

    Curve of Total Costof Carrying

    and Ordering

    Carrying Cost Curve

    Ordering Cost Curve

    Cost

    Order QuantityFigure 6.3

    Total Cost as a Function of Order Quantity

  • 7/30/2019 BUSN603_11th_PPT_Ch_06

    22/118

    Copyright 2012 Pearson Education, Inc. publishing as Prentice Hall 6-22

    Finding theEOQ

    According to the graph, when the EOQ assumptionsare met, total cost is minimized when annualordering cost equals annual holding cost.

    ho CQ

    CQ

    D

    2Solving forQ

    hoCQDC

    22 22

    QC

    DC

    h

    o *

    EOQ QQ

    C

    DC

    h

    o 2

  • 7/30/2019 BUSN603_11th_PPT_Ch_06

    23/118

    Copyright 2012 Pearson Education, Inc. publishing as Prentice Hall 6-23

    Econom ic Order Quant i ty (EOQ) Model

    hC

    Q

    2costholdingAnnual

    oC

    Q

    DcostorderingAnnual

    h

    o

    C

    DCQ

    2*EOQ

    Summary of equations:

  • 7/30/2019 BUSN603_11th_PPT_Ch_06

    24/118

    Copyright 2012 Pearson Education, Inc. publishing as Prentice Hall 6-24

    Sumco Pump Company

    Sumco Pump Company sells pump housings toother companies.

    The firm would like to reduce inventory costs byfinding optimal order quantity.

    Annual demand = 1,000 units Ordering cost = $10 per order

    Average carrying cost per unit per year = $0.50

    units20000040500

    10000122 ,.

    ))(,(*

    h

    o

    CDCQ

  • 7/30/2019 BUSN603_11th_PPT_Ch_06

    25/118

    Copyright 2012 Pearson Education, Inc. publishing as Prentice Hall 6-25

    Sumco Pump Company

    Total annual cost = Order cost + Holding cost

    hoC

    QC

    Q

    DTC

    2

    ).()(,

    502

    20010

    200

    0001 1005050 $$$

  • 7/30/2019 BUSN603_11th_PPT_Ch_06

    26/118

    Copyright 2012 Pearson Education, Inc. publishing as Prentice Hall 6-26

    Sumco Pump Company

    Program 6.1A

    Input Data and Excel QM formulas for theSumco Pump Company Example

  • 7/30/2019 BUSN603_11th_PPT_Ch_06

    27/118

    Copyright 2012 Pearson Education, Inc. publishing as Prentice Hall 6-27

    Sumco Pump Company

    Program 6.1B

    Excel QMSolution forthe SumcoPump

    CompanyExample

  • 7/30/2019 BUSN603_11th_PPT_Ch_06

    28/118

    Copyright 2012 Pearson Education, Inc. publishing as Prentice Hall 6-28

    Purchase Cost o f Invento ry Items

    Total inventory cost can be written to include thecost of purchased items.

    Given the EOQ assumptions, the annual purchasecost is constant at DCno matter the order

    policy, where Cis the purchase cost per unit.

    Dis the annual demand in units.

    At times it may be useful to know the average

    dollar level of inventory:

    2leveldollarAverage

    )(CQ

  • 7/30/2019 BUSN603_11th_PPT_Ch_06

    29/118

    Copyright 2012 Pearson Education, Inc. publishing as Prentice Hall 6-29

    Purchase Cost o f Invento ry Items

    Inventory carrying cost is often expressed as anannual percentage of the unit cost or price of theinventory.

    This requires a new variable.

    Annual inventory holding charge asa percentage of unit price or costI

    The cost of storing inventory for one year is then

    ICCh thus,

    IC

    DCQ o

    2*

  • 7/30/2019 BUSN603_11th_PPT_Ch_06

    30/118

    Copyright 2012 Pearson Education, Inc. publishing as Prentice Hall 6-30

    Sensi t iv i ty Analys is w i th theEOQModel

    The EOQ model assumes all values are know andfixed over time.

    Generally, however, some values are estimated ormay change.

    Determining the effects of these changes iscalled sensit iv i ty analysis .

    Because of the square root in the formula,changes in the inputs result in relatively small

    changes in the order quantity.

    h

    o

    C

    DC2EOQ

  • 7/30/2019 BUSN603_11th_PPT_Ch_06

    31/118

    Copyright 2012 Pearson Education, Inc. publishing as Prentice Hall 6-31

    Sensi t iv i ty Analys is w i th theEOQModel

    In the Sumco Pump example:

    units200500

    1000012 .

    ))(,(EOQ

    If the ordering cost were increased four times from$10 to $40, the order quantity would only double

    units400500

    4000012 .

    ))(,(

    EOQ

    In general, the EOQ changes by the square rootof the change to any of the inputs.

  • 7/30/2019 BUSN603_11th_PPT_Ch_06

    32/118

    Copyright 2012 Pearson Education, Inc. publishing as Prentice Hall 6-32

    Reorder Poin t :Determ ining When To Order

    Once the order quantity is determined, thenext decision is when to order.

    The time between placing an order and itsreceipt is called the

    lead t ime(L ) or

    del ivery t im e.

    When to order is generally expressed as areorder po int(ROP).

    Demandper day

    Lead time for anew order in daysROP

    dL

  • 7/30/2019 BUSN603_11th_PPT_Ch_06

    33/118

    Copyright 2012 Pearson Education, Inc. publishing as Prentice Hall 6-33

    Procomps Computer Chips

    Demand for the computer chip is 8,000 per year.

    Daily demand is 40 units.

    Delivery takes three working days.

    ROPdL 40 units per day 3 days 120 units

    An order based on the EOQ calculation is placedwhen the inventory reaches 120 units.

    The order arrives 3 days later just as theinventory is depleted.

  • 7/30/2019 BUSN603_11th_PPT_Ch_06

    34/118

    Copyright 2012 Pearson Education, Inc. publishing as Prentice Hall 6-34

    Reorder Poin t Graphs

    Figure 6.4

  • 7/30/2019 BUSN603_11th_PPT_Ch_06

    35/118

    Copyright 2012 Pearson Education, Inc. publishing as Prentice Hall 6-35

    EOQ Without The Ins tantaneousReceip t Assumpt ion

    When inventory accumulates over time, theinstantaneous receiptassumption does not apply.

    Daily demand rate must be taken into account.

    The revised model is often called the product ionrun model.

    Figure 6.5

  • 7/30/2019 BUSN603_11th_PPT_Ch_06

    36/118

    Copyright 2012 Pearson Education, Inc. publishing as Prentice Hall 6-36

    Annual Carry ing Cos t forProduct ion Run Model

    In production runs, setup costreplaces orderingcost.

    The model uses the following variables:

    Q number of pieces per order, orproduction run

    Cs setup costCh holding or carrying cost per unit per

    yearp daily production rated daily demand ratet length of production run in days

  • 7/30/2019 BUSN603_11th_PPT_Ch_06

    37/118

    Copyright 2012 Pearson Education, Inc. publishing as Prentice Hall 6-37

    Annual Carry ing Cos t forProduct ion Run Model

    Maximum inventory level (Total produced during the production run)

    (Total used during the production run)

    (Daily production rate)(Number of days production) (Daily demand)(Number of days production)

    (pt) (dt)

    since Total produced Qpt

    we know p

    Qt

    Maximuminventory

    level

    p

    dQ

    p

    Qd

    p

    Qpdtpt 1

  • 7/30/2019 BUSN603_11th_PPT_Ch_06

    38/118

    Copyright 2012 Pearson Education, Inc. publishing as Prentice Hall 6-38

    Annual Carry ing Cos t forProduct ion Run Model

    Since the average inventory is one-half the maximum:

    p

    dQ1

    2

    inventoryAverage

    and

    hCp

    dQ

    12costholdingAnnual

  • 7/30/2019 BUSN603_11th_PPT_Ch_06

    39/118

    Copyright 2012 Pearson Education, Inc. publishing as Prentice Hall 6-39

    Annual Setup Cost forProduct ion Run Model

    sCQ

    D

    costsetupAnnual

    Setup cost replaces ordering cost when a product isproduced over time.

    replaces

    o

    CQ

    DcostorderingAnnual

  • 7/30/2019 BUSN603_11th_PPT_Ch_06

    40/118

    Copyright 2012 Pearson Education, Inc. publishing as Prentice Hall 6-40

    Determ ining the Opt imalProduct ion Quant i ty

    By setting setup costs equal to holding costs, wecan solve for the optimal order quantity

    Annual holding cost Annual setup cost

    shC

    Q

    DC

    p

    dQ

    12

    Solving for Q, we get

    p

    dC

    DCQ

    h

    s

    1

    2*

  • 7/30/2019 BUSN603_11th_PPT_Ch_06

    41/118

    Copyright 2012 Pearson Education, Inc. publishing as Prentice Hall 6-41

    Produc t ion Run Model

    Summary of equations

    p

    dC

    DCQ

    h

    s

    1

    2quantityproductionOptimal *

    sC

    Q

    DcostsetupAnnual

    hC

    p

    dQ

    12

    costholdingAnnual

  • 7/30/2019 BUSN603_11th_PPT_Ch_06

    42/118

    Copyright 2012 Pearson Education, Inc. publishing as Prentice Hall 6-42

    Brown Manu factur ing

    Brown Manufacturing produces commercialrefrigeration units in batches.

    Annual demand D 10,000 units

    Setup cost Cs $100Carrying cost Ch $0.50 per unit per year

    Daily production rate p 80 units dailyDaily demand rate d 60 units daily

    1. How many units should Brown produce in each batch?2. How long should the production part of the cycle last?

  • 7/30/2019 BUSN603_11th_PPT_Ch_06

    43/118

    Copyright 2012 Pearson Education, Inc. publishing as Prentice Hall 6-43

    Brown Manu factur ing Example

    p

    dC

    DCQ

    h

    s

    1

    2*1. 2.

    80

    60150

    100000102

    .

    ,*Q

    000000164

    1500000002 ,,

    .

    ,,

    units4,000

    days50

    80

    0004 ,p

    QcycleProduction

  • 7/30/2019 BUSN603_11th_PPT_Ch_06

    44/118

    Copyright 2012 Pearson Education, Inc. publishing as Prentice Hall 6-44

    Brown Manu factur ing

    Program 6.2A

    Excel QM Formulas and Input Data for the BrownManufacturing Problem

  • 7/30/2019 BUSN603_11th_PPT_Ch_06

    45/118

    Copyright 2012 Pearson Education, Inc. publishing as Prentice Hall 6-45

    Brown Manu factur ing

    Program 6.2B

    The Solution Results for the Brown ManufacturingProblem Using Excel QM

  • 7/30/2019 BUSN603_11th_PPT_Ch_06

    46/118

    Copyright 2012 Pearson Education, Inc. publishing as Prentice Hall 6-46

    Quant i ty Discount Models

    Quantity discounts are commonly available. The basic EOQ model is adjusted by adding in the

    purchase or materials cost.

    Total cost

    Material cost + Ordering cost + Holding cost

    hoC

    QC

    Q

    DDC

    2costTotal

    where

    D annual demand in unitsCo ordering cost of each orderC cost per unitCh holding or carrying cost per unit per year

  • 7/30/2019 BUSN603_11th_PPT_Ch_06

    47/118

    Copyright 2012 Pearson Education, Inc. publishing as Prentice Hall 6-47

    Quant i ty Discount Models

    Quantity discounts are commonly available. The basic EOQ model is adjusted by adding in the

    purchase or materials cost.

    Total cost

    Material cost + Ordering cost + Holding cost

    hoC

    QC

    Q

    DDC

    2costTotal

    where

    D annual demand in unitsCo ordering cost of each orderC cost per unitCh holding or carrying cost per unit per year

    Holding cost ChI C

    I holding cost as a percentage of the unit cost (C)

    Because unit cost is now variable,

  • 7/30/2019 BUSN603_11th_PPT_Ch_06

    48/118

    Copyright 2012 Pearson Education, Inc. publishing as Prentice Hall 6-48

    Quant i ty Discount Models

    A typical quantity discount schedule can look likethe table below.

    However, buying at the lowest unit cost is notalways the best choice.

    DISCOUNTNUMBER

    DISCOUNTQUANTITY DISCOUNT (%)

    DISCOUNTCOST ($)

    1 0 to 999 0 5.00

    2 1,000 to 1,999 4 4.80

    3 2,000 and over 5 4.75

    Table 6.3

  • 7/30/2019 BUSN603_11th_PPT_Ch_06

    49/118

    Copyright 2012 Pearson Education, Inc. publishing as Prentice Hall 6-49

    Quant i ty Discount Models

    Total cost curve for the quantity discount model

    Figure 6.6

    TC Curve forDiscount 1

    TC Curve for Discount 3TotalCost

    $

    Order Quantity

    0 1,000 2,000

    TC Curve for Discount 2

    EOQ for Discount 2

  • 7/30/2019 BUSN603_11th_PPT_Ch_06

    50/118

    Copyright 2012 Pearson Education, Inc. publishing as Prentice Hall 6-50

    Brass Department Store

    Brass Department Store stocks toy race cars. Their supplier has given them the quantity

    discount schedule shown in Table 6.3. Annual demand is 5,000 cars, ordering cost is $49, and

    holding cost is 20% of the cost of the car

    The first step is to compute EOQ values for eachdiscount.

    orderpercars70000520

    49000521

    ).)(.(

    ))(,)((EOQ

    orderpercars71480420

    49000522

    ).)(.(

    ))(,)((EOQ

    orderpercars71875420

    49000523

    ).)(.(

    ))(,)((EOQ

  • 7/30/2019 BUSN603_11th_PPT_Ch_06

    51/118

    Copyright 2012 Pearson Education, Inc. publishing as Prentice Hall 6-51

    Brass Department Store Example

    The second step is adjust quantities below theallowable discount range.

    The EOQ for discount 1 is allowable.

    The EOQs for discounts 2 and 3 are outside the

    allowable range and have to be adjusted to thesmallest quantity possible to purchase andreceive the discount:

    Q1 700Q2 1,000Q3 2,000

  • 7/30/2019 BUSN603_11th_PPT_Ch_06

    52/118

    Copyright 2012 Pearson Education, Inc. publishing as Prentice Hall 6-52

    Brass Department Store

    The third step is to compute the total cost for eachquantity.

    DISCOUNTNUMBER

    UNITPRICE

    (C)

    ORDERQUANTITY

    (Q)

    ANNUALMATERIALCOST ($)

    = DC

    ANNUALORDERINGCOST ($)= (D/Q)Co

    ANNUALCARRYINGCOST ($)= (Q/2)Ch TOTAL ($)

    1 $5.00 700 25,000 350.00 350.00 25,700.00

    2 4.80 1,000 24,000 245.00 480.00 24,725.00

    3 4.75 2,000 23,750 122.50 950.00 24,822.50

    The final step is to choose the alternative with thelowest total cost.

    Table 6.4

  • 7/30/2019 BUSN603_11th_PPT_Ch_06

    53/118

    Copyright 2012 Pearson Education, Inc. publishing as Prentice Hall 6-53

    Brass Department Store

    Program 6.3A

    Excel QMs Formulas and the Input Data for the BrassDepartment Store Quantity Discount Problem

  • 7/30/2019 BUSN603_11th_PPT_Ch_06

    54/118

    Copyright 2012 Pearson Education, Inc. publishing as Prentice Hall 6-54

    Brass Department Store

    Program 6.3B

    Excel QMs Solution to the Brass DepartmentStore Problem

  • 7/30/2019 BUSN603_11th_PPT_Ch_06

    55/118

    Copyright 2012 Pearson Education, Inc. publishing as Prentice Hall 6-55

    Use of Safety Stock

    If demand or the lead time are uncertain,the exact ROP will not be known withcertainty.

    To prevent s tockouts, it is necessary tocarry extra inventory called safety stock.

    Safety stock can prevent stockouts whendemand is unusually high.

    Safety stock can be implemented byadjusting the ROP.

  • 7/30/2019 BUSN603_11th_PPT_Ch_06

    56/118

    Copyright 2012 Pearson Education, Inc. publishing as Prentice Hall 6-56

    Use of Safety Stock

    The basic ROP equation is

    ROPdLd daily demand (or average daily demand)L order lead time or the number of

    working days it takes to deliver an order(or average lead time)

    A safety stock variable is added to the equationto accommodate uncertain demand during leadtime

    ROP dL + SSwhere

    SS safety stock

  • 7/30/2019 BUSN603_11th_PPT_Ch_06

    57/118

    Copyright 2012 Pearson Education, Inc. publishing as Prentice Hall 6-57

    Use of Safety Stock

    Figure 6.7

  • 7/30/2019 BUSN603_11th_PPT_Ch_06

    58/118

    Copyright 2012 Pearson Education, Inc. publishing as Prentice Hall 6-58

    ROP wi th Known Stockout Costs

    With a fixed EOQ and an ROP for placing orders,stockouts can only occur during lead time.

    Our objective is to find the safety stock quantitythat will minimize the total of stockout cost and

    holding cost. We need to know the stockout cost per unit and

    the probability distribution of demand during leadtime.

    Estimating stockout costs can be difficult asthere may be direct and indirect costs.

  • 7/30/2019 BUSN603_11th_PPT_Ch_06

    59/118

    Copyright 2012 Pearson Education, Inc. publishing as Prentice Hall 6-59

    Safety Stock w i th UnknownStockou t Costs

    There are many situations when stockout costsare unknown.

    An alternative approach to determining safetystock levels is to use a servic e level.

    A service level is the percent of time you will notbe out of stock of a particular item.

    Service level 1 Probability of a stockoutor

    Probability of a stockout 1 Service level

  • 7/30/2019 BUSN603_11th_PPT_Ch_06

    60/118

    Copyright 2012 Pearson Education, Inc. publishing as Prentice Hall 6-60

    Hinsdale Company

    Inventory demand during lead time is normallydistributed.

    Mean demand during lead time is 350 units with astandard deviation of 10.

    The company wants stockouts to occur only 5%of the time.

    350 X ?

    SS

    5% Area ofNormal Curve

    Figure 6.8

    Mean demand 350dLT Standard deviation 10

    X

    Mean demand + Safety stockSS Safety stock XZ

    XZ

  • 7/30/2019 BUSN603_11th_PPT_Ch_06

    61/118

    Copyright 2012 Pearson Education, Inc. publishing as Prentice Hall 6-61

    Hinsdale Company Example

    350 X ?

    SS

    5% Area ofNormal Curve

    From Appendix A we find Z 1.65 SSX

    Solving for safety stock:

    SS 1.65(10) 16.5 units, or 17 units

    X = ROP = 350+16.5 = 366.5 units

    Figure 6.9

  • 7/30/2019 BUSN603_11th_PPT_Ch_06

    62/118

    Copyright 2012 Pearson Education, Inc. publishing as Prentice Hall 6-62

    Hinsdale Company

    Different safety stock levels will be generated fordifferent service levels.

    However, the relationship is not linear. You should be aware of what a service level is costing in

    terms of carrying the safety stock in inventory.

    The relationship between Zand safety stock canbe developed as follows:

    2. We also know that SSX1. We know that

    XZ

    3. Thus SS

    Z

    4. So we haveSSZ

    Z(10)

  • 7/30/2019 BUSN603_11th_PPT_Ch_06

    63/118

    Copyright 2012 Pearson Education, Inc. publishing as Prentice Hall 6-63

    Hinsdale Company

    Safety Stock at different service levelsSERVICE LEVEL(%)

    ZVALUE FROMNORMAL CURVE TABLE

    SAFETY STOCK(UNITS)

    90 1.28 12.8

    91 1.34 13.4

    92 1.41 14.1

    93 1.48 14.8

    94 1.55 15.5

    95 1.65 16.5

    96 1.75 17.5

    97 1.88 18.8

    98 2.05 20.5

    99 2.33 23.3

    99.99 3.72 37.2Table 6.5

  • 7/30/2019 BUSN603_11th_PPT_Ch_06

    64/118

    Copyright 2012 Pearson Education, Inc. publishing as Prentice Hall 6-64

    Hinsdale Company

    Figure 6.9

    Service level versus annual carrying costs

    This graph wasdeveloped for aspecific case, but

    the general shape ofthe curve is thesame for all service-level problems.

    Calcu lat ing Lead Time Demand

  • 7/30/2019 BUSN603_11th_PPT_Ch_06

    65/118

    Copyright 2012 Pearson Education, Inc. publishing as Prentice Hall 6-65

    Calcu lat ing Lead Time Demandand Standard Dev iat ion

    There are three situations toconsider:Demand is variable but lead time is

    constant.Demand is constant but lead time is

    variable.

    Both demand and lead time are variable.

    Calcu lat ing Lead Time Demand

  • 7/30/2019 BUSN603_11th_PPT_Ch_06

    66/118

    Copyright 2012 Pearson Education, Inc. publishing as Prentice Hall 6-66

    Calcu lat ing Lead Time Demandand Standard Dev iat ion

    Demand is variable but lead time isconstant:

    Where:

    Calcu lat ing Lead Time Demand

  • 7/30/2019 BUSN603_11th_PPT_Ch_06

    67/118

    Copyright 2012 Pearson Education, Inc. publishing as Prentice Hall 6-67

    Calcu lat ing Lead Time Demandand Standard Dev iat ion

    Demand is constant but lead time isvariable:

    Where:

    Calcu lat ing Lead Time Demand

  • 7/30/2019 BUSN603_11th_PPT_Ch_06

    68/118

    Copyright 2012 Pearson Education, Inc. publishing as Prentice Hall 6-68

    Calcu lat ing Lead Time Demandand Standard Dev iat ion

    Both demand and lead time arevariable.

    Notice that this is the most general case and that

    the other two cases can be derived from thisformula.

  • 7/30/2019 BUSN603_11th_PPT_Ch_06

    69/118

    Copyright 2012 Pearson Education, Inc. publishing as Prentice Hall 6-69

    Hinsdale Company

    Suppose for product SKU F5402, daily demand isnormally distributed, with a mean of 15 units and astandard deviation of 3. Lead time is exactly 4 days.To maintain a 97% service level, what is the ROP,

    and how much safety stock should be carried?

    ROP = 15(4)+1.88(3*2)= 60 + 11.28=71.28

    So the average demand during lead time is 60units, and safety stock is 11.28 units.

  • 7/30/2019 BUSN603_11th_PPT_Ch_06

    70/118

    Copyright 2012 Pearson Education, Inc. publishing as Prentice Hall 6-70

    Hinsdale Company

    Suppose for product SKU B7319, daily demand isconstant at 25 units per day, but lead time isnormally distributed, with a mean of 6 days and astandard deviation of 3. To maintain a 98% service

    level, what is the ROP?

    ROP = 25(6)+2.05(25*3)= 150+153.75

    =303.75

    So the average demand during lead time is 150units, and safety stock is 153.75 units.

  • 7/30/2019 BUSN603_11th_PPT_Ch_06

    71/118

    Copyright 2012 Pearson Education, Inc. publishing as Prentice Hall 6-71

    Hinsdale Company

    Suppose for product SKU F9004, daily demand isnormally distributed, with a mean of 20 units and astandard deviation of 4. Lead time is normallydistributed, with a mean of 5 days and a standard

    deviation of 2 days. To maintain a 94% servicelevel, what is the ROP?

    ROP = 100+1.55(40.99)= 163.53

    Calculat ing Annual Hold ing

  • 7/30/2019 BUSN603_11th_PPT_Ch_06

    72/118

    Copyright 2012 Pearson Education, Inc. publishing as Prentice Hall 6-72

    Calculat ing Annual HoldingCost w i th Safety Stock

    Under standard assumptions of EOQ,average inventory is just Q/2.

    So annual holding cost is: (Q/2)*Ch.

    This is not the case with safety stockbecause safety stock is not meant tobe drawn down.

    Calculat ing Annual Hold ing

  • 7/30/2019 BUSN603_11th_PPT_Ch_06

    73/118

    Copyright 2012 Pearson Education, Inc. publishing as Prentice Hall 6-73

    Calculat ing Annual HoldingCost w i th Safety Stock

    Total annual holding cost = holdingcost of regular inventory + holdingcost of safety stock

    Where:

    THC = total annual holding costQ = order quantityCh = holding cost per unit per yearSS = safety stock

    Excel QM Form ulas and Input Data for

  • 7/30/2019 BUSN603_11th_PPT_Ch_06

    74/118

    Copyright 2012 Pearson Education, Inc. publishing as Prentice Hall 6-74

    Excel QM Form ulas and Input Data forthe Hinsdale Safety Stock Prob lems

    Program 6.4A

    Excel QM Solu t ion to the

  • 7/30/2019 BUSN603_11th_PPT_Ch_06

    75/118

    Copyright 2012 Pearson Education, Inc. publishing as Prentice Hall 6-75

    Excel QM Solu t ion to theHinsdale Safety Stock Prob lem

    Program 6.4B

  • 7/30/2019 BUSN603_11th_PPT_Ch_06

    76/118

    Copyright 2012 Pearson Education, Inc. publishing as Prentice Hall 6-76

    Single-Period Invento ry Models

    Some products have no future value beyond thecurrent period.

    These situations are called news vendorproblems orsingle-per iod inventory m odels.

    Analysis uses marginal profit (MP) and marginalloss (ML) and is called marginal analysis.

    With a manageable number of states of natureand alternatives, discrete distributions can beused.

    When there are a large number of alternatives orstates of nature, the normal distribution may beused.

    Marginal Analysis w ith

  • 7/30/2019 BUSN603_11th_PPT_Ch_06

    77/118

    Copyright 2012 Pearson Education, Inc. publishing as Prentice Hall 6-77

    Marginal Analysis w ithDiscrete Distr ibu t ions

    We stock an additional unit only if the expectedmarginal profit for that unit exceeds the expectedmarginal loss.

    P probability that demand will be greaterthan or equal to a given supply (or theprobability of selling at least oneadditional unit).

    1P probability that demand will be less thansupply (or the probability that oneadditional unit will not sell).

    Marginal Analysis w ith

  • 7/30/2019 BUSN603_11th_PPT_Ch_06

    78/118

    Copyright 2012 Pearson Education, Inc. publishing as Prentice Hall 6-78

    Marginal Analysis w ithDiscrete Distr ibu t ions

    The expected marginal profit is P(MP) .

    The expected marginal loss is (1P)(ML).

    The optimal decision rule is to stock theadditional unit if:

    P(MP) (1 P)ML

    With some basic manipulation:

    P(MP) MLP(ML)P(MP) + P(ML) ML

    P(MP + ML) ML

    orMPML

    ML

    P

    Steps of Marginal Analysis w ith

  • 7/30/2019 BUSN603_11th_PPT_Ch_06

    79/118

    Copyright 2012 Pearson Education, Inc. publishing as Prentice Hall 6-79

    Steps of Marginal Analysis w ith

    Discrete Distr ibu t ions

    1. Determine the value of for theproblem.

    2. Construct a probability table and add a

    cumulative probability column.3. Keep ordering inventory as long as the

    probability (P) of selling at least one additional

    unit is greater than

    MPML

    ML

    MPML

    ML

  • 7/30/2019 BUSN603_11th_PPT_Ch_06

    80/118

    Copyright 2012 Pearson Education, Inc. publishing as Prentice Hall 6-80

    Cafdu Donu t

    The caf buys donuts each day for $4 per cartonof 2 dozen donuts.

    Any cartons not sold are thrown away at the endof the day.

    If a carton is sold, the total revenue is $6. The marginal profit per carton is.

    MP Marginal profit $6 $4 $2

    The marginal loss is $4 per carton since cartonscan not be returned or salvaged.

    Caf du Donuts Probability

  • 7/30/2019 BUSN603_11th_PPT_Ch_06

    81/118

    Copyright 2012 Pearson Education, Inc. publishing as Prentice Hall 6-81

    Caf du Donut s ProbabilityDistr ibut ion

    DAILY SALES(CARTONS OF DOUGHNUTS)

    PROBABILITY (P) THAT DEMANDWILL BE AT THIS LEVEL

    4 0.05

    5 0.15

    6 0.15

    7 0.20

    8 0.25

    9 0.10

    10 0.10

    Total 1.00Table 6.6

  • 7/30/2019 BUSN603_11th_PPT_Ch_06

    82/118

    Copyright 2012 Pearson Education, Inc. publishing as Prentice Hall 6-82

    MPMLMLStep 1. Determine the value of for the

    decision rule.

    Cafdu Donu t Examp le

    6706

    4

    24

    4.

    $$

    $

    MPML

    ML P670.P

    Step 2. Add a new column to the table to reflect theprobability that doughnut sales will be at

    each level or greater.

    Marg inal Analys is fo r Cafdu

  • 7/30/2019 BUSN603_11th_PPT_Ch_06

    83/118

    Copyright 2012 Pearson Education, Inc. publishing as Prentice Hall 6-83

    Marg inal Analys is fo r CafduDonut

    DAILY SALES(CARTONS OFDOUGHNUTS)

    PROBABILITY (P) THATDEMAND WILL BE ATTHIS LEVEL

    PROBABILITY (P) THATDEMAND WILL BE AT THISLEVEL OR GREATER

    4 0.05 1.00 0.665 0.15 0.95 0.66

    6 0.15 0.80 0.66

    7 0.20 0.65

    8 0.25 0.45

    9 0.10 0.20

    10 0.10 0.10

    Total 1.00

    Table 6.7

    C f d D E l

  • 7/30/2019 BUSN603_11th_PPT_Ch_06

    84/118

    Copyright 2012 Pearson Education, Inc. publishing as Prentice Hall 6-84

    Cafdu Donu t Examp le

    Step 3. Keep ordering additional cartons as longas the probability of selling at least oneadditional carton is greater than P, whichis the indifference probability.

    Pat 6 cartons 0.80 > 0.67

    Marginal Analys is w i th the

  • 7/30/2019 BUSN603_11th_PPT_Ch_06

    85/118

    Copyright 2012 Pearson Education, Inc. publishing as Prentice Hall 6-85

    Marginal Analys is w i th theNormal Distr ibut ion

    We first need to find four values:

    1. The average or mean sales for the product, 2. The standard deviation of sales,

    3. The marginal profit for the product, MP.4. The marginal loss for the product, ML.

    We let X* optimal stocking level.

    Steps o f Marginal Analysis w ith the

  • 7/30/2019 BUSN603_11th_PPT_Ch_06

    86/118

    Copyright 2012 Pearson Education, Inc. publishing as Prentice Hall 6-86

    Steps o f Marginal Analysis w ith the

    Normal Distr ibut ion

    1. Determine the value of for theproblem.

    2. Locate Pon the normal distribution (Appendix

    A) and find the associated Z-value.

    MPML

    ML

    to solve for the resulting stocking policy:

    ZX *

    *X

    Z

    3. Find X* using the relationship:

    Joes Stocking Decision for the

  • 7/30/2019 BUSN603_11th_PPT_Ch_06

    87/118

    Copyright 2012 Pearson Education, Inc. publishing as Prentice Hall 6-87

    Joe s Stocking Decision for theChicago Tr ibune

    Demand for the Chicago Tr ibuneat JoesNewsstand averages 60 papers a day with astandard deviation of 10.

    The marginal loss is 20 cents and the marginal

    profit is 30 cents.Step 1. Joe should stock the Tribuneas long asthe probability of selling the last unit is at leastML/(ML + MP):

    40050

    20

    cents30cents20

    cents20.

    MPML

    ML Let P= 0.40.

    Joes Stocking Decision for the

  • 7/30/2019 BUSN603_11th_PPT_Ch_06

    88/118

    Copyright 2012 Pearson Education, Inc. publishing as Prentice Hall 6-88

    Joe s Stocking Decision for theChicago Tr ibune

    Step 2. Using the normal distribution in Figure6.10, we find the appropriate Zvalue

    Z= 0.25 standard deviations from the mean

    50 X Demand

    Area under the Curve is 0.40

    Figure 6.10 X*

    Optimal Stocking Policy (62 Newspapers)

    Area under the Curve is 1 0.40 = 0.60

    (Z= 0.25) Mean Daily Sales

    Joes Stocking Decision for the

  • 7/30/2019 BUSN603_11th_PPT_Ch_06

    89/118

    Copyright 2012 Pearson Education, Inc. publishing as Prentice Hall 6-89

    Joe s Stocking Decision for theChicago Tr ibune

    Step 3. In this problem, 60 and 10, so

    10

    60250

    *. X

    or

    X* 60 + 0.25(10) 62.5, or 62 newspapers

    Joe should order 62 newspapers since theprobability of selling 63 newspapers is slightlyless than 0.40

    Joes Stocking Decision for the

  • 7/30/2019 BUSN603_11th_PPT_Ch_06

    90/118

    Copyright 2012 Pearson Education, Inc. publishing as Prentice Hall 6-90

    gChicago Tr ibune

    The procedure is the same when P> 0.50. Joe also stocks the Chicago Sun-Times.

    Marginal loss is 40 cents and marginal profit is10 cents.

    Daily sales average 100 copies with a standarddeviation of 10 papers.

    80050

    40

    cents10cents40

    cents40.

    MPML

    ML

    Z= 0.84 standard deviations from the mean

    From Appendix A:

    Joes Stocking Decision for the

  • 7/30/2019 BUSN603_11th_PPT_Ch_06

    91/118

    Copyright 2012 Pearson Education, Inc. publishing as Prentice Hall 6-91

    gChicago Tr ibune

    With 100 and 10

    10

    100840

    *. Xor

    X* 100 0.84(10) 91.6, or 91 newspapers

    100 X Demand

    Area under the

    Curve is 0.40

    Figure 6.11X*

    Optimal Stocking Policy (91 Newspapers)

    (Z= 0.84)

    ABC A l i

  • 7/30/2019 BUSN603_11th_PPT_Ch_06

    92/118

    Copyright 2012 Pearson Education, Inc. publishing as Prentice Hall 6-92

    ABC Analys is

    The purpose of ABC analysis is to divide theinventory into three groups based on the overallinventory value of the items.

    Group A items account for the major portion ofinventory costs. Typically about 70% of the dollar value but only 10% of

    the quantity of items.

    Forecasting and inventory management must be donecarefully.

    Group B items are more moderately priced. May represent 20% of the cost and 20% of the quantity.

    Group C items are very low cost but high volume. It is not cost effective to spend a lot of time managing

    these items.

    S f ABC A l i

  • 7/30/2019 BUSN603_11th_PPT_Ch_06

    93/118

    Copyright 2012 Pearson Education, Inc. publishing as Prentice Hall 6-93

    Summary of ABC Analys is

    INVENTORYGROUP

    DOLLARUSAGE (%)

    INVENTORYITEMS (%)

    ARE QUANTITATIVE CONTROLTECHNIQUES USED?

    A 70 10 Yes

    B 20 20 In some cases

    C 10 70 No

    Table 6.8

    Dependent Demand : The Case for

  • 7/30/2019 BUSN603_11th_PPT_Ch_06

    94/118

    Copyright 2012 Pearson Education, Inc. publishing as Prentice Hall 6-94

    pMater ial Requiremen ts Plann ing

    All the inventory models discussed so farhave assumed demand for one item isindependent of the demand for any otheritem.

    However, in many situations itemsdemand is dependent on demand for oneor more other items.

    In these situations,Material Requ iremen tsPlann ing (MRP)can be employed

    effectively.

    Dependent Demand : The Case for

  • 7/30/2019 BUSN603_11th_PPT_Ch_06

    95/118

    Copyright 2012 Pearson Education, Inc. publishing as Prentice Hall 6-95

    pMater ial Requiremen ts Plann ing

    Some of the benefits of MRP are:1. Increased customer service levels.

    2. Reduced inventory costs.

    3. Better inventory planning and scheduling.

    4. Higher total sales.

    5. Faster response to market changes and shifts.

    6. Reduced inventory levels without reducedcustomer service.

    Most MRP systems are computerized, butthe basic analysis is straightforward.

    Material Struc tu re Tree

  • 7/30/2019 BUSN603_11th_PPT_Ch_06

    96/118

    Copyright 2012 Pearson Education, Inc. publishing as Prentice Hall 6-96

    Material Struc tu re Tree

    The first step is to develop a bi l l of mater ials(BOM).

    The BOM identifies components, descriptions,and the number required for production of oneunit of the final product.

    From the BOM we can develop a materialstructure tree.

    We use the following data: Demand for product A is 50 units.

    Each A requires 2 units of B and 3 units of C. Each B requires 2 units of D and 3 units of E.

    Each C requires 1 unit of E and 2 units of F.

    Material Struc tu re Tree

  • 7/30/2019 BUSN603_11th_PPT_Ch_06

    97/118

    Copyright 2012 Pearson Education, Inc. publishing as Prentice Hall 6-97

    Material Struc tu re Tree

    Material structure tree for Item A

    ALevel

    0

    1

    2

    B(2) C(3)

    D(2) E(3) F(2)E(1)

    Figure 6.12

    Material Struc tu re Tree

  • 7/30/2019 BUSN603_11th_PPT_Ch_06

    98/118

    Copyright 2012 Pearson Education, Inc. publishing as Prentice Hall 6-98

    Material Struc tu re Tree

    It is clear from the three that the demand for B, C,D, E, and F is completely dependent on thedemand for A.

    The material structure tree has three levels: 0, 1,

    and 2. Items above a level are called parents.

    Items below any level are called components .

    The number in parenthesis beside each item

    shows how many are required to make the itemabove it.

    Material Struc tu re Tree

  • 7/30/2019 BUSN603_11th_PPT_Ch_06

    99/118

    Copyright 2012 Pearson Education, Inc. publishing as Prentice Hall 6-99

    Material Struc tu re Tree

    We can use the material structure tree and the demandfor Item A to compute demands for the other items.

    Part B: 2 number of As 2 50 100.

    Part C: 3 number of As 3 50 150.Part D: 2 number of Bs 2 100 200.Part E: 3 number of Bs + 1 number of Cs

    3 100 + 1 150 450.Part F: 2 number of Cs 2 150 300.

    Gross and Net Mater ial

  • 7/30/2019 BUSN603_11th_PPT_Ch_06

    100/118

    Copyright 2012 Pearson Education, Inc. publishing as Prentice Hall 6-100

    Requ iremen ts Plan

    Once the materials structure tree is done, weconstruct a gross material requirements plan.

    This is a time schedule that shows: when an item must be ordered when there is no

    inventory on hand, or

    when the production of an item must be started in orderto satisfy the demand for the finished product at aparticular date.

    We need lead times for each of the items.

    Item A 1 week Item D 1 weekItem B 2 weeks Item E 2 weeksItem C 1 week Item F 3 weeks

    Gross Material Requ irements Plan

  • 7/30/2019 BUSN603_11th_PPT_Ch_06

    101/118

    Copyright 2012 Pearson Education, Inc. publishing as Prentice Hall 6-101

    for 50 Units o f AWeek

    1 2 3 4 5 6

    ARequired Date 50

    Lead Time = 1 WeekOrder Release 50

    BRequired Date 100

    Lead Time = 2 WeeksOrder Release 100

    CRequired Date 150

    Lead Time = 1 WeekOrder Release 150

    DRequired Date 200

    Lead Time = 1 WeekOrder Release 200

    ERequired Date 300 150

    Lead Time = 2 WeeksOrder Release 300 150

    FRequired Date 300

    Lead Time = 3 WeeksOrder Release 300

    Figure 6.13

    Net Material Requ irements Plan

  • 7/30/2019 BUSN603_11th_PPT_Ch_06

    102/118

    Copyright 2012 Pearson Education, Inc. publishing as Prentice Hall 6-102

    Net Material Requ irements Plan

    A net material requirements plan can be constructedfrom the gross materials requirements plan and thefollowing on-hand inventory information:

    ITEM ON-HAND INVENTORY

    A 10

    B 15

    C 20

    D 10

    E 10

    F 5

    Table 6.9

    Net Material Requ irements Plan

  • 7/30/2019 BUSN603_11th_PPT_Ch_06

    103/118

    Copyright 2012 Pearson Education, Inc. publishing as Prentice Hall 6-103

    Net Material Requ irements Plan

    Using this data we can construct a planthat includes: Gross requirements.

    On-hand inventory.

    Net requirements.

    Planned-order receipts.

    Planned-order releases.

    The net requirements plan is constructedlike the gross requirements plan.

    Net Material Requ irements Plan

  • 7/30/2019 BUSN603_11th_PPT_Ch_06

    104/118

    Copyright 2012 Pearson Education, Inc. publishing as Prentice Hall 6-104

    for 50 Units o f A

    Week LeadTimeItem 1 2 3 4 5 6

    A Gross 50 1

    On-Hand 10 10

    Net 40

    Order Receipt 40

    Order Release 40

    B Gross 80A 2

    On-Hand 15 15

    Net 65

    Order Receipt 65

    Order Release 65

    Figure 6.14(a)

    Net Material Requ irements Plan

  • 7/30/2019 BUSN603_11th_PPT_Ch_06

    105/118

    Copyright 2012 Pearson Education, Inc. publishing as Prentice Hall 6-105

    for 50 Units o f A

    Week LeadTimeItem 1 2 3 4 5 6

    C Gross 120A 1

    On-Hand 20 10

    Net 100

    Order Receipt 100

    Order Release 100

    D Gross 130B 1

    On-Hand 10 10

    Net 120

    Order Receipt 120

    Order Release 120

    Figure 6.14(b)

    Net Material Requ irements Plan

  • 7/30/2019 BUSN603_11th_PPT_Ch_06

    106/118

    Copyright 2012 Pearson Education, Inc. publishing as Prentice Hall 6-106

    for 50 Units o f A

    Week LeadTimeItem 1 2 3 4 5 6

    E Gross 195B 100C 2

    On-Hand 10 10 0

    Net 185 100

    Order Receipt 185 100

    Order Release 185 100

    F Gross 200C 3

    On-Hand 5 5

    Net 195

    Order Receipt 195

    Order Release 195

    Figure 6.14(c)

    Two o r More End Produc ts

  • 7/30/2019 BUSN603_11th_PPT_Ch_06

    107/118

    Copyright 2012 Pearson Education, Inc. publishing as Prentice Hall 6-107

    Two o r More End Produc ts

    Most manufacturing companies have more thanone end item.

    In this example, the second product is AA and ithas the following material structure tree:

    AA

    D(3) F(2)

    If we require 10 units of AA, the gross

    requirements for parts D and F can be computed:

    Part D: 3 number of AAs 3 10 30Part F: 2 number of AAs 2 10 20

    Two o r More End Produc ts

  • 7/30/2019 BUSN603_11th_PPT_Ch_06

    108/118

    Copyright 2012 Pearson Education, Inc. publishing as Prentice Hall 6-108

    Two o r More End Produc ts

    The lead time for AA is one week. The gross requirement for AA is 10 units in week 6

    and there are no units on hand.

    This new product can be added to the MRP

    process. The addition of AA will only change the MRP

    schedules for the parts contained in AA.

    MRP can also schedule spare parts andcomponents.

    These have to be included as gross requirements.

    Net Material Requ irements

  • 7/30/2019 BUSN603_11th_PPT_Ch_06

    109/118

    Copyright 2012 Pearson Education, Inc. publishing as Prentice Hall 6-109

    Plan , Includ ing AA

    Figure 6.15

    Just-in -Time (J IT) Invento ry

  • 7/30/2019 BUSN603_11th_PPT_Ch_06

    110/118

    Copyright 2012 Pearson Education, Inc. publishing as Prentice Hall 6-110

    Contro l

    To achieve greater efficiency in theproduction process, organizations havetried to have less in-process inventory onhand.

    This is known as JIT invento ry.

    The inventory arrives just in time to beused during the manufacturing process.

    One technique of implementing JIT is amanual procedure called kanban.

    Just-in-Time Invento ry Con trol

  • 7/30/2019 BUSN603_11th_PPT_Ch_06

    111/118

    Copyright 2012 Pearson Education, Inc. publishing as Prentice Hall 6-111

    Just in Time Invento ry Con trol

    Kanban in Japanese means card.

    With a dual-card kanban system, there is aconveyance kanban, or C-kanban, and a

    production kanban, or P-kanban. Kanban systems are quite simple, but they

    require considerable discipline.

    As there is little inventory to cover

    variability, the schedule must be followedexactly.

    4 Steps o f Kanban

  • 7/30/2019 BUSN603_11th_PPT_Ch_06

    112/118

    Copyright 2012 Pearson Education, Inc. publishing as Prentice Hall 6-112

    4 Steps o f Kanban

    1. A user takes a container of parts or inventoryalong with its C-kanban to his or her work area.

    When there are no more parts or the container isempty, the user returns the container along with

    the C-kanban to the producer area.2. At the producer area, there is a full container of

    parts along with a P-kanban.

    The user detaches the P-kanban from the fullcontainer and takes the container and the C-

    kanban back to his or her area for immediateuse.

    4 Steps o f Kanban

  • 7/30/2019 BUSN603_11th_PPT_Ch_06

    113/118

    Copyright 2012 Pearson Education, Inc. publishing as Prentice Hall 6-113

    4 Steps o f Kanban

    3. The detached P-kanban goes back to theproducer area along with the empty container

    The P-kanban is a signal that new parts are to bemanufactured or that new parts are to be placed

    in the container and is attached to the containerwhen it is filled .

    4. This process repeats itself during the typicalworkday.

    The Kanban Sys tem

  • 7/30/2019 BUSN603_11th_PPT_Ch_06

    114/118

    Copyright 2012 Pearson Education, Inc. publishing as Prentice Hall 6-114

    The Kanban Sys tem

    ProducerArea

    StorageArea

    UserArea

    P-kanbanand

    Container

    C-kanbanand

    Container

    4

    3 2

    1

    Figure 6.16

    Enterp r ise Resource Planning

  • 7/30/2019 BUSN603_11th_PPT_Ch_06

    115/118

    Copyright 2012 Pearson Education, Inc. publishing as Prentice Hall 6-115

    MRP has evolved to include not only the materialsrequired in production, but also the labor hours,material cost, and other resources related toproduction.

    In this approach the term MRP II is often used andthe word resourcereplaces the word requirements.

    As this concept evolved and sophisticated softwarewas developed, these systems became known asenterpr ise resou rce plann ing(ERP) systems.

    Enterp r ise Resource Planning

    Enterp r ise Resource Planning

  • 7/30/2019 BUSN603_11th_PPT_Ch_06

    116/118

    Copyright 2012 Pearson Education, Inc. publishing as Prentice Hall 6-116

    The objective of an ERP System is to reduce costsby integrating all of the operations of a firm.

    Starts with the supplier of materials needed andflows through the organization to includeinvoicing the customer of the final product.

    Data are entered only once into a database whereit can be quickly and easily accessed by anyone inthe organization.

    Benefits include:

    Reduced transaction costs. Increased speed and accuracy of information.

    Enterp r ise Resource Planning

    Enterp r ise Resource Planning

  • 7/30/2019 BUSN603_11th_PPT_Ch_06

    117/118

    Copyright 2012 Pearson Education, Inc. publishing as Prentice Hall 6-117

    Drawbacks to ERP: The software is expensive to buy and costly to

    customize. Small systems can cost hundreds of thousands of

    dollars.

    Large systems can cost hundreds of millions.

    The implementation of an ERP system mayrequire a company to change its normaloperations.

    Employees are often resistant to change. Training employees on the use of the new

    software can be expensive.

    Enterp r ise Resource Planning

    Copyr ight

  • 7/30/2019 BUSN603_11th_PPT_Ch_06

    118/118

    Copyr ight

    All rights reserved. No part of this publication may bereproduced, stored in a retrieval system, or transmitted, inany form or by any means, electronic, mechanical,photocopying, recording, or otherwise, without the prior

    itt i i f th bli h P i t d i th U it d