business continuity 24 month planning cycle - policy implications - final
TRANSCRIPT
BUSINESS CONTINUITY
24 Month Planning Cycle:
Policy Implications
September 2016
Context
• Business Continuity (BCP) is a continual, team-based planning process, undertaken to ensure that critical functions are minimally operational in the event of a service disruption
• Sequentially, planning teams complete the following BCP components within a 24 month period; o Risk Assessment
o Business Impact Analysis
o Strategy and Incident Response (Continuity) Plan
o Plan Exercise and Continual Improvement
• BCP is a legislated requirement under the Emergency Measures Act
Context
Planning Cycle initiated April 2014
• Kick-started by formal authority – Clerk letter
• Actively Supported by GOM BCP Table members
• Legitimized by existing statute
• Legitimized professionally by
• Disaster Recovery Institute (DRI) Best Practices
• Business Continuity Institute (BCI) Good Practice Guidelines
• Inter-provincial comparison
Policy Implications • Good example of a GOM “Soft Policy”
• Organic and amenable to improvements, corrections, alignments and changing service requirements (e.g. 12 month cycle in the future)
• Can be “formalized”
• Has effectively produced
• Common operating framework and clear practice guidance
• Workable timelines for BCP Leads and GOM staff
• Lean approach to continuity planning
• Flexibility in matching deliverables with existing resources
Contact
Ron Andrews
Senior Business Continuity Manager
OSHRM Branch - Corporate Services
Manitoba Infrastructure
(204) 232-8629 [email protected]
Ian Boughton
Planning Officer
Emergency Measures Organization
(204) 390-0499 [email protected]